Government Ownership of Railroads, and War Taxation E-Book

Kahn

• Herausgeber: Science & Technology Publishing
• Kategorie: Fachliteratur
• Sprache: Englisch

Seitenzahl: 30

Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2025

Beschreibung

Government Ownership of Railroads, and War Taxation by Otto H. Kahn is a thought-provoking treatise that delves into the pressing economic and political issues facing the United States during the early 20th century. Written in the context of World War I, the book critically examines the movement toward government ownership and operation of railroads, a topic of intense national debate at the time. Kahn, a prominent financier and railroad executive, presents a detailed analysis of the potential consequences of government control, drawing on both American and European experiences to highlight the inefficiencies, bureaucratic challenges, and risks to individual liberty that such a system might entail. The book also addresses the subject of war taxation, exploring the financial burdens imposed by the war effort and the methods by which the government sought to raise necessary funds. Kahn discusses the principles of sound taxation, the dangers of excessive levies on capital and income, and the importance of maintaining economic stability during times of national crisis. Through persuasive argumentation and a wealth of historical examples, Kahn advocates for policies that balance the needs of the state with the preservation of private enterprise and individual initiative. Government Ownership of Railroads, and War Taxation serves as both a historical document and a timeless commentary on the relationship between government and industry, the challenges of public finance, and the enduring tension between collective action and personal freedom. It is an essential read for anyone interested in economic policy, political history, and the evolution of American infrastructure and governance.

Leseprobe

Government Ownership of Railroads, and War Taxation

OTTO H. KAHN

AN ADDRESS BEFORE THE NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL CONFERENCE BOARD NEW YORK, OCTOBER 10, 1918

Table of Contents

Government Ownership of Railroads

3

Section I

Section II

Section III

Section IV

Section V

Punitive Paternalism in Taxation

27

Section I

Section II

Section III

Section IV

Section V

I

GOVERNMENT OWNERSHIP OF RAILROADS

Paternalistic control, even when entirely benevolent in intent, is generally harmful in effect. It is apt to be doubly so when, as sometimes occurs, it is punitive in intent.

The history of our railroads in the last ten years is a case in point.

In their early youth our railroads were allowed to grow up like spoiled, wilful, untamed children. They were given pretty nearly everything they asked for, and what they were not given freely they were apt to get somehow, anyhow. They fought amongst themselves and in doing so were liable to do harm to persons and objects in the neighborhood. They were overbearing and inconsiderate and did not show proper respect to their parent, i. e., the people.

But the fond parent, seeing how strong and sturdy they were and on the whole, how hustling and effective in their work, and how, with all their faults of temper and demeanor, they made themselves so useful around the house that he could not really get along without them, only smiled complacently at their occasional mischief or looked the other way. Moreover, he was really too busy with other matters to give proper attention to their education and upbringing.

As the railroads grew towards man's estate and married and begot other railroads, they gradually sloughed off the roughness and objectionable ways of their early youth, and though they did not sprout wings, and though once in a while they still did shock the community, they were amazingly capable at their work and really rendered service of inestimable value.

But meanwhile, for various reasons and owing to sundry influences, the father had grown testy and rather sour on them. He cut their allowance, he restrained them in various ways, some wise, some less so, he changed his will in their disfavor, he showed marked preference to other children of his. And one fine day, partly because he was annoyed at the discovery of some wrongdoing in which, despite his repeated warnings, a few of the railroads had indulged (though the overwhelming majority were blameless) and partly at the prompting of plausible self-seekers or well-meaning specialists in the improvement of everybody and everything—one fine day he lost his temper and with it his sense of proportion. He struck blindly at the railroads, he appointed guardians (called commissions) to whom they would have to report daily, who would prescribe certain rigid rules of conduct for them, who would henceforth determine their allowance and supervise their method of spending it, etc.

And these commissions, naturally wishing to act in the spirit of the parent who had designated them, but actually being, as guardians are liable to be, more harsh and severe and unrelenting than he would have been or really meant to be, put the railroads on a starvation diet and otherwise so exercised their functions, with good intent, doubtless, in most cases, that after a while those railroads, formerly so vigorous and capable, became quite emaciated and several of them succumbed under the strain of the regime imposed upon them. And then, seeing their condition and having need, owing to special emergencies, of railroad services which required great physical strength and endurance, one fine morning the parent determined upon the drastic step of taking things into his own hands. And so forth....

II