3,99 €
If you look at society, the economy, and armed conflicts today, you can only conclude that there are more and more conflicts on our planet. Individuals rule over millions of people, but not exactly in their best interests. Whether some of this can be prevented is more than questionable. I have documented my views on this here. This is not to say that you agree with them, but rather it should give you much more food for thought.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2025
Foreword
Far be it from me to attack anyone here or to judge anyone. Rather, it is my view of things, as I interpret it below. It may well be that one or the other thinks that this is a radical view of things. But sometimes it seems to me that you bury your head in the sand. Not reacting will solve itself. I believe that this thread runs through the entire writing. As I said, this is not paternalism of anyone, but my opinion on various things at home and abroad.
How should one interpret the conversation between the two Presidents Trump and Zelensky? The fact is that 3 years ago Russia attacked its neighboring state for no apparent reason and there was massive destruction. When a sovereign state, such as Ukraine, defends itself, it is in the interest of every country to protect its territory. It cannot be ruled out that this will lead to enormous costs. But what would have happened if this state had not been provided with the most necessary weapons and money. It is obvious that the Russian president had miscalculated a bit. It's just that this man was wrong about his goals. Now, through various sanctions against the aggressor, this has also burdened its own economy in the meantime. This raises the question of how long its population will follow if a large part of the state revenues lead to this absurd war. But it is also not exactly expedient what the American president says at the meeting with Zelensky. His approval of the Russian president only fuels the mood between the individual countries and poses a great danger to our globe. How can such power-hungry heads of state be restricted?
In Italy, for example, people are thinking aloud about reactivating the generation of electricity through nuclear energy after 35 years. But what science has dealt with the disposal of radioactive material? To date, there is no technology that can safely dispose of 100 percent of this material. In addition, it should also be noted that this type of electricity generation is the most expensive way to generate electricity. And who comes back to Handkuss, the end customer, who then has to pay this higher price. There is talk of the Green Deal and the phase-out of fossil fuels, but what do you see there? There is an enormous amount to be achieved in the field of alternative energies, but it should not be done with slogans, but it should also be carried out. However, this phenomenon can not only be seen in Italy, but many other countries are thinking about it. It is doubtful whether such approaches will make our globe worth living in for future generations. The natural disasters of recent times show us very well that something must be tackled in this area very soon. If we continue to watch our climate warm up without doing anything about it.
Tausende von E-Books und Hörbücher
Ihre Zahl wächst ständig und Sie haben eine Fixpreisgarantie.
Sie haben über uns geschrieben: