LECTURE I. NECESSITY FOR A PROPER COMPARISON OF THE TWO RELIGIONS.
LECTURE II. THE HISTORICAL ANTECEDENTS OF BUDDHISM AND CHRISTIANITY, AND THE EVIDENTIAL VALUE OF THEIR RESPECTIVE SCRIPTURES.
LECTURE III. THE BUDDHA OF THE PITAKAS: THE CHRIST OF THE NEW TESTAMENT.
LECTURE IV. THE DHARMA OF BUDDHA:[180] THE GOSPEL OF JESUS CHRIST.
LECTURE V. THE BUDDHIST SANGHA[244]: THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH.
LECTURE VI. THE TWO RELIGIONS IN HISTORY.
POSTSCRIPT.
PREFACE
In
endeavouring to sketch in so limited a space even the most salient
features of the many-sided religion of Buddhism it is possible that
here and there I may have misrepresented it.If
so, I hope the fault will be attributed to inadvertence, or rather
to
disadvantages under which I have worked. The sacred beliefs of any
section of mankind are entitled to receive at our hands not only
justice but kindly consideration, and a religion so vast and in
some
respects so wonderful as Buddhism ought to have much to commend it
to
our sympathy. Long and patient study of it has indeed greatly
modified opinions originally formed concerning it, but it has only
tended to increase respect for so earnest an effort of the
intellect
to solve the mystery of human life and destiny. Even Christians may
have something to learn from Buddhists. The divers and seemingly
antagonistic Churches of Christendom help to educate and reform
each
other, and non-Christian religions may perform a similar office to
Christianity in bringing into prominence some universal truths
which
its creeds have allowed to slip into forgetfulness. Our perception
and apprehension of what Christianity really is will be all the
clearer and firmer for an impartial study of the system formulated
so
long ago by Gotama the Buddha.The
aim of the Lecture has not been to use the extravagances of
Buddhism
as a foil to set off the excellencies of Christianity. That
Christianity as a religion is immensely superior to Buddhism goes
without saying, unless in the case of a very small and conceited
and
purblind minority. I have tried by a fair exposition of what is
best
and highest in this religion to discover its feeling after
something
better and higher still, and to suggest rather than indicate the
place which it occupies in the religious education of humanity.
As
“
Man
hath all which nature hath, but more,And
in that more lie all his hopes of good,”so
Christianity, while having in it in fuller measure and clearer form
every truth that has vivified any other religion, has in it, as the
new creation to which the long travail of the soul under every form
of faith has from the first been pointing, something peculiar and
contrasted—which is the Divine answer to all their aspirations.
This we do not need to demonstrate: indeed it may be a verity, as
incapable of demonstration as is that of the existence of Deity or
the immortality of the soul. It is sure eventually to be almost
universally recognised, and meanwhile, whether accepted or denied,
we
may say—E pur si
muove.Very
gratefully would I acknowledge my profound obligations to all who
have instructed me in this subject. Though we no longer regard the
Saddharma-Pundarika and Lalita Vistara as good specimens of
Buddhism,
we still venerate the great scholars who first introduced them to
our
notice. The splendid productions of Burnouf, Foucaux, Köppen,
Stanislas Julien, Hodgson and Turnour; the excellent works of
Spence
Hardy, Gogerly, Bigandet and H. H. Wilson, and, among the best of
all, the laborious and faithful Dictionary of Professor Childers,
though several of them are unfortunately out of print, are not
likely
to be soon out of date. It is with pleasure that we find them so
frequently quoted or referred to by our latest and best
authorities.
Still, ever since Professor Max Müller organised his truly catholic
enterprise of the translation of the Sacred Books of the East, he
has
brought us very considerably nearer to real Buddhist teachers
themselves. To praise the scholarship of himself, and Oldenberg,
and
Rhys Davids, and Kern, and Fausböll, and others of his
collaborateurs,
would be unwarrantable presumption on my part; but as a humble
disciple very willing to learn, I am glad to have this opportunity
of
publicly expressing my appreciation of the great services which in
their editions of old Eastern texts, and in these series of
translations, they are rendering to the cause of religion.The
lectures were drafted and in great part written before I read the
very valuable works of Sir Monier Williams on
Buddhism and of Dr.
Kellogg on the Light
of Asia and the Light of the World.
I specially mention these books as likely to prove very useful
guides
to any one desirous of prosecuting the subject of the present
Lecture. In the notes I have marked my indebtedness to them, and to
many authors of what has already become a great literature. Many
others whose works have been of service to me in a course of
reading
extending over many years are not noted, simply because in the
caprices of memory my peculiar obligations to them could not at the
time be recalled.For
in regard to Buddhism I do not profess to add any original
information to the stock already acquired. Others have extracted
the
ore from these old and interesting fields, and minted it into gold
and silver. What has thus been rendered available many like myself
can only reduce into copper or bronze, but if only our work be
faithfully done, we may thus help in increasing the currency and in
extending its circulation. With this in view I accepted the honour
which the Croall Trustees conferred upon me in calling me to
undertake this Lecture, and if the only effect of my efforts be to
stimulate other ministers of the Church more advantageously
situated
to prosecute their researches to much better purpose, no one will
be
more pleased than myself.ARCHIBALD
SCOTT.