The Corona Pandemic - With References to The Epidemic in Germany E-Book

Prodosh Aich

• Herausgeber: Books on Demand
• Kategorie: Geisteswissenschaft
• Sprache: Englisch
• Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2021

Seitenzahl: 520

Beschreibung

We have always known: We are what we know. The conscious being. And what do we know in general? Only what we are told! Through whatever media. If a narrative is coherent, if it does not make us uncomfortable, if it does not contradict our experience and our already stored knowledge, we classify it and thus know something more. I could not classify the public "Corona narratives". But I could not put them away either. In April 2020, I had to realise that I could not understand and I would not understand the "Corona Narratives" without a thorough effort of the repeated readings of the published "Corona narratives", of thinking, of contemplating. The result is the present book. The starting point is the undisputed facts in daily media reports. Classifying the facts was arduous. This arduous journey is documented in this book. Logically, this "travelogue" is not interrupted by individual sections. This book has no "table of contents", no "preface", no "prologue", no "epilogue". I have conscientiously researched the connections and contexts. If you can't prove after reading that I made a mistake, then my conscientiousness was worth it. Every single proven research error will broaden my horizon of thought. Some related facts I have necessarily had to refer to repeatedly in different contexts. They are not repetitions.

Leseprobe

About this book

We gather experiences in everyday life. In encounters. Face to face. Stories are told. We listen to them and evaluate them.

But rarely do we know the first teller of the stories. We do not ask who the first teller actually is, who puts up with him, why he tells us something and what he wants to achieve with us.

The share of face-to-face narratives is steadily decreasing. Media are on the rise. Indirect narratives. And we do not ask about the ownership of the media and the interests of their owners. I have had to learn painfully to deal with the narrator first and then decide whether the narrative is important.

Following this awareness, I introduce myself. I am a scientist of Indian origin. Born in 1933, I have lived in Germany longer than most living Germans. As a citizen with limited rights, as a resident.

Some peculiar circumstances have saved me from being absorbed by the pressure to conform in the academic world. Nevertheless, I have too often come to knowledge too late. I have had to take the time to reflect on the connections between contexts of "coming to knowledge too late". More about me can be found at www.acharyya.de.

We have always known: We are what we know. The conscious being. And what do we know in general? Only what we are told! Through whatever media. If a narrative is coherent, if it does not make us uncomfortable, if it does not contradict our experience and our already stored knowledge, we classify it and thus know something more.

I could not classify the public "Corona narratives". But I could not put them away either. In April 2020, I had to realise that I could not understand and I would not understand the "Corona Narratives" without a thorough effort of the repeated readings of the published "Corona narratives", of thinking, of contemplating. The result is the present book.

The starting point is the undisputed facts in daily media reports. Classifying the facts was arduous. This arduous journey is documented in this book. Logically, this "travelogue" is not interrupted by individual sections. This book has no "table of contents", no "preface", no "prologue", no "epilogue".

I have conscientiously researched the connections and contexts. If you can't prove after reading that I made a mistake, then my conscientiousness was worth it. Every single proven research error will broaden my horizon of thought.

Some related facts I have necessarily had to refer to repeatedly in different contexts. They are not repetitions.

Without the researched connections, the events described in this book would be a "diary", or an accounting "chronology" of German Corona history, embedded in the Corona pandemic.

The credit of the English Version of the book goes to MVR Nair, my co-author of the book TRUTHS. He has been close to me all along. He read the German original toilsome using Google translation. He insisted on the English version. So it is. Of course, MVR Nair has read the final version carefully giving his suggestions.

Time for apologies. The language used in this book is plain, drastic, undiplomatic and not concept-heavy. Plain language. Calling a spade, a spade. Unvarnished. My wife Helga Bross had to put up with my everyday language on the subject several times. In the end, she also read through the entire text critically. I would like to take this opportunity to thank her.

Feedback is welcome.

Prodosh Aich

The author

Prodosh Aich was born in Kolkata in 1933. Attended school and studied philosophy in India. Studied ethnology, philosophy and sociology in Cologne. He is a university lecturer, publicist and blogger. Taught sociology at the universities of Cologne, Rajasthan (India) and Oldenburg.

Prodosh Aich has published books and many essays, as well as many radio features and documentaries. He is still Indian, even though he has lived in Germany longer than most Germans.

"The Corona Epidemic in Germany. Part of the Corona Pandemic" is the thirteenth book by Prodosh Aich. "Coloureds among Whites" (1962),

"The Indian University" (1971), "Social Work" (1972), "As Further Neglect Threatens ..." (1973), "How democratic is local politics?" (1977),

"Possibilities and limits of project study" (1978), "City hall looters" (1986).

"Consequences of Walking Upright " (2000), "Lies with Long Legs" (2003), "Lies with Long Legs" (2004), "TRUTHS" (2015), "The Vedic Heritage" (2019).

The publication of "The Indian University" (1971) and "Town Hall

Looters" (1986) has been prevented. " Consequences of Walking

Upright" (2000) contains the suppressed book "The Indian University" and also narrates the connections, the contexts, as in a documentary film and names the actors and their machinations in suppressing unwelcome research results.

Table of Contents

About the book

About the author

Start of Text

Acharrya Series, Science in Critical Review, since 2000

"To be an impeccable member of a flock of sheep, one must first and foremost be a sheep".

In the current Corona story, we have no option. We do not have the choice to be a blameless member of a flock of sheep; or to be a member of a flock of blameworthy sheep; or in wanting to be a member of a flock of sheep in Germany at all. We are being pushed with all our might to become a sheep above all.

With all their might, politicians urge us to believe that an invisible monster in the guise of an invisible virus called SARS-CoV-2 has "set out" to destroy our "beautiful perfect world". If our "beautiful world" is worth anything to us, we would have to trust these politicians unconditionally as "good shepherds" and follow them blindly.

We are tacitly told that we are too stupid to recognise the dangers posed by the "invisible monster". Are politicians no longer our representatives according to the Basic Law? Are we not a democracy? Rule of the people? "All state power emanates from the people". Art. 20, para. 2, sentence 1 GG? Are we not the people?

The

Federal Republic of

Germany is a

democratic

and

social federal state

.

All

state power emanates from the people

. It shall be exercised by the people in

elections

and

votes and

by special organs of

legislation

,

executive power

and

jurisdiction.

The legislature is bound by the

constitutional order

, the executive power and the judiciary are bound by

law

and justice.

Against anyone who undertakes to eliminate this order, all Germans have the

right to resist

if

no other remedy

is

possible.

How are the politicians supposed to have become smarter than us? By secret services?

I put the question on the back burner.

On the occasion of the Corona epidemic, a programme for collective synchronisation is being unwound. How, for what purpose and by whom was this set in motion? In order to find answers to these questions, we must first look at the course of the "Corona story" in context and put "two-and-two" together like a human being.

Currently, politicians, represented by Federal Health Minister Jens Spahn, "scientifically" advised by an army of "specialists as experts", represented by virologist Christian Drosten, want us to believe that they alone are able to save us from this "invisible monster Corona", if only we wanted to be an impeccable member of a flock of sheep. Personally, I have no confidence in these "good shepherds" represented by the Jens Spahns and the "virologists" Christian Drostens.

What do the virologists do?Virologists? Since when have the virologists been around?

I also put these questions also on the back burner.

It seems that these "our" politicians, with the "experts" in tow, are succeeding in their endeavour. So quickly and so thoroughly that even Manfred Güllner, who regularly "looks the people in the mouth", publicly ponders whether the apparent success, namely turning the "German poets and thinkers" into sheep, is due to the typical "German gene". Manfred Güllner, also a product of the "Cologne Cadre School" of Empirical Social Research at the University of Cologne like me, a few years younger than me, but mutating into a business like opinion-maker.

The quote

"

To be an impeccable member of a flock of sheep, one must first and foremost be a sheep

"

is not mine.

Albert Einstein -

undoubtedly a great "thinker" - is said to have created this sentence at a late age. I do not know exactly when.

It is also not relevant to know this. But I do know that

Albert Einstein was a sheep

at least once in his chequered life when he opened the door to the

atomic bombs

on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Albert Einstein

had direct access to the then

US president

- unlike the many atomic physicists who emigrated from Europe and wanted to build the "bomb" for the

US president

before

Adolf Hitler.

By the way:

No other state except the USA has ever dropped nuclear bombs.

But back to the "Corona story", to the fears generated, to thepanic, to the mass hysteria of a "Flock of sheep".

The federal government and the state governments of Germany, appointed by parliamentary representations, have started to suspend the constitution of Germany, "Das Grundgesetz", in February 2020. In the "tow" of the "experts" they believe they only have to act as they acted and immediately in order to get over the invisible monster in the disguise of a virus. Resistance to this bending of the constitution is not yet perceptible.

We have been made to forget that governments have the constitutional mandate to carry out the will of the people, mediated by their elected representatives in parliament. Instead, the federal and the 16 state governments of Germany act past the parliaments, supported by ominous "experts". This breach of the constitution is apparently not only accepted by us. But we, the whole of society, and our representatives in the parliaments are even falling into fear, into panic, into hysteria. What has happened?

At the end of December 2019, a "respiratory disease" is occurring with striking frequency in Wuhan in the People's Republic of China. Wuhan is about four times larger than Berlin and the capital of the "province" of Hubei, one of the 27 "provinces" in the middle of the People's Republic of China. In terms of area, the People's Republic of China is the fourth largest country in the world with about 1.4 billion people, almost 20% of the world's population. By mid-January, the incidence of this "respiratory disease" had become a fatal "epidemic".

An

epidemic

is a temporally and locally limited increased occurrence of

similar

"cases of disease" in humans, according to current "knowledge" caused by

a

"pathogen". In most cases, these "pathogens" are invisible "

microorganisms

". There are bacteria, fungi, protozoa, viruses.

How many "micro-organisms" there are in total, we don't know yet.

But we know that only a few of these "micro-organisms" are known to us. We also know that many "micro-organisms" are indispensable for a healthy human life. We do not know how many "microorganisms" we absolutely need for healthy life.

Our "biologists" don't want to know either, because such knowledge cannot be packaged into a "business model". The "chemists" and the "biologists" hunt for "pests", label these "pests", devise "recipes" to kill these "pests" and sell us these "recipes" as "hopes", as "tickets" to an "extended" life.

Is an "extended" life also worth living?

Like all other "living" and "non-living" beings, "micro-beings" are subject to the rules of nature. All beings have a beginning and they have an end. What was "before the beginning and will be after the end" we do not know. The "prevailing science", namely the "modern science" or the natural-sciences, does not have questions like what was "before the beginning" and what could be "after the end" in mind.

But we know from our "ancestors" and from our own perception and knowledge that all "living beings" are "born", "live" for a predetermined time and then "die". Between living and dying they "reproduce". To live they need "food". Healthy food.

The food suppliers are in each case other species of living beings. The species are thus interdependent and equally weighted (equivalent) in the order of nature. Thus, despite the life and death of the individual generations, all species necessary for the overall order of nature remain on earth.

This order on earth is a small part of a larger order, the order of the solar system. And the order of the solar system is a small part of the order of the universe. The order on Earth has functioned for millions of years and will continue to function. It does not matter whether man, as a tiny part of this order, understands the order of nature or not.

Nature provides the basis of existence and survival for all species through its set of rules of necessities and offerings. Food is at the centre. All species are provided for.

If a species, for whatever reason, becomes "voracious" or reproduces at an above-average rate or its "lifespan" is extended, a part of this species will sooner or later have too little or nothing left to live on.

In this way, nature regulates the "population" of individual species through the supply of food. It is not impossible that this or another species of countless species on earth will become superfluous and "die out" in the course of time.

In terms of the "individual", a person lives on average around 100 years with a "good" supply of the necessary food. Even with an abundance of the best food, life cannot be prolonged. If the body receives all the necessary nourishment, the person is healthy. And the healthy human being must exercise so that the "miracle work" of nature does not "rust". The healthy human being is a healthy human being. By the very nature of things. If the body does not receive all the necessary nourishment or if the body is not "moved" enough, the person is less healthy and lives a shorter than average life.

The invisible "microorganisms" have a much shorter lifespan. The individual organs of the human body serve as a source of food for many "microorganisms". Organs of the human body need many "microorganisms" for the health of the body. This knowledge is not a discovery of "modern science". This knowledge has been handed down from our "ancestors". Knowledge that has been handed down is common property. This knowledge is not marketable. The "modern sciences" do not strive for discoveries, they strive for inventions. Discoveries are not marketable. Only inventions are marketable. By the very nature of the thing.

Status end of December 2019

From all indications, the "Corona story" begins in December 2019. In Wuhan in the People's Republic of China, a "respiratory disease" is occurring with striking frequency at the end of December 2019. In the current case, a new microbe is said to have discovered cells of human respiratory tract as a new food source. It is still an assumption.

How it came to this assumption is not communicated.

The new "pathogen" is said to be a "subspecies" of microorganisms called "viruses". The viruses are said to be smaller than bacteria. The viruses cannot live and multiply without a "host". There are said to be many "subspecies" of viruses.

What are "subspecies"? How many "subspecies" are there? Who will want to know?

The current virus in Wuhan is said to be a still unknown "subspecies" of the "Corona family viruses". It still remains an assumption.

A number of people in Wuhan complain of respiratory illnesses similar to the earlier "attacks" by "corona viruses". These are impairments such as cough, fever, breathing difficulties and even "pneumonia".

"WHOis closely monitoring the situation and is in close contact with the national authorities in China," the UN agency said in Geneva. "There is limited information to assess the overall risk of this cluster of lung diseases of unknown cause." The World Health Organisation (WHO) is following the situation in China closely, but has not yet recommended any special "travel precautions".

Nothing more is known until 6 January 2020. More about the WHO later.

When lung activity fails, the supply of oxygen necessary for "life" ceases. The human being dies without oxygen. The lung is one of the central "organs" in the human body. And like all organs in the human body, the lungs have a "

predetermined

" finite "life span".

The rules of nature.

This

finite

life span is

beyond

human or other

interventions

. Microorganisms as "parasites" in the body, or in individual human organs, can

shorten the

"pre-programmed" finite life span of the lung. A "repair" or any other "intervention" cannot

extend the

"

predetermined

" life span of the lung. At best, it can

prevent the

shortening.

The modern "experts" in the old cultural country of China, i.e., the "specialists" of "disease management", like the "medical doctors", like the microbiologists and like the "virologists", were on the spot. They "recognise" that the unknown "disease" of the respiratory tract must be caused by a "new" virus.

➢

They seem to ask reflexively: Where does this novel virus come from? What are the "transmission routes" of this virus to infected people? How could the "damage" to humans caused by this virus be averted?

About the work opportunities, about the way of working, about the path of "findings of "medical doctors" and those of "microbiologists" and "virologists", more later.

By the time these systematic questions could be asked, the epidemic in Wuhan was already here. In all likelihood, this new virus had been infecting some people in Wuhan for some time. The China office of the WHO (World Health Organisation) was closely monitoring this new "flu-like disease" in China.

What is the WHO?

The "

WHO

" is a sub-organisation of the United Nations for the observation, control and administration of supra-regional

infectious diseases

. It has little to do with

health.

It is not concerned with

health

, nor with the

healthy people

.

The healthy

people, the overwhelming majority, who have always lived in

interdependence

with many

visible

and

invisible species

, have

naturally fended off

the "attacks" of the "new virus"

without any effort,

even in Wuhan.

Less healthy

people, a

vanishingly small part of

the whole, have had to "

fight

" against the new virus. Depending on the

severity of

the battles,

externally perceptible traces

become visible in the infected people. The

externally perceptible traces are

called "

symptoms of a disease"

by the

modern

"experts", above all by "medical doctors".

The "specialists" in general, likewise the "

medical doctors

" in particular, perceive these

traces

and

interpret

these natural, externally perceptible "signs" of

struggle

as "

symptoms

" of a

disorder

in the body. This

disorder

is then labelled as a "

disease

". They claim to know

ways

and

means to

eliminate the

disorder of

the body, i.e., the "disease", through their "interventions".

What "weapons" do the modern-day "experts" have in their quiver for their interventions?

Who supplies them with these weapons?

Nature?

More about that later.

The "specialists" secure their monopoly of interpretation through invented technical language with new terminology. A disorder in the body is called a "disease" in the technical Jargon of the "medical experts", "evident" through the "symptoms". This interpretation sounds plausible, but the "physicians" cannot justify this plausibility causally.

In the "logic of the medical profession", these "symptoms" must be repressed in a carefully controlled way through their interventions. Are the interventions carefully controlled? If their interventions were indeed carefully controlled, they would not insure the risks and side effects so lavishly in the private sector.

The virologists are not forgotten.

Status 7 January 2020

It is reported in the international media that the Chinese authorities in Wuhan have published a "gene sequence" of the "new virus" on the net. On this basis, it has already been possible to develop "a diagnostic test", i.e., a "laboratory technique", to identify this new pathogen.

Status 9 January 2020

The infected people in Wuhan are said to have been visitors to a long-established "fish and meat market". The "new virus", according to the virologists, should actually be indigenous to the living animal body like the other viruses supposedly known to the virologists. According to the virologists, the "new virus" must have "jumped over" from the animal body to the human body for unknown reasons.

That is how it is believed. Full stop.

Why should the "new virus" jump over?

Wouldn't it be a waste of time to want to know exactly why viruses should "jump" from the "animal body" to the human body?

Isn't time also money? Be that as it may.

Apparently, an imaginary plausibility is enough for virologists.

Status 11 January 2020

The WHO announces that Chinese experts have classified the "new pathogen" as a new type from the Corona virus family.

The corona viruses, known as such since the

1960s

, often caused harmless colds, but also dangerous respiratory diseases such as SARS (

2003

) and MERS (

2012

). More about SARS and MERS later.

When the WHO announces something, all institutions that have anything to do with "disease management" should take note of it. Worldwide.

This market in Wuhan is closed and the whole area is disinfected. But the "epidemic" spreads rapidly. The first death is reported in Wuhan.

Neighbouring countries are introducing "border controls" on entries directly from the People's Republic of China. A precaution, in any case until the transmission route is clarified. Still on 11 January 2020. The "experts" had apparently recommended "border controls".

➢

If the experts were really

experts

, they should have recommended an

entry quarantine for everyone.

Only then would no traveller have been able to

bring

the virus into the country.

Or did the "experts" want to point out the "golden" job creation measures not to be dispensed with?

Status 17 January 2020

The second death is reported in Wuhan.

Status 20 January 2020

The number of infected in Wuhan just reached triple digits on 20 January.

Chinese "President" Xi Jinping announces a determined fight against the "new epidemic lung disease". The "administrations" in Hubei are overwhelmed.

Xi Jinping says: "People's lives and health should be the top priority and the spread of the outbreak should be firmly contained".

The second largest economic power in the world is uncompromisingly mobilizing the entire "state power" to limit this epidemic in terms of area at any rate.

Meanwhile, the German and international media are preoccupied with the "protests in Hong Kong" and with possibly manipulated publications by the Chinese government agencies about the extent of the epidemic, especially about the numerical "talking down" of the numbers of people actually infected and dead.

Was that what it came down to? On ideological trench warfare with "full steam"?

Many insinuations that are contradictory in themselves and with each other.

On this day, it is also announced that in three neighbouring countries, Japan, South Korea and Thailand, a "Corona-like virus" has been detected in people "suffering from influenza". All these people are said to have been in Wuhan. On business, of course.

The neighbouring states of the People's Republic of China are introducing fever controls for people entering the country directly from China as a precautionary measure, because the "new virus" can also cause fever in infected people. All other entrants are allowed to enter unhindered. These are mainly business people.

A less than half-hearted measure, to lock out the virus.

Out of ignorance? On purpose?

US airports in Los Angeles, New York and San Francisco will also introduce "checks" on travellers from Wuhan on 20 January.

For most "specialists" and for the "medical profession", it is said that it is still not clear beyond doubt whether human-to-human transmission of the infecting viruses is possible.

On 20 January, neither the WHO nor the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) in Germany will commit themselves as to whether human-to-human transmission is also possible. For these two "disease-fighting institutions", the virus must have jumped from the animal body to the infected humans at the "fish, meat and animal market" in Wuhan. So it does not necessarily have to be an epidemic.

The

WHO

is the supreme research authority

(

research agency

?)

of the "United Nations" and the

Robert Koch Institute

is the supreme "research authority" of Germany. The

Robert Koch Institute

is supervised by the Federal Ministry of Health and is de facto a department of the Federal Ministry of Health.

The "researchers" of the

Robert Koch Institute

are

microbiologists

. Are they still thinking about the preconditions of a "virus jump" from "animal to human" in

Wuhan

? We do not know.

Microbiologists

are specialists within the "

discipline of biology

". All "

logists

" or "

logies"

are creations of the "

modern-sciences

", all created in the

18th

and/or

19th

centuries, even if they have

hidden

behind the Latin and/or Greek "names".

There are reasons for this "hiding". The main reason for "hiding" is that the actors did not have to

justify

the "

newly invented

". More about science, "sciences", "scientists" later.

Biology

" is one of the

upper sub-areas of

the

newly

created

natural-sciences

. The other

upper sub-areas

are "

chemistry

" and "

physics

". The

history of

"

The Natural-sciences in History

" proves that they are

not sciences

.

Resourceful people begin by dividing nature into "hostile" and "less hostile" parts. After the division, they begin to make the "hostile part" of nature controllable by means of "tinkering". They sell these "tinkering" (skills) to the respective "rulers". They then

call themselves

"natural-scientists" and found the natural-sciences.

Nature is indivisible.

Biology" was invented in the

18th

century as a main supplier of

justification formulas

for the

new

world domination established by European Christians after

war

,

robbery

,

murder

, genocide,

occupation

and

exploitation.

Who wants to know

today

what the European Christians did as robbers in the non-European areas from the

15th

century onwards? Doesn't the invention of natural-sciences as the

new

science cover up everything? Just like the worldwide celebration of "scientific achievements" of individual "special scientists" in the awarding of "

Nobel

Prizes"? Who wants to know today where the money for the "

Nobel

Prizes" comes from?

It is blood money.

Of 355 chemical patents of the chemist and inventor of weapons technologyAlfred Bernhard Nobel

Since time immemorial, humans have lived and survived on earth according to the rules of "nature". Human is one "species" among the uncountable and innumerable other "species" on earth.

The conditions on earth are determined by many extra-terrestrial rules that are superior to the rules of "nature" on earth. Since when? It is irrelevant whether humans have lived and survived this life for millions of years or for thousands of years.

Every single "species" on earth is a miracle of "nature". On the "individual" or "collective" levels of all species on earth, the rules of nature apply: All species have a beginning on the level of generations and they have an end. In between, life takes place.

The time span of life for the individual species is different. This different time span of life for the individual species ensures the functions, the balance and the control of the "populations" of the individual species on earth according to the rules of nature.

What is before the beginning and what will be after the end, we do not yet know. However, these questions have already been asked in individual cultural areas. We already know,

that every "individual", no matter what kind,

arrives

with

nothing, dependent

on the care of many and on the food available,

that every "individual" develops

procreative and creative power

,

that each "individual" as a full-fledged "member" for the species reaches a highest "

performance point"

, then slowly approaches the end with

"dwindling" strength

and

that each "individual" eventually "

disappears

" with

nothing.

The rules of "nature" on earth.

Since time immemorial,human has used his five senses and the "supercomputer" in his head to understand his immediate and indirect "environment" through observation, experience and in exchange with other people, to store what he has understood as "knowledge" in his head and to bequeath the accumulated knowledge to future generations before it "disappears".

It goes without saying that the near and the far celestial bodies, the light and the darkness, the "flora and fauna", the "weather and the climate conditions" and the "inanimate materials" had not escaped man in this "accumulation of knowledge". This accumulation of knowledge is science. Science describes "what is" and "what is" has already been conveyed. Science cannot be marketed. Because all people already possess this "condensed transmitted knowledge".

Sciencehas shaped man since time immemorial. Humans have placed themselves as a part within the "biodiversity" and have done everything possible to nurture and preserve the wonderful order of nature.

We do not know whether other species on earth besides humans have created similar science for themselves. We do know, however, that no species on earth other than human has ever tried to occupy the habitat of other species, to destroy other species and to seek ways and means to tame nature.

This is the declared programme of the "natural-sciences". Nature-science defines itself as the acquisition of knowledge and skills to better cope with the alleged adversities of nature vis-à-vis humans.

Who defines the "adversities" of nature vis-à-vis the "creation of God", the image of "God" on earth, the human being? Well!

From the beginning,natural-scientists bring their "products" to the markets. In markets, the buyers determine the "rules of the game". The buyers often sell on as "intermediate traders". The top end buyers are the "rulers". Ultimately, natural-scientists serve their "arts" to the rulers. They become "sellers" of "products" at top prices on the market. Or they are "employees" of those who set the "rules of the game" in the markets. The laws of the market.

Determined by the laws of the market, the shirt is closer to the "natural-scientists" than "anything else". From the beginning. In the course of time, the "new scientists" have hijacked for themselves almost all the available positive qualities that the respective language offers and/or can be newly created in the language.

The natural-sciences are becoming more and more "branched". First in biology, chemistry and physics. Further ramifications follow, supposedly for the sake of "specialisation". The specialists dig themselves into deep trenches, "develop" their special abbreviations as a "specific language" to generally secure the specific meaning of their existence. If their "products" are marketable, the specialists' existences are secured. They then live well and do not want to know what is being done with their "products". They are not responsible for anything. It interests them little that they can no longer see nature from their "deep trenches". "Deepening", i.e., specialisation has its price!

Why doall these "fumblers and tinkerers" want to call themselves scientists?

The main branches of biology are: Plants (botany) and animals (zoology). In other words, "living" nature. The main branches (specialisations) of "animals" are: Descriptions of moving living beings that can be perceived with the eyes, with one exception.

This biology separates the human being from the main branch of moving living beings. Because for the natural-sciences, the human being is the human being and not an "animal". Only man has been able to create the natural-sciences. Only man is said to be endowed with this ability because he is a special "super-natural creation", a creation of "God". Who is God? I do not know.

Thus, natural-science joins the "ancestral gallery" of Moses, Jesus and Muhammad. According to this, man is not an integral part of nature, but a "creation" of "God". Thus, the specializations in zoology remain for decades the found perceptible remaining moving living beings.

In biology, the human being is given a special position. The human being is described in many dimensions: In human biology, in anthropology (study of man), in primatology, in the theory of evolution, etc. The Natural-science has "mandatorily" positioned man as the highest of all living beings and as the "only antagonist" of nature on earth.

Biological anthropology has also classified the "homo-sapiens" and elevated the blond-blue-eyed-white-Christian "homo-sapiens" to the highest rank as the most superior "race".

This biology, with the "most global" claim among the three "main branches" of the natural-sciences, looked attentively at chemistry and physics and came to "ponder" about botany.

Botany,in addition to descriptive plant science, has classified the "flora" on earth into "useful" and "less useful" to humans. In the process of nurturing the "useful" plants, they occasionally found inexplicable "damage". The "search" for the "pests" remained unsuccessful until 1940. Then the device invented by physics called the electron microscope made the "pest", a very small "living being", describable visible. They gave these living beings the name "virus". "Virus" means poison. This stigmatisation of the virus has remained.

The invention of the "light microscope" had previously enabled biologists to "realise" that there are living things that are smaller than human eyes can see. This was the birth of "microbiology". Gradually, biology classified micro-organisms scientifically into bacteriology, mycology, protozoology and, sometime later, virology. These are deep "graves" of specialisations. What do the "buried" see when they want to look up?

What are "pests" in botany, are called "pathogens" in human and animal science. The damage caused by the "pathogens" is called "diseases" and the means of fighting the "diseases" are called medicine. The "pests" and the "pathogens" must be fought to destruction with all the means of combat invented by the natural-sciences.

This is also the birth of "biological weapons". Chemical weapons were already there. The "A" weapons were already in sight. Despite verbal outlawing, "ABC" weapons continue to be tinkered with. Also in Germany. High-security wings in German "universities". Not all university teachers are aware of this.

For the destruction of the "pathogen" that has penetrated the human body, the "physician" has three "weapons" in his quiver: "cutting away", "poisoning" and "shooting down". But if the pathogen is a virus, the "physician" is powerless.

The virus is only viable as a part of the "living body". The virus needs the host, the human being or another living being. Viruses cannot be isolated in the body. The viruses cannot live and multiply without "hosts". They die. Immutable rule of nature. That is why "medical doctors" are reduced from "hunters" to "observers" and to "caretakers" when they have to deal with viruses.

With the wisdom of an Albert Einstein on my shoulders:

"To be an impeccable member of a flock of sheep, one must first and foremost be a sheep",

was the short interruption in the chronology of Corona's history, which is unavoidable, so as not to become a sheep.

So back to the "Corona story", back to 20 January 2020.

The Pasteur Institute in Paris fears that human-to-human transmission exists. The Pasteur Institute is an internationally highly regarded research centre for biology and medicine, also advises the WHO, and is 41% funded by the French state.

➢

Who finances the remaining 59% and why should the

Pasteur Institute be

financed "externally"? To advise the

WHO?

And how is the

WHO

financed?

The Pasteur Institute is an "epidemiological" surveillance centre, controller of infectious diseases and inventor of diagnostic and testing procedures in "medicine". On 20 January 2020, this institute considers it possible that the "new pathogen" has an 80% similarity with that Corona virus that caused the last "pandemic", called SARS in 2003/04, but did not spread worldwide. And according to this assessment, the new virus is less dangerous than the pathogen "SARS- 2003/04".

➢

A pandemic is

not an extension of

an epidemic. "Pandemic" is an abbreviation for the description of a situation in which a

similar

epidemic is occurring in many parts of the world at the same time.

➢

The above statement of the Paris Pasteur Institute is evidence that the publication of the "findings" of the Chinese "specialists" on the internet of 7 January 2020 was available to all.

The British Centre for the Analysis of Global Infectious Diseases at Imperial College London considers the spread of the epidemic in China to be much greater than the government of the People's Republic is publicly "spreading". Not about 200 infected, but more than 1700 infected.

Did it come down to counting fly legs?

➢

By the way, I stumble over the name of the

British centre

for the analysis of global infectious diseases,

Imperial College London

. In the Anglo-Saxon education system, a "college" does not have the rank of a

university

. A college is not a "

research institute

", but an

educational institution

.

➢

"

Imperial

College" reveals that this was one of the important cadre schools of the "British Empire". In the

18th

century, the

British

chased most

European

Christians out of their "overseas possessions" with brutal force of arms in order to establish the "British Empire".

The apple does not fall far from the tree.

On 20 January, it was clear to the world's second largest economy that a "flu-like disease" had developed into a fatal epidemic in Wuhan. The epidemic spread rapidly. A "human-to-human transmission" of the pathogen (droplet infection) was also considered likely. The "administrations" in Hubei were overwhelmed. The second largest economic power in the world began to uncompromisingly mobilise the entire "state power" in order to limit this epidemic in terms of area at any rate.

In plain language, it means "locking up" the "infected" people and the movement of people from one place to another.

➢

In order not to be reduced "

to an impeccable member of a flock of sheep

", I take my knowledge and mind together and think about the

facts

in context.

An epidemic has broken out in Wuhan. The cause of this epidemic is a virus. The epidemic threatens to spread beyond Wuhan and Hubei (the province).

A virus is a microbiological being with special properties. I leave it to the natural-scientists to argue whether a virus is also a living being. Unlike other microorganisms, a virus cannot live and reproduce without a "host". A "host" is a cell of another living being. Currently, this living being is the human being. The average lifespan of viruses is about 14 days.

We do not know what functions the viruses have in the overall order of nature. We do not know how many different microbiological beings the healthy humans must harbour in order to remain healthy.

We only know that some "virus subspecies" can cause trouble for humans as uninvited "guests" if humans do not succeed in repelling or simply "coping" with the uninvited "guests" with the body's own health power. During the process of rejection through the respiratory tract, these viruses have no chance of survival if they cannot quickly find a new "host" (droplet infection, or "skipping"). Most of the time, the viruses die.

The healthy person repels the "uninvited guest". Only when health is "damaged" does the "uninvited guest" have a chance to survive, to live and to multiply. A "struggle" takes place. There is no possibility of "foreign intervention" in this "fight" between the weakened human being and the viruses in the body.

The viruses in the body cannot be "poisoned", cannot be "shot down", cannot be "cut away". Because the viruses cannot be isolated in the human body. Thus the "quiver" of the "medical doctors" and the natural-scientists is empty.

But the "medical professionals" and the natural-scientists use the "arts" of putting off the "frightened": The search for a "therapy", the search for a "vaccine" and its imminent availability. More on the "vaccine" later.

If the body's own strength is not enough, if health is considerably impaired, the human being dies within 14 days on average. These rules determined by nature are not negotiable, cannot be changed.

➢

Those who claim otherwise want to make us "

an impeccable member of a flock of sheep

" and "make money " at our cost.

We all know that people are often bothered by "cold viruses" and "flu viruses". Not all people. Only a small part. So we know that a small proportion of people do not "cope" well with the nuisance and have to deal with the viruses. How small is this small part of the total? This "small" part cannot even be expressed in "per mille". Of this part that does not "cope well", again only a small part dies, about 3 per cent, when the time has come for this small part to "go" anyway.

The "mortality rate" in relation to viral diseases plays an insignificant role in the annual statistics of causes of death. In Germany, about 1,000,000 people die every year, about 2,800 people every day. Even before "Corona", about 70,000 people died annually from respiratory diseases, including about 20,000 people from "flu".

➢

I keep that little statistic in mind so as not to be reduced to a

sheep.

The healthier a person is, the more easily they repel attacks from "parasites" of all kinds. The stronger the body's own power, the more easily people repel the most frequently attacking parasites such as bacteria, fungi and viruses.

After this little basic of health sciencewe are back to the "flu epidemic" in Wuhan in the People's Republic of China.

So, on 20 January, to overcome this "flu epidemic", the world's second largest economy decided to use the only available, simple and straightforward strategy: Deprive the viruses of their livelihood. To this end, the People's Republic of China has taken coordinated steps on two levels: At the level of individuals and at the level of areas.

Deprive the viruses of their basis of life.

The infected persons were isolated and supported to strengthen their body's own power, attempts were made to locate possibly "endangered" persons ("chains of infection") with all available means and to place them under observation. All for 14 days each ("incubation period").

As is well known, the People's Republic of China has the "digital technology" to oversee the "reach" of all citizens in all walks of life. Because the People's Republic of China has mastered digital technology, it also knows the limits of this technology. It cannot track down all possible "virus carriers". For this reason, the People's Republic of China decided to impose a "habitat quarantine" in the 11 million city of Wuhan or in the entire province of Hubei in parallel to the quarantine of persons. "In principle", no one was allowed to leave Hubei province.

➢

In principle, the virus could be

captured

regionally. In principle, because a

complete

capture of the "chains of infection" is not possible. The second largest

economic power

uncompromisingly mobilises the entire "state power" and

begins

to contain this epidemic "area-wise" in the entire republic.

The Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention publicly states on 20 January: "We can prevent the outbreak if the right measures are taken now." The Robert Koch Institute, the highest federal health authority, sees no need for action on 20 January and explains: The "new virus" does not simply transmit from person to person as with flu.

The Robert Koch Institute even fails to check, whether all "health offices" in the country are functional or they were already saved to bankruptcy. An oversight? Just an oversight?

The WHO considers that it is likely to spread to other countries because of global travel habits. The greatest risk of spread would be within China because of the beginning of the New Year. This is when a particularly large number of people are on the move. The possibility of tracing the "chains of infection" would thus be low.

The WHO is concerned about private domestic travel in China.

What about travel of the many business people who are not Chinese and live off the Chinese market?

Status 21 January 2020

Christian Drosten, internationally celebrated virologist and the Corona specialist, is more present in the German media than the Robert Koch Institute. He gives a long interview in "tagesschau24" (main national news). His key statements on 21 January are:

"We

know little, of course

. ...

We don't even know

what it means if this becomes a pandemic. And ...

we don't know too much about this

virus

yet. ...

from a virological point of view

(is)

a new type of

SARS corona virus. ... This

does not mean that

just because it is

closely related to

the SARS virus, the

disease will be

as severe as SARS.

...

➢

Christian Drosten

has wanted to be the Corona specialist since

2003

.

With the

drugs, I think you

can use all the

preliminary work on

the SARS coronavirus. There are

even

drugs that have been

tried

against the SARS virus that look very promising. It will be more complicated with the

vaccines if they go that

far. ...

If you really have a

disease that

you want to

vaccinate

against because it has

spread

, then you certainly have to go back very far to the beginning. ... With the SARS-Corona virus, the

spread efficiency

was actually relatively low. And

we believe that

a combination of intervention measures, particularly

in the major Asian cities, where very rigorous isolation was carried out,

but also in combination with virus characteristics that were favourable, have led to it

limiting itself again almost by itself

. ...

At the beginning of an

infection epidemic, the

danger is

always overestimated

. This is simply because the conspicuous,

particularly ill patients

are recorded and those who are mildly infected - and there are always those - are not initially recorded. ...

Medical diagnostics, which

thrives on looking at the patient, does

not take us too far here. Because we are in the middle of the

influenza season in the

northern hemisphere, so not only in

China

. It is also the influenza season here, and

this illness

looks very

similar to a viral flu in

many patients. ...

... from my point of view, it makes sense to

perhaps react a little over-sensitively now

. Because we

know too little

and at the same time, we see that the whole thing is apparently just really spreading, and surprisingly quickly.

And we really have to use

this small remaining window of

opportunity to

join forces and try to stop

it. It doesn't matter whether we already know that it's dangerous or mild.

➢

On

21 January

,

Christian Drosten knew

little and believed

much.

➢

On 22 January it

becomes clear what

Christian Drosten

meant by "

stopping the whole thing"

on

21 January.

Christian Drosten

thinks it is very good that the Chinese authorities in

Wuhan

have ordered

exit controls.

He thinks it would be

"not very efficient"

if Germany were to "

now

issue

an entry warning for China

" or want to carry out "

fever controls at airports

".

The essential task, he said, was elsewhere: "We certainly need to be prepared for laboratories to be able to test for this virus and for hospitals to think about what they will do if there is an increased number of cases. "

➢

As with SARS-CoV-1,

Christian Drosten

was almost the first internationally to publish a "standard test" for the new virus. He does not want to

prevent

the Corona epidemic; he wants to

manage

it.

"This virus in particular is new. ... that's how you can see it now from a virological point of view, a new type of SARS corona virus. ... It actually has rather positive aspects. We can already cross-use some of the research work that has been done so far. We have a lot of preliminary findings and therefore no longer have to do a lot of basic scientific work. ... That does not mean that just because it is closely related to the SARS virus, the disease will also be as severe as with SARS. ... It is certainly somewhat surprising. It was thought that the issue of SARS was closed forever, that this virus had been eradicated. Now it is coming back in a different variant. “

The SARS Corona virus caused the

first

"pandemic" of this century in

2003.

It made

Christian Drosten

known as a remarkable virologist. He was also involved in the development of

the first test

(detection) of this virus, as with this "new" Corona virus as well. There were

no "medicines"

against the disease SARS. Before a

vaccine

could be invented, the virus disappeared. This is the background for the

last three sentences

by

Christian Drosten

:

"It is certainly somewhat surprising. It was certainly thought that the issue of SARS was closed forever, that this virus had been eradicated. Now it's coming back in a different variant.

“

Do the virologists know, does Christian Drosten know how, why and where the SARS Corona virus disappeared to? Do the virologists even want to know?

➢

The expression "

eradicated

" I just let it pass as a gift to

Christian Drosten

. I am not asking about weapons in his arsenal. He is only advised to find out

where

and with

which weapons

the SARS-CoV-1 was "eradicated".

➢

Wanting to "find out" about this would be closer to "research work".

But who is to finance such work

?

"We can already imagine that it probably comes from a similar source, that is, once again from wild animals that were traded, used by humans for industrial purposes. That will certainly become clear in the next few weeks. The Chinese colleagues are already on the trail. ... As far as the drugs are concerned, I believe that it is possible to use all the preliminary work on the SARS-Corona virus. There are even drugs that have already been tried out against the SARS virus that look very promising. It will be more complicated with the vaccines, if you go that far.

➢

A clarification of where the "SARS Corona virus" had jumped to humans is

ultimately lacking.

➢

But not the clarification of the question whether "

the much preliminary work on

the SARS coronavirus" has "already been

tried out

" on

animals

such as mice or also on

humans

.

➢

Microbiologists in general and virologists in particular know that a medicinal intervention

against the

viruses is

not possible.

The viruses cannot be "

shot down

", not "

poisoned"

, not "

cut away"

without the "host" of the viruses.

➢

The medical profession has no other weapons at its disposal. In

this

context, the reference to "

vaccines

" is another

gift from me to

virologist

Christian Drosten

for the time being. I will come back to "vaccines" later.

"If you really have a disease that you want to vaccinate against because it has spread, then you certainly have to go back very far to the beginning. ... With the SARS-Corona virus, the spread efficiency was actually relatively low. And we believe that a combination of intervention measures, particularly in the major Asian cities, where very rigorous isolation was carried out, but also in combination with virus characteristics that were favourable, have led to it limiting itself again almost by itself. People in Wuhan wear respirators. The new type of virus was detected there for the first time.

What was needed was a great awareness among the population of the big Asian cities, for example in Hong Kong, which then led to patients going to the doctor early on, especially at the onset of symptoms, and thus also being able to be isolated at an early stage. ...

Of course, you can look at the statistics now, there are four deaths out of hundreds of infected people. But that doesn't really say all that much at the moment. If we were to say that in a few weeks we have established that the disease is spreading and the mortality rate has remained the same, then that would be a very bad situation. ...

At the beginning of an infection epidemic, the danger is always overestimated. This is simply because the conspicuous, particularly ill patients are recorded and those who are mildly infected - and there are always those - are not initially recorded.

Medical diagnostics, which thrives on looking at the patient, does not take us too far here. Because we are in the middle of the influenza season in the northern hemisphere, so not only in China. It is also the influenza season here, and this illness looks very similar to a viral flu in many patients.

And we need to test a sample in the lab because of that, to be able to say yes or no whether it's this new virus now or not. "

tagesschau24:The World Health Organisation wants to decide at a crisis meeting tomorrow whether an international health emergency should be declared. What would that mean? And does that make sense from your point of view?

Christian Drosten:Yes, from my point of view it makes sense to perhaps react a little over-sensitively now. Because we know too little and at the same time, we see that the whole thing is obviously spreading, and surprisingly quickly.

And we really have to use this small remaining window of opportunity to join forces and try to stop it. Regardless of whether we already know that it will be dangerous or rather mild. “

➢

Does the virologist

Christian Drosten

not want to know and simply ignore that a virus cannot spread

itself

? A "host" must spread the virus. Which "host" or "hosts" come into question in the current case?

Christian Drosten

has said nothing about this. Why not?

Status 22 January 2020

The president of the Robert Koch Institute, Lothar Wieler, thinks that the Chinese authorities did not act excessively.

Christian Drosten finds it very good that the Chinese authorities in Wuhan have ordered exit controls. But he thinks it would be "not very efficient" if Germany were to "now issue an entry warning for China" or carry out "fever checks at airports".

➢

Well, the Chinese authorities in Wuhan have

not

ordered

exit controls

. The Chinese authorities in Wuhan have

prevented entry and exit

. Are the virologists allowed to be so inaccurate in their perception?

➢

Why does the responsible advisor to the

German

government,

Christian Drosten,

consider it "not very efficient" to initiate preventive measures for Germany on

22 January 2020?

Does he want the new Corona virus to

enter

into

Germany

so that the

virologist

can prove

his excellence?

The essential task, he said, was elsewhere: "We certainly need to be prepared for laboratories to be able to test for this virus and for hospitals to think about what they will do if there is an increased number of cases. "

➢

I have to take a deep breath.

Christian Drosten is

not thinking about

preventing

an epidemic in

Germany

. He wants to

manage the epidemic

in Germany.

In an interview with tagesschau24, the department head of infectious diseases at the University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Marylyn Addo, also emphasised that the priority now is to inform the staff in the clinics.

The will to hinder the entry of the Corona virus does not occur to the "politicians", to the practitioners and to this type of ❠scientists" like Christian Drosten.

➢

Who is

Christian Drosten?

Why is he incapable of thinking about

preventing

an epidemic? Why does he want to

manage

the Corona virus epidemic as a celebrated virologist? Yes, who is

Christian Drosten?

Christian Heinrich Maria Drosten, born in 1972 in the Bonifazius Hospital Lingen in Emsland, grew up on a farm in Groß Hesepe in Emsland. At the Marianum Episcopal Grammar School in Meppen, he takes his school-leaving exams at the age of 20. He decides to study instead of taking over his parents' farm.

➢

Nothing is known to the public about the time until the final exams, the

Abitur

. Nothing about his school achievements - both educationally and socially. Nor about the parental family and the siblings.

After completing his high school, Christian Drosten begins his studies in chemical engineering at the Technical University of Dortmund. He shifts to biology at the University of Münster.

➢

The first choice of subject indicates an interest in "

higher craft technologies

".

Christian Drosten

himself has not publicly announced anything about this shift of subject. Nor has he said anything about

how many

semesters he spent at the

Technical University of Dortmund

before turning to

biology

at the

University of Münster.

A "radical" shift indeed.

Christian Drosten changes his field of study again at the age of 22. He starts studying human medicine at the University of Frankfurt in 1994. At the age of 28, he passed the state examination in Frankfurt duly as stipulated. After the "state examination", the "Arzt im Praktikum" (practical training) is required for licensing as a doctor of human medicine.

➢

It is not known why

Christian Drosten

switched from

biology

to

human medicine

. The fact is that many doctors of human medicine do not take up the

profession out

of

vocation.

Human doctors

earn

comparatively

very good salaries

. Whatsoever.

➢

Only, published reporting that he had always been interested in

viruses

cannot be true. The study path from biology via microbiology to the virology would not only be shorter. And why at the distant

University of Frankfurt

?

Christian Drosten completed his "Arzt im Praktikum" (practical training) at the Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine in Hamburg, in the renowned Department of Virology, headed by Prof. Dr. Herbert Schmitz (1940, doctorate 1967, habilitation 1972, "Privat Dozent" (private lecturer) 1973, professorship 1974) and received his medical licence in 2002. Christian Drosten is now 30 years old.

He decides to pursue an academic career, stays at the Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine in Hamburg and joins the laboratory group for virology at the Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine in Hamburg, headed by Dr Stephan Günther, who is nine years senior to Christian Drosten.

His mentor

Stephan Günther

had taken his Doctorate in

1993

at the renounced "

Charité in Berlin

" on the topic

"

Emergence of hepatitis B virus mutants in the course of interferon-alpha-induced seroconversion from HBeAg to anti-Habe

".

In

2003

he "habilitated" (licence of professional teaching at a University) in medicine at the

University Hospital

Eppendorf in Hamburg.

At 31, Christian Drosten completed his studies in 2003 with a doctorate at the University of Frankfurt on the topic: "High-throughput PCR test system for immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis B virus for testing blood donors".

➢

The titles of the

two

doctorates are remarkable. Why the doctorate in Frankfurt? Why not in Hamburg?

➢

By the way,

Christian Drosten

's doctoral thesis has not been published. Keeping with the normal practice

Christian Drosten

's doctoral thesis

should have been

stored in

2003

as a

dissertation

in the library of the

Johann Wolfgang Goethe University

Frankfurt am Main. This is not the case.

➢

Up until his doctorate, his educational life was without

exclamation marks.

➢

In early

2003,

the

first

pandemic of the

21st

century took shape in the

southern Chinese

city of

Foshan

in the most populous and economically developed province of

Guangdong.

A yet unknown pneumonia was spreading rapidly. As mentioned, the

first pandemic of

this century. More about this later.

➢

A "gold-digger mood" among virologists still without "pandemic" experience.

Finally,

a virus epidemic! The

WHO

was providing "swab samples" for diagnosis. So, the search for a

correlation

as

proof

between the

unknown

pneumonia and a certain virus as causative agent could begin. Many domestic and foreign microbiologists and virologists are on the spot.

The laboratory group for virology at the Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine in Hamburg, led by Stephan Günther, succeeded faster than other virologists in identifying the "pathogen" as a new type of virus, a "new version" of the "corona viruses", and in creating a test for diagnostics. Stephan Günther and Christian Drosten were allowed to put "the test" on the web and publish "the test" in an article in an English journal. The virus causing "severe acute respiratory syndrome" was described. A new "variant" of the Corona virus family was given the name SARS-CoV.

National honours follow. Both

Stephan Günther

and

Christian Drosten

were awarded the Federal Cross of Merit 1st Degree in

2005.

Young

Christian Drosten

also became famous "overnight". And

SARS-CoV

is still a "blank slate". The virus called SARS-CoV

disappeared from the real world

. But it

remained in

the high-security laboratories.

Christian Drosten

is now

31

years old. He continues to work with

SARS-CoV

in the hope that the SARS-CoV virus would come back in a mutated version. He keeps close contact with the

WHO

. At any sign of a virus epidemic, he is on hand to create a test for diagnosis.

➢

Christian Drosten

rushed ahead of his mentor

Stephan Günther in the

career ladder and is now known worldwide as

the

"Corona virologist".

➢

The "corona viruses" have been known since

1960.

So far, virologists have been able to "detect" different "corona viruses" in humans in the upper respiratory tract in connection with mild "cold complaints". In animals also with more severe complaints. The corona virus family dries quickly in the air and loses infectivity".

The "pandemic" with SARS symptoms (an atypical pneumonia) was short-lived, much to the "chagrin" of virologists. By summer 2003, this atypical pneumonia named SARS had disappeared.

In total, about 8100 people were infected with SARS. At most 900 people died from the new type