104,99 €
A practical guide to stem cell-based regenerative techniques in dogs
Stem Cell-Based Regenerative Medicine in Canine Practice delivers an essential reference for the use of stem cells in canine practice. Intuitively organized by organ and body systems, the book is easy-to-follow, and addresses many common conditions encountered when dealing with dogs in veterinary practice, including those affecting the central nervous system, muscular system, and vascular system.
The book is grounded in evidence-based research and readers are provided with guidance on the potential challenges and problems that may arise when considering and using stem cell therapeutics. It also explains the techniques for stem cell extraction and how to use stem cell regenerative medicine for the best results.
Readers will also find:
Written for veterinarians in general practice, Stem Cell-Based Regenerative Medicine in Canine Practice will also benefit veterinary students and researchers.
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 1134
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2025
Cover
Table of Contents
Title Page
Copyright Page
About the Author
Foreword
Preface
Abbreviations
About the Companion Website
1 Canine Mesenchymal Stem Cells Sources, Properties, and Regulations for Clinical Use
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Understanding the Stem Cell
1.3 Sources of Dog MSCs for Proliferation
1.4 Why Do We Need to Culture Mesenchymal Stem Cells?
1.5 Why to Characterize MSCs?
1.6 Factors Affecting MSCs Therapeutic Outcome
1.7 Stem Cell Regulations in Research and Therapeutics
References
2 Osteoarthritis
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Predisposing Factors
2.3 OA Pathogenesis
2.4 MSCs and Their Potential Therapeutic Role in OA
2.5
In Vivo
MSCs Studies
References
3 MSCs in Canine Bone Tissue Engineering
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Bone Regeneration
3.3
In Vivo
Studies
References
4 Muscle, Tendon, and Ligament Affections
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Why Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Not Tendon Stem/Progenitor Cells (TSPCs)?
4.3
In Vivo
Studies
4.4 Muscle Studies
References
5 Peripheral Nerve Affections
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Peripheral Nerve Injury
5.3 Why MSCs and Not Schwann Cells for Nerve Regeneration
5.4
In Vivo
Peripheral Nerve Injury Studies
References
6 Central Nervous System Affections
6.1 Introduction
6.2 CNS Intrinsic Regeneration Potential
6.3 Exogenous Stem Cell Therapy
References
7 Myocardial and Valvular Diseases
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Why MSCs in Cardiac Diseases?
7.3
In Vivo
MSCs Therapeutic Studies in Dogs
References
8 Oral and Esophageal Affections
8.1 Introduction
8.2 Oral Mucosal Ulcers
8.3 Periodontal Disease
8.4 Maxillary Alveolar Bone Cleft Model
8.5 Peri‐implant Defect Models
8.6 Esophagus
References
9 Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Anal Furunculosis
9.1 Introduction
9.2 Why Mesenchymal Stem Cells
9.3
In Vivo
Studies
References
10 Liver Affections
10.1 Introduction
10.2 Regenerative Medicine in Canine Hepatology
10.3
In Vivo
Liver Regenerative Studies
10.4 Hepatocutaneous Syndrome
References
11 Lung Affections
11.1 Introduction
11.2 MSCs Potential Therapeutic Effects
11.3
In Vivo
Studies
References
12 Renal Insufficiency and Urinary Bladder Affections
12.1 Introduction
12.2
In Vitro
Renal Studies
12.3
In Vivo
Renal Studies
12.4 Urinary Bladder
References
13 Skin Wounds and Atopic Dermatitis
13.1 Introduction
13.2
In Vivo
Skin Wound‐Healing Studies Using MSCs
13.3 Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
References
14 Diabetes
14.1 Introduction
14.2
In Vitro
Studies
14.3
In Vivo
Studies
References
15 Corneal Ulcers and Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca
15.1 Introduction
15.2 Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) Versus Corneal/Limbal Stem Cells
15.3 Corneal Affections
15.4 Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca (KCS)
References
Index
End User License Agreement
Chapter 2
Table 2.1 Dog preclinical experimental chondral defect models evaluating me...
Table 2.2 Dog preclinical experimental femoral osteochondral defect and tro...
Table 2.3 Dog
in vivo
MSCs preclinical experimental studies on joint tissue...
Table 2.4 Clinical studies on evaluation of mesenchymal stem cells therapeu...
Table 2.5 Clinical studies on evaluation of MSCs therapeutic effect on oste...
Table 2.6 Clinical studies on evaluation of MSCs therapeutic effect on oste...
Table 2.7 Clinical studies on evaluation of MSCs therapeutic effect on dysp...
Chapter 3
Table 3.1 Experimental studies on femoral bone defect in dogs using mesench...
Table 3.2 Experimental studies on radial and ulnar bone defect in dogs util...
Table 3.3 Experimental studies on tibial bone defects in dogs using mesench...
Table 3.4 Experimental studies on healing of mandibular bone defects and cl...
Table 3.5 Dog
in vivo
clinical studies on various bone affections using mes...
Chapter 4
Table 4.1 Dog
in vivo
preclinical experimental studies on flexor tendon mod...
Table 4.2 Dog
in vivo
preclinical experimental studies on dog infraspinatus...
Table 4.3 Dog
in vivo
MSCs clinical studies on tendinopathy of gastrocnemiu...
Table 4.4 Dog
in vivo
clinical studies on cranial cruciate ligament rupture...
Table 4.5 Dog
in vivo
clinical studies on muscle affections evaluating heal...
Chapter 5
Table 5.1 Preclinical experimental studies on regeneration of dog sciatic n...
Table 5.2 Preclinical experimental studies on regeneration of resected dog ...
Table 5.3 Preclinical experimental study on regeneration of ulnar nerve def...
Chapter 6
Table 6.1 Dog clinical studies on canine distemper evaluating the therapeut...
Table 6.2 Dog preclinical experimental studies evaluating mesenchymal stem ...
Table 6.3 Dog preclinical experimental studies evaluating mesenchymal stem ...
Table 6.4 Clinical studies on spinal cord injuries (SCIs) in dogs evaluatin...
Table 6.5 Dog Clinical intervertebral disc disease (IVDD)/herniation studie...
Chapter 7
Table 7.1 MSCs preclinical experimental studies on dog myocardial infarctio...
Table 7.2 MSCs preclinical experimental studies on biological pacemakers in...
Table 7.3 MSCs clinical studies on cardiomyopathy and valvular diseases in ...
Chapter 8
Table 8.1 Preclinical experimental studies on induced oral mucosal ulcers i...
Table 8.2 Preclinical experimental studies in periodontal disease involving...
Table 8.3 Preclinical experimental studies on furcation defects in dogs
Table 8.4 Preclinical experimental studies in periodontal disease involving...
Table 8.5 Preclinical experimental studies on esophageal mucosal resection ...
Chapter 9
Table 9.1 Clinical studies on inflammatory bowel disease and anal furunculo...
Chapter 10
Table 10.1 MSCs preclinical experimental studies on acute and chronic liver ...
Chapter 11
Table 11.1 Preclinical experimental studies on dog cardiopulmonary bypass m...
Chapter 12
Table 12.1 MSCs preclinical experimental studies on renal injury and bladde...
Table 12.2 Clinical studies on chronic kidney disease and Fanconi syndrome ...
Table 12.3 Urinary bladder resections evaluating therapeutic role of mesenc...
Chapter 13
Table 13.1 Preclinical experimental studies on full‐thickness skin wounds i...
Table 13.2 Clinical studies on skin wounds in dog evaluating mesenchymal st...
Table 13.3 Preclinical and clinical studies on atopic dermatitis in dog eva...
Chapter 14
Table 14.1 Preclinical experimental studies on diabetes in dog using evalua...
Table 14.2 MSCs clinical studies on insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus in ...
Chapter 15
Table 15.1 Clinical studies of dog corneal affections treated with mesenchy...
Table 15.2 Clinical studies on keratoconjunctivitis in dogs treated with me...
Chapter 1
Fig. 1.1 Sources of stem cells from initial fertilization to the adulthood o...
Fig. 1.2 Sources of mesenchymal stem cells and their characterization on the...
Chapter 2
Fig. 2.1 Predisposing factors of osteoarthritis in dogs.
Fig. 2.2 Osteoarthritis in dogs mediated through cartilage: role of inflamma...
Fig. 2.3 Osteoarthritis in dogs mediated through cartilage: role of growth f...
Fig. 2.4 Osteoarthritis in dogs mediated through cartilage: role of receptor...
Fig. 2.5 Osteoarthritis in dogs mediated through synovitis: role of inflamma...
Fig. 2.6 Osteoarthritis in dogs mediated through subchondral bone: role of e...
Fig. 2.7 Factors affecting mesenchymal stem cells chondrogenic potential.
Fig. 2.8 Therapeutic mechanisms that mesenchymal stem cells may offer in ost...
Fig. 2.9 Percentage of different experimental osteoarthritis models conducte...
Fig. 2.10 Percentage of different clinical osteoarthritis studies in dogs ev...
Chapter 3
Fig. 3.1
Ex vivo
osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal dog stem cells th...
Fig. 3.2
In vivo
bone healing potential of mesenchymal stem cells in differe...
Fig. 3.3
In vivo
osteogenic healing potential of mesenchymal stem cells in d...
Chapter 4
Fig. 4.1 Three‐stage process of affection in tendon and ligament: reactive, ...
Fig. 4.2 Comparative analysis of stem/progenitor cells of tendon or ligament...
Fig. 4.3 Growth factors and their effect on mesenchymal stem cell tenogenesi...
Fig. 4.4 (A) Differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells into tenocyte‐like ce...
Fig. 4.5 Percentage of different tendinopathy models in dogs that are evalua...
Fig. 4.6 Number of clinical studies utilizing mesenchymal stem cells in tend...
Fig. 4.7 Number of clinical studies utilizing mesenchymal stem cells in trau...
Chapter 5
Fig. 5.1 Neuron and its different parts including soma (cell body), axon, an...
Fig. 5.2 Schematic representation of different grades of nerve injuries as p...
Fig. 5.3 Nerve regeneration in low‐grade peripheral nerve injuries involving...
Fig. 5.4 Role of Schwann cells in peripheral nerve regeneration.
Fig. 5.5 Pie chart showing different peripheral nerve injury models conducte...
Chapter 6
Fig. 6.1 Schematic diagram showing
ex vivo
differentiation of mesenchymal st...
Fig. 6.2 Potential therapeutic effects that mesenchymal stem cells may impar...
Fig. 6.3 Pie chart shows two types of stem cells (MSCs and OESCs) that are u...
Fig. 6.4 The pie chart shows different types of canine spinal cord injury mo...
Fig. 6.5 The pie chart shows mesenchymal stem cells are clinically evaluated...
Chapter 7
Fig. 7.1 Mesenchymal stem cells therapeutic properties:
ex vivo
differentiat...
Fig. 7.2 Experimental cardiac regeneration models conducted in dogs using me...
Fig. 7.3 Clinical trials for different cardiac ailments conducted in dogs us...
Chapter 8
Fig. 8.1 List of different oral affections in dogs that are evaluated for th...
Fig. 8.2 Pie chart showing a number of studies conducted on a particular ora...
Fig. 8.3 Pie chart showing esophageal affections and the number of studies c...
Chapter 9
Fig. 9.1 Different forms of chronic enteropathies in dogs. Inflammatory bowe...
Fig. 9.2 (A) It shows the co‐ordination of the epithelial mucosal barrier, i...
Fig. 9.3 Anal furunculosis pathogenicity and features in dogs.
Fig. 9.4 The figure demonstrates why mesenchymal stem cells are preferred fo...
Fig. 9.5 Number of studies conducted in dogs that evaluate mesenchymal stem ...
Chapter 10
Fig. 10.1 Schematic diagram showing different manipulation techniques employ...
Fig. 10.2 Experimental studies conducted in dogs evaluating MSCs’ therapeuti...
Chapter 11
Fig. 11.1 Effect of microenvironment on mesenchymal stem cell properties and...
Fig. 11.2 Potential therapeutic effects that the rejuvenated or extra‐lung m...
Chapter 12
Fig. 12.1 Two different regenerative medicine methods undertaken for renal a...
Fig. 12.2 Internal repair potential in kidney is attributed either to dediff...
Fig. 12.3 Four different
ex vivo
methods to differentiate mesenchymal stem c...
Fig. 12.4 Pie chart showing number of different renal models that evaluate m...
Chapter 13
Fig. 13.1 Pic chart showing number of clinical full‐thickness skin wound mod...
Fig. 13.2 Pic chart showing number of experimental and clinical studies on a...
Chapter 14
Fig. 14.1 Diabetes‐related data in canine population. Around 1.2% prevalence...
Fig. 14.2
Ex vivo
differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells into insulin‐pro...
Fig. 14.3 Pie chart showing
in vivo
experimental and clinical studies on dia...
Chapter 15
Fig. 15.1 Comparative analysis of corneal/limbal stem cells and the mesenchy...
Fig. 15.2 Potential therapeutic effects that may be offered by mesenchymal s...
Fig. 15.3 Pie chart showing various, although very limited, corneal affectio...
Fig. 15.4 Pie chart showing the number of keratoconjunctivitis sicca clinica...
Cover Page
Table of Contents
Title Page
Copyright Page
About the Author
Foreword
Preface
Abbreviations
About the Companion Website
Begin Reading
Index
WILEY END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT
iii
iv
xiii
xiv
xv
xvi
xvii
xix
xx
xxi
xxii
xxiii
xxiv
xxv
xxvi
xxvii
xxviii
xxix
xxx
xxxi
xxxii
xix
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
Mudasir Bashir Gugjoo
Division of Veterinary Clinical ComplexFaculty of Veterinary Sciences & Animal HusbandrySher-e-KashmirUniversity of Agricultural Sciences and Technologyof KashmirShuhama, Alusteng, Srinagar, Jammu and KashmirIndia
This edition first published 2025© 2025 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial intelligence technologies or similar technologies. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, except as permitted by law. Advice on how to obtain permission to reuse material from this title is available at http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions.
The right of Mudasir Bashir Gugjoo to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with law.
Registered Office(s)John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USAJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd, New Era House, 8 Oldlands Way, Bognor Regis, West Sussex, PO22 9NQ, UK
For details of our global editorial offices, customer services, and more information about Wiley products visit us at www.wiley.com.
The manufacturer’s authorized representative according to the EU General Product Safety Regulation is Wiley‐VCH GmbH, Boschstr. 12, 69469 Weinheim, Germany, e‐mail: [email protected].
Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats and by print‐on‐demand. Some content that appears in standard print versions of this book may not be available in other formats.
Trademarks: Wiley and the Wiley logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and/or its affiliates in the United States and other countries and may not be used without written permission. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book.
Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of WarrantyWhile the publisher and authors have used their best efforts in preparing this work, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this work and specifically disclaim all warranties, including without limitation any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives, written sales materials, or promotional statements for this work. This work is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a specialist where appropriate. The fact that an organization, website, or product is referred to in this work as a citation and/or potential source of further information does not mean that the publisher and authors endorse the information or services the organization, website, or product may provide or recommendations it may make. Further, readers should be aware that websites listed in this work may have changed or disappeared between when this work was written and when it is read. Neither the publisher nor authors shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages.
Library of Congress Cataloging‐in‐Publication DataNames: Gugjoo, Mudasir Bashir, author.Title: Stem cell‐based regenerative medicine in canine practice / Mudasir Bashir Gugjoo.Description: Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 2025. | Includes bibliographical references and index.Identifiers: LCCN 2024058459 (print) | LCCN 2024058460 (ebook) | ISBN 9781394253258 (hardback) | ISBN 9781394253272 (adobe pdf) | ISBN 9781394253265 (epub)Subjects: MESH: Dog Diseases–therapy | Stem Cell Transplantation–veterinary | Tissue Engineering–veterinary | Regenerative Medicine–methodsClassification: LCC SF991 (print) | LCC SF991 (ebook) | NLM SF 991 | DDC 636.70896–dc23/eng/20250213LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2024058459LC ebook record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2024058460
Cover Design: WileyCover Images: © Mudasir Bashir Gugjoo
Dr. Mudasir Bashir Gugjoo, PhD, is a distinguished faculty member at Sher‐e‐Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Kashmir (SKUAST‐K), specializing in Veterinary Surgery and Radiology. He completed his doctoral studies in Veterinary Surgery and Radiology at the Indian Veterinary Research Institute (IVRI), Izatnagar, focusing on stem cell‐based therapeutics. Dr. Gugjoo has been widely recognized for his contributions to veterinary science, receiving multiple accolades, including awards for best paper presentations and faculty teaching. His academic journey was supported by prestigious fellowships, such as the Junior and Senior Research Fellowships from the Indian Council for Agricultural Research (ICAR), funding his master’s and doctoral studies.
Currently, Dr. Gugjoo's research is funded by the Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB) and the Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Government of India (GoI). His laboratory focuses on exploring the regenerative potential of mesenchymal stem cells and developing innovative tissue‐engineered biomaterials aimed at regenerating bone, cartilage, wounds, peripheral nerves, and corneal ulcers. He has successfully mentored numerous master's and doctoral students in regenerative medicine and organized several workshops and hands‐on training sessions, sponsored by SERB and the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), GoI.
Dr. Gugjoo and his team have led pioneering advancements in regenerative medicine, developing tissue‐engineered constructs for cartilage, bone, corneal ulcers, and specialized skin creams. In veterinary cardiology, they have established standardized echocardiographic parameters and indices for different canine breeds. Additionally, his team has refined a sonographic technique to accurately diagnose specific brain parasites, advancing diagnostic capabilities in veterinary medicine.
Dr. Gugjoo has an extensive body of work, having authored over 70 peer‐reviewed publications and written and edited books on stem cell research in veterinary science with both national and international publishers. He has contributed chapters to various academic books and frequently writes columns in newspapers. In addition to his research and teaching, he has been an active member of scientific societies, participated in faculty improvement programs, and served as a resource person in conferences and workshops. His work has been cited in leading veterinary texts and journals, and he also contributes as an editor and reviewer for peer‐reviewed journals and research funding proposals.
It is a pleasure to write a foreword for the book Stem Cell‐Based Regenerative Medicine in Canine Practice, authored by Mudasir Bashir Gugjoo. Veterinary medicine has witnessed remarkable advancements over the past few decades, with regenerative medicine emerging as a beacon of hope for treating various clinical conditions in our canine companions. This book delves into the transformative potential of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in addressing a myriad of health issues that afflict dogs.
The author has meticulously compiled and presented comprehensive insights into the therapeutic mechanisms of MSCs, highlighting their ability to differentiate ex vivo and their therapeutic effects in vivo. This book covers a wide spectrum of clinical conditions affecting different tissues and organs, offering a detailed exploration of how MSCs can be harnessed to promote healing and regeneration.
From osteoarthritis to tendinopathies, from liver affections to neurological disorders, and from immune affections to infections, the potential applications of MSCs are vast and varied. The authors provide a thorough examination of both experimental and clinical studies, showcasing the promising results and the challenges that lie ahead in this rapidly evolving field. The book also puts to rest the media reports of hyped‐up claims of miraculous cures from stem cells that currently lack scientific backing.
As we stand on the cusp of a new era in veterinary medicine, this book serves as an invaluable resource for veterinarians, researchers, and students alike. It not only underscores the scientific advancements but also emphasizes the practical applications and future directions of stem cell‐based therapies in canine practice. Moreover, in numerous cases, dogs are used as model animals for human translational studies; the literature and treatments developed therefrom for humans can also become therapeutic options for dogs. This cross‐species relevance highlights the “One Health” principle, which emphasizes the interconnectedness of animal, human, and environmental health.
Dr. Mudasir Bashir Gugjoo, the author of this book, brings a wealth of knowledge and experience to the table. His dedication to advancing veterinary medicine and his pioneering work in the field of regenerative therapies have been instrumental in shaping this comprehensive guide.
I am confident that this book will inspire and guide not only those dedicated to improving the health and well‐being of companion pets but also the ones interested in stem cell biology. The journey of regenerative medicine is just beginning, and this book is a testament to the incredible potential that lies ahead.
Nazir Ahmad Ganai
Vice Chancellor, SKUAST‐K
In today’s world, pet owners are more determined than ever to provide the best possible care for their animals. While regenerative medicine is not yet a cure‐all, it holds great promise for alleviating some of the common clinical issues faced by canines. Stem cell‐based therapies, in particular, are generating interest for their potential to offer new solutions in veterinary medicine. However, the rapidly growing and diverse body of literature on this topic can make it challenging for veterinarians, researchers, and even pet owners to grasp the current state of regenerative medicine and its therapeutic possibilities.
This book aims to fill a significant gap by addressing the common clinical conditions in canines that could benefit from regenerative medicine, with a special focus on stem cell‐based therapies. It provides a thorough discussion of the problems and limitations in current treatment approaches and explores how regenerative medicine utilizing stem cells, with or without the use of biomaterials, could offer new hope in canine practice. The book reviews the existing literature on the therapeutic potential of stem cells in canines, bringing an evidence‐based perspective to the table.
While much of the available literature on regenerative medicine is focused on human medicine, there is a pressing need for a comprehensive guide dedicated to veterinary applications—especially for dogs. While the author’s previous works have covered stem cell therapeutics in veterinary medicine, this book is unique in its focus on canine clinical practice, making it an essential, one‐stop reference for anyone interested in the subject.
Designed primarily as a reference guide for veterinary practitioners, stem cell researchers, and students, this book will also serve as an informative resource for medical professionals and pet owners eager to understand the potential of stem cell‐based regenerative medicine. By highlighting the limitations in current treatments and the gap between laboratory research and practical applications, this book aims to inspire future research and advance the field of regenerative medicine for the benefit of canine health.
18
F‐FDG:
F‐fluorodeoxyglucose
2D:
2‐Dimensional
3‐D:
3 dimensional
4HNE:
4‐Hydroxynenonal
5‐Aza:
5‐Aza‐2′‐deoxycytidine
5‐HT:
Serotonin
99m
Tc‐MIBI:
99m
Tc‐sestamibi
99mTcO4−:
99mTc‐pertechnetate
ABCG2:
ATP‐binding cassette (ABC) transporters
AC:
Adenylate cyclase
ACI:
Autologous chondrocyte implantation
ACM:
Acellular matrix
ACTA2:
Actin alpha 2
AD:
Adipose tissue
ADAMTS:
Disintegrin and metalloproteinase thrombospondin‐like motifs
ADAMTS16:
ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 16
AF:
Anal furunculosis
AFP:
Alpha‐fetoprotein
AKI:
Acute kidney injury
AKT:
Ak strain transforming
ALB:
Albumin
ALDH1A3:
Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A3
ALI:
Acute lung injury
ALK5:
Activin receptor‐like kinase 5
ALP:
Alkaline phosphatase
ALT:
Alanine transaminase
AM:
Amniotic membrane
AMPs:
Antimicrobial peptides
ANG:
Angiopoietin
Anpep:
Aminopeptidase N
AP:
Apical ligament
AQP1:
Aquaporin 1
ARDS:
Acute respiratory distress syndrome
ARE:
Antibiotic responsive enteropathy
AST:
Aspartate aminotransferase
AT3:
Antithrombin 3
ATF6:
Activating transcription factor 6
ATMPs:
Advanced therapy medicinal products
ATP:
Adenosine triphosphate
ATR:
Angiotensin receptor
AURKA:
Aurora‐A kinase
AV:
Atrioventricular
Bad:
Bcl‐2–associated death protein
Bax:
Bcl‐2–associated X protein
BBB:
Blood–brain barrier
BCL‐2:
B‐cell lymphoma 2
BCP:
Biphasic calcium phosphate
BC‐TS:
Tubular bacterial cellulose
BDKRB2:
Bradykinin receptor B2
BDNF:
Brain‐derived nerve factor
BDNF:
Brain‐derived neurotrophic factor
bFGF:
Basic fibroblast growth factor
BglII:
Bacillus globigii‐derived type II restriction endonuclease
BHA:
Butylated hydroxyanisole
BIC:
Bone implant contact
BM‐:
Bone marrow
BMA:
Bone marrow aspirate
BMD:
Bone mineral density
BME:
β‐Mercaptoethanol
BMP:
Bone morphogenetic factor
BrdU:
Bromodeoxyuridine
BST1:
Bone marrow stromal cell antigen‐1
BTE:
Bone tissue engineering
BUN:
Blood urea nitrogen
C/ABB:
Chitosan/anorganic bovine bone
CADESI‐4:
Canine atopic dermatitis extent severity index‐4
CAGR:
Compound annual growth rate
cAMP:
3′5‐cyclic monophosphate monohydrate
CARD15:
Caspase recruitment domain‐containing protein 15
CBC:
Complete blood count
CBPI:
Canine Brief Pain Inventory
CCAAT/EBPα:
Cytosine–cytosine–adenosine–adenosine–thymidine enhancer binding protein
CCECAI:
Canine Chronic Enteropathy Clinical Activity Index
CCL2:
C‐C motif ligand 2
CCl
4
:
Carbon tetrachloride
CCNB1:
Cyclin B1
CD:
Canine distemper
CD:
Cluster of differentiation
CDCs:
Cardiosphere‐derived stem cells
CdHA:
Calcium‐deficient hydroxyapatite
CDK1:
Cyclin‐dependent kinase 1
Cdkn1a:
Cyclin‐dependent kinase inhibitor 1A
CDV:
Canine distemper virus
CDX4:
Caudal Type Homeobox 4
CFU(f):
Colony forming unit(fibroblasts)
CGRP:
Calcitonin gene‐related peptide
CHF:
Congestive heart failure
CHOP:
C/EBP Homologous Protein
CIBDAI:
Clinical Inflammatory Bowel Disease Activity Index
CIE:
Chronic inflammatory enteropathy
CIMVs:
Cytochalasin B‐induced membrane vesicles
C‐jun:
Jun Proto‐Oncogene
CK19:
Cytokeratin19
CKD:
Chronic kidney disease
CLEC3A:
C‐type lectin domain family 3 member A
CM:
Conditioned medium
CMAP:
Compound muscle action potential
CMC:
Carboxy methyl cellulose
CMR:
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance
c‐MYC:
Cellular myelocytomatosis
CNS:
Central nervous system
CNTF:
Ciliary neurotrophic factor
COL2A:
Collagen 2A
COL3A1:
Collagen 3A1
Coll I:
Collagen I
COX:
Cyclooxygenase
CPB:
Cardiopulmonary bypass
CPS:
Calcium phosphate scaffold
CrCL:
Cranial cruciate ligament
CRI:
Continuous rate infusion
CRISPR:
Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats
CRP:
C‐reactive protein
CSA:
Cyclosporin A
CSF:
Cerebrospinal fluid
CSG:
Chondroitin sulphate glycosaminoglycan
CSH:
Calcium sulfate hemihydrate
CTGF:
Connective tissue growth factor
CTI:
Cardiac troponin I
CTNND2:
Catenin delta 2
CTT:
Cardiac troponin T
CVM:
Centre for veterinary medicine
Cx45:
Connexin 45
CXCR4:
C‐X‐C chemokine receptor type 4
CYP:
Cytochrome P450
DAPT:
N‐[N‐(3,5‐Difluorophenacetyl)‐
L
‐alanyl]‐S‐phenylglycine t‐butyl ester
dbCAMP:
Dibutyryl Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate
DCM:
Dilatation cardiomyopathy
DCN:
Decorin
DCs:
Dendritic cells
DDFT:
Deep digital flexor tendon
DE:
Definitive endoderm
DED:
Dry eye disease
Dexa:
Dexamethasone
DFE:
Dermatophagoides farinae
extract
DISA:
Dual isotope simultaneous acquisition
DKA:
Diabetic ketoacidosis
DKK1:
Dickkopf‐1
DLA:
Dog leukocyte antigen
DM:
Diabetes mellitus
DMD:
Duchenne’s muscle dystrophy
DMEM:
Dulbecco’s minimally essential medium
DMEM‐HG:
Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s Media‐High Glucose
dMSCs:
Dog mesenchymal stem cells
DMSO:
Dimethyl sulfoxide
dMyHC:
Developmental myosin heavy chain
DNA:
Deoxyribonucleic acid
DP:
Dental pulp
DRB1:
Major Histocompatibility Complex, Class II, DR Beta 1
DTEF:
Divergent transcriptional enhancer factor
ECG:
Electrocardiography
ECM:
Extracellular matrix
ECMO:
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
EDNRA:
Endothelin receptors
EDVI:
End diastolic volume index
EF:
Ejection fraction
EGF:
Epidermal growth factor
EGFP:
Enhanced green fluorescent protein
Egr1:
Early response protein
ELISA:
Enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay
EMT:
Epithelial–mesenchymal transition
eNOS:
Endothelial nitric oxide synthase
Eomes:
Eomesodermin
Epac2:
Exchange Protein Directly Activated by cAMP 2
EPCS:
Electric‐pulse current stimulation
EPCs:
Endothelial progenitor cells
EPO:
Erythropoietin
EPOR:
Erythropoietin receptor
ER:
Endoplasmic reticulum
ERK:
Extracellular signal‐regulated kinase
ESCs:
Embryonic stem cells
ESD:
Endoscopic submucosal dissection
ESF:
External skeletal fixation
ESVI:
End systolic volume index
EVs:
Extracellular vesicles
FBS:
Fetal bovine serum
FDA:
Food and Drug Administration
FDMBB:
Freeze‐dried mineral bone block
FGF:
Fibroblast growth factor
FGFR:
Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2
FGFR1:
Fibroblast growth factor 1 receptor
FISH:
Fluorescence
in situ
hybridization
Foxa1:
Forkhead box protein A genes
FOXP3:
Forkhead box protein P3
FRE:
Food responsive enteropathy
FS:
Fractional shortening
Fzd:
Frizzled
GAD65:
Glutamic acid decarboxylase 65
GADA:
Glutamic acid decarboxylase‐65 antibody
GAG:
Glycosaminoglycans
GalC:
Galactocerebrosidase
GAP43:
Growth‐associated protein 43
GAP‐43:
Growth‐associated protein 43
GATA:
Guanine Adenine Thiamine Adenine (GATA) binding protein 4
GBR:
Guided bone regeneration
GCPs:
Good clinical practices
GDF‐6:
Growth differentiation factor‐6
GDNF:
Glial cell line‐derived neurotrophic factor
GDNF:
Glial cell‐derived neurotrophic factor
GFAP:
Glial fibrillary acidic protein
GFR:
Glomerular filtration rate
GLP‐1:
Glucagon‐like peptide‐1
Glut2:
Glucose transporter 2
GLUT‐4:
Glucose transporter type 4
GM:
Gentamicin
GM‐CSF:
Granulocyte macrophage colony‐stimulating factor
GMPs:
Good manufacturing practices
GNL3:
Guanine nucleotide‐binding protein‐like 3
GSCs:
Gastrulation stage cells
GSH:
Reduced glutathione
GSK3β:
Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3β
GWS:
Genome‐wide association studies
HA:
Hydroxyapatite or hyaluronic acid as specified
HBDS:
Heparin/fibrin‐based delivery system
HCN4:
mouse hyperpolarization‐activated cyclic nucleotide‐gated cation
HCPI:
Helsinki Chronic Pain Index
HCS:
Hepatocutaneous syndrome
HD:
Heart disease
Hes1:
Hairy and enhancer of split‐1
hESCs:
human embryonic stem cells
HF:
Heart failure
HGF:
Hepatocyte growth factor
HindIII:
Type II site‐specific deoxyribonuclease restriction enzyme
hJ:
Human jaw
hMSCs:
Human mesenchymal stem cells
Hnf:
Hepatocyte nuclear factor
HNF4:
Hepatocyte nuclear factor‐4 alpha
HO‐1:
Hemoxygenase 1
Hoxb4:
Homeobox 4
HSP:
Heat shock protein
hTID:
Human type 1 DM
HUVECs:
Human umbilical vein endothelial cells
IA:
Intra‐articular
IA2:
Insulinoma antigen 2
IBD:
Inflammatory bowel disease
IBMX:
3‐isobutyl‐1‐methylxanthine
ICG:
Indocyanine green
IDO:
Indoleamine 2,3‐dioxygenase
I
f
:
Funny current
IgA:
Immunoglobulin A
IgE:
Immunoglobulin E
IGF‐1:
Insulin‐like growth factor‐1
IGF‐1R:
Insulin‐like growth factor 1 receptor
IGFBP5:
Insulin‐like growth factor binding protein 5
IgM:
Immunoglobulin M
IL:
Interleukin
IL‐1R:
Interleukin 1 receptor
IL1RA:
Interleukin‐1 receptor antagonist protein
ILD:
Interstitial lung disease
INF‐γ:
Interferon‐ƴ
IPCs:
Insulin‐producing cells
IPF:
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
iPSCs:
Induced pluripotent stem cells
IRAP:
Interleukin‐1 receptor antagonist protein
IRE:
Immunosuppressant responsive enteropathy
IRE1:
Inositol‐requiring enzyme 1
IRI:
Ischemic‐reperfusion injury
IRIS:
International Renal Interest Society
IRS‐1:
Insulin receptor substrate 1
ISCT:
International Society for Cellular Therapy
Isl‐1:
Islet‐1
ITS:
Insulin, transferrin, and selenous acid
IV:
Intravenous
IVDD:
Intervertebral disc disease
IVRT:
Isovolumic relaxation time
JNK:
Jun N‐terminal kinase
KCl:
Potassium chloride
KCS:
keratoconjunctivitis sicca
KFDA:
Korea Food Drug Administration
KLF3‐AS1:
Krüppel‐like factor 3 antisense RNA 1
Klf4:
Krüppel‐like factor 4
Ksp‐cadherin:
Kidney‐specific cadherin
L:
Lumbar
LAD:
Left anterior descending
LcHS:
Large canine hepatocyte spheroids
LDL:
Low‐density lipoprotein
LGALS9:
Galectin‐9
LIES:
Low‐intensity electrical stimulation
LIF:
Leukemia inhibitory factor
lncRNA:
Long noncoding RNA
LOCC:
Longitudinally oriented collagen conduit
LPS:
Lipopolysaccharide
LSCD:
Limbal stem cell deficiency
Lum:
Lumican
LVEF:
Left ventricular ejection fraction
LVESV:
left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV)
M1:
Macrophage phenotype 1
Mabs:
Monoclonal antibodies
MafA:
MAF BZIP transcription factor A
MAP2:
Microtubule‐associated protein 2
MAPK:
Mitogen‐activated protein kinase
MBP:
Myelin basic protein
MCP‐1:
Monocyte chemoattractant protein‐1
MCV:
Motor conduction velocity
MDA:
Malondialdehyde
mECs:
Mouse visceral endoderm‐like cells
MEF‐2:
Myocyte enhancer factor‐2
MEFM:
Neurafilament medium chain
MEP:
Motor‐evoked potential
MF‐20:
Sarcomeric myosin
MFAT:
Microfragmented adipose tissue
mg/dL:
Milligram per deciliter
mg/kg b. wt.:
Milligram per kilogram of body weight
mg/mL:
Milligrams/milliliters
Mg:
Magnesium
MHC:
Major histocompatibility
MI:
Myocardial infarction
MIPO:
Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis
miRNAs:
Micro ribonucleic acid
MIRO1:
Mitochondrial Rho GTPase1
MKX:
Mohawk
MLC‐2v:
Myosin regulatory light chain 2
MLR:
Mixed lymphocyte reaction
mM:
Millimolar
mmol/L:
Millimoles per liter
MMPs:
Matrix metalloproteinases
MNCs:
Mononuclear cells
MOI:
Multiplicity of infection
MPa:
Mega pascals
MPO:
Myeloperoxidase
MPSS:
Methyl prednisolone sodium succinate
MR:
Magnetic resonance Imaging
MRC1:
Mannose receptor C‐type 1
mRNAs:
Messenger ribonucleic acid
MRP:
Multidrug resistance‐associated protein
MSCs:
Mesenchymal stem cells
MSCV:
Murine stem cell virus
mShox2:
Mouse short stature homeobox 2
MST:
Multilayer sliced tendon
MUO:
Meningo‐encephalitis of unknown origin
MVI:
Mitral valve insufficiency
MVs:
Microvesicles
mW/cm
2
:
Milliwatts per square centimeter
Myf‐5:
Myogenic factor‐5
MYH9:
Myosin heavy chain 9
MyoD:
Myoblast determination protein
n:
number of animals per study or number or studies as indicated
NBBM:
Natural bovine bone mineral
NBM:
Natural bovine bone mineral
NCAM1:
Neural cell adhesion molecule 1
NEAA:
Non‐essential amino acids
NEFL:
Tau neurofilament light peptide
NES:
Nestin
NETs:
Neutrophil extracellular traps
NeuN:
Neuronal nuclear antigen
NeuroD1:
Neurogenic Differentiation 1
NF‐H:
Neurofilament H
NF‐kB:
Nuclear Factor Kappa B
NGCs:
Nerve guidance conduits
NGF:
Nerve growth factor
NGF‐b:
Nerve growth factor‐b
NGFR:
Nerve Growth Factor Receptor
Ngn3:
Neurogenin 3
nHA:
nano hydroxyapatite
nHAC:
Nano HA and collagen
NIC:
Nicotinamide
NIS:
Adenovirus‐mediated sodium iodide symporter
Nkx2.2:
NK2 Homeobox 2
NKx2‐5:
NK2 homeobox 5
NLR:
Neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio
Nm:
Nanomolar
NO:
Nitric oxide
NOD2:
Nucleotide‐binding oligomerization domain‐containing protein 2
NPH:
Neutral protamine Hagedorn
NRE:
Non‐responsive enteropathy
NSAIDs:
Non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs
NSCs:
Neural stem cells
NT‐3:
Neurotrophin 3
NT‐BNP:
N‐terminal pro b‐type natriuretic peptide
NTR:
Neurotrophin receptor
OA:
Osteoarthritis
OC:
Osteocalcin
Oct4:
Octamer‐binding transcription factor 4
Oct‐4:
Octamer‐binding transcription factor 4
OECs:
Olfactory ensheathing cells
OMEC:
Oral mucosal epithelial cell
OPCs:
Oligodendroglia precursor cells
OSM:
Oncostatin M
PAMPs:
Pathogen‐associated molecular patterns
Pax4:
Paired box 4
Pax‐7:
Paired box 7
PB:
Peripheral blood
PBS:
Phosphate buffer saline
PCBM:
Particulate cancellous bone and marrow
PCL:
Polycaprolactone
PCL‐TCP:
Polycaprolactone‐tricalcium phosphate
PCNA:
Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen
PCSK1:
Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 1
PD:
Periodontal disease
PDGF:
Platelet derived growth factor
PDGFRB:
Platelet‐derived growth factor receptor beta
PDL:
Periodontal ligament
PDX1
:
Pancreatic and duodenal homeobox 1
PEP:
Pancreatic endocrine progenitors
PEP:
Pre‐ejection period
PERK:
Protein kinase RNA‐like ER kinase
PGE2:
Prostaglandin E2
PI3K/Akt:
Phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase/protein kinase B
PI3K:
Phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase
PIS:
Pain Interference Scores
PLAC:
Poly
L
‐lactide/e‐caprolactone tube
PLB:
Phospholamban
PLE:
Protein losing enteropathy
PLGA:
Poly(lactic‐co‐glycolic acid)
PLLA:
Poly(
L
‐lactic acid)
PLR:
Platelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratio
PM:
Self‐assembling peptide nanomaterial
PMMA:
Poly(methyl methacrylate)
PMP:
Polymethylpentene
PNI:
Peripheral nerve injury
PNS:
Peripheral nervous system
Poly I:C:
Polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid
poly(PAAm‐co‐BMA:
Poly(N‐isopropylacrylamide‐co‐n‐butyl methacrylate)
POSTN:
Periostin
PP:
Polypropylene
PPARγ:
Peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor gamma
PPRs:
Pattern recognition receptors
PRF:
Platelet‐rich fibrin
PRP:
Platelet rich plasma
PSAG:
Polysulfated glycosaminoglycan
PSS:
Pain Severity Scores
PTF:
Pre‐corneal tear film
PTGIS:
Prostaglandin I2 synthase
PTHRs:
Parathyroid hormone receptors
PU/PD:
Polyuria, polydipsia
Puppy DT:
Puppy deciduous teeth
PVAO:
Peak velocity of aortic flow
PVAS:
Pruritus visual analogue scale
PVF:
Peak vertical force
PYGM:
Glycogen phosphorylase, muscle associated
QoL:
Quality of life
RA:
Retinoic acid
RA:
Right atrium
RAA:
Renin–angiotensin–aldosterone
REX1:
Reduced expression 1
Rfx6:
Regulatory factor X6
rhBMP:
recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein
ROM:
Range of motion
ROS:
Reactive oxygen species
RTA:
Road traffic accident
RTA’s:
Road traffic accidents
RTECs:
Renal tubular epithelial cells
RT‐PCR:
Reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction
RUNX2:
Runt‐related transcription factor 2
RV:
Right ventricle
RVC:
Reticulated vitreous carbon
RyR:
Ryanodine receptor
SAN:
Sinoatrial node
SAP‐90:
Post‐synaptic protein
SCI:
Spinal cord injury
SCPs:
Stem cell‐based products
SCRG1:
Scrapie responsive gene 1
SCs:
Schwann cells
SCX:
Scleraxis
SDF‐1:
Stromal cell‐derived factor‐1
SDFT:
Superficial digital flexor tendon
SEP:
Somatosensory‐evoked potential
SERCA2a:
Calcium adenosine triphosphatase
SFM:
Serum free media
Sfrp2:
Secreted frizzled‐related protein 2
SHOX2:
Short Stature Homeobox 2
SII:
Systemic immune‐inflammation index
SIRS:
Systemic inflammatory respiratory syndrome
SIS:
Small intestinal submucosa
SMA:
α‐smooth muscle actin
SNPs:
Single nucleotide polymorphisms
Sox:
SRY Box Transcription factor
SOX2:
Sex‐determining region Y box 2
SPECT:
Single positron emission computed tomography
STAT3:
Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3
STC1:
Stanniocalcin‐1
STT:
Schirmer tear test
SVF:
Stromal vascular fraction
SVZ:
Sub ventricular zone
Sy:
Synovial
SYP:
Synaptophysin
SYT1:
Synaptotagmin‐1
T:
Thoracic
T1D:
Type 1 diabetes
T3:
Tri‐iodothyronine
TAGLN:
Transgelin
Tagln:
Transgelin
Tbx18:
T‐box gene family
TBX3:
T‐Box Transcription Factor 3
Tbx3:
T‐Box Transcription Factor 3
TE:
Tissue engineered
TEK:
Tyrosine kinase endothelial
TEM:
Transmission electron microscopy
TERT:
Telomerase reverse transcriptase
TF:
Tissue factors
TFBC:
Tendon–fibrocartilage–bone composite
TGF‐β:
Transforming growth factor (TGF)‐β
TH1:
T helper 1 cell
THRs:
Thyroid hormone receptors
TiAl6V4:
Alpha‐beta titanium alloy
TIMP:
Tissue inhibitor matrix metalloproteinases
TLRs:
Toll‐like receptors
TNF:
Tumor necrosis factor
Tnmd:
Tenomodulin
TO‐GCN:
Time‐Ordered Gene Co‐expression Network
TPI%:
Total pressure index percentage
TPLO:
Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy
Tregs:
T regulatory cells
TrkC:
Tropomyosin receptor kinase C
TSA:
Trichostatin A
TSG:
Tumor necrosis factor‐inducible gene 6 protein
TSP2:
Thrombospondin
TSPCs:
Tendon stem/progenitor cells
TTA:
Tibial tuberosity advancement
TUBB3:
tubulin beta 3 class III
TUNEL:
Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick‐end labelling
UC:
Umbilical cord
UCB:
Umbilical cord blood
USG:
Ultrasonography
USPRS:
Ultrasound shoulder pathology rating scale
UTI:
Urinary tract infection
UTMD:
Ultrasound‐targeted microbubble destruction
VAS‐loc:
Visual Analogue Scale for locomotion
VAS‐pain:
Visual Analogue Scale for pain
VCAM‐1:
Vascular cell adhesion molecule‐1
VEGF:
Vascular endothelial growth factor
VEGFR2:
Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2
VI:
Vertical impulse
VLA‐4:
Very late antigen 4
vWF:
von Willebrand’s factor
WJ:
Wharton’s jelly
Wnt:
Wingless‐related integration site
α‐SMA:
Alpha‐smooth muscle actin
β1‐Ad:
β1‐adrenergic receptor
β‐TCP:
β‐tricalcium phosphate
This book is complemented by a companion website:
www.wiley.com/go/caninestemcell
This website includes:
Videos
The stem cell concept is fundamental to biology that tries to understand the development of life and the formation and function of various tissues and organs. This concept stands at the forefront of 21st‐century research and holds promise for groundbreaking advancements in biology and medicine. Stem cell research is anticipated to open new horizons, offering insights into the intricate processes of life and presenting innovative solutions in healthcare. The stem cell concept sees its inception in embryology (Gugjoo 2020). An individual, right from its initial developmental phase as a zygote to its maturity, harbors varied stem cell types. In dogs, prenatal development occurs in three phases/periods, namely, ovum period (2–17 days), embryo period (19–35 days), and fetal period (35th day to birth). In the ovum period, fertilization is followed by the development of the blastocyst that attaches to the uterus. The embryo period begins with blastocyst implantation till organogenesis is completed. Finally, characteristic features of an individual and its growth occur in the fetal period (Phemister 1974). In the early developmental stage, the potential of the primitive cell (zygote) up to the morula stage, is to develop the whole organism along with the fetal membranes (totipotent) (Fig. 1.1). As the developmental stages progress, this differentiation potential invariably decreases and the cells either become restricted in their differentiation potential or are terminally differentiated. Blastocyst that comprises inner cell mass and trophoblast has the potential to form an individual supported by fetal membranes. At this stage, specification is well established as the inner cell mass (harbors embryonic stem cells, ESCs) gives rise to an individual without its fetal membranes (pluripotent) while the trophoblast develops into fetal membranes (multipotent) (Gugjoo 2020). Contrary to this, zygote or cells in the morula give rise to the whole organism and its supporting membranes without any specification. Once the individual is born, there is a reserve cell pool in each tissue/organ that has the potential to maintain homeostasis. These adult stem cells are mostly multipotent and, in some cases, show features of pluripotency. In a particular organ/tissue, these adult stem cells get destined toward a particular lineage and the progenitor cells developed thereafter are oligopotent, which further get destined to a particular cell type (unipotent) and finally differentiate into a specialized somatic cell. Apart from the naturally available stem cells, somatic cells are also dedifferentiated into the stem cells through incorporation of the specific self‐renewal and pluripotency maintenance markers (Oct4, Sox3/4, c‐MYC, and Klf4). These adult cells induced to have pluripotency features are termed as induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) (Gugjoo et al. 2020a, b, c) (Fig. 1.1).
Fig. 1.1 Sources of stem cells from initial fertilization to the adulthood of dogs. The stem cells demonstrated are totipotent (zygote/morula), pluripotent (embryonic stem cells/induced pluripotent stem cells), and multipotent (mesenchymal stem cells). The image also depicts stromalness and differentiation properties of mesenchymal stem cells.
Stem cells are being used for drug testing, understanding the development of an individual (embryology), and more recently for therapeutics. Because the focus of this book is on clinical applications of stem cells in canine practice, this chapter shall focus on the therapeutic properties of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) vis‐a‐vis available dog literature. ESCs or iPSCs have teratogenic potential as these cells tend to differentiate spontaneously. Additionally, ESCs have ethical issues of embryo destruction, and above all, the clear understanding of their physiological processes is still limited. Despite the challenges, there is decent literature on the utilization of ESCs or iPSCs for therapeutics in humans. However, in dogs such literature is very limited. This may be due to the above‐cited reasons; besides, the supporting infrastructure is limited and the cost of treatment with such cells remains less economical. Contrarily, adult stem cells have numerous sources, easy isolation processes, and cultivation. Besides, the teratogenic potential and ethical issues are less. Among these adult stem cell types, MSCs are seen as the most promising stem cells due to their broader sources, ease of isolation and proliferation, limited chances of teratogenicity, and ethical issues, besides their therapeutic properties (Zuk et al. 2002; Cardoso et al. 2017). As such from here on focus shall remain on MSCs.
The stem cell is an unspecialized cell of a multicellular organism that has stemness property characterized by an ability to develop its identical copy through the “self‐renewal” and a specialized destined cell through the “differentiation” (Till et al. 1964; Ab Kadir et al. 2012; Gugjoo et al. 2020d, e). Therefore, the cell that self‐renews its pool and differentiates into particular lineage as per the microenvironment/niche is a stem cell. Self‐renewal property differentiates stem cells from progenitor cells as the latter cells are unable to self‐renew but do differentiate. Self‐renewal is maintained through divisional symmetry or asymmetry. Symmetric division involves the production of identical copies in which daughter cells copy the entire genome and epigenetic changes of the parent cell. The asymmetric division produces nonidentical daughter cells through divisional asymmetry or environmental asymmetry (Wilson and Trumpp 2006; He et al. 2009). Divisional asymmetry produces one similar/identical and another nonidentical copy. This occurs when the cell fate determinants get reorganized prior to the cell division. In environmental asymmetry, microenvironment/niche‐based signals induce cell division producing identical copies. One of the identical daughter cells undergoes asymmetric cell division producing nonidentical daughter cells that function as per the demand of the local tissue (Spradling et al. 2001; Ohlstein et al. 2004). Such tissue‐specific cell production is actually the differentiation process (pluripotency/multipotency) of stem cells. The microenvironment/niche maintains cell self‐renewal and simultaneously as per the signals activates cell division for differentiation as well. With the loss of microenvironment, stem cells lose their self‐renewal properties (Li and Neaves 2006; Lilly et al. 2011).
The self‐renewal potential of the cells varies with ESCs/iPSCs able to maintain growth and proliferation for longer periods while MSCs tend to have limited self‐renewal properties. Cancer cell lines are considered to grow indefinitely due to their continuous self‐renewal ability. There is little understanding in this regard, although some of the known features of the cells are attributed toward such a property. Telomerase, an enzyme that maintains telomeres (DNA regions at chromosomal ends) activity, remains higher in stem cells including MSCs and might be responsible for self‐renewal (Greenwood and Lansdorp 2003). Nonetheless, all these stem cells express elements of various pluripotency signaling pathways such as Wnt/fzd/beta‐catenin, sonic, and Hedgehog and overexpress proteins such as homeobox 4 (Hoxb4) and caudal type homeobox 4 (Cdx4) (Watt and Hogan 2000; Kyba et al. 2002; Willert et al. 2003). It is worth noting that the self‐renewal and differentiation properties are exhibited by tumor cells as well. The possible reasons for pluripotent ESCs to self‐renew for indefinite periods may be due to their specific origin and developmental stage, tightly regulated genetics and epigenetics, and highly controlled environment. Apart from these two above‐mentioned features, numerous other specific features make stem cells including MSCs a keynote topic for research and therapeutics. The subsequent part of this chapter shall specifically focus on various aspects of MSCs.
Stemness of stem cells pertains to their ability to self‐renew and differentiate, while simultaneously preserving crucial differentiating genes in a state of quiescence and equilibrium. In the case of MSCs, which are a type of adult stem cell, the stemness is characterized by the capacity to undergo self‐renewal and differentiate into multiple cell lineages such as adipocytes, chondrocytes, and osteoblasts. These cells lack spontaneous differentiation as commonly seen with ESCs. Despite being recognized, the understanding of these properties is limited, and there is skepticism about the existence of true stemness properties in the cells. MSCs cell cycle is regulated in such a way as to balance self‐renewal with differentiation. Compared to pluripotent stem cells, MSCs genetic and epigenetic regulation involve use of different transcription factors (Notch, Hedgehog, and bone morphogenetic protein, BMP, pathways) and growth factors [fibroblast growth factor (FGF) and transforming growth factor‐beta (TGF‐β)] to regulate self‐renewal and differentiation. In adult tissues, the microenvironment is less tightly controlled as numerous physiological processes are undertaken and wide ranges of external stimuli arise. MSCs reside in an environment that supports their tissue repair and regeneration function. Exposure to varied stimuli eventually directs them to a state of senescence after a certain number of divisions. Stem cell‐based therapeutics occur through a multitude of processes including self‐renewal and differentiation. However, the higher the rate of their doubling, the earlier they lose these properties. In order to make maximum use of MSCs, it is important to understand their stemness and establish new techniques that can preserve multipotency for long.
MSCs stemness markers are supported by only a few genes while the molecular basis, especially the key transcription factors of their stemness, is poorly understood. Unlike ESCs, where pluripotent genes such as Oct4, Nanog, klf4, and Sox2 are well‐established, MSCs lack a single key transcription factor. To understand factors involved in stemness, highly expressed genes in undifferentiated MSCs are compared with the trilineage differentiated cells. By knocking down each gene individually, no single transcription factor is involved in the complete blockade of the differentiation process and maintaining the stemness (Kubo et al. 2009). There is progressive research that tries to understand the stemness basis of MSCs. One of the studies shows that human MSCs positive for CD271 (low‐affinity nerve growth factor receptor, LNGFR or p75 neurotrophin receptor, and p75NTR), CD90 (Thy1), and CD106 (vascular cell adhesion molecule‐1, VCAM1) retains propensity of self‐renewal and multipotency (Mabuchi et al. 2013). Two novel mechanisms, namely, scrapie responsive gene 1 (SCRG1)/bone marrow stromal cell antigen‐1 (BST1) ligand‐receptor combination and cell‐cell adhesion through N‐cadherin, are considered to establish these properties (Chosa and Ishisaki 2018).
MSCs differentiate into various lineages to the extent of pluripotency in a specific ex vivo differentiation system (extended multipotency). However, in vivo studies in numerous cases show MSCs suboptimal performance with a limited engraftment rate raising concerns over the use of the word “stem” to these cells (D'souza et al. 2015). There are well‐established biological functions that contribute to their therapeutic role and are attributed to their stromal functions rather than the multipotent differentiation (Phinney and Prockop 2007; Horwitz and Dominici 2008; Murphy et al. 2013; Gugjoo et al. 2020a, c, d). MSCs stemness and proliferation properties were initially evaluated in the 1960s and 1970s that reached maturity in the 1980s and peaked in 2000 beyond which focus on such studies was reduced. Over a period of time, the consensus over the MSCs stromalness increased with simultaneous reduction in their stemness properties for their therapeutics (Fig. 1.1). Initially, the stromalness of MSCs is realized with the study demonstrating hematopoietic supportive role through release of various growth factors, chemokines, cytokines, extracellular vesicles (EVs), or microvesicles (Matthay et al. 2017; Lykhmus et al. 2019; Spano et al. 2019; Witwer et al. 2019). Down the line, these cells are termed as medicinal signaling cells changing the paradigm but keeping the acronym (Caplan and Correa 2011). Presently, the acronym of stemness and stromalness coexist although the latter property is preferably attributed to MSCs in vivo therapeutic benefits (Mastrolia et al. 2019).
Stromalness of MSCs is achieved through their secretome harboring diverse soluble factors and EVs (Maia et al. 2017). Soluble factors of MSCs secretome contain factors such as TGF‐β1 and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), indoleamine 2,3‐dioxygenase (IDO), nitric oxide (NO), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and interleukin‐68 (IL‐68). These factors arise either constitutively or after priming with the pro‐inflammatory mediators. MSCs priming with the specific microenvironment enhances their resistance and specific expression potential (Barrachina et al. 2017; de Cássia Noronha et al. 2019; Gugjoo et al. 2023). There is good evidence supporting tissue and species‐specific variation in MSCs secretome (Carrade et al. 2012). There may or may not be comparable immunomodulation and the pathways involved may also vary. Canine BM‐MSCs and AD‐MSCs show comparable immunomodulation; however, involved pathways are different (Russell et al. 2016; Chow et al. 2017). EVs are classified as per their size, namely, exosomes (50–100 nm diameter) or microvesicles (0.1–1 μm diameter). EVs carry a diverse range of factors ranging from proteins, organelles to genetic materials (DNA and RNA) (Manzoor et al. 2023). Presently the focus is shifting toward the use of these EVs as they remain devoid of stem cell‐based limitations (immunogenicity, teratoma, and limited action in harsh environments). Besides, EVs are unaffected by the freeze‐thaw process, do not require preservatives during cryopreservation, and are economical (Abraham and Krasnodembskaya 2020).
MSCs show limited ability to trans‐differentiate in comparison to the ESCs/iPSCs. Nevertheless, their trans‐differentiation occurs across the germ layers and is demonstrated in numerous studies from varied tissue sources in humans and animals including dogs (Fig. 1.1). MSCs trans‐differentiation occurs when kept in specific differentiation media, scaffolds, or mechanical forces. MSCs are at least evaluated for their tri‐lineage differentiation in line with the International Society for Cellular and Gene Therapy (ISCT) for their therapeutic purposes (Dominici et al. 2006). However, the differentiation potential goes beyond to other lineages such as myocytes/cardiomyocytes, neural‐like cells, and germ cell‐like cells. MSCs trans‐differentiation as per the available microenvironment/niche shows that their fate is not defined but rather changeable/plastic. It is worth mentioning that true trans‐differentiation remains questionable as the cells down the lineage do not always undergo characteristic ontologic processes that are involved in the formation of a particular cell lineage (Pelagalli et al. 2018). MSCs not only are plastic in their differentiation potential but also show plasticity in immunomodulation and immunoevasion as per the available microenvironment (Wang et al. 2014; Russell et al. 2016; Wang et al. 2019). Pro‐inflammatory mediators such as interferon‐ƴ (IFN‐γ), tumor necrosis factor‐α (TNF‐α), and interleukin‐2 (IL‐2) variably activate dog MSCs immunomodulatory activities (Liu et al. 2006; Poncelet et al. 2007; Russell et al. 2016).
MSCs due to their ability to “mobilize” and “home” in the distant site make their peripheral transplantation quite a feasible option for therapeutics especially at less accessible sites. Presently studies are going on to understand the mechanisms involved in the process. MSCs are assumed to follow similar steps as those of the leukocytes. For a cell to migrate, its adhesiveness to the local milieu has to be waived off followed by its directional movement to the particular site or location. The steps involved in homing include endothelial contact of the cells by tethering and rolling, resulting in deceleration of the cells into the bloodstream. Subsequently, activation of G‐protein‐coupled receptors and simultaneous activation‐dependent arrest occurs. Finally, the cells transmigrate through the endothelium and underlying basement membrane (Butcher and Picker 1996). For resident MSCs migration and homing, mobilization occurs by downregulation of their adhesion molecules initiated by cytokines and/or chemokines such as platelet‐derived growth factor (PDGF) AB and BB, and HGF (Son et al. 2006; Ponte et al. 2007; Liu et al. 2009; Baek et al. 2011). This is followed by general principles applicable to resident and transplanted cells. In the initial step of mobilization, endothelial selectins and expression of CD44 on MSCs have an important role to play in the initial step (Sackstein et al. 2008). Activation of MSCs to mobilize occurs through G‐protein‐coupled receptors that are typically chemokine receptors. For BM‐MSCs homing, CXCR4‐stromal‐derived factor‐1 (SDF‐1) axis is critical (Moll and Ransohoff 2010; Angelone et al. 2017). Integrins play an important role in stable activation‐dependent arrest of MSCs. The integrins form dimers that bind with endothelial cell adhesion molecules. Very late antigen‐4 (VLA‐4), formed by combination of integrin α4 and β1, interacts with the VCAM‐1 and is demonstrated to be involved in MSCs homing (Rüster et al. 2006; Segers et al. 2006). Diapedesis or transmigration of MSCs through the endothelial cell layer and basement membrane is brought about by lytic enzymes such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Among various MMPs, MMP‐2 and MMP‐9 are shown to have an important role as these enzymes preferentially degrade basement membrane components (collagen and gelatin) (Nagase and Woessner 1999; Steingen et al. 2008). Finally, MSCs recruitment/homing into the inflamed and damaged tissues may be brought by adhesion molecules such as galectin‐1 and galectin‐3 (Reesink et al. 2017).
MSCs are immune‐privileged/immunoevasive and bring in the immunomodulatory and/or anti‐inflammatory actions as dictated by the available microenvironment (Gugjoo et al. 2019a, b; Gugjoo et al. 2020a; Gugjoo and Pal 2020). Their immunoevasive nature, ability to avoid immune rejection, arises out of a lack of expression of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC)‐II and minimal expression of the MHC‐I and co‐stimulatory molecules. Immunomodulatory actions may occur either through cell–cell contact, by their secretome or constitutively. Cell–cell contact‐mediated actions arise through various MSCs receptors such as toll‐like receptors (TLRs), intracellular adhesion molecules (ICAMs), VCAM, and Fas ligand‐dependent interactions (Tomchuck et al. 2008; DelaRosa and Lombardo 2010; Akiyama et al. 2012). Transwell assays in canines show MSCs ability to secrete soluble factors that inhibit the immune response of the lymphocytes (Kang et al. 2008; Lee et al. 2011). Secretome‐based immunomodulation/inhibition seems more potent as compared to the cell–cell contact interactions (Di Nicola et al. 2002). These cells modulate CD8+ CD4+ T and dendritic cells and disrupt natural killer cells to prevent T‐cell responses (Di Nicola et al. 2002; Wang et al. 2009). MSCs interaction with the CD4 and CD8 lymphocytes is activated in the inflammatory environment that bring in the higher anti‐inflammatory actions. MSCs co‐cultured with peripheral blood‐derived mononuclear cells (PB‐MNCs) and macrophages or under pro‐inflammatory mediators (PGE2, lipopolysaccharide, interferon‐ƴ, tumor necrosis factor‐α, and IL‐2) reduce mononuclear cells (MNCs) production of inflammatory mediators such as TNF‐α, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and interleukin (IL)‐1β (Singer and Caplan 2011; Russell et al. 2016; Chae et al. 2017; Lara et al. 2017; de Moraes et al. 2016).
It is now a well‐accepted concept that MSCs may prevent microbial infections as has also been reported in numerous studies including the dogs (Johnson et al. 2017). Such an action occurs either indirectly (modulate local environment and/ or amplify immune cell function) or directly (eradicate microbes through antimicrobial peptides, AMPs) (Cortés‐Araya et al. 2018; Taghavi‐Farahabadi et al. 2021; Silva‐Carvalho et al. 2022). MSCs and/or secretomes may also potentiate antibiotic actions and could be useful against the biofilms (Johnson et al. 2017