1,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: Booksell-Verlag
- Kategorie: Religion und Spiritualität
- Sprache: Englisch
In "The Miracle of Saint Anthony," Maurice Maeterlinck explores the profound themes of faith, hope, and the human condition through a poignant and symbolist lens. The play artfully intertwines the miraculous with the mundane, portraying the life and miracles of Saint Anthony with a lyrical and reflective narrative style. Its rich, evocative language and philosophical depth reflect the late 19th and early 20th-century European literary context, characterized by a departure from realism towards introspection and metaphysical inquiry. Maeterlinck's deft handling of silence and presence highlights the tension between desire and fulfillment, inviting the audience to engage in a dialogue about the nature of belief and the search for meaning. Maurice Maeterlinck, a Belgian playwright and poet, was a leading figure in the Symbolist movement, which sought to convey emotions and ideas through indirect and suggestive means. His own spiritual inquiries, influenced by his background in mysticism and philosophy, permeate his works, including "The Miracle of Saint Anthony." The author's exploration of the intersection between the divine and the human experience is evident throughout, reflecting both his personal convictions and the broader cultural movement of his time. "The Miracle of Saint Anthony" is a compelling read for those interested in exploring the depths of spirituality and the complexities of faith. Maeterlinck's masterful use of allegory and symbolism not only provides a rich textual experience but also invites readers to reflect on their own beliefs and the miracles in their lives. This text is invaluable for students of literature and spirituality alike, encouraging profound contemplation and emotional resonance. In this enriched edition, we have carefully created added value for your reading experience: - A succinct Introduction situates the work's timeless appeal and themes. - The Synopsis outlines the central plot, highlighting key developments without spoiling critical twists. - A detailed Historical Context immerses you in the era's events and influences that shaped the writing. - An Author Biography reveals milestones in the author's life, illuminating the personal insights behind the text. - A thorough Analysis dissects symbols, motifs, and character arcs to unearth underlying meanings. - Reflection questions prompt you to engage personally with the work's messages, connecting them to modern life. - Hand‐picked Memorable Quotes shine a spotlight on moments of literary brilliance. - Interactive footnotes clarify unusual references, historical allusions, and archaic phrases for an effortless, more informed read.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2023
Ähnliche
The miracle of Saint Anthony
Table of Contents
Introduction
When a pious household calls on a saint to mend what greed has broken, faith and farce collide in the shadow of a miracle.
Maurice Maeterlinck’s The Miracle of Saint Anthony enters this trembling space between devotion and desire with a theatrical poise that feels both ancient and unsettlingly modern. A leading voice of European Symbolism and later a Nobel laureate in Literature, Maeterlinck knew how to evoke invisible forces—fear, hope, and communal suggestion—and let them move characters as surely as any plot device. In this work he bends that sensibility toward comedy, scrutinizing the rituals of belief without dismissing their human necessity. The result is a drama in which laughter illuminates conscience, and the promise of wonder exposes the price of self-deception.
Written in the early twentieth century by the Belgian dramatist Maurice Maeterlinck, The Miracle of Saint Anthony (originally in French as Le Miracle de saint Antoine) is a short play that tests the thresholds between sacred legend and everyday life. Its premise is straightforward: a provincial home becomes the stage for expectations of a miracle associated with Saint Anthony, the patron invoked in moments of loss. Around this expectation gather family, neighbors, and onlookers, each bringing hopes and motives. Maeterlinck’s intention is not to stage spectacle, but to examine how the idea of the miraculous alters speech, posture, and moral clarity in ordinary people.
Maeterlinck’s dramatic art had long explored the unseen—those currents of fate and feeling that pass through rooms and relationships. Here, he retools that art for satire, asking how the rumor of sanctity reshapes a household’s priorities. The play’s economy—a compact setting, concentrated time, and a chorus of converging voices—serves his purpose: to reveal how communal imagination can sanctify self-interest or transfigure it. He avoids doctrinal arguments and focuses instead on behavior: who listens, who looks away, who calculates, who prays. The miracle remains a question as much as an event, a measure of character more than a disruption of nature.
This play’s classic status rests on the precision with which it captures the modern drama’s pivot from solemn Symbolism to nimble tragicomedy. Maeterlinck preserves the aura of the mysterious while letting everyday speech, props, and social habits carry the action. Its influence is felt in the twentieth century’s fascination with ambiguity—where the unseen is not denied but filtered through skepticism, satire, and empathy. The Miracle of Saint Anthony stands as a touchstone in Maeterlinck’s oeuvre: compact, performable, and thematically rich, it has been included in collected editions, translated for new audiences, and discussed as a key experiment in his comic range.
Part of the work’s endurance lies in its stance: it neither mocks faith nor flatters it. By giving equal weight to devotion, opportunism, fear, and hope, Maeterlinck sketches a community recognizable across borders and eras. The play demonstrates how a single extraordinary claim reorganizes attention—how doorways suddenly matter, how whispers gain authority, how silence can accuse. Such techniques anticipate strands of later twentieth-century theater, where tone shifts without warning and the boundary between solemn ritual and everyday routine blurs. Readers and spectators encounter a dramatic language that is supple, suggestive, and attuned to the moral acoustics of a crowded room.
Composed against the backdrop of a Catholic culture that shaped daily rhythms in Belgium and beyond, the play engages the historical aura of saints without becoming a pageant. At a moment when European societies wrestled with modern skepticism and enduring religious practice, Maeterlinck stages an intimate case study. He shows how the sacred enters through household thresholds rather than cathedrals, how belief is mediated by rumor, and how authority is negotiated around tables and corridors. The historical texture enriches, rather than anchors, the drama: it clarifies why an appeal to Saint Anthony feels plausible and urgent within the characters’ social and moral economy.
Formally, The Miracle of Saint Anthony is a compact dramatic machine. Its brevity heightens tension; its ensemble structure orchestrates overlapping motives with musical clarity. The play draws on the medieval tradition of miracle narratives while stripping them to their behavioral core, renewing the genre for a modern stage. Maeterlinck’s staging instincts—use of thresholds, crowd dynamics, and the charged stillness before a decisive moment—replace overt theatrical effects with psychological suspense. Action arises from small negotiations and sudden reversals of status. The miraculous, in this framework, becomes a catalyst for performance: of piety, of grief, of calculation, and occasionally of genuine compassion.
The imagery is modest yet resonant: the hum of a household under strain, the hastily arranged tokens of reverence, the social choreography of visitors and kin. Doors, candles, and murmured invocations create a perimeter between the ordinary and the hoped-for extraordinary. Maeterlinck treats these details as instruments, letting them sound in counterpoint with the characters’ desires. The play’s language—simple, rhythmic, and suggestive—opens spaces for the audience’s own imagination to complete the picture. What is not shown becomes as meaningful as what is. In that discretion lies the play’s power: it asks viewers to locate the miraculous within their own perceptions.
Without relying on grand protagonists, the drama turns a household into a prism for human nature. Each figure reflects a distinct attitude toward misfortune and grace—credulity, skepticism, calculation, generosity, fear of scandal, hunger for status. The interactions are brisk and revealing; alliances form and falter as the prospect of a miracle moves the goalposts of propriety. Maeterlinck refrains from caricature by granting each stance its logic. The community’s collective behavior matters as much as any single voice, and the social pressure of being observed—by neighbors, by tradition, by the imagined eyes of a saint—becomes a character in its own right.
Reading the play today, one feels the uncanny familiarity of its tensions. Public hope mingles with private interest; narratives of wonder compete with practical necessities. Maeterlinck invites audiences to listen for the ethical frequencies beneath the laughter: when does faith console, and when does it conceal? Where does compassion end and convenience begin? The dramaturgy compels attention to those questions without fixing answers. By the final curtain, the lasting impressions are tonal—a blend of tenderness and irony—and methodological: a theater that treats belief not as a target, but as a medium through which truth and self-deception slowly separate.
The Miracle of Saint Anthony remains relevant because it dramatizes how communities negotiate meaning under pressure, how the sacred can be invoked to justify, to comfort, or to confront. Its themes—faith and doubt, truth and performance, generosity and greed—continue to animate contemporary discourse in civic, domestic, and digital arenas. Maeterlinck’s achievement is to make these themes playable: clear enough to grip, open enough to haunt. For new readers and audiences, the play offers the pleasure of wit alongside the rigor of moral inquiry. It is a classic not by monumentality, but by its enduring power to illuminate ordinary hearts.
Synopsis
The Miracle of Saint Anthony is a short comic play by Maurice Maeterlinck set in a modest bourgeois household where a wealthy aunt has just been laid out. Relatives gather for a vigil, balancing outward displays of piety with private calculations about her estate. The atmosphere mixes solemn ritual with everyday chatter, revealing practical concerns that surface even in mourning. As candles burn and neighbors come and go, the family anticipates the notary’s arrival and wonders what provisions the deceased made. The play opens with quiet order, then steadily introduces friction, preparing the ground for a situation that will test motives and beliefs.
Early scenes focus on domestic details and tensions. The household discusses funeral formalities, the cost of ceremonies, and the decorum expected in a respectable home. Conversation soon turns to the aunt’s character and her rumored savings. Some remember her generosity; others stress her stubbornness and secrecy. The relatives’ differing recollections hint at competing hopes, especially regarding inheritance. Servants circulate with practical news from the sickroom and the street. The notary is delayed, which heightens anxiety. As drawers are opened and boxes inspected, the absence of any clear written testament begins to trouble everyone, and polite mourning gives way to quiet, self-interested urgency.
The missing will becomes the immediate problem. Several relatives propose a systematic search, but the house’s cluttered hiding places frustrate them. Legal questions arise: without a testament, who inherits, and how will the estate be divided? To resolve uncertainty, some suggest invoking Saint Anthony, a well-known patron of lost objects. Sending for a statue or reliquary is presented as a local custom rather than a last resort. The plan carries both religious and practical appeal: a ritual might soothe the household and, if successful, locate the document. Negotiations begin about offerings and fees, reflecting a careful balance of devotion and economy.
Representatives arrive with the image of Saint Anthony, bringing bells, candles, and set phrases for the rite. The family greets them with deference colored by calculation, clarifying what is asked and what is promised. A minor test involving a misplaced household item seems to confirm the saint’s efficacy, lifting spirits and loosening purses. The notary, once present, remains cautious, reminding everyone that only a signed paper can settle their claims. The interplay between sacred ritual and legal formality anchors the middle movement: belief is courted for its utility, yet every gesture is weighed against cost and consequence, keeping tensions politely contained.
While attention centers on the missing testament, the adjoining room with the bier becomes a source of whispers. A servant reports a sound; another feels a draught and blames the shutters. Someone remarks the hands do not look as cold as expected. Suggestions to fetch a doctor compete with concerns about propriety and expense. The relatives voice pious hope for the aunt’s soul, yet some are visibly unsettled by signs that unsettle finality. The possibility that death might not be absolute complicates their plans. The household, caught between devotion and self-interest, hesitates, its composure fraying at the edges.
As the ritual proceeds, the family intensifies prayers for the lost will, framing their petitions with careful promises. At the same time, they exchange private warnings against any miracle that might overturn the expected succession. Donations are recalculated; conditions are attached to vows. The officiants stress faith and perseverance, while the notary insists on procedure. The relatives attempt to steer the outcome, hoping to gain the document yet avoid disruptions that could nullify it. Maeterlinck frames the scene as a balance of words and wishes, where sincerity and calculation coincide, and where each new sign risks tipping the household into confusion.
A turning point arrives when unmistakable disturbances arise near the bier. Candles tremble; a sheet seems to stir; the room grows alert. Exclamations of joy mix with unease. Some relatives rush to the threshold displaying concern; others hang back, doing sums in their head. The officiants maintain composure; the notary measures implications. The idea of a miracle, welcome in abstraction, proves complicated in practice. The play emphasizes reactions rather than outcomes: faces, postures, and contradictions reveal character. These moments expose the household’s true priorities without explicitly resolving the central questions, keeping the narrative poised between revelation and restraint.
Word of the disturbance spreads, drawing neighbors and heightening scrutiny. The family tries to protect its reputation while preserving advantage. Ritual phrases grow louder; bargaining becomes more urgent. The tension aligns legal, religious, and social pressures: wills and witnesses, vows and offerings, gossip and decorum all intersect. The house feels smaller as voices overlap and instructions collide. Maeterlinck sustains the farcical pulse while maintaining a clear line through events, letting each development follow from the last. The action rises to a carefully managed peak where any decision could fix everyone’s fate, yet the final step remains delayed for maximum clarity and economy.
The Miracle of Saint Anthony presents a concise portrait of bourgeois anxiety under the twin lights of superstition and law. Its sequence moves from orderly mourning to practical problem, from ritual solution to unforeseen complication. Without disclosing final turns, the play’s core message is evident: a supposed miracle functions as a mirror, revealing motives usually kept decorous. Maeterlinck uses tight staging, precise dialogue, and controlled escalation to show how faith can be enlisted for convenience and how fate resists management. The result is a neutral study in competing loyalties—family, wealth, and belief—shaped into a compact dramatic arc with satirical edge.
