Neurotrauma - Nadine Abelson-Mitchell - E-Book

Neurotrauma E-Book

Nadine Abelson-Mitchell

0,0
49,99 €

-100%
Sammeln Sie Punkte in unserem Gutscheinprogramm und kaufen Sie E-Books und Hörbücher mit bis zu 100% Rabatt.

Mehr erfahren.
Beschreibung

Neurotrauma: Managing Patients with Head Injuries is a comprehensive, holistic, evidence-based approach to the primary, secondary and tertiary care of a person with neurotrauma.

Using a patient-centred needs approach to enhance the quality of care of head injured patients, family and carers, this multidisciplinary book enables the reader to apply the knowledge, skills and attitudes learned to the practice of neurotrauma in all settings.  It explores:

  • Anatomy and physiology of the brain
  • Pharmacology for neurotrauma patients
  • Assessment of the patient with neurotrauma
  • Management of neurotrauma in a range of settings including at the scene, in the emergency department, and at the hospital
  • Neuro-rehabilitation
  • Community care
  • Nursing management of the patient

This practical resource includes activities, exercises, and ethical and legal considerations throughout, making it ideal reading for all staff working in neuroscience, emergency, critical and rehabilitation settings.

Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:

Android
iOS
von Legimi
zertifizierten E-Readern

Seitenzahl: 604

Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2013

Bewertungen
0,0
0
0
0
0
0
Mehr Informationen
Mehr Informationen
Legimi prüft nicht, ob Rezensionen von Nutzern stammen, die den betreffenden Titel tatsächlich gekauft oder gelesen/gehört haben. Wir entfernen aber gefälschte Rezensionen.



Table of Contents

Title page

Copyright page

Preface

Dedication

Acknowledgements

Contributor Details

NADINE ABELSON-MITCHELL

JUDE FEWINGS

PENNY FRANKLIN

ANTHONY GILBERT

HENRY GULY

KATY LEWIS

SUE MOTTRAM

ZUHAIR NOORI

SIMON PARFORD

MICHELLE SMITH

JUDI THOMSON

KEVIN TSANG

ANDREW WARLOW

PETER WHITFIELD

DANIELLE WILLIAMS

Abbreviations

List of Tables and Figures

TABLES

FIGURES

Section 1: FOUNDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

INTRODUCTION

Chapter 1 The Patient’s Journey

INTRODUCTION

CARE PATHWAYS: POLICIES AND GUIDELINES

INTEGRATED CARE PATHWAYS

Chapter 2 Philosophy

INTRODUCTION

CONCLUSION

Chapter 3 The Needs Approach Model

INTRODUCTION

WHAT IS A NEED?

STRUCTURE OF THE NEEDS APPROACH MODEL

USE OF THE MODEL

ASSESSING THE PATIENT’S NEEDS

PLANNING

GOAL SETTING

IMPLEMENTATION

EVALUATION

RISK

THE MIRACULOUS RECOVERY

NURSING DIAGNOSIS

CONCLUSION

Chapter 4 The Patient Matters

THE PATIENT

FAMILY AND CARERS

CONCLUSION

Chapter 5 Multidisciplinary Management

INTRODUCTION

STAFFING

SPEECH AND LANGUAGE THERAPY SERVICES

Chapter 6 Physiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

RESPIRATORY CARE

POSITIONING

MUSCULOSKELETAL INTEGRITY AND NEUROMUSCULAR STATUS

SUMMARY

REHABILITATION AND MOTOR CONTROL THEORIES

POSTURE AND SEATING

CONCLUSION

Chapter 7 Neuropsychology

INTRODUCTION

WHAT IS CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY?

WHO IS A CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST?

WHAT IS THE ROLE OF THE CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST IN THE MANAGEMENT OF TBI?

NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS

THE PATIENT’S NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNEY

ADDITIONAL FACTORS INFLUENCING NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL FUNCTIONING

OTHER ISSUES AND CONSIDERATIONS

Chapter 8 Social Considerations

THE ROLE OF THE SOCIAL WORKER

SOCIAL ISSUES

CONCLUSION

Chapter 9 Occupational Therapy

Section 2: PRE-REQUISITE KNOWLEDGE

INTRODUCTION

Chapter 10 Epidemiology

INTRODUCTION

SEVERITY OF INJURY

HOSPITAL ATTENDANCE

INCIDENCE

PREVALENCE OF HEAD INJURY

AGE DISTRIBUTION

GENDER DISTRIBUTION

RACE AND ETHNICITY

MECHANISM OF INJURY

SEASONAL VARIATION

PREDISPOSITION

USE OF ALCOHOL

HEAD INJURY MORTALITY

CONCLUSION

Chapter 11 Prevention of Head Injuries

INTRODUCTION

RECOMMENDATIONS

ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS (RTAs)

ACTION REGARDING THE USE OF PRESCRIPTION, OVER THE COUNTER AND ILLICIT DRUGS

PREVENTION OF SPORTS INJURIES

CARE OF OLDER PEOPLE

INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE

CONCLUSION

Chapter 12 Applied Anatomy and Physiology

INTRODUCTION

THE NERVOUS SYSTEM

THE SCALP

THE SKULL

STRUCTURE OF THE BRAIN

ADDITIONAL CONCEPTS RELATED TO NEUROPHYSIOLOGY

ACID-BASE BALANCE

SUMMARY

CONCLUSION

Chapter 13 Investigations

Chapter 14 Pharmacology for Neurotrauma Patients

INTRODUCTION

ANAESTHETIC AGENTS

ANALGESICS

DIURETICS

ANTI-EPILEPTIC DRUGS

ANTICOAGULANTS

ANTI-EMETICS

LAXATIVES

CONCLUSION

Chapter 15 Applied Microbiology

INTRODUCTION

MENINGITIS

ENCEPHALITIS

BRAIN ABSCESS

CONCLUSION

Section 3: FEATURES OF NEUROTRAUMA

INTRODUCTION

Chapter 16 Classification of Traumatic Brain Injury

INTRODUCTION

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY BRAIN INJURY

OPEN AND CLOSED HEAD INJURY

CONCLUSION

Chapter 17 Raised Intracranial Pressure

INTRODUCTION

DEFINITION

CAUSE OF INCREASED INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE

DIAGNOSIS

INVESTIGATIONS

TREATMENT

MANAGEMENT OF THE PATIENT

CONCLUSION

Chapter 18 Assessment of the Patient with Neurotrauma

INTRODUCTION

GENERAL PRINCIPLES

NEUROLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS

VITAL SIGNS

RECORDING THE OBSERVATIONS

UNDERTAKING A COMPREHENSIVE CNS EXAMINATION

RECORDING THE ASSESSMENT

CONCLUSION

Section 4: MANAGEMENT OF NEUROTRAUMA

INTRODUCTION

Chapter 19 Management of Neurotrauma at the Scene

INTRODUCTION

SEVERE AND MODERATE HEAD INJURY

AIRWAY WITH CERVICAL SPINE PROTECTION

BREATHING

CIRCULATION

DISABILITY

EXPOSURE AND ENVIRONMENT

MINOR HEAD INJURY

Chapter 20 Management of Neurotrauma on Transfer

INTRODUCTION

AIRWAY WITH CERVICAL SPINE PROTECTION

BREATHING

CIRCULATION

DISABILITY

EXPOSURE

OTHER

WHO SHOULD ACCOMPANY THE PATIENT?

Chapter 21 Management of Neurotrauma in the Emergency Department

INTRODUCTION

PREPARING FOR THE ARRIVAL OF A SERIOUSLY INJURED PATIENT

SEVERE AND MODERATE HEAD INJURY

MINOR HEAD INJURY

ADMISSION

DISCHARGE FROM THE ED

MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WHO ARE ADMITTED FOR OBSERVATION

SOCIAL ASPECTS

Chapter 22 Hospital Management of Neurotrauma

INTRODUCTION

INITIAL ASSESSMENT OF TRAUMA PATIENTS

MANAGEMENT IN THE NEUROSCIENCE UNIT

INTENSIVE CARE MANAGEMENT

FURTHER MANAGEMENT AND PROGNOSIS

Chapter 23 Nursing the Patient with Neurotrauma

INTRODUCTION

ADVOCATE

ESSENTIAL NURSING SKILLS

THERAPEUTIC PRACTICE

CO-ORDINATION

CLINICAL GOVERNANCE

ADVICE/COUNSELLING

POLITICAL AWARENESS

EDUCATION

RESEARCH

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

REHABILITATION NURSING

ACTIVITIES

Chapter 24 Prognosis and Patient Outcome

INTRODUCTION

FACTORS PREDICTING PROGNOSIS AFTER HEAD INJURY

OUTCOME MEASURES

RETURN TO WORK

QUALITY OF EVERYDAY LIFE

CONCLUSION

Chapter 25 Dying and Death

INTRODUCTION

THE FAMILY

BRAIN DEATH

CONCLUSION

ACTIVITIES

Section 5: NEUROREHABILITATION

INTRODUCTION

Chapter 26 Sequelae of Neurotrauma

INTRODUCTION

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT SOME SEQUELAE

CONCLUSION

Chapter 27 Neurorehabilitation

INTRODUCTION

DEFINITION OF REHABILITATION

LEVELS OF REHABILITATION

SETTINGS FOR REHABILITATION

REHABILITATION COSTS

STAFFING FOR REHABILITATION

STANDARDS OF REHABILITATION PRACTICE

REHABILITATION CRITERIA

THE REHABILITATION PROCESS

GOALS OF REHABILITATION

CONCEPTS UNDERPINNING REHABILITATION

PLANNING THE REHABILITATION PROGRAMME CONTENT

SCHEDULING THE PROGRAMME

COMMUNITY-BASED REHABILITATION (CBR)

CONCLUSION

Chapter 28 Early Stimulation Programmes

INTRODUCTION

DEFINITION OF EARLY STIMULATION PROGRAMME

BACKGROUND

OBJECTIVES OF INTRODUCING AN EARLY STIMULATION PROGRAMME (ESP)

SETTING UP THE ESP

CONTENT OF THE ESP

SPECIFIC TECHNIQUES

HOW TO ENCOURAGE THE INVOLVEMENT OF FAMILY OR FRIENDS

Chapter 29 Discharge Planning

INTRODUCTION

WHAT IS DISCHARGE PLANNING?

BENEFITS OF DISCHARGE PLANNING

DISCHARGE PLANNING PROCESS

CRITERIA FOR DISCHARGE PLANNING

SELECTING THE DISCHARGE DESTINATION

THE DAY OF DISCHARGE

CONCLUSION

Chapter 30 Living in the Community

INTRODUCTION

INTEGRATING INTO THE COMMUNITY

Chapter 31 Legal Matters

INTRODUCTION

COMPENSATION CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF HEAD INJURIES

BRAIN INJURY AND MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE

HEAD INJURIES

THE COST OF BRAIN INJURY

Chapter 32 Meeting Tomorrow’s Challenges

CONCLUSION

Section 6: APPENDICES

Appendix 1 Pre-Admission Assessment

INSTRUCTIONS

PRE-ADMISSION ASSESSMENT

FAMILY INFORMATION

PREVIOUS HEALTH HISTORY

CURRENT HEALTH STATUS

HEALTH NEEDS

Appendix 2 Discharge Report

INSTRUCTIONS

SECTION A

SECTION B

SECTION C

SECTION D

Activity Answers

CHAPTER 12 ANSWERS

CHAPTER 18 ANSWERS

CHAPTER 20 ANSWERS

CHAPTER 21 ANSWERS

Additional Resources

BOOKS

HELPFUL WEBSITES

Glossary

References

Index

This edition first published 2013

© 2013 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Blackwell Publishing was acquired by John Wiley & Sons in February 2007. Blackwell’s publishing program has been merged with Wiley’s global Scientific, Technical and Medical business to form Wiley-Blackwell.

Registered office: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK

Editorial offices: 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ, UK

The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK

111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030-5774, USA

For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services and for information about how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com/wiley-blackwell.

The right of the author to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher.

Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The publisher is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book.

Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author(s) have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. It is sold on the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services and neither the publisher nor the author shall be liable for damages arising herefrom. If professional advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Neurotrauma : managing patients with head injuries / edited by Nadine Abelson-Mitchell.

p. ; cm.

 Includes bibliographical references and index.

 ISBN 978-1-4051-8564-6 (pbk. : alk. paper)

 I. Abelson-Mitchell, Nadine.

 [DNLM: 1. Craniocerebral Trauma–therapy. 2. Craniocerebral Trauma–rehabilitation. 3. Evidence-Based Medicine. WL 354]

 617.5'1044–dc23

2012027830

A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.

Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may not be available in electronic books.

Cover images courtesy of iStockphoto

Cover design by Steve Thompson

Preface

This book is designed to provide a holistic, evidence-based approach to the primary, secondary and tertiary care of a person with neurotrauma in all settings.

It uses a patient-centred needs approach to enhance the quality of care of head injured patients, their family and carers.

The book content enables the reader to apply the knowledge, skills and attitudes learned to the practice of neurotrauma in all settings.

In addition, as many of the neurosurgical procedures that are undertaken result in trauma to the brain, this neurotrauma book can also be used in wider neuroscience practice by health professionals, families, carers and all personnel committed to the care of a patient with neurotrauma.

Nadine Abelson-Mitchell

Dedication

This book is dedicated to my inspirational father Harry Abelson (z”l), who taught me to cope with adversity, my wonderful mother, Hilda Abelson, husband, John Mitchell whose help is immeasurable, sister Marissa Rittoff and my aunt Miriam Brener (z”l), a fine nurse.

It is also dedicated to my patients and their families who have strived to achieve their maximum potential.

People who have suffered a head injury ‘must have accessible, available, and appropriate health care and wellness promotion services’ to enable the person to lead a ‘full life in the community’ (Office of the Surgeon General [US] and Office on Disability [US] 2005: v).

Acknowledgements

I wish to acknowledge the following for their contribution to the book:

The authors and co-authors who have contributed to the knowledge within the book.
My husband, John Mitchell, for his unstinting support and hours of proof reading.
A special thank you to Claire Butcher for editing the manuscript, Esther Hughes and Hannah Paddon for their continued support and to Fiona Carmichael for the drawings.
The companies who provided me with images for the book:SECA Ltd for the ECG imagesCodman Ltd for the ICP monitoring imagesToshiba Medical Systems for the images of the MRI Scanner and CT Scanner.
The Publishers for agreeing to publish the book.
My patients with whom I have shared many hours of practice.

Contributor Details

NADINE ABELSON-MITCHELL

Nadine is an Associate Professor in the School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Education and Society at Plymouth University, Devon, UK. She is also an Honorary Nurse Consultant for the Plym Neurorehabilitation Unit, Plymouth Community Healthcare CIC, Plymouth, UK.

Nadine has been actively involved in neurotrauma practice since 1976. In 1987, Nadine completed a PhD entitled the ‘Comprehensive care of adults with moderate and severe head injuries’.

Nadine lived in South Africa before moving to the United Kingdom where she was responsible for developing post-registration neurotrauma programmes for Registered Nurses. Her expertise in neurotrauma management has enabled her to be an expert witness and prepare medico-legal reports with regard to medical negligence and road traffic accidents. She opened a very successful nurse-led community-based practice managing neurotrauma patients in the community.

She has written book chapters, has published numerous articles and undertaken national and international conference presentations and workshops. She is a Trustee of Headway, Plymouth, UK.

Having written this book she is preparing a workbook on her experience of community-based rehabilitation for use by all.

JUDE FEWINGS

Jude Fewings qualified in 1992 from Caledonia University (formally Queen’s College) Glasgow. Following a three year general rotation in Newcastle-upon-Tyne, she moved to a post on the Neuroscience rotation in Sheffield in 1995, working almost exclusively within Neurosurgery and the Neurosurgical ICU. Subsequent promotion culminated in being appointed Team Leader in Neurosciences in 1999.

In this Clinical Specialist role, Jude led the integrated teams of physiotherapists and occupational therapists in the assessment and treatment of all neurological patients and worked closely with Hallam University regularly lecturing on the under- and postgraduate therapy courses, herself gaining a Postgraduate Certificate in Neurological Physiotherapy.

In 2005 Jude was appointed to the post of Consultant Therapist in Neurosurgery at Plymouth. As an experienced clinician she was able to comment on, and therefore influence, the relevant strategic direction of the Trust and its policies whilst remaining involved in the clinical aspects of physiotherapy.

PENNY FRANKLIN

Penny Franklin is an independent and supplementary nurse prescriber as well as a community practitioner nurse prescriber and a Fellow of the Institute of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. She is also an Associate Professor in Health Studies, Medicines Management and Prescribing at Plymouth University.

She is a member of the BMA and British National Formulary Subcommittee for the Community Practitioners Formulary for Prescribing; secretary of the Association for Nurse Prescribing; expert advisor to the National Prescribing Centre (NPC) and NICE for the Updating of Information for Designated Medical Practitioners; practice advisor to the CPHVA for non-medical prescribing/medicines management; academic link for Non-Medical Prescribing for Non-Medical Prescribing Leads in the Southwest Peninsula; external examiner for Prescribing at the University of Reading; education committee member for Community Practitioners and Health Visitors Association and clinical practice as public health nurse.

Penny has co-authored The Oxford Handbook of Non-medical Prescribing for Nurses and Allied Health Professionals with S. Beckwith (2011).

ANTHONY GILBERT

Tony Gilbert is Deputy Head of the School of Social Science and Social Work at Plymouth University, UK. Prior to taking an appointment in higher education, Tony worked for approximately 17 years in health and social care mainly with people with intellectual disability. His research interests are in applied social sciences and social policy where he has been involved in a number of studies in areas such as mental health, safeguarding and the sustainability of community-based organisations.

HENRY GULY

Henry Guly was a Consultant in emergency medicine at Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, retiring in 2011. He qualified in 1974 and, after initially training in general practice, he started in emergency medicine in 1980 and was appointed a Consultant in Wolverhampton in 1983 and moved to Plymouth in 1986. Before he retired he was a civilian consultant in emergency medicine and civilian advisor in resuscitation to the Royal Navy.

KATY LEWIS

Katy Lewis was born in Cornwall, where she completed school and sixth form before gaining a BSc in English and Psychology 1997–2000 at Cardiff University, followed by an MSc in Language Pathology at the University of Reading 2001–2003.

Her first post (2003) was as a Research Speech & Language Therapist (SLT) on a research project for the Peninsula Medical School into the intensity of SLT in post-stroke aphasia.

Her second post (2004) comprised a split between the acute hospital setting and a post-acute neurorehab unit, working with clients post ABI, and some MS, GBS and others.

She was then based solely at the Plym Neurorehab Unit in Plymouth where, barring a brief spell working on a Stroke Unit, she has been ever since.

SUE MOTTRAM

Sue Mottram is Chief Executive of Headway Dorset, a charity for the support and rehabilitation of people with acquired brain injury living in the county of Dorset. At the time of her son’s accident, she was managing a mental health rehabilitation unit in Bournemouth. She is a state registered mental nurse, has a 2.1 honours degree in psychology and a postgraduate degree in personnel management.

ZUHAIR NOORI

Zuhair Noori is a Consultant in Neurorehabilitation in Croydon’s Healthcare Trust for in-patient and community neurorehabilitation and has previously been a consultant neurosurgeon in England and overseas. He holds a Specialist Certificate (CCST) in Rehabilitation, London as well as a Certificate of the European Board in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. He is trained in neurosurgery, spinal cord injuries and spinal disease rehabilitation. He has had training in amputation medicine. His expertise relates to tone, neurological pain and biomechanics of mobility. He also has experience in the neuropsychological aspects of neurological diseases and more specifically in conversion reactions.

SIMON PARFORD

Simon Parford is a member of the Law Society’s Clinical Negligence Specialist Panel and Action Against Medical Accidents Clinical Negligence Specialist Panel.

He has undertaken claimant clinical negligence litigation since 1986 and has specialised exclusively in this area of work since 1991. Specialist areas of interest are child and adult brain injury claims and spinal injury claims. He investigates Brain Injury Claims involving failures and/or delays in diagnosing and/or treatment. He has investigated dozens of such claims and has achieved many multi-million pound settlements; the largest to date being in excess of £6 500 000. These claims are almost always difficult, complicated claims involving complex medical issues and very substantial quantum.

MICHELLE SMITH

Michelle Smith is a Consultant Clinical Neuropsychologist, a full member of the British Psychological Society Divisions of Clinical Psychology and Neuropsychology, and registered with the Health Professions Council. Current clinical practice is part-time at the Wessex Neurological Centre, University Hospital Southampton, with the adult specialist epilepsy surgery team, and at Glenside Hospital and Care Homes leading the psychology service and team for the rehabilitation of adults with acquired brain injuries or progressive conditions, complex care and high dependency, and neurobehavioural programmes. Before this she was Head of the Neuropsychology Rehabilitation and Counselling Services for Neurotrauma and Neurological Disease in Southampton for many years, with clinical experience ranging from acute, and in-patient, to long-term community settings. This experience was, and still is, primarily based on multidisciplinary team collaboration. Current professional interests include epilepsy and surgery, impaired consciousness after acquired brain injury, quality of life in people on long-term mechanical ventilation, with previous research regarding rehabilitation of memory problems in Multiple Sclerosis.

JUDI THOMSON

Judi Thomson qualified as a social worker in 1981 and obtained a Degree in Social Science and a Certificate of Qualification in Social Work. She has worked in a wide range of settings but her core work has been hospital social work. She has worked with adults with disabilities and life threatening illness. She has also worked in local offices in the community and has spent a short time working with children with cancer and their families – a post funded by the Malcolm Sargent Cancer Fund for Children.

Whilst working in hospital she developed an interest in strokes and this led to a post being created dedicated to working with stroke survivors and their carers. It was funded jointly by Health and Social Services and enabled her to carry out a truly multidisciplinary role. She went on to become a Care Coordinator for the Primary Care Trust in the Continuing Health Care team reviewing and assessing eligibility for continuing healthcare and also contributing to multidisciplinary panels.

She then went on to become Carer Support Worker for Headway Dorset where she now remains, supporting carers, families and friends of adults who have an acquired brain injury. She is able to provide support to those with an ABI and help families. Part of her role is to provide education, information and advice but also to assist in navigating the myriad of services which exist and are ever changing. Her background in social work has provided her with extensive knowledge and she feels able to be an effective advocate for anyone who she comes in contact with.

KEVIN TSANG

Mr Kevin King Tin Tsang was born in Hong Kong and read medicine at Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospitals. He is currently working at Frenchay Hospital, Bristol. Previously he worked at Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, as a specialist registrar (ST6) in neurosurgery.

He has also worked in the neurosurgical departments in Queen’s Hospital, Romford, and Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, and also worked with the spine team in Oxford, both at the Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre and at John Radcliffe Hospital.

He has a particular interest in trauma care, both cranial and spinal, and will be looking to further his career in that direction.

ANDREW WARLOW

Andrew Warlow is a Partner and leads the Head and Spinal Injuries Unit at Wolferstans. He specialises in complex, catastrophic injury claims. He is the contact partner for Wolferstans and has been for a number of years on the Headway – The Brain Injury Association Personal Injuries Solicitors List, as well as the Spinal Injuries Association Directory for Personal Injuries Solicitors. He is also the contact partner for Wolferstans in the Child Brain Injury Trust Legal Directory. Andrew is a Fellow of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers and a member of The Law Society’s Specialist Personal Injury Panel.

Andrew is a member of The Management Committee of Headway Plymouth, a local charity promoting awareness of and helping the victims of acquired brain injury and their carers.

PETER WHITFIELD

Peter Whitfield is a Consultant and Associate Professor in Neurosurgery at the South West Neurosurgery Centre, Derriford Hospital/Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth. His interest in neurosurgery was fuelled by undergraduate training in Southampton. He undertook Basic Surgical Training in Glasgow and Winchester before being appointed a Registrar in Cambridge. He was awarded an MRC Clinical Training Fellowship and undertook a PhD on the molecular mechanisms underpinning cerebral ischaemia. He has a longstanding interest in head injury management and is the lead editor of ‘Head Injury: A Multidisciplinary Approach’ (Cambridge University Press). He has a keen interest in surgical training and is the Deputy Chair of the Specialists Advisory Committee in Neurosurgery, a member of the National Neurosurgical Selection Panel and an examiner for the Royal College of Surgeons and the European Association of Neurological Surgeons.

DANIELLE WILLIAMS

Danielle Williams is a senior II occupational therapist at the Royal Hospital for Neuro-disability in Putney, London, specialising in long-term care in disability management of individuals with complex neurological disabilities and is a Bachelor of Science in Occupational Therapy.

Previously she was employed by Headway Dorset for 18 months, following a placement with the organisation during her training and work through the summer as part of the rehabilitation team. The charity is unusual, if not unique in regards to other Headway groups across the UK, in that it has a multidisciplinary team of professionals providing rehabilitation across the county. Working with clients who have survived brain injuries is a challenging and rewarding vocation, and Headway Dorset delivers a fantastic service to its client group. Danielle has found working with the experienced team, including occupational therapists, neurophysiotherapists, neuropsychologists and nurse specialists with decades of experience between them, an excellent learning experience for a newly qualified healthcare professional.

She has a particular interest in the dynamics between the physical, cognitive and psychological challenges experienced by survivors of brain injury, and gets great pleasure from facilitating change and progress in clients’ recovery. She also has a keen interest in vocational rehabilitation, and a strong belief in the health benefits of having a productive role in our society, whether it be paid or otherwise.

Abbreviations

ABCDE

Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability, Exposure and Environment

ABI

Acquired brain injury

A&E

Accident and Emergency Department

ACTH

Adrenocorticotropic hormone

ADH

Antidiuretic hormone

ADL

Activities of living

AMPLE

Allergies, Medication, Past history, Last ate or drank, Events

ARN

Association of Rehabilitation Nurses

ATLS

Advanced trauma life support

ATMIST

Age, Time, Mechanism of injury, Injuries, Signs, Treatment given

BBB

Blood brain barrier

BP

Blood pressure

BSRM

British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine

BSDT

Brain stem death testing

CBF

Cerebral blood flow

CBR

Community-based rehabilitation

CBV

Cerebral blood volume

CN

Cranial nerve

CNS

Central nervous system

CPAP

Continuous positive airways pressure

CPP

Cerebral perfusion pressure

CSF

Cerebrospinal fluid

CT scan

Computerised tomography scan

CVA

Cerebrovascular accident

CVP

Central venous pressure

DH

Department of Health

DAI/TAI

Diffuse axonal injury/Traumatic axonal injury

DVT

Deep vein thrombosis

EBIC

European Brain Injury Consortium

ECF

Extracellular fluid

ECG

Electrocardiogram

ED

Accident and Emergency Department/Casualty

EEG

Electroencephalogram

ESP

Early stimulation programme

ETT

Endotracheal tube

FAST scan  

Focused abdominal sonography for trauma scan

FAM

Functional assessment measure

FIM

Functional independence measure

FSH

Follicle-stimulating hormone

GBS

Guillain-Barré syndrome

GCS

Glasgow Coma Scale

GOS

Glasgow Outcome Scale

HDU

High Dependency Unit

ICF

Intracellular fluid

ICP

Intracranial pressure

↑ICP

Increased intracranial pressure

ICSH

Interstitial cell-stimulating hormone

ICU

Intensive Care Unit

INR

International normalised ratio

IV

Intravenous

LH

Luteinizing hormone

LOC

Level of consciousness

LMA

Laryngeal mask airway

MAP

Mean arterial pressure

MC&S

Microscopy, culture and sensitivity

MRI scan

Magnetic resonance imaging scan

MS

Multiple sclerosis

MSH

Melanocyte-stimulating hormone

MVA

Motor vehicle accident

NANDA-I

NANDA International

NIC

Nursing Interventions Classification

NICE

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence

NOC

Nursing Outcomes Classification

NNN

(NANDA, NIC & NOC)

OPD

Out-patient department

P

Pulse

PCWP

Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure

PCS

Post-concussion syndrome

PEEP

Positive end-expiratory pressure

PEG

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy

PNS

Parasympathetic nervous system

PTA

Post-traumatic amnesia

RAS

Reticular activating system

RNF

Rehabilitation Nursing Foundation

R/RR

Respiration

RCP

Royal College of Physicians

RTA

Road traffic accident

RTC

Road traffic collision

RSI

Rapid sequence induction

SAH

Subarachnoid haemorrhage

SALT

Speech and Language Therapist

SNS

Sympathetic nervous system

T

Temperature

TBI

Traumatic brain injury

TSH

Thyroid-stimulating hormone

UK

United Kingdom

U&E

Urea and electrolytes

USA

United States of America

WHO

World Health Organization

WTE

Whole time equivalent

List of Tables and Figures

TABLES

1

 

Estimated costs in 18–25 year olds experiencing head injury

3.1

 

Comprehensive needs of an individual

5.1

 

Role of the rehabilitation medicine Consultant

10.1

 

Number of A&E attendances for England

11.1

 

Worldwide acceptable blood alcohol content (BAC) levels

11.2

 

Speed limits in the UK

12.1

 

Functions of neuroglia

12.2

 

Hormones of the pituitary gland

12.3

 

Clinical manifestations of cerebellar disease

12.4

 

Cranial nerves

12.5

 

Properties of cerebrospinal fluid

12.6

 

Differences between upper and lower motor neurone lesions

12.7

 

Effects of SNS and PNS on the body

13.1

 

Investigations

14.1

 

List of pharmaceutical agents

15.1

 

Classification of meningitis

15.2

 

Appearance of CSF

16.1

 

Types of primary injuries

16.2

 

Effect on neurochemical mediators

16.3

 

Types of intracranial secondary brain injury

16.4

 

Types of extracranial secondary brain injury

18.1

 

Glasgow Coma Scale categories and scoring system

18.2

 

Eliciting a response to eye opening

18.3

 

Eliciting the verbal response

18.4

 

Eliciting the motor response

18.5

 

Cranial nerves controlling eye movement

18.6

 

MRC grading system

18.7

 

Observation of the respiratory system

18.8

 

Enquiry regarding behaviour patterns

18.9

 

Enquiry regarding memory

18.10

   

Test for signs of agnosia, apraxia and aphasia

18.11

 

Types of agnosia

18.12

 

Types of aphasia

18.13

 

Position of limbs

18.14

 

Muscle tone

18.15

 

Types of involuntary movement

18.16

 

Deep reflexes

18.17

 

Superficial reflexes

21.1

 

Indications for immediate CT scan

21.2

 

Indications for CT scan within 8 hours

22.1

 

Criteria for intubation and ventilation

23.1

 

Nursing care plan

26.1

 

Sequelae of neurotrauma

27.1

 

Minimum staffing for a district specialist in-patient rehabilitation service

27.2

 

Minimum staffing provision for community specialist rehabilitation services

FIGURES

1.1

 

Care pathway for traumatic brain injury

1.2

 

The ‘Slinky’ model of phased rehabilitation

2.1

 

Model of neurotrauma management

2.2

 

Wheel of wellness

2.3

 

Illness–wellness continuum

2.4

 

The Iceberg Model

2.5

 

Model of Wellness

3.1

 

Needs Approach Model

3.2

 

Human needs

3.3

 

Safety and environmental needs

3.4

 

Mentation needs

3.5

 

Respiratory needs

3.6

 

Haemodynamic needs

3.7

 

Communication needs

3.8

 

Psychological/Cognitive needs

3.9

 

Thermoregulation needs

3.10

 

Comfort needs

3.11

 

Fluid needs

3.12

 

Nutritional needs

3.13

 

Elimination needs

3.14

 

Hygiene needs

3.15

 

Skin integrity needs

3.16

 

Dressing needs

3.17

 

Mobility needs

3.18

 

Spiritual needs

3.19

 

Social needs

3.20

 

Leisure and recreation needs

3.21

 

Sexual health needs

3.22

 

Vocational/Educational needs

3.23

 

Rest and sleep needs

5.1

 

The multidisciplinary team

12.1

 

Anterior view of the skull

12.2

 

Superior and right lateral view of the skull

12.3

 

Posterior view of the skull

12.4

 

Lateral view of the skull

12.5

 

Medial view of sagittal section of the skull

12.6

 

Base of the skull

12.7

 

Inferior view of the skull

12.8

 

The meninges

12.9

 

Sagittal section of the brain

12.10

 

Anterior section of the brain

12.11

 

Functional areas of the brain

12.12

 

Graphic demonstrating primary, secondary and association areas of cerebrum

12.13

 

Picture of homunculus

12.14

 

The limbic system

12.15

 

The Circle of Willis

12.16

 

Diagrammatic representation of the Circle of Willis

12.17

 

Venous drainage

12.18

 

Cerebrospinal fluid circulation

12.19

 

Intracranial pressure wave forms

12.20

 

Pressure volume curve

12.21

 

Sympathetic Nervous System showing the pre-ganglionic fibre

12.22

 

Sympathetic Nervous System showing the post-ganglionic fibre

12.23

 

Simple ion exchange

12.24

 

Haemoglobin buffering system

12.25

 

Respiratory control

12.26

 

Kidney reabsorption

13.1

 

CT Scanner

13.2

 

Normal CT Scan

13.3

 

Normal CT Scan

13.4

 

Extraparietal bleed

13.5

 

Intracranial bleed

13.6

 

MRI scanner

13.7

 

Normal MRI scan

13.8

 

Normal MRI scan

13.9

 

Depressed fracture of skull

13.10

 

EEG electrode application

13.11

 

EEG brain activity

13.12

 

ECG machine

13.13

 

Correct placement of ECG leads

13.14

 

Normal ECG

13.15

 

Sinus tachycardia

13.16

 

Normal chest x-ray

13.17

 

Pneumothorax

18.1

 

Picture of pupil sizes

18.2

 

Diagram of optic chiasm

18.3

 

Normal appearance of optic disc

18.4

 

A copy of a neuro-observations chart used at Derriford Hospital, Plymouth

22.1

 

Indications in NICE guidelines for CT scanning in head injury

22.2

 

CT scan showing a right-sided acute subdural haematoma (ASHD) with significant midline shift

22.3

 

CT scan showing petechial haemorrhages at the grey-white margin and in the corpus callosum, in keeping with traumatic axonal injury (TAI)

22.4

 

A post-operative CT scan showing the extent of a decompressive craniectomy

22.5

 

Protocol for control of ↑ICP, South-West, Neurosciences Unit, Plymouth

22.6

 

Graph showing relationship between cerebral blood flow (CBF), arterial pressure (MAP), and autoregulation between 50–150 mm Hg

22.7

 

Schematic diagram showing the contents of the cranium according to the Monro–Kellie doctrine

22.8

 

ICP monitor and probe insertion

22.9

 

Schematic diagram showing the set-up of an external ventricular drain

22.10

   

CT scan showing a patient with bitemporal contusions, worse on the right than the left associated with a thin right-sided acute subdural haematoma

22.11

 

Post-operative CT scan of the same patient as in Figure 22.10 showing satisfactory resolution of the contusions

23.1

 

The role of the nurse

27.1

 

The ICF Model

27.2

 

Extended Needs Approach Model

27.3

 

Extract of objectives related to the need: safety

27.4

 

Extract of prescribed intervention related to the need: safety

27.5

 

Extract of individualised timetable

27.6

 

An example of multidisciplinary record

Section 1

FOUNDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

INTRODUCTION

This book has been designed to empower health and other professionals with applicable knowledge in neurotrauma practice, to support and manage patients, families, carers and communities throughout all stages of a patient’s journey to recovery. This is accomplished using a multidisciplinary approach to facilitate recovery and maximise potential, whatever this level may turn out to be.

The management of patients with neurotrauma has improved over the last decade. This has resulted in patients, who previously would not have survived, surviving their head injuries and requiring extensive rehabilitation (House of Commons 2001). This has had a major effect on the use of available resources (Christensen et al. 2008). Services, including rehabilitation, are neither equitable nor accessible to all neurotrauma patients (Aronow 1987; Beecham et al. 2009; British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine [BSRM] 2008a; Bulger et al. 2002; RCP 2010; United Kingdom Acquired Brain Injury Forum (UKABIF) 2004; Zampolini et al. 2012). Not all patients with moderate or severe head injuries are able to access neurosurgical centres (Treacy et al. 2005). The majority go home, some with a follow-up appointment or a GP referral, others without any follow-up, yet patients requiring rehabilitation should be able to access this at any stage within their journey (RCP 2010).

It is said that the costs for a person injured in a road traffic accident can vary between £35 000 and £60 000 per incident (Beecham et al. 2009) and costs for an injured pedestrian are estimated at £57 400 per incident (Crandall et al. 2002). The estimated cost per patient experience is presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Estimated costs for 18–25 year olds experiencing head injury.

People with neurotrauma may achieve a good recovery. However, a lack of recovery, or partial recovery, may be devastating for them, their families and communities. This book examines the journey related to health, illness and recovery, in particular for neurotrauma. In order to maximise outcome, cost-effectiveness, efficiency and quality of care, it is necessary to accompany the patient along the journey in the primary, secondary and tertiary settings.

Key Objectives
On completion of this section you should be able to achieve the following:
Define neurotrauma.Define the patient’s journey.Describe factors that affect the patient’s journey.Determine how to ensure the patient has a seamless journey regarding neurotrauma.Evaluate the various care pathways for neurotrauma patients.Describe various models of wellness.Apply these models to neuroscience practice.Apply the Needs Approach Model in practice.Determine how using the Needs Approach Model will assist in providing holistic, patient-centred care in a multidisciplinary milieu.Describe effective multidisciplinary management.Describe the role of the neuropsychologist.Describe the techniques one can use to provide a therapeutic milieu.Manage difficult patients.Describe behaviour modification.Describe how to communicate with patients, families and carers.
Ethical/Legal Considerations
Debate the ethical issues related to this section.
Consider and apply the legal and ethical issues highlighted in these chapters to neurotrauma practice:
Patient Charter.Human Rights.Accountability and responsibility.Consent.Confidentiality.Record-keeping.

Chapter 1

The Patient’s Journey

Nadine Abelson-Mitchell

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Education and Society, Plymouth University, Devon, UK

INTRODUCTION

A person is on a journey through life which runs from the ante-natal period to the time of death. It is to be anticipated that, through experience, a person can manage obstacles in their pathway and continue on their journey in a productive and positive manner. This life journey contains a number of pathways. These pathways, such as financial circumstances, interpersonal relationships and health, do not always run smoothly and may lead to various deviations. The health pathway is a continuum of wellness, illness, recovery or death and includes all occasions of ill-health.

Primary prevention is an important aspect of the patient’s journey. Preventing disease or ill-health through early education will decrease morbidity and mortality. A particular pathway along the patient’s journey commences once the patient has been diagnosed with a particular health condition/problem. Unfortunately, due to the nature of neurotrauma, there is seldom a pre-arranged plan in place as there is for elective surgery. This part of the health journey usually comes as a shock and ‘emergency resources’ may need to be called upon to be able to continue the journey. It is important to provide a smooth route throughout the patient’s journey in order to ensure that quality care is provided, decrease stress, increase compliance and decrease deviant or destructive behaviour. The patient’s journey takes place within a particular environment and involves the patient, family and the wider community. It is a journey that needs to be patient-centred and focused on the patient’s perspective, expectations, motivation and behaviour. When considering the journey the patient’s life experience, their strengths, abilities, capabilities and any fears or weaknesses must be considered. The patient’s health journey, interrupted by the neurotrauma, is influenced by a number of existing factors:

The patient:

Age.

Gender.

Pre-existing conditions.

Social practices.

Health status.

The factors:

Peri-natal care.

Environment.

Education.

Family support.

Community support.

Planning the patient’s journey may be referred to as ‘process mapping’ whereby the team and the patient work out the pathway a patient is expected to follow. This requires taking into account all aspects of holisitic, person-centred care that the patient may require, as well as the resources needed to achieve the proposed plan. The team is then able to examine the patient’s situation in terms of patient outcome and consider and identify potential challenges that may occur along the pathway that may hinder achievement of the patient’s goals.

CARE PATHWAYS: POLICIES AND GUIDELINES

Numerous care pathways have been developed to ensure cost-effective, efficient patient care to help create a seamless journey through this episode of altered health. Internationally, specific policies and standards have been developed that focus on neurotrauma throughout the patient’s journey (Espinosa-Aguilar et al. 2008; Seeley et al. 2006; Sesperez et al. 2001; Zampolini et al. 2012). The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) (NICE 2007) has developed guidelines for the management of head-injured patients. The National Service Framework for Long-term Conditions (DH 2005a) has a particular focus on the needs of people with neurological disease and considers some of the generic issues, including rehabilitation, that are of relevance to people with long-term conditions and disabilities. The introduction of these policies addresses some of the inequities for patients requiring rehabilitation (Pickard et al. 2004).

Guidelines have been produced by a number of sources, nationally and internationally, to assist in clinical decision making, prevention, diagnosis and management, including rehabilitation, of patients with neurotrauma. Guidelines make specific practical recommendations based upon rigorous and available scientific data (RCP 2010).

The health professional is responsible and accountable for the quality of care a patient receives. Basic care in today’s climate is often protocol driven, particularly as many basic tasks are undertaken by non-professional personnel under the direct or indirect supervision of registered personnel.

INTEGRATED CARE PATHWAYS

Internationally (Espinosa-Aguilar et al. 2008; Seeley et al. 2006; Sesperez et al. 2001) and nationally (BSRM 2002; BSRM 2008a; 2009; NICE 2007; Royal College of Physicians [RCP] and BSRM 2003) interprofessional, integrated care pathways have been developed to improve the management of patients with neurotrauma and are useful in managing specific issues such as depression (Turner-Stokes et al. 2002).

The National Service Frameworks stress the importance of integrated care pathways in the development of quality healthcare. These pathways, if developed and implemented effectively, will increase interprofessional co-ordination, efficiency of healthcare, reduce sequelae of head injury and reduce healthcare costs (Coetzer 2009; Singh et al. 2012; Vitaz et al. 2001; Zampolini et al. 2012).

Figure 1.1 Care pathway for traumatic brain injury (RCP 2010: p. 28).

Reproduced from: Royal College of Physicians. Medical rehabilitation in 2011 and beyond. Report of a working party. London, RCP, 2010. Copyright © 2010 Royal College of Physicians. Reproduced by permission.

Figure 1.2 The ‘Slinky’ model of phased rehabilitation (RCP and BSRM 2003: p.10).

Reproduced from: Royal College of Physicians and British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine. Rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: National clinical guidelines (Turner-Stokes, L. ed). London, RCP, BSRM, 2003. Copyright © 2003 Royal College of Physicians. Reproduced by permission.

Patients able to access these recommended pathways should experience a seamless transition from incident to home or final destination.

Activity 1.1
Scenario
An 18 year old boy was admitted with a GCS of 14/15 with a scalp injury that required suturing after a skate boarding accident in the park.
Exercise
1. Interview the patient and his mother to gain a picture of the patient’s life journey thus far.
2. Plan a session with the mother and son to decrease the risk of further head injuries.
Activity 1.2
1 Select a patient in the unit who has had neurotrauma (GCS 5/15) and plot the patient’s journey.
2 Are there any aspects related to professional practice that you need to consider in the patient’s journey?
3 Develop a communication plan for patient.
4 Develop a communication plan for family and carers.
Activity 1.3
1 Do you use an integrated care pathway in the unit?
2 If yes, see Chapter 16, Activity 16.1 and describe a possible pathway for Trevor.
3 If no, why does your organisation not use an integrated care pathway?
4 Would you consider developing such a pathway with a team of colleagues?

Chapter 2

Philosophy

Nadine Abelson-Mitchell

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Education and Society, Plymouth University, Devon, UK

INTRODUCTION

Beliefs and values determine the philosophy that underpins the quality of service provided to neurotrauma patients. Neurotrauma practice is an approach, an attitude and a process. The philosophy behind neurotrauma practice is one of ensuring comprehensive quality holistic care that spans all ages and applies to all settings, individuals, families and communities. It is a philosophy that believes in the worth and value of each human being as an individual, family member and member of a community.

A model of care, or a particular approach to care, underpins this philosophy. There are numerous models of care that can be applied to neurotrauma practice. There are models that provide a framework, a logical systematic approach to quality care. The most commonly used are the ‘medical model’ (Mountain and Shah 2008), with a focus on functional ability, and the social model (Sharpf 2002) that encompasses the whole person. In their pure form, most models do not include all that is required in nursing. In order to achieve the goals of nursing an adapted, integrated model (Joubert et al. 2006) of care is appropriate. This integrated model takes into consideration the World Health Organization (WHO) International Classification of Functioning (ICF), Disability and Health components (WHO 2001). The integrated model is a patient-centred model that enables a comprehensive holistic approach to the patient incorporating a multidisciplinary team rather than an illness/disease orientated model.

The focus of the model changes as the patient progresses throughout their journey. Within secondary health services acute and sub-acute management is the priority. As the patient progresses along their journey to tertiary services, the focus changes to a wellness model of care (Hattie et al. 2004; Hettler 1984; Myers and Sweeney 2004; Myers et al. 2000).

The wellness model focuses on health and lifestyle and includes aspects such as:

Holistic health that encompasses the integration of body, mind and spirit.

Making informed choices.

Approaches to wellness.

Facing challenges.

Changing lifestyles.

The WHO (1958: p. 1) defines health as ‘a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being, not merely the absence of disease or infirmity’. This definition enables a holistic approach to healthcare and engenders the concept of wellness. It may require a culture change to embrace a wellness model rather than a disease-based, medical model. The concept of wellness implies that the individual will be proactive, aware of the advantages of a healthy lifestyle and the appropriate health promotion and lifestyle choices to maintain wellness. The wellness model empowers and enables people to progress towards wellness, health and independence; to accept challenges, to encompass integration and creativity, in order to lead a fulfilling life. When all the patient’s needs are in balance the person is in a state of homeostasis and harmony (Figure 2.1). In this respect, primary prevention and health promotion are very important. Should disease or injury occur, the patient’s equanimity of life is disrupted. Once this adverse event has been managed the patient can expect to return to optimal wellness.

Figure 2.1 Model of neurotrauma management.

Wellness, for all patients who have experienced neurotrauma, is the objective of health management. The philosophy behind the wellness model is the patient’s right to wellness and recovery, to enjoy life and to strive for health, safety and wellbeing.

The challenge is how to achieve this state in patients who may have an altered level of consciousness and physical, emotional, psychological and cognitive deficits. The wellness model involves a whole person approach. It implies that it is a holistic approach that includes the physical, psychological, social, spiritual, intellectual, emotional, environmental, educational and leisure needs of the patient (Avery 1996; Kiefer 2008; Wade 2011). It emphasises the holistic view of health. The individual is considered as a unified whole progressing towards high level wellness (Hattie et al. 2004; Hettler 1980; Travis and Ryan 2004). It is about life choices and living a meaningful existence. It enables integrated functioning that maximises an individual’s potential within a particular environment.

A person determines the level of wellness they wish to achieve for the lifestyle choices they make. It is an active choice to pursue optimal health and wellbeing. As this may not be possible in the patient with neurotrauma, inter­vention is planned to empower the patient to achieve and maintain their maximum level of wellness. With today’s technology individuals who survive neurotrauma are faced with the need to significantly adjust their attitudes and approaches to life, to become a leader of the team, control their own destinies and adjust to the real world.

Alternatively, low-level wellness is the inability of the individual to meet their needs in a way that allows for adequate functioning. People with neurotrauma may fall into the ‘sick role’ as opposed to a wellness role. Being sick becomes the focal point of their lives, they function poorly, readily deplete their energy reserves and may slip into a life of submission and dependency.

The Needs Approach Model (NAM) developed by Abelson (Abelson-Mitchell 2006) is based within the framework of a wellness model and incorporates core components of wellness such as physical, psychological, emotional, environmental, lifestyle, social, leisure and independence (Kiefer 2008) (see Chapter 3). The Needs Approach Model is appropriate for use in all care settings as the patient’s needs are determined by the patient, or caregivers in the event that the patient is unable to determine his own needs. The Needs Approach Model can be applied in a primary, secondary or tertiary setting as the needs are relevant to health and wellbeing in primary prevention, acute illness and throughout the process of rehabilitation and recovery.

There are numerous authors who have developed theories of wellness; namely Travis and Ryan (2004), Witmer et al. (1998) and Hettler (1980). These can be related to the wellness model and Needs Approach Model that has been developed (Abelson-Mitchell 2006). Spirituality, psychological and physical dimensions are key to all theorists (Hettler 1984; Kiefer 2008; Myers et al. 2000; Travis and Ryan 2004).

Witmer et al. (1998) developed the ecological Wheel of Wellness (Figure 2.2). Albeit that the theoretical Wheel of Wellness was initially developed for counselling, it can certainly be applied to health. The Wheel of Wellness represents the whole person, body, mind and spirit (Myers et al. 2000). Any change in one aspect of the wheel may lead to change in some or all of the other aspects. Spirituality is at the centre of the wheel and from there the various individual life tasks radiate to the other circles at the edge of the wheel. The Wheel of Wellness includes ‘five life tasks’ namely spirituality, self-direction, work and leisure, friendship and love. Self-direction is further divided into 12 life tasks, namely sense of worth, sense of control, realistic beliefs, emotional awareness and coping, problem solving and creativity, sense of humour, nutrition, exercise, self-care, stress management, gender identity and cultural identity. These 12 life tasks determine the person’s response to the contents of the next wheel which relate to work and leisure, love and friendship. The outer wheel relates to government, media, business, industry, education, community, family and religion (Myers and Sweeney 2008: p. 483). For further details regarding the Wheel of Wellness see www.uncg.edu/ced/jemyers/wellness/docs. In addition, Myers and Sweeney (2004) have developed the Indivisible Self, which underscores the holistic nature of wellness.

Figure 2.2 The wheel of wellness. Witmer, Sweeney and Myers.

Copyright © 1998 J.M. Witmer, T.J. Sweeney, & J.E. Myers.

Travis developed a wellness model for health as a continuum from ill-health to wellness (http//:thewellspring.com/flex/the-wellness-paradigm/1951/) (Figure 2.3).

Figure 2.3 Illness–wellness continuum. www.thewellspring.com.

Travis, Copyright © 2004, 1988, 1972 JW Travis. Reproduced with permission.

Image not available in this digital edition

The continuum has two sections either side of a neutral point. To the left of the neutral point, where disability and illness are represented, treatment is used to manage these issues. To the right of the neutral point, the person is well and attains high-level wellness through awareness, education and growth. The person is perpetually trying to achieve wellness. Achieving high-level wellness requires lifestyle choices, determination and active participation. It is important for a person to establish their position on the continuum. More importantly, when establishing their position they need to consider the direction they wish to follow. The direction should be towards high-level wellness rather than premature death (Travis and Ryan 2004).

With regard to wellness, Travis and Ryan (2004) advocate the Iceberg Model (Figure 2.4) to understand wellness and health.

Figure 2.4 The Iceberg Model. www.mywellnesstest.com/IcebergModel.asp.

Travis © 1978, 1988, 2004 JW Travis. Reproduced with permission.

Image not available in this digital edition

What is visible above the surface is the tip of the iceberg. One needs to look at the rest of the iceberg to discover what is happening below the surface. Travis and Ryan (2004) suggest that there are three levels below the iceberg that need to be considered:

Level I The lifestyle and behavioural level relates to a person’s physical being, eating, exercise, safety and stress management.
Level II The psychological and motivational level helps a person understand their chosen lifestyle and the influence of cultural norms.
Level III The spiritual, being and meaning realm relates to reality, a place within reality, spirituality, philosophy in the unconscious mind and the real meaning of life.

According to Travis and Ryan (2004) it is these three levels that underpin wellness or ill-health.

Hettler (1980) developed a hexagonal six-dimensional model of wellness (Figure 2.5) that includes social, occupational, intellectual, spiritual, physical and emotional aspects of life, wherein he stresses that it is necessary to have balance in all dimensions of life. It is each dimension, as well as all dimensions together, that will determine one’s wellness status and it is important to strive for high-level wellness (Box 2.1).

Figure 2.5 Model of Wellness. Wellness promotion on a university campus, B. Hettler, Family & Community Health 3 (1).

Copyright © 1980 B. Hettler. Reproduced with permission.

- - - - - - - - - -
Box 2.1 Strategies That Can Be Used to Enable High-Level Wellness
1. Maximise assets. Build on the patient’s positive attributes or assets. Patients’ feelings of normality can be increased by building on their physical and psychosocial assets. Patients should be en­­couraged to use their creative talents to engage in activities which match, enhance or exceed their capabilities.
2. Work to reduce limitations and negative factors. Help compensate for negative factors by identifying them and developing strategies to cope with them e.g. using a memory log or an electric wheelchair. Explore ways in which the environment can produce more growth and become less restricting for these patients.
3. Help to use available energy efficiently and conserve energy whilst striving to achieve maximum wellness. Activities must be balanced and paced allowing adequate rest.
4. Assist the patient to become progressively aware of the ramifications of, and the limitations imposed by, challenges and to come to terms with ‘this is the way it is going to be’ and ‘making the best of it’.
5. Resolve external or internal conflicts.
6. Maintain integrity of the patient’s ego. Feelings of ego integrity involve a positive self-concept and self-worth. Enable the patient to gain and use their own personal power. Feelings of empowerment may enable individuals to experience a sense of control and mastery over their lives. Allow patients to accept responsibility for their life, programme, role in society, etc. Avoid intrusions by caregivers and protectors.
7. Achieve maximum level of self-integration. Inspire hope by focusing on and maximising the moment, by living in the present, by appreciating the aesthetics in the environment, by maximising experiences and sustaining relationships and interconnecting with others.
8. Having a positive attitude spreads outwards to others.
- - - - - - - - - -

CONCLUSION

The Needs Approach Model incorporates many of the aspects of the Wheel of Wellness (Myers and Sweeney 2008), the Health–Illness Continuum (Travis and Ryan 2004) and Hettler’s Hexagon Model (Hettler 1980) in a different format. Wellness theories and the Needs Approach Model are concerned with the integration of mind, body and spirit. Wellness is the focus and health and wellness are the first priorities. Belief in the wellbeing and wholeness of an individual is a priority to help them function at maximum capacity and achieve full potential, irrespective of what that level will be; determining and meeting a patient’s needs are the main concerns. Lifestyle and life choices affect happiness and potential for achieving goals.

Activity 2.1
1. Is the care in the Unit based on a medical model, social model or integrated model?
2. Analyse the advantages/disadvantages of the model in current use.
3. Describe how the model in use could be improved.
4. Apply the Witmer, Sweeney and Myers Wheel of Wellness to your practice with neurotrauma patients.
5. How can you use the Wheel of Wellness in practice to improve patients’ lifestyles and choices?
6. Using Travis’s Health–Illness continuum, consider the state of your health.
7. Using Travis’s Health–lllness continuum, consider the state of a patient’s health.
8. Using Travis’s Iceberg Model, consider the state of your health.
9. Use Hettler’s Hexagonal Model to facilitate patient or family understanding of their condition.
10. Include information from the Iceberg Model when considering planning for the patient.
11. Relate Hettler’s concept, Travis’s concept and Witmer, Sweeney and Myers’ concept to the Needs Approach Model.

Chapter 3

The Needs Approach Model

Nadine Abelson-Mitchell

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Education and Society, Plymouth University, Devon, UK

INTRODUCTION

Based on the integrated model of health, and the wellness model, a new model of care called the Needs Approach Model (Figure 3.1) has been developed (Abelson-Mitchell 2006). The model is a patient-focused, needs-led, integrated model of care. The model incorporates aspects of Roper, Logan and Tierney’s model of Activities of Living (Roper et al. 2000), Orem’s model of self-care (Orem 1983) and Maslow’s hierarchy of needs (Maslow 1968).

Figure 3.1 Needs Approach Model.

Reflection
Whilst working in the neurosurgical unit as the ‘clinical teacher’ I overheard a conversation about a patient. The patient had been admitted with an acoustic neuroma. The patient stayed for three days and then discharged himself. The staff were not pleased with the situation but refrained from making further enquiries. On the third occasion when this happened I asked the staff if I could talk to the patient. Whilst talking to the patient I discovered the reason for his leaving the hospital after three days. He had a farm and his wife had had a stroke and he could not leave her for more than three days at a time. He had been assessed by members of the interdisciplinary team yet this had been missed by everyone. How could this important aspect of his life be missed? This incident was the basis for the development of the Needs Approach Model.

WHAT IS A NEED?

Human beings have needs. A need can be defined as an element that is required for the body to maintain physical, psychological and social wellbeing. Needs are what individuals must gratify for normal functions to happen. Humans have certain needs, one of which is the basic requirement to maintain health and wholeness.

STRUCTURE OF THE NEEDS APPROACH MODEL

The Needs Approach Model is comprised of a circle, or wheel, of needs which are represented individually, as well as collectively, in the circle. If one need is affected this may affect other needs within the circle. The Needs Approach Model enables a holistic approach to patient care.

In the circle there are 22 needs relating to the physical, psychological, social, cognitive, spiritual, vocational and educational needs of patients in all settings, including home-based care. Some of the needs have been subdivided to enable appropriate assessment and planning within the overall need, e.g. hygiene. Within the model there is a sector called ‘other’, should an additional need be identified. Within the continuum of health and wellness, needs may be partially or fully achieved. An Extended Needs Approach Model has also been developed for use in community-based rehabilitation (see Chapter 27).

In the model the bio-psycho-social individual is viewed as a self-care agent, the key participant in the attainment of health/wellness and responsible for their own care, where possible. This model views neurotrauma practice and rehabilitation as a process through which an indivi­dual’s movement towards health is facilitated. A dynamic process of planned and adaptive change in lifestyle, as a response to an unplanned change imposed on the individual by disease or traumatic incident. The focus may not be on a cure, but on living with as much freedom as possible, at every stage, and in whichever direction the condition progresses.

It is anticipated that patients will be able to meet their needs independently. Where patients are unable to meet their needs independently, the health team will facilitate the attainment of their needs in a conducive environment.

USE OF THE MODEL

The model is simple to use, and is particularly user-friendly enabling nurses, the interprofessional team, patients, families and carers to continue with care along the patient’s journey (Abelson-Mitchell and Watkins 2006). The Needs Approach Model ensures that neuroscience guidelines and standards are incorporated in practice (National Health Service Institute of Innovation and Improvement 2011a, 2011b; DH 2001a, 2005a, 2010c).

The Needs Approach Model utilises a problem-solving approach to assess, plan, implement and evaluate appropriate needs of the patient. The basic structure for the model is shown in Figure 3.2.

Figure 3.2 Human needs.

ASSESSING THE PATIENT’S NEEDS

Assessment of the patient takes place at various stages along the journey, according to the patient’s needs and health status. A detailed assessment will enable the multidisciplinary team to plan appropriate care, including rehabilitation for the patient. This assessment may include a full central nervous system (CNS) assessment depending on the patient’s needs (Chapter 18).

Whilst it is necessary to initially undertake a comprehensive assessment in order to establish the patient’s needs, it may not be necessary to assess all needs on all occasions. The assessor, together with the team, can decide which needs are relevant to the individual. In order to complete the assessment, depending on the circumstances, it may be necessary to meet family and carers. It is important to maintain confidentiality and respect at all times.

A comprehensive assessment involves history taking, physical examination, evaluating the results of investigations prior to establishing nursing diagnoses, and establishing any real or potential risks that are present.

A comprehensive assessment includes the needs listed in Table 3.1.

Table 3.1 Comprehensive needs of an individual.

Need

Page

Safety and environmental

15

Mentation

16

Respiratory

16

Haemodynamic

17

Communication

17

Psychological/Cognitive

18

Thermoregulation

18

Comfort

19

Fluids

19

Nutrition

20

Elimination

20

Hygiene

21

Skin integrity

21

Dressing

22

Mobility

22

Spiritual

23

Social

24

Leisure/Recreation

24

Sexual

25

Vocational/Educational

25

Rest/Sleep

26

Other

Details and comments of the specific needs are given in Figures 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8,