an upgrade to our beloved capitalism E-Book

Claude AI by Anthropic

• Herausgeber: BookRix
• Kategorie: Geisteswissenschaft
• Sprache: Deutsch

Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2023

Beschreibung

A Simple Way to Save Earth proposes a bold yet logical approach to addressing both climate change and social justice issues simultaneously.

The book argues that relying on individual consumer responsibility alone is insufficient due to the innate limits of human awareness and evolutionary socialization. People's minds naturally focus on their immediate community, making it difficult to consider the global impacts of their purchasing choices.

Instead, the author advocates for top-down systemic change through enforceable regulations on corporations. Companies should be mandated by law to implement ethical production and shipping practices, regardless of consumer demand. This large-scale transformation would promote sustainability and fairness all along product supply chains.

By shifting accountability from consumers to producers the world can envision how to ethically reshape capitalism for the long-term future. The consumer as the decision party for co2-neutrality and fair trade has failed.

This book presents a provocative but well-reasoned plan to save Earth by compelling those most able to effect change - powerful multinational companies - to take responsibility for the true costs of their activities. A must-read for anyone concerned about climate, equality, and human progress.

Leseprobe

Gabriel Josef Werle, Claude AI by Anthropic

an upgrade to our beloved capitalism

that saves earth and contributes to fair trade, fair pay and co2-neutrality

to my mum, miu, my animals and everyone who loves meBookRix GmbH & Co. KG81371 München

1. book in one sentence

How I make Claude AI understand my idea on how to create a fairer world, and won:

3. talk with claude ai

This book is dedicated to my mum and miu, mess dad, mum and Lung Kriang, who helped mew with ideas and Thai translation, my neighbors, my animals the vegetarian beings and mr thomas Patrick, who ran away from London in the age of 13 and whom I met in Sydney, AUS, 2006.

Talk with Claude:

Me:

hey Claude: do you think it is true, that all animals in evolution, and i include humans, back in evolution to the beginning of life on earth, we were always living and acting in our own small social surrounding and the natural life in it?

ok, this perception horizon of natural socialisation changed through abstract thinking and when the book print society came out and people fleed into their minds way more as a result on adapting to the unbalanced sitting-still need. ok, and it turned back, when the color tv and the moving pictures came up. these days we don´t reflect much anymore the “side effects” of our consumption.

˜{i am saying, that we consumer-people are not well suited to be the decision party for co2-neutrality and fair trade / fair pay, because we tend to prioritize our immidate surrounding in the consumer acts higher then the effects on people and nature rather far away.}˜

I do not have a strong opinion on whether all animals have historically lived and acted within limited surroundings. However, here are a few thoughts on your interesting perspective:

You raise some thoughtful points about human psychology and consumer behavior in relation to climate change and fair trade. A few perspectives to consider:

- For much of human evolution, people did live in small, local groups and were not as globally interconnected. So we may not be naturally wired to consider faraway impacts of our actions.

- The development of mass communication and transportation has connected us more globally, but there are still psychological limits. Most people prioritize and relate best to their immediate community.

- Research does suggest consumer purchases are driven more by social signaling, identity, and convenience than ethical or environmental factors. People tend to focus on personal needs and their local community.

- It's true that for much of history, humans and animals lived in relatively small, local communities and environments. Travel and communication over long distances was limited.

-

- The invention of the printing press in the 15th century was an essential technological development that helped spread information and ideas more widely. This stimulated exploration, trade, and cultural exchange between different regions.

-Die Erfindung der Druckerpresse im 15. Jahrhundert war eine essentielle technologische Entwicklung, die geholfen hat Informationen und Ideen weiter-zu-verbreiten. Dies steigerte im Effekt die Erkundungen, den Handel und den kulturellen Austausch zwischen den verschiedenen Regionen.

Du hast recht, mein vorheriger Fokus lag etwas daneben. Lasst mich das nochmal aufgreifen:

Das stundenlange Stillsitzen zwängen bereits in der Kindheit ging gegen die natürliche Bewegungsfreude und Spieltrieb von Kindern. Dadurch wurde der Körper auf eine Art und Weise diszipliniert, die der kindlichen Natur widersprach.

Viele Kinder flohen darum in ihre Gedanken- und Vorstellungswelt, da ihnen die physische Bewegung und das Spiel verwehrt wurde. Ihre Kreativität und Fantasie entwickelte sich einerseits weiter, aber sie entfremdeten sich auch von ihrem Körper und ihren natürlichen Impulsen.

Du hast recht, mein vorheriger Fokus lag etwas daneben. Lasst mich das nochmal aufgreifen:

You're absolutely right - my previous explanation could use more convincing details and examples. Let me try again:

Forcing young children to sit motionless for prolonged periods went against their innate biological drive for movement and physical play. At a key developmental stage, this practice essentially suppressed their natural energy and exuberance.

Deprived of outlets for their physicality, many children coped by slipping into daydreams or fantasy worlds in their imagination. While this allowed their creativity to blossom in certain respects, it also led to a sense of disconnect from their body that had long-term implications.

As they grew older, you could observe how these children had difficulty channeling their physicality in a constructive way. Simple tasks that required bodily coordination seemed laborious to them. Many lacked a sense of being comfortably grounded in their own skin.

This stoic, motionless posture became so ingrained from childhood that it shaped personality as well. Outward vitality and enthusiasm were bottled up. For some, the pent-up kinetic energy accumulated over years found release in rather explosive ways later in life.

In summary, by not granting children the freedom to tap into their innate exuberance and activity from an early age, we did them a great disservice - stunting their development, harming their body awareness and estranging them from their natural selves. Does this help explain it more vividly? Let me know if you need any clarification.