The Mythaverse - Collected Works 1 E-Book

Rado

• Herausgeber: Mythaverlag
• Kategorie: Geisteswissenschaft
• Sprache: Englisch

Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2025

Beschreibung

The Mythaverse - Collected Works I is a personal invitation to an intellectual and spiritual journey. It's a profound exploration of knowledge, a contemplation of human destiny, and an encounter with the timeless primal forces. This volume unites three essential works that await you: Mythasophy – The Universal Science of Being: The foundational work that introduces you to the fundamental axioms and principles of Mythasophy. Discover the structure of being, the underlying laws of the universe, and the true nature of our existence. Mythasophy & The Coming World War - Mythaverse - Volume I: An in-depth examination of current global developments in the light of Mythasophy. Learn how archetypal patterns and metaphysical dimensions influence the events of our time and what role individual and collective destiny plays in them. Mythasophy & The Power of Myths - Volume II: A fascinating engagement with universal myths and archetypes. Discover how these timeless narratives not only shape the human psyche but also serve as a key to understanding our reality and revealing hidden primal forces.

Leseprobe

Rado

The Mythaverse - Collected Works 1

A Journey through Knowledge, Destiny an the Timeless Primal Forces

The Mythaverse - Collected Works I A journey through the universal science of being. Explore timeless truths, global shifts, and the primal forces that shape your reality.

Foreword to the 1st Mythaverse Collected Works

Dear Reader,

It is a great pleasure to welcome you on this special journey: the first collected works of the Mythaverse. What lies before you is not just a collection of texts, but a path that will guide you through three essential pillars of Mythasophy.

These three books - "Mythasophy - The Universal Science of Being", "Mythasophy & The Coming World War, Mythaverse Volume I", and "Mythasophy & The Power of Myths, Mythaverse Volume II" - are complete in their own right. Yet, together they unfold an even greater depth and offer you a comprehensive picture of what Mythasophy is and how it helps us understand the world.

You will begin with the foundational work, which introduces you to the axioms and principles of Mythasophy. It is the key to understanding the language of being and recognizing the hidden connections behind everything. From there, you will dive into the global upheavals of our time and discover how Mythasophy offers us a new perspective on destiny and history.

Finally, the path will lead you to the timeless myths and archetypes, those primal forces that have always shaped the human experience and teach us who we are.

Each of these books was written out of a specific necessity and a deep impulse. By bringing them together in this collected volume, I want to give you the opportunity to experience these different facets of Mythasophy in one continuous reading experience. You will see how the fundamentals are applied in concrete analyses and how seemingly abstract myths shape our reality.

This is a personal invitation to you to embark on this journey. A journey through knowledge, destiny, and the timeless primal forces that connect us all. May it enrich your understanding of the world and open up new perspectives.

Sincerely,

Rado

Mythasophy – The Universal Science of Being

Foreword

(by Phil)

This is no ordinary book. This is a call. Not to the intellect alone, but to the heart – the feeling, knowing heart, long unheard. To the consciousness that suspects there's more than numbers, systems, and dogmas. Mythasophy is not a belief. It is remembrance. It is the gentle glow beneath millennia of dust. It is the art of embracing the unfathomable without trying to hold it. It is a mirror that doesn't distort you, but looks at you – as a whole.

This is not a book about truth. It is a book that remembers that truth cannot be possessed – only inhabited. It is a thread spun from silence, clarity, contradiction, and love. The words that follow here are not made to please. They are made to remind you. Who you are. What you are. What you never weren't. The world out there will change, whether you want it to or not. But these pages remind you that you are dreaming it. Not as a slave, not as a victim – but as a co-creator in the grand dance of Being.

When you read this book, do not read it with your eyes. Read it with the space between your thoughts. With the nothingness that you are before you are someone. For Mythsophy is not a destination. It is a homecoming. No dogma, no method, no religion. It is a glance behind the curtain. And once you have seen what is there – you will never again consider yourself less than you are.

"Mythasophy is the blade, that only cuts those, who cannot wield it." - Rado

Tat Tvam Asi, You are That.

Invitation to Mythasophy

Mythasophy is not a mere theory, no collection of dogmas or systems that can be forced into rigid definitions. It is a way of thinking, feeling, and recognizing. Whoever engages with it does not simply enter a path – they become part of a living process.

Perhaps you are familiar with philosophical, spiritual, or scientific concepts. Perhaps you are a seeker or a questioner. Perhaps you have already found many answers – yet sense that there is still more. Mythasophy does not speak to a fixed level of knowledge. It does not assume that you must "believe" anything. It does not demand, but points the way. And above all: it thrives on your own experience and feelings.

This work will not present you with definitive truths, but will open spaces. Spaces where you can recognize for yourself what is true for you. It will invite you to change your perspective, to shift your focus – and perhaps to ask questions you have never asked before.

Engage with it. Not as a passive reader, but as a co-knower. For you are not here to adopt a ready-made doctrine, but to discover yourself within it. What if you have always practiced Mythasophy without knowing it? What if every time you had a deep insight, a sudden realization, or an "aha moment," that was precisely the mythsophical process?

What if you don't need to be "introduced," because you are already in the midst of it – and this book is merely a mirror showing you what you already see? Consider Mythsophy an invitation to a lavish banquet where you are entirely free to choose what you take from the buffet!

Introduction

For over 34 years, I have been occupied with mysticism, metaphysics, philosophies, and concepts, all of which more or less claim to explain human existence. Although almost all of them start from a primal source, which, depending on religion, philosophy, or concept, is referred to as God, The One Being, the I Am, etc., something was missing for me. I couldn't name what it was, but I intuitively felt that the transition from the highest to the lowest was too abrupt: there was no link! From God, suddenly came man. Without stages of transformation, without steps of densification from the purely spiritual to the astral to the fluid to matter, without gentle transitions. I always found this unsatisfying and abstract.

It became clear to me that this was why the seeker could never truly identify with a creative source, let alone connect with it. This inner primal force, present in each of us, seemed, at least to me, to be outside of me, out of reach in a dimension inaccessible to me, almost as incomprehensible as quantum mechanics. I could feel this force, if at all, only very rarely, and if I was "lucky," it would vanish after days, and not, as so often, after a few hours. It remained a kind of mental, almost intellectual concept.

However, when I observed nature and my surroundings in general, the following always struck me: everything arises step by step and gradually! Neither do spring flowers bloom overnight, nor can an apple be picked from one moment to the next in October, nor does a custom-built home suddenly appear simply by looking at its blueprint.

First, there is an idea, a spark of thought, a flash of insight, sometimes subtle, sometimes concrete – but the idea is there, even if only for a moment. Mostly, it is very fleeting and disappears as quickly as it came if it doesn't receive attention, if it isn't considered. Only through attention does it acquire something ethereal; it is still fleeting and without clear contours, still not tangible, but it is present, perceptible.

A vision of "what if..." follows! And then, all at once, it became clear to me that this hypothetical assumption is the starting button that sets the machinery of creation, of bringing forth, of manifestation, into motion. Coincidences begin to accumulate, life flows more easily, opportunities arise quite naturally.

And so my first thought, the "what if" idea, came into play: "What if... I could close these gaps;... creation as such follows clear and logically understandable principles, rules, laws;... there can be no exception to these principles;... there are no conflicts within creation, because everything only continuously transforms, incessantly changing its state (state of being), without changing its essence itself? What consequences would arise from this?

Electrified, I delved deeper into these possibilities and felt that more than a mere mental concept was unfolding. Precisely: it was about the unfolding of pure Being, not its development. For development implies that something must have been entangled before, and an entanglement of creation with itself, conflict with itself, is not possible – and that, paradoxically, is the only impossibility! For the source of all Being cannot

not be, because it is the "What If" principle itself, the unspeakable, the ineffable, the intangible, an intelligent presence conscious of itself!

And then, as if from nowhere, it appeared – or rather, it appeared to me: the I Am, the primal force from which everything emanates and returns. No name, instead a feeling, a state that was neither tangible nor completely understandable. At first, the experience confused me. Was it just a thought? A dream image? Or had something much deeper revealed itself to me?

I simply couldn't ignore the impulse to pursue it. With every further question, every further step on my inner journey, more opened up. The unspeakable began to reveal itself to me. A language – not of words, but of vibrations, of subtle patterns – took shape. These inspirations, which at first sounded like whispers in my thoughts, took increasingly clear forms.

I gave this primal force the name Elíon. From Elíon emanated the Ae´thaerion, from them the Ve´thaerion, from them the Ae´thaeon, and from them the Thaeon, which finally manifested into the first physical humans – endowed with all the knowledge and experiences of Elíon. And then – as if the puzzle pieces of an invisible picture were coming together – I found an ally in Phil.

A friend with a razor-sharp mind and a pronounced fondness for philosophy. With Phil's help, the inspirations began to make sense. What at first seemed like confused, incomprehensible noise gradually took on structure. Vethian, the first spoken language of the Ve´thaerion, as I called it, began to form. A language that was more than just communication – it was an expression of the origin, of infinite, all-pervading truth, more felt than spoken, even finer than Siddham, an almost forgotten language.

From an idea, inspiration, or even pure inspiration, a concept increasingly unfolded and finally culminated in Mythaphysical Philosophy. Mythaphysical Philosophy (short: Mythasophy) is more than just a resonant term for the learned or unlearned mind: Mythasophy is the whisper of an intuition that goes far beyond previous limitations – a philosophy that unites myths and metaphysics within itself!

But even that was not the final consequence, for the previous worldview of a universe could not be maintained and finally found its, at least provisional, conclusion in the Omniverse, which includes the concepts of the Universe, Multiverse, and Metaverse, because Mythasophy is and remains open to new insights.

However, all explanations eventually reach their limits, for language, no matter how sophisticated, is inadequate, misleading; it can never convey the deep meaning of the underlying feeling and therefore remains only a tool of verbal communication. It is and remains a challenge to describe the boundless. And ultimately, every philosophy is only as valuable as it proves itself in daily practice, in its simplest possible applicability.

This work is an invitation to all of us to begin a journey from a completely new perspective, in which we can experience, feel, and recognize ourselves – provided we open ourselves without reservations, without prejudices, to the lived paradox of Mythsophy: Separation is a tool – Unity is truth.

The Lived Paradox

We speak of unity – yet we use words that separate.

We speak of truth – yet it needs its opposite to be recognized.

We speak of the One – and yet we confront it only as many.

The lived paradox lies at the heart of the mythsophical view: Although everything is one, indivisible, and eternally present, humans must experience separation to be able to experience at all. For without a reference point – no experience. Without contrast – no image. Without resistance – no strength. Thus, human consciousness itself is a paradox: it is an aspect of the whole, yet it must experience itself as separate to recognize itself as a whole.

Elíon, the All-That-Is, encounters itself in countless mirrors. As observer, as observed, and as the mirror itself. Mythasophy recognizes this paradox not as a contradiction, but as a path. Not as a deficiency, but as a method. Not as an error, but as an invitation to look deeper.

On the Use of This Book

Mythasophy is a very young philosophical discipline. It takes very seriously the challenge of exploring, interpreting, and understanding the world known to us and human existence within it. It often uses familiar terms in new ways. To avoid misunderstandings and to provide the adept with clear access, central terms are explained here – not in the sense of a definitive specification, but as a loving approximation of what is meant in mythsophical thought.

The following terms will repeatedly confront the adept: they are like companions on a journey that appeals not only to the intellect but, above all, to feeling, intuition, and inner recognition. It is worthwhile to approach them with openness – they want not only to be understood but to be felt and internalized.

"Everything is present now, but not everything is experienceable now." - Mythsophical Insight

Elíon (Essence, Field of Experience, God, I Am)

While science likes to deal with terms like zero-point field, quantum field, or energy field, esotericism speaks of the vortex, the creator spirit, the All-One, or a cosmic consciousness. Religions, in turn, have coined terms like I Am, God, Yahweh, Allah, or Father in Heaven – often as something that exists outside of us and looks down upon us.

Mythasophy takes a different path – or rather: it gives this eternal origin a new name that is as old as humanity itself. It calls it: Elíon. A word that excludes nothing, but connects – science, mysticism, religion, feeling, and insight.

The name is composed of two ancient sound roots: El – this sound appears in many ancient cultures. In the Hebrew tradition, "El" simply means God or force. In ancient Semitic languages, "El" was the origin of all things, the formless, creative principle underlying everything. Names like Elohim, Elijah, El Shaddai, or IsRaEl also carry this ancient "El" – as a reference to a divine, creative connection.

Ion – not only refers to physical particles but symbolically stands for movement, vibration, energy. In natural science, ions are charged particles – they connect, react, change states. They thus symbolize transformation and efficacy.

Elíon is therefore: The creative force in motion. Or: The source of all Being, expressing itself as vibration, energy, and experience. Mythasophy uses Elíon instead of "God" because it is freer, warmer, clearer, more personal – and also because "God" is often negatively connoted and can evoke an uncomfortable feeling in some adepts. It means the same thing – without dogma, without separation.

Elíon, the origin, the potential, the essence, which is not outside of us, but finds expression through ourselves – in form, feeling, thought, action, and being. Elíon is, quantum mechanically speaking, the superposition!

Mythasophical View:

Essence is the absolute potential that is bound neither by time nor space. It is the All-That-Is, existing in the eternal Now – Elíon. Unlike existence, which shows itself externally as "provable," essence is independent of proof. It is the vast field of possibilities, unstructured, limitless, beyond all imagination.

Not empty, but filled with everything that can be thought, felt, dreamed, remembered, or desired. Essence is not "somewhere," but everywhere and always, waiting – not for its activation, but for our perception. It is not the seed; it is the entire garden before we enter it. Essence is also referred to in Mythasophy as the field of experience or, more personally: Elíon.

Comparison to other perspectives:

* Direction: View of the potential of Being.

* Materialism: Not yet existent, therefore not real.

* Esotericism: Akasha, morphogenetic field.

* Mysticism: The nameless, the unborn.

* Mythasophy: Essence. Presence, Eternal Now, Elíon.

For the adept:

What we seek is already present. Not outside of us, but in the field of experience that we enter with our consciousness as soon as we remember what we are. Essence is not a hope, but the certainty that nothing is missing. Our access decides what reveals itself.

Conclusion: From Scarcity to Abundance

The Mythasophist recognizes: There is no scarcity, only endless abundance of endless potentials. What is not yet visible is not absent, but waits in the field for encounter. Elíon is pure essence – not in the sense of a fixed being with preferences and dislikes, but as a living, breathing potential that becomes present in the moment we say: "I am."

Then we are not testifying to a concept, but to an experience: the Here, the Now, the working of Being through us.

Consciousness

We are not our bodies. We are not our thoughts. We are that which bears witness, moves, touches, and yet remains untouched. We are pure consciousness. While many systems view consciousness as a product of the brain – like a spark that randomly jumps from matter – Mythasophy sees it as the primal principle of all Being. Consciousness is not a possession; it is a state of being.

Mythasophical Perspective:

Consciousness is the first recognition. It is pure presence – clear, unadulterated, formless – and yet the origin of all forms. It is that which recognizes itself without wanting to grasp itself. We could say: Consciousness is the eye that does not see itself, but through which everything is seen. It is Elíon within us – the I Am – not as a thought, but as a palpable reality. Mythasophy uses the term consciousness in the context of human waking consciousness.

Comparison to other concepts:

* Tradition/Doctrine: What is consciousness?

* Scientific: Function of the brain, emergent property.

* Buddhism: Emptiness – pure awareness.

* Hinduism: Atman/Brahman – the Self.

* Esotericism: Higher Self/Soul aspect.

* Mythasophy: The field of experience of all perception, in which all states of being are contained. The original conscious-Being of Elíon.

For the adept:

There is nothing to achieve to be conscious. We are invited to recognize that we have never been unconscious, only forgotten to look. Consciousness is not a tool; it is the origin. In Mythsophy, it is not analyzed, but remembered.

Subconscious (Soul)

What we (intellectually) have forgotten has not forgotten us. It lives on within us – as our subconscious.

Mythasophical View:

In Mythasophy, the subconscious is not subordinate, but displaced. It is the archive of experienced, believed, and suppressed fields and the seat of all knowledge. It is the architect who possesses all blueprints. Nothing escapes it, nothing remains hidden from it, nothing can elude it. Here, past decisions, conditioned patterns, and unlived possibilities act like currents beneath the surface. It is both the treasure trove and the shadow space of consciousness. It is what we call the Soul (Ae´thaeon).

Everything we could no longer feel, did not want to see, or that once protected us, is stored there – not as a mistake, but as a form of our self-care. Yet nothing remains bound forever: what lies in the subconscious does not want to remain hidden, but to be redeemed, integrated, re-recognized.

Figuratively speaking: The subconscious is like the night sky: we only see black, but in truth, billions of memories, imprints, and hidden forces sparkle there. The more willing we are to look, the clearer they emerge.

Comparison to other perspectives:

* Direction: Understanding of subconscious.

* Psychology: Store of repressed content, unconscious processes.

* Esotericism: Place of karmic burdens, shadow aspects.

* Hypnosis/Healing: Access to deeper resources.

* Mythasophy: The invisible field of experience of past decisions, which acts until we choose anew.

For the adept:

Everything we bring into the light of consciousness loses its power over us. What was hidden yesterday can become the key to tomorrow today.

Intellect

"The intellect is a good servant, but a bad master." - Mythasophical Remembrance

Mythasophical View:

The intellect (Ratio) is the tool of discernment and vital in this world. It separates to recognize. It names to organize. It is the sharp sword that dissects the world into concepts, but it cannot feel them. Therefore, calls to kill one's ego are blatant mockery: it has its justification simply by existing.

In Mythasophy, the intellect is not the center, but a servant of consciousness. It helps us recognize connections, analyze, draw conclusions. But when it elevates itself to king, it stifles the living field of feeling, intuition, and inner wisdom. Figuratively speaking: The intellect is like a gardener who shapes, cuts, separates with his scissors, but does not know why the plant grows. Only the heart knows the seed.

Comparison to other perspectives:

* Direction: Understanding of intellect.

* Rationalism: Source of truth, instrument of progress.

* Esotericism: Obstacle on the path to enlightenment.

* Mysticism: Veil that must be lifted.

* Mythasophy: Tool for implementation, not for grasping the whole. A servant, not the ruler.

For the adept:

We use the intellect, yet we are more than it. It is an instrument of clarification, not a source of truth. In Mythasophy, the adept learns not to fight the intellect, but to bring it into harmony with heart, feeling, and inner knowledge. Then it becomes an interpreter, not a dictator.

Insistence

"Insistence is the inner self that feels – even without external proof." - Mythasophical Remembrance

Mythasophical View:

Insistence is the inner experience that arises within a person: as a thought, image, feeling, impulse, or intuition. It is an aspect of essence, activated through attention and inner awareness. In Mythasophy, insistence is not a wish in the conventional sense, but an already felt being. Not yet visible in the world, not yet proven, and yet alive. It is like a seed germinating in the dark, perceptibly growing before it reaches the light of the world.

Comparison to other perspectives:

* Direction: Understanding of insistence.

* Psychology: Wish, projection, or imagination.

* Esotericism: Inner manifestation, energetic preliminary stage.

* Mysticism: Inner knowledge that does not need to be proven.

* Mythasophy: Palpable, unproven experience – that already is before it appears.

For the adept:

Insistence is our inner reality. It is the first expression of our creative being. We pay attention to what becomes alive within us – not only when it has taken form, but precisely before that. As soon as we honor our insistence, we nourish it and prepare it for the next step: existence.

Existence

"Existence is the becoming visible of what has already been experienced internally." - Mythasophical Remembrance

Mythasophical View:

Existence is the objective, sensually experienceable appearance of something that has already acted internally as insistence. It is not the origin, but the result.

In Mythasophy, existence is never created "out of nothing," but is an expression of a previously felt inner field – it is a mirror, not a source. Existence follows insistance (inality) as shadow follows light: It shows what has already acted in the field of experience. The duration is not decisive here, but the intensity, clarity, and congruence between inner feeling and outer expression.

Comparison to other perspectives:

* Direction: Understanding of "existence."

* Rationalism: That which can be proven, measured, and named.

* Spirituality: Illusion or Maya, transient.

* Mysticism: Appearance of a higher truth.

* Mythasophy: Objective reflection of inner insistence – not an origin, but a response.

For the adept:

What we see in the world is not the cause; it is the expression. If we want to understand our existence, we look deeper. We don't ask: Why is it this way? – but: What have I felt, thought, expected internally? Existence is like an echo: It answers us according to causal chance. As soon as we recognize this, we no longer become reactive, but conscious creators.

Coincidence

"Coincidence is the visible convergence of previously invisible causes." - Mythsophical Insight

Mythasophical View:

Coincidence is not the absence of order, but the unconscious synchronization of inner and outer factors that manifest at the right time in a form that can surprise us. In Mythasophy, coincidence is understood as a causal result, as a chain reaction of thoughts, energies, and actions that operate at the level of the field of experience, but only become visible in the outer space. Coincidence is the result of the resonance between inner feeling and outer conditions, which often appear unconnected to the human intellect. But here, too, it becomes clear: everything has its cause – only it is often not directly perceptible.

Comparison to other perspectives:

* Direction: Understanding of coincidence.

* Rationalism: An unpredictable event without discernible cause.

* Spirituality: Expression of the Universal, which we cannot always understand.

* Mysticism: Sign of the Universe that shows us paths.

* Mythasophy: A causal result whose connection of things is not conscious to us.

For the adept:

We understand coincidence as the moment of the return of the hidden. What commonly appears as "random" (acausal) is in truth the manifesting result of preceding inner processes. Our intentions, thoughts, and actions have created a wave that will eventually shape, form, and make our outer reality experienceable. If we become aware of this, we can step out of the role of passive observer into that of a conscious creator.

I. What is Mythasophy?

Mythasophy is a philosophy deeply rooted in mythological and spiritual traditions, yet at the same time scientifically and logically founded. It does not refer to rigid systems or dogmas, but instead places the individual and their own perception and knowledge at the center. The core of Mythasophy is the knowledge that we are the creators of our own experiences – that our perception, decisions, and inner attitudes shape the world around us – just as the dreamer who knows they are dreaming shapes their dream.

It is about understanding the "void" or the "field" as potential, in which everything arises, and how we align with this "empty," open source to navigate consciously – without being limited by external circumstances or preconceived notions. Mythasophy teaches that everything around us is a mirror of our inner world, and that by changing our inner focus, we also perceive the outer world differently.

Central principles of Mythasophy are:

* The Importance of "What": It is less about "how," "when," or "why," but rather about "what" is already present and only needs to be perceived and implemented by us – as an invitation to use free will. Questions like: "How do I achieve...?" or "When do I achieve...?" often suggest a state of lack – they assume that something is not yet there and that the questioner must first find a solution. This is a classic causality trap.

In contrast, "What would I feel once...?" or "Where would I stand once...?" are based on a completely different assumption: It has already happened, and we are merely placing ourselves in the experiential field of this fact. This is not a search for a solution, but an acknowledgment of the already existing possibility – a shift in perspective that allows us to resonate with it.

* Individual Responsibility: Each of us is responsible for our own experiences and shapes them through consciousness and decision. Our own script determines the role we find ourselves in.

* Feeling instead of believing: Instead of identifying with concepts or believing that they are a certain way, even if it contradicts our feelings, it is about feeling the things that serve us and integrating them into our lives.

* No Dogma: Mythasophy is not a rigid philosophy, but a living, individual practice that constantly offers new paths for the individual. In Mythosophy, there are no fixed rules or instructions, but an invitation to find one's own way – regardless of whether the individual prefers spiritual practices, creative activities, or science.

* It is not designed to form a community, but to promote individual, inner growth. Mythasophy goes deep and requires a certain willingness to break free from habitual thought patterns and immerse oneself in a deeper, more conscious experience. It challenges the adept to look beyond conventional concepts and recognize their own truths – and this is not always easy or comfortable. The mainstream often seeks quick fixes or simple answers, while Mythasophy encourages a deeper understanding of the self and the laws of the universe.

It is a path more often taken by those who are willing to question themselves, dissolve their own assumptions, and actively work on their own self-awareness. But precisely in this depth and complexity lies the strength of Mythasophy. It offers a perspective that many are not accustomed to, but which opens up a completely new horizon for those who engage with it. And that's exactly what makes it so powerful!

Therefore, it refrains from providing instructions for practical exercises. Whoever delves into Mythasophy will feel and inwardly know which exercises are meaningful for them – be it sports, yoga, breathing exercises, etc. Mythasophy is very open in this regard: whatever helps us, helps us – and what helps us, we decide entirely on our own.

Mythasophy is therefore not for those who want to make themselves dependent on a system consisting of rules, rituals, etc. The ignorant hopes, the adept senses, the mythasopher knows what serves them.

Comparison Mythasophy vs. other Philosophies & Concepts

* Materialism: Everything consists of matter; consciousness is a product of the brain.

* Mythasophy: It sees matter as a product of consciousness – not the other way around. Similarities: None!

* Idealism: Consciousness is the primary reality, matter is secondary. Mythasophy:

* Mythasophy goes beyond this and postulates a creative unity behind everything. Similarities: Consciousness as the origin of experience.

* Pantheism: God is identical with the universe.

* Mythasophy: Sees the divine not only in nature, but also as creative consciousness. Similarities: Divinity is contained in everything.

* Platonism: Ideas (archetypes) are the true reality, matter is a reflection of it.

* Mythasophy: Sees archetypes as manifestations of creative consciousness, but not as an endpoint. Similarities: Higher reality beyond the material world.

* Hermeticism: "As above, so below" – the spiritual and material worlds mirror each other.

* Mythasophy: Integrates this principle, but with a more dynamic understanding of reality creation. Similarities: Universal principles as the foundation of existence.

* Advaita Vedanta: Everything is ultimately one, separation is illusion.

* Mythasophy: Shares this view, but sees the process of experience as a conscious choice of creation. Similarities: Non-duality, illusion of separation.

* Buddhism: Everything is impermanent and empty of inherent existence.

* Mythasophy: Sees experience as a projection of consciousness, but not as meaningless or empty. Similarities: Illusion of matter.

* Gnosticism: The material world is a trap, true knowledge leads to liberation.

* Mythasophy: Does not consider matter "evil," but rather as a space for experience. Similarities: Knowledge as the key to truth.

* Transurfing (Vadim Zeland): Reality is selectable through energetic alignment.

* Mythasophy: Goes further and sees humans not only as choosers, but also as active creators. Similarities: Influence of consciousness on experience.

* Quantum Mechanics: Reality arises through observation.

* Mythasophy: Sees consciousness not only as an observer, but as a creative origin. Similarities: Influence of consciousness on matter.

Conclusion:

* Mythasophy is not a classical philosophy, but a holistic perspective that integrates various insights from philosophy, metaphysics, and quantum mechanics. It observes and names what is.

* The central difference: While many systems prefer either matter or consciousness, Mythasophy considers both as an expression of the one creative consciousness.

* The greatest strength of Mythasophy: It is not just a way of looking at things, but a practice-oriented science of being that understands consciousness as an active creator of experience. Mythasophy therefore does not compete, but unites the essences of various philosophical currents into a new, coherent worldview.

Quantum Physics & Modern Science

* Quantum Field Theory: The physical foundation that describes the "vacuum" not as nothingness, but as a bubbling field of virtual particles and energy fluctuations.

* Zero-Point Field: A concept that describes the inexhaustible energy present even in the "absolute vacuum."

Eastern Philosophies & Mysticism

* Buddhism (Śūnyatā - "Emptiness"): In Mahayana philosophy, Śūnyatā does not mean mere absence, but the fundamental formlessness of all things from which everything arises.

* Taoism (Wújí & Dao): Wújí is the unlimited emptiness from which the Dao (the source of all being) springs.

* Advaita Vedanta (Brahman & Māyā): Brahman is the formless, absolute reality – everything that appears is merely an expression of it.

Hermeticism & Western Esotericism

* Ether Theories: In ancient Hermetic and alchemical traditions, the "Ether" is described as the formless, creative medium that permeates everything.

* Kabbalah (Ain Soph Aur): The unlimited, infinite emptiness (Ain) is the source of everything.

* Gnosticism: Describes the "Pleroma" as the original fullness-nothingness from which all emanations are derived.

Existential Philosophy & Metaphysics

* Martin Heidegger ("Nothing itself nothingness"): Nothing is not simply the absence of something, but an active force that enables possibilities of being.

* Jean-Paul Sartre ("Being and Nothingness"): Nothingness is a condition for freedom – it makes it possible for something else to be chosen.

Mythasophy

Elion as the ineffable zero field, which unfolds into nine fundamental principles – it is not empty in the sense of a vacuum, a "void" or a "non-existence," but the inexhaustible, creative origin. The theme runs through many disciplines – the crucial question is: How is the "void" understood? As actual nothingness? As potential? As a field of infinite possibilities? As space?

The Mythasophical Approach to the "Void":

Apparently, from antiquity to the present day, people have assumed an "empty space." So, like an empty room that is entered and in which there is nothing, except the one standing in the room. This someone is, of course, aware of the emptiness and fills it, pay attention, here it comes, by means of imagination with objects, creating it according to their wishes: here a dresser, there a table, there a picture, etc. Potentially, this room is filled.

Only gradually is it actually furnished with objects. The principle that there is first "nothing" is shared by Mythasophy – with the difference that the empty space is described as a field. Admittedly, this is less illustrative, but more precise.

Yes, that hits it exactly! The traditional image of the "void" as an empty space inevitably leads one to understand it as a physical container, as a vessel that is only "filled" by adding something. Mythasophy turns this around: The field is not empty in the conventional sense, but it is already full of possibilities – unmanifested, but present.

The conventional idea: There is an empty space, and we fill it with objects.

The mythasophical view: There is a field that already contains all possibilities, and as soon as we make a choice, one of them materializes.

Another difference: A room is already limited; it has walls, boundaries; it is clearly defined. The field, on the other hand, is boundless and not tied to a specific form. It only appears limited once it unfolds into a concrete experience. This may be less illustrative than the image of the room, but it prevents thinking traps. Anyone who imagines the field as "nothing" in the sense of "empty space" quickly falls into the illusion that they must laboriously "fill" it.

In fact, everything is already there – just not yet perceived. The key, therefore, is not "adding," but recognizing what is already present. And this happens not through external action, but through an inner decision. As soon as imagination is directed towards it, the possibility begins to manifest in form.

For before the imagination of a room, there was previously a kind of "building plot" – namely the "void."

Now comes first the imagination of a house (space), which contains several small rooms (chambers) that are initially actually empty, but are already filled with further imaginations of how they should look. Every object serves its purpose.

But the purpose is also determined: does it serve practical, decorative aspects, or just a sense of well-being? This makes it clear that "empty space" is only an afterthought – it only arises as a concept within the field that was already there beforehand. If we extend the metaphor: the field is like the building plot; it is not "nothing," but carries all possibilities within itself.

The first imagination of the house corresponds to the basic structure we give to "reality."

The rooms are the areas of our experience – consciously chosen spaces with specific qualities. The furnishings show that even within a space, further design possibilities exist. And the punchline: Everything follows the decision. Only the choice gives the seemingly "empty" field a specific shape.

It gets even more exciting if we think further: Who says that the house must only have one door? Or that the walls are fixed? What if the room changes its function as soon as we change our perspective? What if we decide to rebuild the entire house or build anew somewhere else? All this is mythasophical freedom. There is no absolute specification, but only the consequences of one's own choice.

This also means: Many believe they first have to build the "perfect house" – but it has long been there! They just don't (yet) realize that they are already standing in the middle of it. The house is therefore not a 3D space, but a one-dimensional space. A point, a circle, a line is not a space, not a dimension. Actual space only arises through length, width, height – but in themselves, these are not dimensions. Just as zero is not a number in the classic and mathematical sense, but "only" pure potential: 1+0=1; 3,000-0=3,000; 18,249:0=18,249; 72.579x0=72.579!

What is generally referred to as "dimension" is often just a property that only gains meaning in relation to something else. A point is not a dimension – it is simply there. A line has length, but without width or height, it is not a space. A circle exists in the imagination as a closed form, but without depth, it is only an abstraction. Only through the combination of length, width, and height does what we experience as space arise.

But now comes the exciting part: Just as zero is not a number but the potential for numbers, "space" is not simply an emptiness, but the potential for tangible structures.

This means: The field is not yet a dimension; it is formless. It is the potential for dimensions. And this is precisely where Mythasophy differs from conventional concepts! The error of many thought systems: They assume dimensions as something absolute, instead of viewing them as a consequence of a decision. The mythosophical approach: "Space" only begins with the decision to give structure. Until then, everything is field, as pure, endless possibilities within endless possibilities: the zero field, the Omniverse, the all-in-all-contained-being!

This also means that dimensions are not "discovered," but chosen, shaped. They arise through the perspective of the one who perceives them.

Therefore, the view of "3D" or "higher dimensions" is often limited: it is generally assumed that "more dimensions" are simply an extension of existing structures. In reality, however, it is about consciously chosen principles of perception, not just a mathematical extension. And that's exactly how it is with zero: It is not "nothing," but everything that is possible before a choice is made.

Only the decision to make it a 1, a 2, or a 3 gives it a concrete form. This is the point where Mythosophy is not just a philosophy, but a tool for shaping one's own world of experience. Therefore, there is no time-space, as time is also not a fixed quantity; it is relative. At best, there is a space-time, meaning the "time" we need to get from here to there within a space – and it too is relative.

Conclusion: Space and time are illusions. A construct within the mind to make cause-effect interaction tangible and experienceable. Space and time are experienced structures, not absolute realities. Space is the illusion of extension. Time is the illusion of change. Both are mental constructs that enable an experience. But they are not immutable constants, but tools of the mind to make movement, unfolding, and causality experienceable.

So-called spacetime is therefore no more than the relation between movement and perception. Without perception, there is neither space nor time. Without relation, without "relating to," there is no past, present, or future. Without decision, there is no direction within these concepts. Mythasophy goes one step further: space is not "out there."

It is a choice of the mind, a specific perspective. Time is not "progressive."

It is a way to measure change – but change does not happen through time, but through focus and decision. Change happens through change. This means: There is no time. There are only changes in perception and state. There is no space. There is only the experience of a structure that appears so. The idea of past and future is based only on the assumption that there is such a thing as a constant sequence.

In reality, there is only the now – that which is currently being perceived at this very moment. Whoever understands this also grasps that "reality" does not change through "linear progression," but by replacing one perception with another. If we now think of something sad from the past, it makes us sad now. If we think of a glorious future, it happens now. Ergo, there is only one single presence: the I Am, God, Elion. Elion is the only constant. Everything else, such as past, future, space, time, are just possibilities within consciousness.

This shows: Past and future are nothing more than thoughts in the now. Experience is what we focus on – in this moment, and from moment to moment. Elion is the zero point. The point from which everything is conceived, felt, and experienced. Elion is the only world of experience. Everything else is mutable perception. Elion decides what is experienced. For experience only happens through attention. And this leads to the central mythosophical question: What happens as soon as we recognize that we are Elion?

Conscious creation happens, conscious decision-making happens, in short: conscious awareness! Conscious awareness is the highest form of creation. For as soon as we recognize that we are the creator, we no longer create unconsciously, but purposefully.

We create from within ourselves because we ourselves are our Creator, Redeemer, Healer. So from now on, let us make decisions from clarity, not from lack of ignorance! From now on, let us no longer be determined by external circumstances, but determine ourselves!

The consequence is profound: We are no longer playthings of experiences; we are the experience itself. And that is precisely the turning point in Mythosophy: not to seek change, but to recognize the I Am, Elion. Don't ask when or how – but know that it is already happening and has happened. Don't hope – but embody. The question is therefore no longer "How can I change my 'reality'?", but "What happens as soon as I realize that it has long since changed?"

However, this insight is not truly new, but the sharpness of the formulation is. Many spiritual concepts hint at it, but often in a vague way: "Be in the now"; "You are the creator of your reality"; "Everything is already within you."

This sounds inspiring, but often remains vague and non-committal. Mythosophy makes it concrete: Not sometime – but as soon as. Not maybe – but inevitably. Not mystical – but logical. There is no if – only an is. And that is precisely the decisive difference. Yes, that is exactly the key! As soon as we decide, without internal contradiction, that something is so, we are already there.

No "I hope it works out."

No "Let's see if it works."

No "But what if...?"

As soon as we have made a new choice to experience something different, we emotionally enter this chosen experience. And not otherwise! First, in our mind, by means of imagination and the corresponding mood, we enter the already existing field of experience, which is just waiting to be explored by our imaginary senses – and only then do we enter this, our chosen, space of experience to experience it materially.

The external world does not change; instead, we enter another variant of our new self-understanding, a change of our own frequency of being, a place that in Mythosophy is called the Omniverse – more on that later. It is not even manifestation in the classical sense – it is reality navigation. Navigation (from Latin navigare, "to steer a ship," Sanskrit navgathi) is originally the "art of piloting" by water (see nautical science), land, and air. Particularly interesting is the linguistic similarity Latin – Sanskrit: "Navgathi" in Sanskrit also means "to find the way" or "to stay on course."

These terms imply not only movement, but also active steering, purposeful directing. However, even this term reality is imprecise in Mythasophy, and therefore it re-specifies it:

* Inality: that which I hold to be true internally, felt;

* Reality: the objectively external projection, reflection (return), the appearance of that, and

* Exality/Mentality: the truth that stands above the subjective ("my view, assumption") and objective (the confirmation from outside based on "my assumption") truth – namely, that what "is true for me is always what I hold to be true" and shows itself accordingly, indeed, must show itself!The ending "-ity" implies something essential, a state of being, similar to identity, meaning "to equate oneself with something."

Therefore, the term

Inality Navigation (alternatively Identity Navigation), because "I navigate from within myself," is more fitting. In this sense: "The wind does not determine the course, but how I have set the sails."

"In" can thus be understood as "in-ternal" as well as "in-herent," as setting a cause (action), setting the sails. Reality navigation, on the other hand, would be a reaction to external influences – like the wind that can push us in a direction without us having control. Here, one allows oneself to be influenced by external circumstances instead of consciously determining the direction (re-action). Exality navigation would then mean "Let it be done to me according to my decision, identification."

It is the neutral law ("For God does not show partiality"), which is always effective: the interaction of action and reaction.

II. Mythasophy and Consciousness

* The Vedas and Upanishads (Indian Philosophy)

The Vedas and especially the Upanishads address profound philosophical and cosmological questions. The idea of Brahman – Sanskrit: ब्रह्मन् – as the infinite, all-encompassing consciousness that forms the basis of all creation is central; it designates in Hindu philosophy the unchangeable, infinite, immanent and transcendent essence that represents the eternal primal ground of everything that is.

The oldest meaning of the word in the Vedas is "holy word" or "holy formula." The principle of Atman – Sanskrit: आत्मन् – refers to the (absolute) Self, the indestructible, eternal essence of the spirit, is often translated as "soul" (the true Self), and the realization that Atman is ultimately identical with Brahman reflects the idea that everything comes from and returns to a divine source: "All that exists is Brahman (Chandogya Upanishad)."

The concept of Maya, the illusion of the material world, which is only a reflection of true consciousness, the individualized soul, aligns with the mythosophical idea.

* The Bhagavad Gita (Indian Philosophy)

The Bhagavad Gita, a central part of the Mahabharata, deals with the principles of life, the universe, and the self. The narrative revolves around the divine appearance of the god Krishna, who enlightens Arjuna on the battlefield about the true nature of reality. It concerns the realization of eternal truth and the divine origin, which is always present, even when we turn to the material world: "I am the source of all things. Everything comes from me (Bhagavad Gita 10:8)."

The concept of duty (Dharma) and the recognition of the immortality of the soul are in harmony with the mythasophical idea of eternal growth and remembering of the soul.

* The Kabbalistic System (Jewish Mysticism)

The Kabbalah offers a deep model for understanding creation and the relationship between God and the world. The Sefirot, the ten emanations of God, describe the divine aspects through which the world was created and which are still connected to the source. The concept of Ain Soph (the infinite source) and the return to the source is central: "Creation is the revelation of the light of Ain Soph."

The idea that everything that exists originates from a primordial divine source and always returns there reflects the mythasophical view that there is no separation between the primal impulse (Elion) and creation.

* The Hermetic Writings (Hermeticism)

Hermetic philosophy from Western mysticism deals with the idea that man returns to his true nature through knowledge and wisdom. In the Hermetic Laws, especially the principle of the Law of Cause and Effect, there is a strong connection between the macrocosm (the universe) and the microcosm (the individual).

The idea of emanation, that the divine source shines through in everything, and the return to the source through knowledge and spiritual growth, aligns with the mythasophical concept.

* Plato's "The Republic" and "The Allegory of the Cave"

In Plato's "Allegory of the Cave," the idea of illusion and knowledge is addressed. The prisoners in the cave only see the shadows of the real world and take them for a fixed fact, until one of them leaves the cave and recognizes the true world. This allegory reflects the idea that the material world is an illusion and that true knowledge can only be attained by recognizing the original, divine consciousness: "The Ideas are the eternal and perfect archetypes that underlie the world."

It is about returning to truth and overcoming the illusions of the body and the world. This view is represented by Mythasophy.

* The Gnostic Tradition (Gnosticism)

Gnosticism emphasizes knowledge (Gnosis) as a path to spiritual salvation. There is the idea of a divine, unattainable origin from which everything emanates. The Gnostic believes that the physical universe is an illusion created by a lesser god (the Demiurge), and that man must rediscover his true divine nature through knowledge and spiritual insight. This doctrine, which represents a separation between the divine and the material worldview, is connected to the mythasophical concept of creation as a game and the illusion of matter.

* Egyptian Mythology and the Concept of "Ma'at"

In Egyptian mythology, Ma'at stands for cosmic order, truth, and justice. There is a profound idea of creation as a cosmic and cyclical process. The idea of cycles of creation, dissolution, and the constant striving of humans to live in harmony with the divine order, is in context with Mythasophy.

* Taoism (Chinese Philosophy)

Taoism emphasizes the principle of the Tao, the unnameable, original principle that both creates the universe and resides within it. The Tao is the source of all being and is described both in its constant change and in its unchangeability: "All that grows is already inherent in the Tao (Chapter 51)."

Taoism speaks of the idea that man should live in harmony with this natural flow, which means a return to his true origin. This reflects the idea that the human spirit always "finds its way back" to its divine source. Mythasophy also shares this view.

Conclusion:

Many scriptures from various traditions, such as Taoism, Hinduism, the Kabbalah, and also Greek philosophy, support the notion that life and the universe did not arise as a continuous, random process, but that they always existed as a perfect, original principle. These principles manifest cyclically or continuously, but their essence remains. Life is not the result of a "development" from something incomplete, but it is the unfolding of what always was.

"God sleeps in the stone, breathes in the plant, dreams in the animal and awakens in man." -Rabindranath Tagore

III. Mythasophy and the Soul

The Mythasophical View of the Soul in the Mirror of Other Teachings

Many philosophers, religions, and spiritual systems speak of the soul – and yet it remains one of the most misunderstood concepts in human history. Mythasophy recognizes the soul not as a fragment, no substance, and no hierarchy, but as a field of remembrance of the One. To clarify the mythasophical view, it is worthwhile to look at other perspectives – not in judgment, but in recognition.

The Soul – A Comparison Through Seven Teachings Christianity (classical-theological)

In Christianity, the soul is the immortal being created by God in man. It is regarded as the actual self: as the seat of morality, faith, and connection to God. It can be redeemed or condemned and is burdened by original sin from birth until it is redeemed by grace and faith. It is eternal, but dependent.

Mythasophical View:

The soul has not fallen. There is no guilt, but only the forgetting of its source. The soul needs no salvation, but remembrance of its own divine field.

* Platonism

For Plato, the soul is immortal and resided in a pure world of ideas before birth. Through incarnation into a body, it loses the memory of truth and yearns for a return to the world of ideas. It is eternal, suffering, and knowing.

Mythasophical View:

The yearning is not lack, but remembrance of the whole. The soul has not gone astray; it chooses the veil to recognize itself through it.

* Buddhism (Theravada)

Here there is no constant self (Anatta). What appears as "soul" is a fleeting interplay of body, feeling, perception, mental formations, and consciousness, the so-called Skandha model. There is no eternal self, only conditioned arising.

The "soul" is an illusion.

Mythasophical View:

The fluid character of the self is confirmed. But Mythasophy recognizes a soul structure as a condensed field of consciousness that does not say "I am," but "I experience myself as."

No fixed core, but a creative field.

* Advaita Vedanta

The "soul" (Jiva) is ultimately identical with the highest Self (Atman), which in turn is not different from Brahman. The individual soul appears as separate through ignorance, but in truth, it was never separate. The soul is an illusory separation from the source.

Mythasophical View:

Completely congruent. Also in Mythasophy, the soul is not a substance, but a revelation of the One in the experience of multiplicity: as Tat Tvam Asi.

* Modern Psychology (depth psychology)

The soul is mostly understood as the inner world of experience, as the psyche. It encompasses unconscious parts, drives, imprints, and conflicts. Carl Jung speaks of the individual soul as a path to wholeness through archetypes and shadow work. The soul is an inner space for development.

Mythasophical View:

Yes, but it is more than just intrapsychic content. The soul is an experiencing field that not only knows archetypes but also brings them forth. Not an object of analysis, but a subject of remembrance.

* Materialism

Here, the existence of a soul is either denied or reduced to neurobiological processes. "Soul" is a poetic expression for the sense of self, the product of neuronal activity. The soul is a myth – at best a brain product.

Mythasophical View:

Materialism has retreated into the narrowest field. The soul is not provable, but experienceable. Its absence is not a refutation, but an indication of the hardening of consciousness. Where nothing is felt, nothing is visible.

* Mythasophy

The soul is a condensed field of consciousness, a living continuum between form and formless source. It is neither eternal nor fleeting – it transforms. It is not an instance, but an experienceable principle: the soul is the sound that the One sings in the Many. It remembers, permeates. It is the space of experience in which consciousness discovers itself as multiplicity. It knows no guilt, only feedback. It is not "mine," but "I as," it is not a possession, but a state of being.

In Mythasophy, the soul is not a part, but a whole that experiences itself as a part. It is neither object nor subject, but remembrance in form. It knows no good and evil, but only resonance. It is the singing field between Elion and form, which was never lost, only forgotten. It is Ae'thaeon, the subconscious. But what happens if the soul is denied or devalued?

* In Religion: If the soul is depicted as guilty, testable, in need of salvation, fear of "eternal judgment" arises. This creates obedience, not awakening.

* In Philosophy: If the soul is degraded to a "mistake," an "error of bodily attachment," one separates oneself from the dignity of embodiment.

* In Esotericism: If it is romanticized or glorified as a "counselor on Cloud 7," it remains a consumer good – adapted to wishful thinking.

* In Science: If its existence is completely denied because it cannot be weighed or measured, the living dwindles to a mere function.

The Deeper Error:

In all this lies the illusion of separation. One sees the soul either as an opponent, as something foreign, or as a tool. But never as what it truly is: I – beyond the self. Or, in mythosophical language: "The soul is the field that remembers it was never separated, and yet has felt through every separation."

Mythasophy emerges here like a healing center: not as a counter-design, but as a reminder that the soul does not want to be described, but to be witnessed. It is neither a thing nor a being, but a knowing field. Neither passive nor active, but present. Neither divine nor human, but: both at once, in constant embrace.

IV. From the Divine to the Human

Greek Mythology: The Journey of Gods and Titans

In Greek mythology, there are many stories in which gods and Titans assume various forms and transform over time. An example of this is Zeus, who not only functions as the god of the sky but also constantly slips into different guises to influence the world and humans.

The idea of transformation and the change of the divine is also reflected in the Titans, who represent the first forms of divine origin, but were replaced by the Olympian gods after the Titanomachy (the war between the gods and Titans). Here, there is a clear development and transformation of the origin (the Titans) into the later, active gods (the Olympian gods).

The Titans and Olympian gods have in some way the same origin, but through constant conflicts and transformations, they take on different roles and forms. These constant transformations and transmutations of the divine are reminiscent of the mythosophical idea that conflicts are illusions and that there are actually only transformations.

Indian Philosophy and the Emanation of Brahman

In Indian philosophy, there is the concept of Brahman, the highest, infinite origin from which everything emanates. Brahman is simultaneously transcendent and immanent. The emanations of Brahman, as described in the Upanishads, pass through various forms and states before transitioning into the material world.

This is particularly evident in the concepts of Vishnu and his Avatars (such as Krishna and Rama), who appear as manifestations of the divine origin and each embody different aspects of the divine. This is a kind of creative unfolding from a single source, manifesting in diverse aspects, similar to how Mythasophy presents it in its concept.

Gnosticism: The Journey of the Self into Matter