PREFACE TO THE GERMAN TRANSLATION
The
author of the present essay, S. M. Dubnow, occupies a well-nigh
dominating position in Russian-Jewish literature as an historian and
an acute critic. His investigations into the history of the
Polish-Russian Jews, especially his achievements in the history of
Chassidism, have been of fundamental importance in these departments.
What raises Mr. Dubnow far above the status of the professional
historian, and awakens the reader's lively interest in him, is not so
much the matter of his books, as the manner of presentation. It is
rare to meet with an historian in whom scientific objectivity and
thoroughness are so harmoniously combined with an ardent temperament
and plastic ability. Mr. Dubnow's scientific activity, first and
last, is a striking refutation of the widespread opinion that
identifies attractiveness of form in the work of a scholar with
superficiality of content. Even his strictly scientific
investigations, besides offering the scholar a wealth of new
suggestions, form instructive and entertaining reading matter for the
educated layman. In his critical essays, Mr. Dubnow shows himself to
be possessed of keen psychologic insight. By virtue of this quality
of delicate perception, he aims to assign to every historical fact
its proper place in the line of development, and so establish the
bond between it and the general history of mankind. This psychologic
ability contributes vastly to the interest aroused by Mr. Dubnow's
historical works outside of the limited circle of scholars. There is
a passage in one of his books[1] in which, in his incisive manner, he
expresses his views on the limits and tasks of historical writing. As
the passage bears upon the methods employed in the present essay,
and, at the same time, is a characteristic specimen of our author's
style, I take the liberty of quoting:"The
popularization of history is by no means to be pursued to the
detriment of its severely scientific treatment. What is to be guarded
against is the notion that tedium is inseparable from the scientific
method. I have always been of the opinion that the dulness commonly
looked upon as the prerogative of scholarly inquiries, is not an
inherent attribute. In most cases it is conditioned, not by the
nature of the subject under investigation, but by the temper of the
investigator. Often, indeed, the tediousness of a learned
disquisition is intentional: it is considered one of the polite
conventions of the academic guild, and by many is identified with
scientific thoroughness and profound learning…. If, in general,
deadening, hide-bound caste methods, not seldom the cover for poverty
of thought and lack of cleverness, are reprehensible, they are doubly
reprehensible in history. The history of a people is not a mere
mental discipline, like botany or mathematics, but a living science,
a
magistra vitae,
leading straight to national self-knowledge, and acting to a certain
degree upon the national character. History is a science
by
the people,
for
the people, and, therefore, its place is the open forum, not the
scholar's musty closet. We relate the events of the past to the
people, not merely to a handful of archaeologists and numismaticians.
We work for national self-knowledge, not for our own intellectual
diversion."[1]
In the introduction to his
Historische Mitteilungen, Vorarbeiten zu einer Geschichte der
pol-nischrussischen Juden.These
are the principles that have guided Mr. Dubnow in all his works, and
he has been true to them in the present essay, which exhibits in a
remarkably striking way the author's art of making "all things
seem fresh and new, important and attractive." New and important
his essay undoubtedly is. The author attempts, for the first time, a
psychologic characterization of Jewish history. He endeavors to
demonstrate the inner connection between events, and develop the
ideas that underlie them, or, to use his own expression, lay bare the
soul of Jewish history, which clothes itself with external events as
with a bodily envelope. Jewish history has never before been
considered from this philosophic point of view, certainly not in
German literature. The present work, therefore, cannot fail to prove
stimulating. As for the poet's other requirement, attractiveness, it
is fully met by the work here translated. The qualities of Mr.
Dubnow's style, as described above, are present to a marked degree.
The enthusiasm flaming up in every line, coupled with his plastic,
figurative style, and his scintillating conceits, which lend vivacity
to his presentation, is bound to charm the reader. Yet, in spite of
the racy style, even the layman will have no difficulty in
discovering that it is not a clever journalist, an artificer of
well-turned phrases, who is speaking to him, but a scholar by
profession, whose foremost concern is with historical truth, and
whose every statement rests upon accurate, scientific knowledge; not
a bookworm with pale, academic blood trickling through his veins, but
a man who, with unsoured mien, with fresh, buoyant delight, offers
the world the results laboriously reached in his study, after all
evidences of toil and moil have been carefully removed; who derives
inspiration from the noble and the sublime in whatever guise it may
appear, and who knows how to communicate his inspiration to others.The
translator lays this book of an accomplished and spirited historian
before the German public. He does so in the hope that it will shed
new light upon Jewish history even for professional scholars. He is
confident that in many to whom our unexampled past of four thousand
years' duration is now
terra incognita,
it will arouse enthusiastic interest, and even to those who, like the
translator himself, differ from the author in religious views, it
will furnish edifying and suggestive reading. J. F.
INTRODUCTORY NOTE
What
is Jewish History? In the first place, what does it offer as to
quantity and as to quality? What are its range and content, and what
distinguishes it in these two respects from the history of other
nations? Furthermore, what is the essential meaning, what the spirit,
of Jewish History? Or, to put the question in another way, to what
general results are we led by the aggregate of its facts, considered,
not as a whole, but genetically, as a succession of evolutionary
stages in the consciousness and education of the Jewish people?If
we could find precise answers to these several questions, they would
constitute a characterization of Jewish History as accurate as is
attainable. To present such a characterization succinctly is the
purpose of the following essay.