129,99 €
This book introduces the concept of novel process windows, focusing on cost improvements, safety, energy and eco-efficiency throughout each step of the process.
The first part presents the new reactor and process-related technologies, introducing the potential and benefit analysis. The core of the book details scenarios for unusual parameter sets and the new holistic and systemic approach to processing, while the final part analyses the implications for green and cost-efficient processing.
With its practical approach, this is invaluable reading for those working in the pharmaceutical, fine chemicals, fuels and oils industries.
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 445
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2014
Cover
Related Titles
Title Page
Copyright
Dedication Page
Motivation – Who Should Read the Book!?
Acknowledgments
Abbreviations
Nomenclature
Chapter 1: From Green Chemistry to Green Engineering – Fostered by Novel Process Windows Explored in Micro-Process Engineering/Flow Chemistry
1.1 Prelude – Potential for Green Chemistry and Engineering
1.2 Green Chemistry
1.3 Green Engineering
1.4 Micro- and Milli-Process Technologies
1.5 Flow Chemistry
1.6 Two Missing Links – Cross-Related
References
Chapter 2: Novel Process Windows
2.1 Transport Intensification – The Potential of Reaction Engineering
2.2 Chemical Reactivity in Match or Mismatch to Intensified Engineering
2.3 Chemical Intensification through Harsh Conditions – Novel Process Windows
2.4 Flash Chemistry
2.5 Process-Design Intensification
References
Chapter 3: Chemical Intensification – Fundamentals
3.1 Length Scale
3.2 Time Scale
3.3 Length and Time Scale of Chemical Reactions
3.4 Temperature Intensification
3.5 Pressure Intensification
References
Chapter 4: Making Use of the “Forbidden” – Ex-Regime/High Safety Processing
4.1 Hazardous Reactants and Intermediates
4.2 Ex-Regime and Thermal Runaway Processing
References
Chapter 5: Exploring New Paths – New Chemical Transformations
5.1 Direct Syntheses via One Step
5.2 Direct Syntheses via Multicomponent Reactions
5.3 Multistep One-Flow Syntheses
5.4 Multistep Syntheses in One Microreactor/Chip
5.5 Multistep Syntheses in Coupled Microreactors/Chips
References
Chapter 6: Activate – High-T Processing
6.1 Tailored High-T Microreactor Design and Fabrication
6.2 Cryogenic to Ambient – Allowing Fast Reactions to be Fast
6.3 From Reflux to Superheated – Speeding-Up Reactions
6.4 Solvent-Scope Widening by Virtue of Pressurizing Existing High-T Reactions
6.5 New Temperature Field for Product and Material Control
6.6 Energy Activation Other than Temperature – Photo, Electrochemical, Plasma
References
Chapter 7: Press – High-p Processing
7.1 Tailored High-p Microreactor Design and Fabrication
7.2 High Pressure to Intensify Interfacial Transport in Gas–Liquid Reactions
7.3 Pressure as Direct Means – Activation Volume Effects and More
7.4 Pressure for Advanced Fluidic Studies – to be Used for Shaping Materials and More
References
Chapter 8: Collide and Slide – High-c and Tailored-Solvent Processing
8.1 Batch Process-Based Inspirations for High-c Flow Processes
8.2 Solvent-Free or Solvent-Less Operation – “Highest-c”
8.3 Supercritical Fluids to Combine the Former Separated – Mass Transfer Boost
References
Chapter 9: Doing More by Combining – Process Integration
9.1 Integration of Reaction and Cooling/Heating, Separation, or Other
9.2 Integration of Process Control and Sensing
9.3 Thermal Integration on a Process Level
9.4 Integration of Units on Racks, Backbones, Frames, Interfaces, or Similar Level
9.5 Fully Intensified/Flow Process Development
References
Chapter 10: Doing the Same with Less – Process Simplification
10.1 Omitting the Use of a Catalyst
10.2 Simplifying Separation
References
Chapter 11: Implications of NPW to Green and Cost Efficient Processing
11.1 Introduction
11.2 Knowledge-Based Design of Future Chemistry – Coupling the Implementation of NPW with Evaluation and Decision Support Tools
11.3 Evaluation Methods
11.4 Evaluation of the NPW Concept Impact on Sustainability
11.5 Future Environmental and Economic Sustainability Evaluation in the Context of Flow-Chemistry under NPW Conditions
References
Chapter 12: From Milligrams to Kilograms – Scale-Up in Modular Flow Reactors
12.1 Reactor Types
12.2 Scale-Up Parameters
12.3 Numbering-Up
12.4 Single-Channel Operation
12.5 Methodology for Continuous-Flow Process Development
12.6 Conclusions
References
Chapter 13: Evolution of Novel Process Windows
13.1 Multifaceted Novel Process Windows: Evolution
13.2 High-p,T Commercial Flow Chemistry Equipment
13.3 Funding Agency Initiatives
References
Chapter 14: Scientific Dissemination of Novel Process Windows
14.1 Literature Share for Chemical Intensification
14.2 Literature Share for Process-Design Intensification
References
Chapter 15: Outlook
15.1 Process Automation
15.2 Means of Activation Other than High-Temperature, High-Pressure, High-Concentration, and High-Solvent
References
Index
EULA
XVII
XVIII
XIX
XXI
XXIII
XXIV
XXV
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
16
17
18
19
20
21
23
22
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
87
86
88
89
91
92
93
95
94
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
182
181
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
219
218
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
229
227
228
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
Cover
Table of Contents
Chapter 1: From Green Chemistry to Green Engineering – Fostered by Novel Process Windows Explored in Micro-Process Engineering/Flow Chemistry
Figure 1.1
Figure 1.2
Figure 1.3
Figure 1.4
Figure 1.5
Figure 2.1
Figure 2.2
Figure 2.3
Figure 2.4
Figure 2.5
Figure 2.6
Figure 2.7
Figure 3.1
Figure 3.2
Figure 3.3
Figure 3.4
Figure 3.5
Figure 3.6
Figure 3.7
Figure 3.8
Scheme 3.1
Scheme 3.2
Figure 4.1
Scheme 4.1
Scheme 4.2
Scheme 4.3
Figure 4.2
Scheme 4.4
Scheme 4.5
Scheme 4.6
Scheme 4.7
Scheme 4.8
Scheme 4.9
Scheme 4.10
Scheme 4.11
Figure 4.3
Scheme 4.12
Figure 5.1
Scheme 5.1
Scheme 5.2
Scheme 5.3
Scheme 5.4
Scheme 5.5
Figure 5.2
Figure 5.3
Figure 5.4
Scheme 5.6
Scheme 5.7
Figure 5.5
Scheme 5.8
Scheme 5.9
Figure 5.6
Figure 5.7
Scheme 5.10
Scheme 5.11
Figure 5.8
Figure 5.9
Figure 5.10
Scheme 5.12
Figure 5.11
Scheme 5.13
Scheme 5.14
Scheme 5.15
Scheme 5.16
Figure 5.12
Figure 5.13
Figure 5.14
Figure 5.15
Scheme 5.17
Scheme 5.18
Figure 5.16
Figure 5.17
Figure 5.18
Figure 6.1
Figure 6.2
Figure 6.3
Figure 6.4
Figure 6.5
Figure 6.6
Scheme 6.1
Scheme 6.2
Scheme 6.3
Scheme 6.4
Scheme 6.5
Figure 6.7
Figure 6.8
Scheme 6.6
Scheme 6.7
Scheme 6.8
Figure 6.9
Figure 6.10
Scheme 6.9
Figure 6.11
Scheme 6.10
Figure 6.11
Figure 6.12
Scheme 6.12
Figure 6.13
Scheme 6.13
Scheme 6.14
Figure 6.14
Figure 6.15
Scheme 6.15
Scheme 6.16
Scheme 6.17
Figure 6.16
Figure 6.17
Figure 6.18
Figure 6.19
Figure 6.20
Scheme 6.18
Figure 6.21
Figure 7.1
Figure 7.2
Figure 7.3
Figure 7.4
Scheme 7.1
Figure 7.5
Scheme 7.2
Scheme 7.3
Figure 7.6
Figure 7.7
Figure 8.1
Scheme 8.1
Scheme 8.2
Scheme 8.3
Figure 8.2
Figure 8.3
Scheme 8.4
Figure 8.4
Figure 8.5
Figure 8.6
Scheme 8.5
Figure 8.7
Scheme 8.6
Scheme 8.7
Figure 8.8
Figure 8.9
Figure 8.10
Figure 8.11
Figure 8.12
Scheme 8.8
Figure 8.13
Figure 8.14
Figure 8.15
Scheme 8.9
Figure 8.16
Figure 9.1
Figure 9.2
Figure 9.3
Figure 9.4
Figure 9.5
Figure 9.6
Figure 9.7
Figure 9.8
Figure 9.9
Figure 9.10
Figure 9.11
Figure 9.12
Figure 9.13
Figure 9.14
Figure 10.1
Figure 10.2
Figure 10.3
Scheme 10.1
Scheme 10.2
Figure 11.1
Figure 11.2
Figure 11.3
Figure 11.4
Figure 11.5
Figure 11.6
Figure 11.7
Figure 11.8
Figure 11.9
Figure 11.10
Figure 11.11
Scheme 11.1
Scheme 11.2
Figure 11.12
Figure 11.13
Figure 11.14
Scheme 11.3
Figure 11.15
Figure 11.16
Figure 11.17
Figure 11.18
Figure 11.19
Figure 11.20
Figure 11.21
Figure 11.22
Scheme 11.4
Figure 11.5
Figure 11.23
Figure 11.24
Figure 11.25
Figure 11.26
Scheme 11.6
Scheme 11.7
Figure 11.27
Scheme 11.8
Figure 11.28
Figure 11.29
Figure 11.30
Figure 11.31
Figure 11.32
Scheme 11.9
Figure 11.33
Scheme 11.10
Figure 11.34
Scheme 11.11
Figure 11.35
Figure 11.36
Figure 11.37
Figure 11.38
Figure 12.1
Figure 12.2
Figure 12.3
Figure 12.4
Figure 12.5
Figure 12.6
Figure 12.7
Figure 12.8
Figure 12.9
Figure 12.10
Figure 12.11
Figure 12.12
Scheme 12.1
Figure 12.13
Figure 12.14
Figure 12.15
Figure 12.16
Figure 12.17
Figure 12.18
Scheme 12.2
Figure 12.19
Figure 12.20
Figure 12.21
Figure 12.22
Figure 12.23
Figure 12.24
Figure 12.25
Figure 12.26
Figure 13.2
Figure 13.1
Figure 13.3
Figure 13.4
Figure 13.5
Figure 14.1
Figure 14.2
Figure 14.3
Figure 14.4
Figure 14.5
Figure 14.6
Figure 14.7
Figure 15.1
Figure 15.2
Scheme 15.1
Scheme 15.2
Scheme 15.3
Figure 15.3
Figure 15.4
Table 1.1
Table 1.2
Table 3.1
Table 4.1
Table 6.1
Table 6.2
Table 8.1
Table 8.2
Table 8.3
Table 11.1
Table 11.2
Table 12.1
Table 13.1
Hessel, V., Renken, A., Schouten, J.C., Yoshida, J. (eds.)
Micro Process Engineering
A Comprehensive Handbook
2009
Print ISBN: 978-3-527-31550-5
(Also available in a variety of digitial formats)
Kashid, M.N., Renken, A., Kiwi-Minsker, L.
Microstructured Devices for Chemical Processing
2015
Print ISBN: 978-3-527-33128-4
(Also available in a variety of digitial formats)
Reniers, G.L., Sörensen, K., Vrancken, K. (eds.)
Management Principles of Sustainable Industrial Chemistry
Theories, Concepts and Industrial Examples for Achieving Sustainable Chemical Products and Processes from a Non-Technological Viewpoint
2013
Print ISBN: 978-3-527-33099-7
(Also available in a variety of digitial formats)
Sanchez Marcano, J.G., Tsotsis, T.T.
Catalytic Membranes and Membrane Reactors
Second Edition
2009
Print ISBN: 978-3-527-32362-3
(Also available in a variety of digitial formats)
Volker Hessel, Dana Kralisch, and Norbert Kockmann
The Authors
Prof. Dr. Volker Hessel
Technische Universiteit Eindhoven
Den Dolech 2
5600 Eindhoven
Netherlands
Dr. Dana Kralisch
Friedrich Schiller University
Institut für Technische Chemie & Umweltchemie
Lessingstr. 12
07743 Jena
Germany
Prof. Dr. Norbert Kockmann
TU Dortmund
Fakultät Bio- und Chemieingenieurwesen
Emil-Figge-Str. 68
44227 Dortmund
Germany
All books published by Wiley-VCH are carefully produced. Nevertheless, authors, editors, and publisher do not warrant the information contained in these books, including this book, to be free of errors. Readers are advised to keep in mind that statements, data, illustrations, procedural details or other items may inadvertently be inaccurate.}
Library of Congress Card No.: applied for
British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek
The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at <http://dnb.d-nb.de>.
© 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA,
Boschstr. 12, 69469 Weinheim, Germany
All rights reserved (including those of translation into other languages). No part of this book may be reproduced in any form – by photoprinting, microfilm, or any other means – nor transmitted or translated into a machine language without written permission from the publishers. Registered names, trademarks, etc. used in this book, even when not specifically marked as such, are not to be considered unprotected by law.
Print ISBN: 978-3-527-32858-1
ePDF ISBN: 978-3-527-65485-7
ePub ISBN: 978-3-527-65484-0
Mobi ISBN: 978-3-527-65483-3
oBook ISBN: 978-3-527-65482-6
Windows Provide Panoramas
Novel ProcessWindows are a chance to explore new horizons for processing industry. Glass windows of churches initially were Romanic style, being small and protective, as long as constructional engineering was hampered by raw material manufacture, heat losses, and mechanical constraints.With improvements on the engineering side, they turned to the large, ornament-style gothic windows exposing the interior with sunlight giving rise to metaphysical illumination.
This book may be approached by two kinds of readers
with background knowledge in microreactors and process intensification in general which want a further deeping in a central enabling function in for these areas
without such background knowledge and primary interest in flow processing, yet with interest in green chemistry and green engineering. The aim is to get to know the key enabling function of flow processing and to transfer that knowledge to advanced green batch processing and synthesis.
Novel Process Windows as defined in this book need microreactors to be performed in the best way. Yet, the general approach – in the same way as given for process intensification, as defined below – can provide learning also for other advanced chemical synthesis and processing, including with other advanced chemical apparatus.
For the second class of readers, a short summary is given below on microreactors, for the first class on process intensification and green processing. The references help to find more comprehensive information in case more deeper and widespread information is wanted. Both classes of readers may check the summaries they are familiar with as well, for consistency and completeness.
There are several books on micro process engineering, including those written or edited by the authors of this book. These books provide enabling the basic engineering enabling functions for flow chemical synthesis and processing such as the increased mass and heat transfer. Yet, knowing this without having considered the information here is like studying formula-1 racing cars, their construction principles and capabilities, however, to operate them still with normal tankstation fuel. In terms of such a picture, this means to run expensive, much advanced equipment under much reduced performance.
Microreactors as used under such boundary conditions still have many advantages as given below. Yet, they have one prime disadvantage (apart from blocking sensitivity) which is their short contact time as an intrinsic feature. Organic reactions as we know are typically processed on much longer times. One the one side, there is seconds scale, and on the other side, often hours and days scale – seemingly a misfit.
Indeed, it was prognosed from industrial microreactor experts that
only 20% of all organic reactions are suitable for flow
under such transfer-intensified operation (see citation [1] in Chapter 2).
Using the approach provided in this book gives a further enabling chemical-sided push so that the authors roughly estimate that
>70% of all organic reactions may become suitable for flow
that is, in a timescale which is appropriate to microreactors. The price for this is a demanding and laborious reinvention of chemistry beyond the green chemistry needs. This must honestly be stated.
Yet, there will be payback for this. The second process-sided push does allow – on an industrial scale – to truly benefit from such an advantage in application expansion.
For both reasons, not considering this book's knowledge does lead to an incomplete picture first of all in modern flow chemistry and micro processing engineering – yet finally also in green chemistry, green engineering, and process intensification. Thus, the authors believe to hopefully provide one more essential brick in the whole scenario of modern advanced and sustainable processing.
1. Roberge, D.M., Ducry, L., Bieler, N., Cretton, P., and Zimmermann, B. (2005)
Chem. Eng. Technol.
,
28
, 318–323.
Volker Hessel gratefully acknowledges funding provided by the Advanced European Research Council Grant “Novel Process Windows – Boosted Micro Process Technology” under grant agreement number 267443. He also acknowledges financial support from the Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt. He likes to thank Tobias Illg for assistance with the preparation of Sections 3.1 and 3.2. Volker Hessel likes to thank IMM (Mainz, Germany) and Eindhoven University of Technology (The Netherlands) for offering the opportunities to work on the field of Novel Process Windows. This involves in particular Holger Loewe, Josef Heun, Patrick Loeb, Gunther Kolb, and Frank Hainel (all from IMM) and Jaap Schouten, Hans Niemantsverdriet, and Laurent Nelissen (all from TU Eindhoven).
Dana Kralisch gratefully acknowledges the support of Ina Sell in all aspects of Life Cycle Cost analyses.
Norbert Kockmann likes to acknowledge the help and support of Lonza colleagues, notably Dominique Roberge, for fruitful discussions on micro reactor development and application. He wants also to thank Christian Bramsiepe from TU Dortmund University, now INVITE GmbH in Leverkusen, for intensive discussions on modularization.
AP
acidification potential
BOC
chemical protecting group,
tert
-butyloxycarbonyl
CED
cumulative energy demand
DMP
dimethoxypropane
EDL
electron diffusion layer
EHS
environment, health and safety
EP
ecotoxicity potential
GWP
global warming potential
HTP
human toxicity potential
LCA
life cycle assessment
LCC
life cycle costing
LCIA
life cycle impact assessment
LCI
life cycle inventory
LU
land use
NMP
n
-methylpyrrolidone
NP
eutrophication potential
NPV
net present value
ODP
(stratospheric) ozone depletion potential
POCP
(tropospheric) photochemical ozone creation potential
RA
risk assessment
RTD
residence time distribution
SLCA
simplified life cycle assessment
THF
tetrahydrofuran
Green Chemistry is since about 20 years an approach which is meanwhile quite established in chemical research and education [1]. Experts predict a fast-paced growth of the market for Green Chemistry-type processing, from $2.8 billion in 2011 to $98.5 billion in 2020 (Pike Research study [2]). Finally – yet probably not before the next 20 years – experts expect this to eliminate the need for Green Chemistry as an own approach, since it will be identical to the chemistry in the future. Anastas and Kirchhoff [3] bring this to the point in “Origins, Current Status, and Future Challenges of Green Chemistry” as follows.
The revolution of one day becomes the new orthodoxy of the next.
Green Engineering followed somewhat later and just recently came out the shadow of “its big brother.” The implementation of that idea in the chemical industry proceeds now steadily, yet for reasons of complexity of the chemical processes, unavoidably at a slow rate. Today, only 10% of the current process technologies employed on industrial scale can be considered environmentally benign. It is estimated that another 25% could be made so. That leaves room for exploring and discovering the residual 65% of industrial process technology and to render them sustainable [4].
That means that there is still a considerable need to improve the enabling technologies which render chemical synthesis and chemical processes green. Under the umbrella of process intensification, microreaction technology and flow chemistry are prime enablers on the reactor and process side (see later in this chapter for citations). They help to improve current Green Chemistry approaches and in addition even give opportunities to develop new Green Chemistry concepts, which are not possible with conventional equipment. On top of that, micro- and milli-continuous processing provides a more straightforward way to upscale new green ideas. Seeing the last paragraph and the achieved 10% penetration, this is obviously still an open issue.
In continuation of the above given aphorism, this book shall open a window from Green Chemistry to Green Engineering as follows.
The revolution in the chemical laboratory needs to stimulate and bridge to the sustainability evolution on the full-production scale. [5]
Driven by political as well as societal demands, sustainability aspects gain increasing importance in all areas of human beings. Chemical production of compounds, for example, textiles, construction, ingredients in food and cosmetics, packaging, pharmaceuticals, and so on, covers more or less all aspects of human needs. The resulting extensive impact on our environment and consumption of depletable resources distinctly demands for the most efficient use of raw materials and energy. Pollution has to be prevented or at least minimized at the source to avoid end-of-pipe treatments.
New concepts have to come off with significant benefits, for example, in yield, selectivity, heat management, waste reduction, to become an environmentally benign alternative to the state of the art. Also, the environmental burdens of any reaction component, auxiliaries, and energies, obtained during upstream processes, as well as all downstream processes involved have to be taken into account.
All this has stimulated an on-going and total rethinking how to change the elemental pathways of chemical synthesis design, which has become a large movement and created an own scientific filed and society known as Green Chemistry. While processes in the past were guided by economic, technical, and safety criteria, it is now becoming increasingly obvious and a to-do-must to have considered environmental criteria from the very beginning of the process development – which is the creative intuition of the organic chemist how to conceptually approach synthetic chemistry.
In one sentence, Green Chemistry was defined as follows [2].
Green chemistry is the utilization of a set of principles that reduces or eliminates the use or generation of hazardous substances in the design, manufacture, and application of chemical products.
In kind of tabellaric goal definition, Green Chemistry was defined as follows [1b, p. 30].
Prevention
Atom economy
Less hazardous chemical syntheses
Designing safer chemicals
Safer solvents and auxiliaries
Design for energy efficiency
Use of renewable feedstocks
Reduce derivatives
Catalysis
Design for degradation
Real-time analysis for pollution prevention
Inherently safer chemistry for accident prevention.
Essentially, one can reduce that to three major incentives which are to optimize the type of feedstock, its efficiency in conversion, and the safety while doing so (derived from own thoughts and [2]).
Feedstock
: A shift to renewable (non-petroleum) feedstocks
Efficiency
: (i) make maximal use of starting materials (reactants) and minimize waste; (ii) minimize solvent load; and (iii) minimize energy efficiency
Safety
: have maximal process safety and minimize toxicity (to human).
Ideally, supposed-to-be nongreen reagents just vanish from the chemical protocol by using a new chemical route such as given for GSK (Glaxo-Smith-Kline)'s green Friedel–Crafts alkylations [6]. Manifold applications have been demonstrated with respect to modern synthetic strategies, alternative solvents, renewable resources, catalysis, and environmental-friendly enzymatic catalysis in flow [1c-e, 7].
In 2005, the American Chemical Society (ACS) Green Chemistry Institute (GCI) and global pharmaceutical companies established the ACS GCI Pharmaceutical Round-table to motivate for integration of Green Chemistry and Engineering into the pharmaceutical industry [8]. This Roundtable developed a list of key research areas in green chemistry in 2007. In 2010, the Roundtable companies have identified a list of the key green engineering research areas that is intended to be the required companion of the first list. The companies involved were Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Dutch State Mines/De Staats Mijnen (DSM), Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca, and Merck (US).
Ten key green engineering research areas were ranked in relevance (see Table 1.1). The issues 6–10 match with what is understood under process-design intensification in this book – (6) life-cycle analysis, (7) integration of chemistry and engineering, (8) scale-up, (9) process energy intensity, and (10) mass and energy integration. The key areas 1–5 in Table 1.1 refer partly to chemical intensification.
Table 1.1 Ten prime green engineering research areas as identified by ACS GCI Pharmaceutical Round Table (reproduced with permission)
Rank
Main key areas
Sub-areas/aspects
1
Continuous processing
Primary, secondary, Semi-continuous, and so on
2
Bioprocesses
Biotechnology, fermentation, biocatalysis, GMOs
3
Separation and reaction technologies
Membranes, crystallizations, and so on
4
Solvent selection, recycle, and optimization
Property modeling, volume optimization, recycling technologies, in process recycle, regulatory aspects, and so on
5
Process intensification
Technology, process, hybrid systems, and so on
6
Integration of life cycle assessment (LCA)
Life cycle thinking, total cost assessment, carbon/eco-foot printing, social LCA, stream lines tools
7
Integration of chemistry and engineering
Business strategy, links with education, and so on
8
Scale-up aspects
Mass and energy transfer, kinetics, and others
9
Process energy intensity
Baseline for pharmaceuticals, estimation, energy optimization
10
Mass and energy integration
Process integration, process synthesis, combined heat and power, and so on
Adapted with permission from [8]. Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society.
A product-design view is provided by the 12 Principles of Green Engineering which were proposed by Anastas and Zimmerman [9]. Sustainability is here approached in a hierarchical crossover between the molecular, product, process, and system levels.
Inherent rather than circumstantial
Designs of chemical processes shall be so much efficient and nonhazardous as possible. Example is a process to synthesize organic solvents from sugars, which has replaced many more hazardous solvents such as methylene chloride (Argonne National Laboratory). The very low energy input, high efficiency, elimination of large volumes of salt waste allows to reduce pollution and emissions.
Prevention instead of treatment
The production of waste shall be prevented rather than planning process including waste treatment.
Design for separation
The quest of energy and material efficiency is not only to be put on reaction but rather on separation and purification processes as well. Example is the use of supercritical CO2, nearcritical water, and CO2-expanded liquids, which in addition comprise nontoxic substitutes for conventional solvents.
Maximize efficiency
It shall be aimed at maximum efficiency in terms of mass, energy, space, and time. Example is a highly efficient family of catalysts to synthesize high-performance polymers from CO and CO2.
Output-pulled versus input-pushed
Outputs (“pull”) should be removed from the system, rather than adding more input stresses (“push”) to minimize the energy and material consumption.
Conserve complexity
Different from the system design issue given in (5), the product design shall be complex. Idea is that the products then can have longer reuse times through better recycling than given for less complex products.
Durability rather than immortality
Product design shall guarantee for the product lifetime, but no longer to avoid environmental problems. Example is cellulose acetate, which is used for the filters of cigarettes. Their decomposition after use took years in the past. This could be substantially improved by incorporation of weak organic acids in the material. These are released with rain water and degrade the cellulose acetate much quicker.
Meet need, minimize excess
The production amount should be set just to meet the needs and not to result in over-production that creates wastes and is costly.
Minimize material diversity
Recycling and reusing is much facilitated when fewer materials compose a product. Example is a “unibody” piece of aluminum laptop frame that considerably reduced the product's weight and allowed for easy recycling (Apple Inc).
Integrate material
and energy flows
The utilization of waste energy and material flows can be used to improve the efficiency of another part of the production process. Example is the use of CO2 to replace traditional blowing agents for the production of polystyrene foam sheets. The CO2 used came from existing commercial processes as a waste by-product or from natural sources (Dow Chemical Company).
Design for commercial “afterlife”
Selection of materials or components of a process, product, or system should head for reusability and keeping high value after fulfilling their initial product function.
Renewable rather than depleting
With a similar intention, renewable sources should be used for energy, materials, or reagents, wherever possible. Example is a water-based, catalytic process for producing gasoline, jet fuel, or diesel from biomass with little external energy consumption (Virent Energy Systems Inc).
Micro- and milli-process technologies refer to (chemical) processing with reactors and other equipment with open internals in the micro (<1 mm) or milli (a few millimeters) range [10–12]. These devices provide the following functions:
guide and structure flows;
predetermine mass and heat transfer in single and multiple phase;
define and reduce the volume;
carry functional coatings and elements such as catalyst layers or membranes.
Microreactors typically comprise one or (many) more microchannels, and may also encase chambers, column/fin arrays, foams, nets, and fibers, and so on [10–12]. It is for most of these microstructures characteristic that they are artificial and engineering-made, typically by means of precision engineering or microfabrication, as opposed to nano- or microsized reaction compartments mimicking nature's cells or other organizational units such as supramolecular assemblies (micelles, vesicles, etc.). In expansion of this fabrication-related definition, also formerly existing reactor concepts, for example, monoliths, foams, and mini fixed beds as well as even capillaries, are subsumed under the umbrella of the new technology.
Microreactors are defined as check card, thin sized reactors with small outer dimensions, not exceeding a few centimeters (see Figure 1.1) [13]. These are typically made by classical microfabrication techniques based on photolithography, thin-film coating, and etching steps so that the preferred materials are glass, silicon, and polymers. Characteristic internal dimensions are typically in the range of 50–1000 µm.
Figure 1.1Glass chip microreactor with mixer and elongated serpentine channel for reaction; from Chemtrix (a). Such chip reactors are embedded in a flow chemistry environment consisting of pumps, a microreactor holder with heating function and feed/collecting reservoirs, if needed, also a back-pressure valve for high-p experimentation; from Chemtrix (b).
(Reproduced with permission from Chemtrix).
Microstructured reactors have larger outer dimensions, especially concerning their length and width, while the internals are miniaturized (see Figure 1.2) [13]. These are typically made in stainless steel, but also in glass. For both, etching technologies can be used for microstructuring. Steel microstructured reactors are also accessible through precision engineering (micromilling, cutting, embossing, and more), laser machining, and micro-electro discharge machining (μEDM). Laboratory microstructured reactors are typically fist-size and below. Pilot- and production-scale reactors may be shoebox size or even approach extensions in the meter range.
Figure 1.2 Split-recombine micromixers have dedicated microchannel structures due to their mixing principle based on repeated flow splitting – caterpillar micromixer from ICT-IMM with smooth (“3D”) upwards and downwards sloping (left). Typically, such mixers are assembled as (screwed) two-plate structures.
(Reproduced with permission from ICT-IMM).
The same classification can be applied to milli-reactors and millistructured reactors, which are the dimensional extension of the devices given above. Such reactors that are designed for larger throughput and are less prone to failure, for example, by clogging, but certainly also with lower performance potential. Milli-process technologies often use commercial capillaries and tubes with millimeter internal measurements, sometimes being filled with foams or fibers as structured packings.
Microreactors and microstructured reactors (as well as their milli counterparts) are typically scaled-up by two means:
Numbering-up
: internally via parallel channels in plates and via parallel plates with channels (see
Figure 1.3
); externally via parallel devices;
Smart scale-out
: moderate increase in channel dimensions.
Figure 1.3 Flow production unit with internally numbered-up microreactor, at the right lower side of the plant; Plantrix system from Chemtrix.
(Reproduced with permission from Chemtrix).
The first concept has the charm of equaling-up the geometries and finally reaction conditions (mixing, hydrodynamics, heat transfer) from lab to production scale. It is especially applied towards gas-phase and multi-phase reactions. Gas-phase reactions benefit from comparatively easy means (diffuser/pressure barrier) for flow distribution. In case of multi-phase reactions, the maintenance of the flow pattern from lab- to production-scale is crucial; thus, the concept of smart scale-out will most often not be applicable. In case of liquid reactions, both the numbering-up and smart scale-out approaches are applied. Concerning the latter, Lonza Company has developed an extreme, but effective, version by making the whole flow development from lab to production scale within one reactor or even one channel passage and having that in three steps (lab, pilot, production) smartly increased [14]. The latter also reduces the fouling sensitivity.
Ten key research areas of synthetic flow chemistry were identified and provided a deeper understanding into current and future issues in the field [10]c. Comparing these flow essentials with the three intensification fields, as discussed in this book, shows that both views have overlapping contents (see Table 1.2). This clearly shows that issues on chemical intensification have a major role currently in the overall development.
Table 1.2 Ten key research areas in flow chemistry [10]c, which match with the three intensification fields, introduced in the next chapter
Issue
Key characteristics
Intensification field
1
Size matters – micro versus minifluidic (or mesofluidic) reactors
Transport
2
Residence time, flow rate, and reactor volume – key factors in flow chemistry
Transport
3
Flow, heat, and pressure – a crucial relationship
Transport
4
Flow and reactive intermediates – a classical application
Chemical
5
Flow and supported reagents
Chemical
6
Flow and supported catalysts – an ideal match
Chemical
7
Flow and multicomponent reactions
Chemical
8
Flow and photochemistry – new options
Chemical
9
Flow and multistep synthesis – mimicking nature
Process-design
10
Flow, scale up and industrial application – think big
Process-design
There is a missing link between Green Chemistry and Green Engineering. Different approaches for green improvements of chemical syntheses pathways and process technologies have been followed by chemists and engineers during the last two decades, but often independently from each other. Whereas “Green Chemistry” approaches have been primarily apprehended as new chemical synthesis strategies [1] applying alternative solvents [2], chemistry based on renewable resources [3] or yield and selectivity improvements by catalysis [4], Green Engineering approaches have been put on a level with the design of novel equipment and new processing methods [5], using multifunctional reactors, new operating modes, or micro-process technology for process improvement and intensification [6]. Since environmental issues affect many disciplines, cross-disciplinary interaction is essential for success. Otherwise, undesired impacts are shifted from one domain to another, and well-intentioned green developments result in unexpected surprises. In the past, a lot of false decisions already emerged by concentrating only on the optimization of the chemical synthesis itself or by focusing on single principles of green process design, neglecting inconvenient aspects and missing broader implications.
One solution for this missing link was already been assigned to micro-process engineering and flow chemistry. Certainly, this is not the only solution and other solutions may be at hand as well. The citation and exploitation numbers show clearly that this is a prime concept (see Chapter 14).
Yet, there is a second missing link and this has been addressed already in the Motivation statement, placed directly before this first chapter. Microreactors as mostly used about 5 years ago had (and often still have) one prime disadvantage which is their short contact time given as an intrinsic feature. Organic reactions as we know are typically processed on much longer times. One the one side, there is seconds scale, on the other side often hours and days scale – seemingly a misfit.
In this context, this book aims to show how the novel equipment – micro-/flow reactors – allows to reach new operating modes – Novel Process Windows – which open novel opportunities in chemistry and overcome the above-mentioned dilemma (see Figure 1.4).
Figure 1.4Schematic representation of Novel Process Windows. A more detailed description is provided in the coming chapters.
(Hessel et al. [15]; reproduced with permission from Wiley-VCH).
Novel Process Windows can then result in a much improved sustainability footprint via a full-chain oriented and multifunctional process design. Such technology innovation is expected to improve the cost structure of chemical industry and has many other advantages concerning product flexibility, product quality, process development time, and more. It is thus important to point out that Novel Process Windows combines chemical and engineering perspectives.
The book is organized as given in Figure 1.5 which provides a hierarchic approach to implement green ideas on all development stages in chemical process development (from top to down in the said figure) and names also their evaluation method counterparts and the achieved process intensification result (from left to right).
Figure 1.5 Combined approach of Novel Process Windows process design and accompanying life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC).
(Kralisch et al. [15]; reproduced with permission from Wiley-VCH).
This results then in the following five-leveled hierarchy and interrelation of chapter packages and is the backbone of the book structure.
Chapters
1–3: Here, the industrial and society needs are translated into the knowledge-based design approaches for synthesis and processing (Chapter 1). Then, it is shown how this can be used for door-opening functions in chemistry in an entirely new way (Chapter 3). A theoretical assessment is done in Chapter 3 to have the foundation for the knowledge-based design.
Chapters
4–8: Here, the fundamental challenges and chances of the new door-opening concept are given to reach in praxis-intensified flow chemistry which relates to green metrics
Chapters
9, 10: On a higher-complexity (holistic) process level, it will be demonstrated how these process windows change the chemical plant as a whole. Herein, process chemistry, engineering, and chemistry will merge.
Chapters
11, 12: This ends in a demonstration that the technique is beneficial for society through sustainability benefits and mature for chemical industry.
Chapter
13: While the demonstration of the superiority of the concept of Novel Process Windows remains the task of the future, some first summary of 5-years achievement in terms of scientific dissemination and project exploitation is given here as a kind of concluding chapter and outlook.
1. (a) Anastas, P.T. (2010)
Tetrahedron
,
66
, 1026–1027; (b) Anastas, P.T. and Warner, J.C. (1998)
Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice
, Oxford University Press, New York.Green Chemistry – catalysis: (c) Kidwai, M. (2010) in
Handbook of Green Chemistry, Set 1: Green Catalysis
(ed R.H. Crabtree), Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, pp. 81–92; (d) Hintermair, U., Francio, G., and Leitner, W. (2011)
Chem. Commun.
,
47
, 3691–3701; (e) Bandgar, B.P., Gawande, S.S., and Muley, D.B. (2010)
Green Chem. Lett. Rev.
,
3
, 49–54.
2. Navigant Pike Research Study,
www.navigantresearch.com/research/green-chemistry
(accessed 13 May 2014).
3. Anastas, P.T. and Kirchhoff, M.M. (2002)
Acc. Chem. Res.
,
35
(2), 686–694.
4. Warner Babcock Institute for Green Chemistry
www.warnerbabcock.com/green_chemistry/about_green_chemistry.asp
(accessed 13 May 2014).
5. Ecochem
http://ecochemex.com/10-business-reports-sustainability/?utm_campaign=newsletter&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=10063171&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-_VsH7jI_2lajp5XBWx7Aa6IFPsa8pHdxuvG7zKtmFStXYXVa9i_y7itsILNiGtN-cjeYRJXrXoMegm_t9EwHc00YCj7w&_hsmi=10063171
(accessed 13 May 2014).
6. Wilkinson, M.C. (2011)
Org. Lett.
,
13
, 2232–2235.
7. Green Chemistry – new chemical synthesis strategies: (a) Fischmeister, C. and Doucet, H. (2011)
Green Chem.
,
13
, 741–753; (b) Savage, P.E. and Rebacz, N.A. (2010),
Water Under Extreme Conditions for Green Chemistry
. vol. 5, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, pp. 331–361; (c) Reinhardt, D., Ilgen, F., Kralisch, D., Koenig, B., and Kreisel, G. (2008)
Green Chem.
,
10
, 1170–1181;Green Chemistry – renewable resources(d) Le, R.V., Dupe, A., Fischmeister, C., and Bruneau, C. (2010)
ChemSusChem
,
3
, 1291–1297; (e) Jones, M.D. (2010)
Catal. Met. Complexes
,
33
, 385–412; (f) Ilgen, F., Ott, D., Kralisch, D., Reil, C., Palmberger, A., and Koenig, B. (2009)
Green Chem.
,
11
, 1948–1954;Green Chemistry – environmental friendly enzymatic catalysis in flow:(g) Urban, P.L., Goodall, D.M., and Bruce, N.C. (2006)
Biotechnol. Adv.
,
24
, 42–57; (h) Asanomi, Y., Yamaguchi, H., Miyazaki, M., and Maeda, H. (2011)
Molecules
,
16
, 6041–6059; (i) Bolivar, J.M., Wiesbauer, J., and Nidetzky, B. (2011)
Trends Biotechnol.
,
29
, 7.(j) Fornera, S., Kuhn, P., Lombardi, D., Schliter, A.D., Dittrich, P.S., and Walde, P. (2012)
ChemPlusChem
,
77
, 98–101; (k) Pohar, A., Plazl, I., and Žnidarši Plazl, P. (2009)
Lab Chip
,
9
, 3385–3390; (l) Kundu, S., Bhangale, A., Wallace, W.E., Flynn, K.M.
et al
. (2011)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
,
133
, 6006–6611.
8. Constable, D.J.C., Jimenez-Gonzalez, C., and Henderson, R.K. (2007)
Org. Process Res. Dev.
,
11
, 133–137.
9. (a) Anastas, P.T. and Zimmerman, J.B. (2003)
Environ. Sci. Technol.
,
37
(5), 94A–101A; (b) Mulvihill, M.J., Beach, E.S., Zimmerman, J.B., and Anastas, P.T. (2011)
Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour.
,
36
, 271–293.
10. For a selection of reviews which deal with micro process technologies and flow chemistry: (a) Noel, T. and Buchwald, S.L. (2011)
Chem. Soc. Rev.
,
40
, 5010–5029; (b) Hartman, R.L., McMullen, J.P., and Jensen, K.F. (2011)
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
,
50
, 7502–7519; (c) Wegner, J., Ceylan, S., and Kirschning, A. (2011)
Chem. Commun.
,
47
, 4583–4592; (d) Glasnov, T.N. and Kappe, C.O. (2011)
J. Heterocycl. Chem.
,
48
, 11–30; (e) Webb, D. and Jamision, T.F. (2010)
Chem. Sci.
,
1
, 675–680; (f) Cukalovic, A., Monbaliu, J.-C.M.R., and Stevens, C.V. (2010)
Top. Heterocycl. Chem.
,
23
, 161–198; (g) Frost, C.G. and Mutton, L. (2010)
Green Chem.
,
12
, 1687–1703; (h) Hartman, R.L. and Jensen, K.F. (2009)
Lab Chip
,
9
, 2495–2507; (i) Geyer, K., Gustafsson, T., and Seeberger, P.H. (2009)
Synlett
, 2382–2391; (j) Fukuyama, T., Rahman, M.T., Sato, M., and Ryu, I. (2008)
Synlett
,
2
, 151–163; (k) Ley, S.V. and Baxendale, I.R. (2008)
Chimia
,
62
, 162–168; (l) Wiles, C. and Watts, P. (2008)
Eur. J. Org. Chem.
,
2008
, 1655–1671; (m) Mason, B.P., Price, K.E., Steinbacher, J.L., Bogdan, A.R., and McQuade, D.T. (2007)
Chem. Rev.
,
107
, 2300–2318; (n) Geyer, K., Codee, J.D.C., and Seeberger, P.H. (2006)
Chem. Eur. J.
,
12
, 8434–8442; (o) Kirschning, A., Solodenko, W., and Mennecke, K. (2006)
Chem. Eur. J.
,
12
, 5972–5990; (p) Jaehnisch, K., Hessel, V., Löwe, H., and Baerns, M. (2004)
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
,
43
, 406–446; (q) Hessel, V. and Löwe, H. (2003)
Chem. Eng. Technol.
,
26
, 13–24; (r) Hessel, V. and Löwe, H. (2003)
Chem. Eng. Technol.
,
26
, 391–408; (s) Hessel, V. and Löwe, H. (2003)
Chem. Eng. Technol.
,
26
, 531–544; (t) Jensen, K.F. (2001)