0,49 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: DigiCat
- Kategorie: Geisteswissenschaft
- Sprache: Englisch
In "Gujarat and the Gujaratis," Behramji Merwanji Malabari crafts a meticulous exploration of the cultural, social, and economic landscapes of Gujarat in the late 19th century. Employing a blend of ethnographic observation and personal narrative, Malabari delves into the rich tapestry of Gujarati life, highlighting the complexity of its customs, practices, and the diverse influences shaping the region. His literary style is characterized by vivid descriptions and acute social commentary, set against the backdrop of colonial India, which provides critical insight into the evolving identity of the Gujarati people amidst external pressures and internal transformations. Behramji Merwanji Malabari, an esteemed Parsee scholar and social reformer, draws upon his diverse experiences as a traveler and observer to pen this work. His commitment to social justice and reform, particularly in the context of the Indian diaspora, informs his writing, as he endeavors to illuminate the vibrancy of Gujarati culture while advocating for its recognition and appreciation. Malabari's personal journey and academic pursuits lend authenticity to his narrative, making it a reflective examination of a community at a crossroads. "Gujarat and the Gujaratis" offers readers a captivating glimpse into a pivotal time and place in Indian history. It is an essential read for scholars, students, and anyone with an interest in understanding the intricate dynamics of culture, identity, and colonial influence in India. Malabari's eloquence and depth of analysis make this work not only informative but also a profound exploration of the Gujaratis' enduring legacy. In this enriched edition, we have carefully created added value for your reading experience: - A succinct Introduction situates the work's timeless appeal and themes. - The Synopsis outlines the central plot, highlighting key developments without spoiling critical twists. - A detailed Historical Context immerses you in the era's events and influences that shaped the writing. - A thorough Analysis dissects symbols, motifs, and character arcs to unearth underlying meanings. - Reflection questions prompt you to engage personally with the work's messages, connecting them to modern life. - Hand‐picked Memorable Quotes shine a spotlight on moments of literary brilliance. - Interactive footnotes clarify unusual references, historical allusions, and archaic phrases for an effortless, more informed read.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2022
Ähnliche
Gujarat and the Gujaratis
Table of Contents
Introduction
Between affectionate portraiture and unsparing social critique lies the animating energy of Gujarat and the Gujaratis. Behramji Merwanji Malabari’s work of nonfiction social sketches, set across the towns and trading routes of western India under the British Raj, first appeared in the late nineteenth century. In these pages, he studies a region renowned for enterprise, adaptability, and cultural variety, locating the human stories behind public reputations. Part cultural commentary, part vignette-driven travel writing, the book examines manners, institutions, and everyday speech with a reporter’s alertness and a reformer’s moral temper. The result is a portrait of Gujarat that feels intimate yet diagnostic, attentive to both continuity and change.
Rather than presenting a linear narrative, the book gathers a sequence of scenes, character types, and situations, each crafted to reveal a habit of mind or social rhythm. Readers encounter market bustle, domestic arrangements, civic rituals, and the sly ironies of public conversation, all rendered in lively, controlled prose. The tone balances playfulness and sobriety: wit lightens the didactic impulse, while ethical concerns steady the satire. Malabari writes in English for a broad audience, but his vantage remains grounded in local knowledge, producing a conversation between insider familiarity and analytical distance that rewards slow, reflective reading.
Several concerns recur across the sketches, forming a thematic lattice rather than a single argument. Commerce and mobility shape identities; religion and custom guide conduct; education and law promise reform while complicating inherited ties. Gender relations receive particular attention, framed by questions of consent, dignity, and social expectation. Language itself becomes a theme, as idiom, proverb, and public rhetoric disclose communities to themselves. Above all, the book tracks how individuals negotiate status and aspiration in a colonial modernity that both unsettles and enables. The result is less a verdict on Gujarat than an anatomy of choices under pressure.
Malabari’s method is observational and comparative, testing claims by placing practice against principle, ideal against effect. He sketches types without dissolving them into stereotypes, inviting readers to see how virtues can shade into vices when circumstances tighten. Short sections build a mosaic whose cumulative weight outstrips any single anecdote, and transitions often pivot on a keenly noticed gesture or turn of phrase. The humor is pointed but not cruel, granting subjects their agency even when critiquing excess or complacency. This balance gives the book its durability: it entertains while teaching readers how to look, and how to listen.
As a late nineteenth-century Indian reformer and journalist, Malabari wrote during a period of intensified public debate about custom, law, and civic responsibility. His wider campaigns against child marriage and enforced widowhood form part of that backdrop, clarifying why questions of gender and social discipline remain central to his observations here. The setting is colonial Gujarat, with its port cities, mercantile networks, and multilingual publics shaped by new schools and expanding print. Without collapsing history into polemic, the book captures a society negotiating pressures from both imperial governance and its own internal hierarchies, revealing the strain and creativity of adaptation.
For contemporary readers, the work matters as both archive and mirror. It preserves textures of everyday life rarely recorded with such economy, and it models a critical affection that avoids romanticism without succumbing to cynicism. Debates about reform and tradition, the ethics of community leadership, the education of citizens, and the uses of satire in public discourse remain pressing. Diasporic Gujaratis may recognize foundational narratives of mobility and entrepreneurship, while readers elsewhere can test assumptions about region and identity against nuanced evidence. The book’s measured skepticism toward easy generalization is a valuable corrective in an age of quick opinion.
Approached as a series of reflective encounters rather than a program, Gujarat and the Gujaratis offers the pleasures of style alongside the discipline of inquiry. It stands as an early, influential instance of Indian social prose in English, attentive to regional detail while conversant with broader debates about modernity. Reading it today encourages humility about what we think we know, and curiosity about how communities describe themselves when given space to speak. Without revealing particular episodes, one can say that its cumulative argument is methodological: observe closely, judge carefully, and remember that reform endures only when rooted in sympathetic understanding.
Synopsis
Behramji Merwanji Malabari’s Gujarat and the Gujaratis is a work of social observation that assembles a sequence of lively sketches about a region and its people under colonial rule. Instead of a single storyline, it offers portraits, scenes, and character studies that together suggest the textures of everyday life. Malabari writes with a reformer’s curiosity and a journalist’s ear, using humor to bring manners and habits into focus without reducing them to caricature. The opening movement establishes the scope: market towns, coastal settlements, rural tracts, and the corridors of public life, all viewed as interconnected theatres in which Gujarati character is exhibited.
In early sketches, the book surveys the settings that shape conduct: crowded bazaars, quiet villages, pilgrim routes, and administrative offices. Social types emerge—traders, cultivators, scribes, religious functionaries, teachers—each defined by work routines and the codes that govern reputation. Malabari notes habits of thrift, bargaining, and sociability that lubricate exchange, matching them with a wit that exposes pretension. He pays attention to speech and gesture as markers of belonging, observing how courtesy, piety, or bravado can be performed differently across contexts. The emphasis is on recognizable patterns of behavior rather than exceptional individuals, framing the sketches as a study in civic temperament.
Commerce and civic life form a recurring axis. The sketches dwell on the rhythms of markets, the mechanics of credit, and the etiquette that sustains partnerships and rivalries. Malabari depicts meeting rooms and public gatherings where petitions are drafted, subscriptions raised, and reputations made. He balances appreciation for enterprise and cooperative zeal with a critique of ostentation, faction, and the impatience that can follow quick success. By showing how calculation coexists with conviviality, he suggests why trade becomes a training ground for leadership, where negotiation, prudence, and display are learned together and later carried into charitable works, associations, and municipal affairs.
Education and administration appear as tests of adaptation. Schools, colleges, and reading rooms furnish new avenues for ambition, yet they also sharpen anxieties about language, decorum, and the measure of enlightenment. Malabari watches students, clerks, pleaders, and minor officials navigate examinations, paperwork, and courtroom routines, showing how borrowed forms can both discipline and distort local priorities. He ponders the promise of the press and the limits of rote learning, noting where performance eclipses substance. The tone remains observational, measuring gains in literacy and professional polish against lapses in integrity, shallow imitation, and the uneven diffusion of opportunity.
Turning inward, the book treats household and devotional life with a mix of sympathy and skepticism. Malabari describes the protocols of hospitality, the calendar of festivals, and the authority of elders, while appraising how decorum may shade into constraint. He remarks on marriage arrangements and gendered expectations as sites where custom exerts pressure, leaving room for humor to soften reproof. Religious practice appears in assorted forms—from disciplined ritual to flamboyant display—without the author confusing faith with credulity. His method is to invite reflection rather than pronounce verdicts, pressing for reforms that preserve solidarity but relax the burdens of ceremony and convention.
Regional contrasts, mobility, and exchange broaden the survey. Coastal traffic and inland routes create corridors where fashions, ideas, and ambitions circulate, and Malabari tracks how people adjust their manners when they move between village thresholds and urban salons. Artisans, cultivators, and shopkeepers appear not as isolated figures but as participants in longer chains of supply and patronage. The sketches observe how pride of place and community sentiment can harden into parochialism, even as curiosity and emulation foster experiment. Throughout, the author treats identity as a repertoire—something rehearsed, adapted, and occasionally resisted—rather than a fixed inheritance sealed against contact or change.
The closing reflections gather these scenes into a tempered argument for self-criticism, education, and civic cooperation grounded in local strength. Malabari’s satire is less an attack than a lever, urging readers to examine habits that impede fairness, civility, or public spirit while recognizing the resilience, humor, and industry that animate Gujarati society. Without prescribing a single program, the book models how attentive description can prod reform. Its enduring value lies in the composite picture it leaves: a society negotiating modern institutions through inherited practices, and a writer demonstrating how observation, empathy, and wit can enlarge a community’s sense of itself.
Historical Context
Behramji Merwanji Malabari’s Gujarat and the Gujaratis (first published 1882) emerges from late nineteenth‑century western India, when Gujarat lay largely within the Bombay Presidency alongside a patchwork of princely states. Malabari, a Parsi reformer and journalist active in Bombay’s English‑language public sphere, wrote a sequence of sketches about provincial society he knew from travel and close associations. His audience consisted of educated Indians and colonial officials who consumed the expanding Anglo‑Indian press. The book’s setting spans mercantile ports, mill towns, and small princely capitals, situating everyday manners within institutions—courts, municipalities, railways, missions—that had reshaped social life after the 1857–58 imperial transition.
By the 1860s–80s, Gujarat’s economy was tied to global cotton and grain markets through Bombay. The Bombay, Baroda and Central India Railway linked Surat, Baroda (Vadodara), and Ahmedabad to the port, accelerating migration and news circulation. Surat, once Mughal India’s great emporium, remained a trading center, while Ahmedabad developed textile mills after the first spinning and weaving company opened there in 1861. Municipal bodies, vaccination campaigns, and sanitary boards reflected imperial public‑health priorities. Merchant houses, moneylenders, and caste‑based trusts financed trade and philanthropy, providing the social backdrops—bazaars, pol neighborhoods, and law courts—within which Malabari stages his satirical portraits of habit and status.
Gujarati society combined influential mercantile castes (notably Baniyas and Patidars) with sizable Jain, Hindu Vaishnava, Muslim, and Parsi communities. Sectarian institutions shaped everyday conduct: the Swaminarayan Sampradaya, for instance, established major temples at Ahmedabad (1822) and Vadtal (1824), promoting codes of discipline and charity; Jain mahajans regulated community norms; Parsi panchayats administered endowments and family law. Gender conventions—child marriage, restrictions on widows, and elaborate dowry and honor practices—were widely debated by the 1870s. These structures of kinship, credit, and reputation supply the types and situations that Malabari depicts, allowing him to interrogate respectability without misrepresenting the religious diversity that ordered town and bazaar life.
The region’s energetic print and educational culture furnished Malabari with both subjects and readers. The Gujarat Vernacular Society, founded in 1848 by civil servant Alexander Kinloch Forbes, fostered modern prose and history writing and issued the journal Buddhi Prakash from 1850. Poets and social critics such as Dalpatram and Narmadashankar Dave (Narmad) used satire to question orthodoxy. In Bombay, Dadabhai Naoroji’s Gujarati weekly Rast Goftar (from 1851) championed rational reform. The Prarthana Samaj, established in Bombay in 1867, and related reform currents influenced urban Gujaratis. Malabari wrote in English within this milieu, adapting the newspaper sketch and the social essay to provincial themes.
Under Crown rule after 1858, western India saw the consolidation of colonial courts and police, with the Indian Penal Code (1860) and procedure codes standardizing criminal and civil justice. District collectors, subordinate judges, and municipal committees increasingly mediated disputes once handled by caste councils. Christian missions—especially Presbyterian and Anglican bodies—operated schools and hospitals in cities like Surat and Ahmedabad, introducing new pedagogies and charitable models. Malabari’s portraits repeatedly meet such institutions at street level: the petty official, the pleader, the mission teacher, and the municipal sanitary inspector. The book’s critique turns on how legalism and bureaucratic hierarchy intersected with older authority and neighborhood solidarities.
Gujarat also contained powerful princely domains, most prominently Baroda State under the Gaekwad dynasty. In 1875 the British deposed Malhar Rao Gaekwad after an inquiry into an alleged attempt to poison the Resident; a child, Sayajirao III, was selected as ruler under British tutelage. The Baroda crisis sharpened debates on governance, corruption, and reform in the region, and it acquainted Gujarati elites with the intrusive reach of residency politics. Malabari’s sketches register this atmosphere: he writes of courtly etiquette, patronage, and officialdom with an eye to how authority is performed, drawing material from both British‑administered districts and neighboring princely societies.
The Great Famine of 1876–78, which struck large parts of the Bombay Presidency, deeply affected Gujarat’s agrarian districts and market towns. Relief works, grain imports through the railways, and philanthropy by merchants and princely rulers mitigated but did not prevent grave mortality and indebtedness. Such crises exposed how price shocks, monsoon failure, and colonial revenue demands weighed on rural families who supplied the trading cities. Public health concerns—from cholera to smallpox—were recurring realities of urban life. Malabari’s eye for the rhetoric of charity, the post‑famine moralizing of officials, and the precariousness of labor draws directly from this recent collective experience.
Against this background of commercial expansion, reformist debate, and tightened administration, Gujarat and the Gujaratis reads as a social anatomy of a province in transition. Malabari borrows the light touch of the Victorian sketch to question ceremonial excess, litigation mania, and male privilege, while conceding the vitality of Gujarati enterprise and wit. Writing for an audience conversant with Anglo‑Indian journalism, he uses concrete types rather than argument to register change—railway mobility, courtroom talk, new schools, and princely ceremonials. The result is less a travelogue than a diagnostic portrait, reflecting the late nineteenth century’s competing claims of custom, modern law, and civic respectability.
Gujarat and the Gujaratis
PREFACE.
The page of the social and domestic life of the people of India is almost unread by Europeans. There are many reasons for this. First, there is the difference of language. Very few Englishmen have sufficient knowledge of any Indian language to converse with Indians with ease and fluency. Then, there is the deficient education and seclusion of Indian women, which cuts them off from social intercourse with English men, and renders their meeting with English women productive of very meagre results. Gravest of all, as a bar to free intercourse, is religious prejudice. This operates even where friendship exists between Englishmen and Indians. Over every avenue to real cordiality, the Hindu and Muhammadan have written up: "Yes. To smell pork! To eat of the habitation which your prophet, the Nazarite, conjured the devil into. I will buy with you, sell with you, talk with you, and so following; but I will not eat with you, drink with you, nor pray with you." It has been said that the way to an Englishman's heart is through his stomach: well, the people of India cannot penetrate to English hearts that way. Caste sits before every Indian door and forbids the European to enter. The very shadow of a European pollutes the food of a Bráhman; and though an Indian may enter a European's house of prayer, the sacred places of the Hindu may not be profaned by the European footstep.
The story of Indian domestic and social life can be set forth only by the pens of Indians themselves, and these pens have many restraints upon them. Pages, therefore, such as these which are here presented to the English public, deserve to be welcomed. The author possesses a remarkable knowledge of the English language, and combines with it an amount of candour and freedom from bigotry which is rarely to be met with anywhere. In these sketches of Indian life will be seen the struggles which clever and ambitious Indians, who have but a meagre patrimony, must undergo, first to educate, and then to support themselves. Here, too, will be seen evidences of the friction which exists between the governing and the governed race. It is to be hoped that the hauteur of the one and the irritation of the other are decreasing; but the European who goes to sleep with his boots in an Indian gentleman's lap while travelling in the same compartment of a carriage on an Indian railway, is, it is to be feared, not wholly extinct; and wherever he exists he spreads around him an atmosphere of discontent in which good feeling finds it impossible to breathe.
Among the more general and lighter descriptions there are many sketches that will be new to English readers, as, for instance, the manner in which the people of India enjoy their holidays, the elephant-fights in the arena at Baroda. Many of these more interesting passages have drifted into the later chapters, and might be overlooked unless pointed out by reviewers. Of pure literary interest is the chapter on the Hindú epic, the Rámayana, which the author, struggling, perhaps, a little beyond his depth, compares with the Sháhnámah, and even with the Iliad.
What is said about English law may not, perhaps, be acceptable to English readers, and its soundness may be contested, but amongst Indians there would be a universal consensus as to its truth. The law's delay is in India an intolerable grievance; and it is certainly the fact that in the first mutiny the English judges were the most frequent victims.
The portraits of Indian notabilities seem to be drawn from the life, and will, no doubt, be thought by some to be recognisable; and it may be learnt from them that it is not always those Indians who are most countenanced and raised to the highest posts by the English authorities, who are most acceptable to their countrymen.
It will be seen that the author, although a very much younger man, is a friend of Lutfullah and his fellow-townsman, and these sketches have something in common with the autobiography of the older writer. May the débutant be equally fortunate with the English public!
E. B. EASTWICK.
GUJARÁT
AND
THE GUJARÁTIS.
INTRODUCTION.
Permit me, gentle reader, to briefly explain the genesis of this little book[1q]. Starting on my pilgrimage in the too early twilight of life's day, I have often stumbled into dry nulláhs[1][1]—very dry and dismal, and with very steep sides. And in groping my way to reach the other side, I have badly barked my shins. But it is matter for thankfulness to be able to say that in none of my stumbles have I broken any bones. However bad the fall, I have always managed to pick myself up; and, with the rope thrown by friendly hands, have struggled up the stony hill-side. These "roughs and tumbles" of life have become a part of my nature, and I have often felt a vague sort of conviction that life would be scarcely worth living without some prospect of having to "rough it."
A Poor Beginning.
I began life at twelve, giving private lessons. It was a poor beginning—the task of coaching big hulking lads was so dreary. At sixteen I became a regular teacher. I had seen enough of the world before this—the world of India, of course. I entered upon my new duties, therefore, with hearty interest. The work did not feel a drudgery for some time; but two or three years after, my migratory instincts again asserted themselves. I felt that I wanted a change. I had taught and studied children long enough, and I thought I must now study "children of a larger growth."
A Tempting Offer.
At this time I was offered the joint-editorship of a local (English) weekly. I jumped at the offer, and submitted it to a few friends whom I used to consult on matters beyond my management. These gentlemen, each and all, scouted the idea, and strongly advised me to keep where I was.
My Troubles.
Here began my troubles. I had already been favourably known as a versifier; and with the overweening confidence of youth, thought I had the right and the power to enlighten the public on political and other topics of the day. There was nothing for it, however, but to bow to friends' decision, once having sought their advice. During the next two years I had the most miserable time of it. They made me a morose, disconsolate verse-monster. I scribbled English verses by the yard; and after destroying the bulk of them, ventured to publish a few pieces. But no end of verse-writing could compensate for the glorious chance I had missed of becoming a journalist and public censor. However, I received fresh overtures soon after. This time I gave my elderly advisers to understand that I meant to act for myself, though I should be very glad if I could do so with their consent.
Struggles of a Cheap Newspaper.
It was a cheap weekly, hitherto owned by two partners, cousins, one who had given it money, the other brains. Two more partners were added, my friend N. bringing money, and I supposed as supplying brains. The work was fairly divided—the first proprietor, D., a small clerk, undertook business management. N. was to help D., and also to make himself useful to us—my friend P. and myself—in the literary business. For a week or two all went on smoothly; but we soon felt the necessity of discussing our position. N. was a man of temper, and among other things "compositors" did not take kindly to him. I received frequent complaints as to his harshness; but knowing he had brought us a thousand rupees I could do nothing more than appeal to his good sense. One Saturday night Mr. N. was given a "proof" to read. He corrected it; but instead of entering corrections on the margins, poked his pen into the body of the "composed matter." The compositor almost fainted at sight of the "proof" he had to revise—he could not follow the corrections, and the paper was delayed next morning. On Sunday, when we four proprietors met, I gently asked Mr. N. to be good enough to enter corrections, in future, on the margins of the proof-sheet. N. glared at me for what he took to be an insult, and replied that he had paid 1,000 rupees to be his own master—that he would do just what he liked, and would not be bullied by people who had not contributed a farthing. This sneer was passed over by me; but the co-editor winced under it, and replied hotly to N.'s insinuation. What threatened to be a bad quarrel was, however, soon made up; and we all adjourned to an adjoining hotel to discuss the future of the paper and a substantial breakfast provided for the occasion.
Editorial Vagaries.
But by-and-bye we two editors could not quite agree between ourselves. I was for treatment of social questions chiefly; my friend P. affected politics. We settled this difference by confining each to his own forte. Our ignorance, even in this, was as boundless as was our arrogance. But was it not glorious to criticise and ridicule the highest men in the country? What a privilege for too-early-emancipated school-boys! Nothing could be easier than my share of the literary work: I turned into prose, every week, two of my versified social essays, of which I had a plentiful supply at home. Did poet ever sacrifice his substance as I did, in those days, in the public interests? My sweet sonorous hexameters surrendered bodily to the manipulations of the deity P. D.! No martyr could do more. My friend P. wrote political essays. He was decidedly better-read than I. Certainly he took pains with his essays; but how could a young man of less than twenty overtake topics which baffle the grasp of practised veterans? One day, writing, I believe, of the battle of Plevna, P. asked me what was meant by "the Porte." I said "the Porte" was the Sultan of Turkey's principal wife. P. thought it was only the European title of the Khedive of Egypt. We often thought in that curious way, and often wrote ourselves down, in our own paper, a pair of conceited jackanapes. And when, next morning, we found out our mistake, we accused each other of ignorance, obstinacy, and so on.
Editorial Amenities.
