Erhalten Sie Zugang zu diesem und mehr als 300000 Büchern ab EUR 5,99 monatlich.
Not only is it reckless to say that it is a "cervical cancer vaccine": it is also false. The HPV vaccine, as its name implies, fights some strains of the Human Papilloma Virus, and the real effectiveness in preventing Cervical Cancer remains to be seen. But this is not talked about; the same happens with the healthy girls who lost their last years of school due to extreme fatigue, with the athletic girls lying in bed with paralysis or who must use crutches, and with the fainting and seizures suffered by hundreds of the girls who received the HPV vaccine. Uncover the secret plot behind a totally expendable vaccine that saved a pharmaceutical company from bankruptcy and quickly grew into a multi-billion dollar business.
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 47
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2020
Das E-Book (TTS) können Sie hören im Abo „Legimi Premium” in Legimi-Apps auf:
Ähnliche
1. HPV vaccine: alarms go off
In 2006 the FDA approved Gardasil for medical use. It had been presented as a vaccine that protects against HPV (Human Papilloma Virus), which causes more than 70% of cervical cancer cases. So, Gardasil was a possible prevention against cervical cancer, “the second that most affects women in the world” and that annually causes more than 310,000 deaths throughout the planet. The fact that this vaccine could prevent cancer gave it a priority importance, and therefore the clinical trial phases were framed within the FDA’s “fast track”, which shortened the times for its approval and commercialization. Gardasil was marketed and soon became part of the mandatory or recommended vaccination schedules around the world, as it had the approval of the main international health organizations: World Health Organization (WHO), United States Center for Disease Control (CDC), European Medicines Agency (EMA). The vaccine is expected to significantly reduce the incidence and mortality of this type of cancer. It is the first vaccine “capable of preventing cancer”.
So far, part of the information. But if we examine the numbers and facts a little more carefully and suspiciously, we discover that the story behind this vaccine is far more complex and even dangerous. Many specialists warn that the efficacy of the vaccine as prevention of cervical cancer is not yet proven, and that it could only be evaluated at least twenty years after it began to be applied, since it is a cancer that develops very slowly. The alarm bells have also rang because HPV can be detected with routine gynecological exams, even many years before it could lead to cancer. Another source of warning has been the way in which clinical trials were conducted, which seemed designed to hide adverse effects. And also there are the vaccine’s side effects, denied by the main narrative but claimed through similar stories all over the world: healthy young people who after receiving the vaccine had seizures, brain damage, paralysis, chronic fatigue, premature ovarian failure and in some cases they even died.
The figures that would justify mass vaccination, the benefits of which could outweigh possible side effects, also don’t hold up when examined more closely: more than 85% of cervical cancer cases in the world occur in the poorest countries, where lots of women don’t have access to gynecological examinations and also suffer from malnutrition, endemic malaria and other factors. The last variable of this story, although not the least important, is the economic one: the sales of Gardasil and Cervarix, the two brands of HPV vaccines on the market, generate $ 3.5 billion annually to the pharmaceutical companies that sell them.
Virologist Luc Montagnier, who received the Nobel Prize in 2008 for isolating the HIV virus, named the HPV vaccine “a scandal”. In the pages that follow, we will review each of the items that would justify such a claim: stories of young people who tell their suffering in the first person, failures in controls that were supposed to guarantee the safety of participants in clinical trials, a misleading narrative created to commercialize a fake “cancer vaccine” and the voices of specialists who explain the reasons why a mass vaccination against HPV, under current conditions, is absolutely unjustified.
•
2. Adverse reactions caused by vaccines
Vaccines have been at the center of debates for at least a couple of decades. They have been questioned for some of the ingredients used as adjuvant (mainly, mercury, aluminum and their derivatives), they have been put under the microscope for the serious side effects attributed to them, and also because of the increasing amount of mandatory vaccines and the justification for such tight vaccination schedules.
Vaccines are applied to healthy individuals, as a preventive measure. Although they have played a fundamental role globally in the eradication of devastating contagious diseases such as smallpox, measles or polio, for many people these immunizations have led to serious complications or even death. The WHO identifies five categories of adverse reactions to a vaccine:
1.Vaccination-induced reactions (including allergic reactions). Individual response produced by the inherent properties of the product, when the vaccine has been correctly handled and administered.
2.Reactions due to defects in the quality of the vaccine.
3.Reactions due to program errors: errors in storage, handling or administration. Unlike the previous one, it can be prevented and avoided.
4.Reactions due to anxious processes related to the vaccine act. Not related to the product, but to the “fear of the vaccine act”. The 4 most common types described are: fainting (syncope), hyperventilation (dizziness, headache, tingling of hands and mouth), vomiting and seizures.
5.Coincident events, not related to the vaccine.
The consensus that endorses the mandatory nature of vaccines is dominant in the narratives of international health organizations, in the media and also on the Internet. It is explained that most of the complaints or arguments against vaccines are not based on “scientific evidence that could justify them”. The job that vaccines have done in history in terms of eradicating devastating diseases or saving millions of lives is part of why they are considered an untouchable and unquestionable part of public health.
