War Taxation E-Book

Kahn

• Herausgeber: Science & Technology Publishing
• Kategorie: Fachliteratur
• Sprache: Englisch

Seitenzahl: 44

Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2025

Beschreibung

War Taxation: Some Comments and Letters is a thought-provoking collection of essays and correspondence by Otto Hermann Kahn, originally published in 1917 during the height of World War I. In this book, Kahn, a prominent banker and philanthropist, addresses the pressing issue of war finance, focusing particularly on the methods and implications of taxation as a means to support the enormous costs of war. Through a series of articulate and insightful letters, Kahn engages with both critics and supporters, dissecting the economic, social, and moral dimensions of war taxation. The book delves into the challenges faced by governments in raising funds for military expenditures, weighing the merits and drawbacks of various taxation strategies, including income taxes, excess profits taxes, and other fiscal measures. Kahn argues for a balanced approach that ensures the financial stability of the nation while maintaining fairness and equity among its citizens. He warns against the dangers of excessive or poorly structured taxation, which could stifle economic growth, discourage investment, and create social unrest. Kahn’s commentary is informed by his deep understanding of finance and his commitment to public service. He emphasizes the importance of patriotism and shared sacrifice, urging citizens to support the war effort not only through taxes but also through voluntary contributions and the purchase of war bonds. At the same time, he cautions policymakers to consider the long-term consequences of their decisions, advocating for prudent fiscal management and transparency. War Taxation: Some Comments and Letters offers a unique window into the economic debates of the early 20th century, reflecting the anxieties and aspirations of a society at war. It remains a valuable resource for historians, economists, and anyone interested in the intersection of finance, public policy, and national security. Through its clear prose and reasoned arguments, the book invites readers to reflect on the enduring challenges of funding collective endeavors in times of crisis.

Leseprobe

War Taxation

Some Comments and Letters

Otto H. Kahn

1917

War Taxation

Contents

Some Comments

Pages 7 to 42

Letters

I

THE INCOME TAX

Pages 43 to 60

II

RETURN UPON TAXABLE AND TAX-EXEMPT SECURITIES

Pages 61 to 70

War Taxation

The recent publication of a little pamphlet entitled "Some Comments on War Taxation" elicited numerous interesting comments by the readers. The points to which these comments mainly related were the statements contained in the pamphlet that:

First. If our neighbor Canada continues her present policy of not taxing incomes, or if she imposes only a moderate tax while rates of income taxation in America are fixed at oppressively and unnecessarily high rates, there can be little question that the ultimate result will be an outflow of capital to Canada, and that men of enterprise will seek that country.

Second. Moneyed men not having their capital engaged in active business, if they are so constituted that their consciences permit them to evade their share of monetary sacrifice, can put their funds into tax-exempt securities.

In reference to the foregoing points, I have written two letters in answer to correspondents. These letters contain an elaboration of certain arguments and viewpoints set forth in the original article on War Taxation and also refer to some additional phases of the subject. Those who have done me the honor of perusing that article may possibly be interested in reading these letters.

In order that they may be presented as a part of the argument as a whole, the original article with a few additions and slight revisions is printed in the first part of this pamphlet, followed by the letters.

O. H. K.

52 William Street, New York, July 5, 1917.

 

SOME COMMENTS ON WAR TAXATION

This is a reprint, somewhat amplified, of an article printed recently in the New York Times. The original article was written before the recommendations of the Ways and Means Committee of the House of Representatives were reported.

In a time of patriotic exaltation and of universal obligation and readiness to make great sacrifices to bring a most just and righteous war to a successful conclusion, the voice of sober argument and matter of fact considerations is apt to grate upon the ears of the people.

That voice is all the less likely to be popular when the arguments it puts forth may easily lend themselves to the interpretation of being actuated by solicitous care for selfish interests.

I am fully aware that by publishing the following observations I am exposing myself to that interpretation and to criticism of, and attack upon, my motives.

Yet, seeing that certain measures now under consideration threaten to take shape in a way which, from my practical business experience and after mature deliberation, I am bound to regard as faulty and as indeed harmful to the country, I believe it to be right and proper to contribute my views to the public discussion of the subject, for whatever they may be worth.

I can only hope, then, that in what I am going to say I shall be given credit for endeavoring to speak conscientiously and to the best of my knowledge and judgment from the point of view of the welfare of the entire country and not of the welfare merely of the well-to-do.

I shall address myself to the practical aspect and to a few phases only of the question and shall not attempt to enter into the economic theories and the broader and deeper considerations involved.

I shall assume in my argument that what Congress is seeking to accomplish is to impose taxes justly, effectively and scientifically with the desire to disturb the country's trade and commerce as little as possible and to avoid as much as may be the evils of financial dislocation.

I shall take it for granted that at a time when more than ever the unity of the country should be emphasized, sectional selfishness will find no place in the taxation program, and that, should it be attempted nevertheless, the congressional delegations of the States which would be unjustly affected, would resist, regardless of party affiliations, harmful discrimination against their constituents and their States.

I shall assume that it is not the purpose and intent of Congress, under the guise of the necessities of the war situation, to embrace the doctrines of Socialism.

Our present economic system, our present method of wealth distribution may or may not stand in need of change; the fact remains that Congress has no mandate to effect a fundamental change.

The consequence of such a change would be so immensely far-reaching that no government has the right to sanction steps to bring it about until the subject has been fully discussed before the people in all its bearings and the people have pronounced judgment through a Presidential or other election.

I will first state what in my opinion ought not to be done:

I

I take it that not many words need be used to expose the fallacy of the argument, heard even in the Halls of Congress: "If men are to be conscripted, wealth also must be conscripted."

Men will be conscripted to the extent that it is wise and just and needful. So, and no other, should wealth and the country's resources in general be conscripted.