The Great Reset - Catherine Dumont - E-Book

The Great Reset E-Book

Catherine Dumont

0,0

Beschreibung

The new simulated scenarios carried out by the World Economic Forum starting in 2020 account for global cyberattack situations, and in fact since then cyberattacks have become more frequent or so does the press tell us. The idea, the threat, as happened with the pandemic, is beginning to circulate. What would happen if we had to face a wave of cyberattacks that affected companies and their servers, but also the operation of hospitals, transportation and security? The proposed scenario refers not only to a cyberattack, but to a new pandemic: the cyber pandemic. The world economic system is supposed to need a "reset", and of course the WEF already has the plan about what the new global system should look like, what energy paradigm should be dominant and which players will be fundamental in the immediate future.

Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:

Android
iOS
von Legimi
zertifizierten E-Readern
Kindle™-E-Readern
(für ausgewählte Pakete)

Seitenzahl: 31

Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2021

Das E-Book (TTS) können Sie hören im Abo „Legimi Premium” in Legimi-Apps auf:

Android
iOS
Bewertungen
0,0
0
0
0
0
0
Mehr Informationen
Mehr Informationen
Legimi prüft nicht, ob Rezensionen von Nutzern stammen, die den betreffenden Titel tatsächlich gekauft oder gelesen/gehört haben. Wir entfernen aber gefälschte Rezensionen.



The new threat begins to circulate

If we have learned something from the Covid-19 pandemic, it is that for many characters or groups of power it was not a surprise. Over the months we learned of the existence of the Global Monitoring Preparedness Board, which depends on the UN and was created just a couple of years before the coronavirus pandemic in order to assess whether the world was prepared for an eventual pandemic, and it included the participation of Dr. Elias of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Dr. Athony Fauci of the NIAID (National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases) and the director of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Dr. George Gao. We learned about Event 201, a pandemic simulation scenario held on October 18, 2019, in New York City, hosted by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, John Hopkins University and the World Economic Forum. We reviewed Bill Gates’ TedX talk from 2015 in which he warned that we should prepare for the next epidemic. We learned that gain-of-function studies to enhance the pathogenicity of viruses had been carried out for decades, and that they were financed, through intermediate organizations, by the same institute that Fauci directed. We reviewed the patent study conducted by Dr David Martin, and found that there were at least 73 patents related to human coronaviruses, their detection and treatment, and that some of those patents even predated the first SARS-CoV outbreak in 2002. We were alarmed to learn that the challenged PCR test was officially recommended by the UN as a detection mode on January 17, 2020, just a few days after the first case was known and when there were still no cases registered outside of China, and we also learned that in the paper published in record time on the 23rd of that same month, its author, the German Dr. Christian Drosten, stated that the virus “posed a challenge for public health”. We reread with fear the 2010 Rockefeller Foundation report, Scenarios for the future of technology and international development, which describes, among others, the scenario of a pandemic that would imply quarantines, use of masks, States of Control and citizens who are capable of giving up their freedoms to obtain protection from the State.

All these actors had been working to “prepare the world for the pandemic”, they had been developing messenger RNA vaccines, patenting developments, financing studies so that coronaviruses were more contagious and more lethal, they had been warning that a scenario of confinement, fear and control like the one we live in as of March 2020 was just around the corner. The question to ask ourselves is what´s next? The life that we knew until the beginning of the pandemic will no longer exist, in any case we will live in the “new normal”, as it has been called. This new normal implies many things: millions of jobs have been lost, millions of small businesses, shops or companies have disappeared, and in fact there was a general reconfiguration of the way we consume, work, study and interact. In this new context, dependence on the Internet has intensified: not only for trade and economic activity, but also for work, education and even for contact with our loved ones, everything is now mediated by screens and subject to the connectivity.