43,99 €
COGNITIVE SELF CHANGE
“The consensus amongst the leading researchers in the offender treatment area is that the comprehensive and sophisticated clinical methods the authors have derived for offender treatment are unsurpassed. Indeed, they have formed the basis for what is known as the core correctional practices for reducing anti-social behavior.”
Paul Gendreau, Professor Emeritus, University of New Brunswick
“Bush and colleagues’ phenomenologically based approach to offender rehabilitation is based explicitly on the stories they have collected from prisoners and probationers and is a welcome contribution to an academic literature that too often obfuscates the actual work involved in delivering help to the hardest to reach in the criminal justice system.”
Shadd Maruna, Ph.D., Dean of the Rutgers School of Criminal Justice
Cognitive Self Change presents a practical guide to rehabilitation based on understanding the way individual offenders experience themselves and the world around them at the moment they offend. De-incentivizing criminal behavior and replacing it with self-empowered change are the keys to upending the traditionally antagonistic relationship between criminals and those meant to help them change. The authors, with their experience of working with offenders and implementing rehabilitation programs, have drawn together clinical and academic perspectives on the treatment of high-risk offenders, analyzing current approaches to treatment and the problems encountered in their application.
Cognitive Self Change rejects the traditional dichotomy of control versus treatment, devising instead a strategy that integrates both. Focusing on high-risk and “hard-core” offenders, not just those that are “ready to change,” they discuss why offenders offend, why they are seldom motivated to change, and why they often fail to engage in treatment. This leads to a strategy of communication that teaches offenders a set of skills they can use to change themselves, and that motivates them to do so.
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 374
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2016
Cover
Title Page
Preface
Acknowledgements
Introduction
Understanding Offending Behavior
Hard-Core
Cognitive Self Change
A Human Connection
Phenomenology and Self-reports: Some Preliminary Comments about Method
Summary of Chapters
Chapter 1: The Idea of Criminal Thinking
Ellis, Beck, and Antisocial Schemas
Psychopathology or Irresponsibility
An Alternative Point of View
Chapter 2: Offenders Speak their Minds
Seven Male Offenders
Three Young Women
Three Violent Mental Health Patients
Two Problematic Groups
Three British Gang Members
Conclusions and Interpretations
Chapter 3: Cognitive–Emotional–Motivational Structure
The Idea of Conscious Agency: a Likely Story
Will and Volition, Self and Self-interest
The Model
Basic Outlaw Logic: Learning the Rewards of Criminal Thinking
Variations of Criminal Thinking
Conclusions and Implications
Chapter 4: Supportive Authority and the Strategy of Choices
The Problem of Engagement
Conditions of Communication and Engagement
Supportive Authority
Rethinking Correctional Treatment
The Strategy of Choices
Final Comments
Chapter 5: Cognitive Self Change
Four Basic Steps
Collaboration and the Strategy of Choices
Brief Notes on Program Delivery: Group Size, Duration and Intensity, Facilitator Qualifications and Training
Chapter 6: Extended Applications of Supportive Authority
Why Offenders Need Help
Not Either/Or: Some Promising Examples
The System as the Intervention: Some Recent Examples
Supportive Authority, Revisited
An Idealistic Proposal (with modest expectations)
Chapter 7: How We Know
Introduction
Cognitive Self Change
The Significance of Subjectivity
Science and Subjectivity
Bibliography
Index
End User License Agreement
Introduction
Figure I.1 Cognitive–Emotional–Motivational Structure
Chapter 03
Figure 3.1 Cognitive–Emotional–Motivational Structure
Chapter 04
Figure 4.1 The Voice of Supportive Authority
Figure 4.2 The Elements of Supportive Authority
Chapter 05
Figure 5.1 Circle Diagram
Figure 5.2 A Themes and Patterns Diagram
Chapter 06
Figure 6.1 The Us versus Them Cycle: An Escalating Conflict of Attitudes and Actions
Cover
Table of Contents
Begin Reading
iii
iv
v
ix
x
xi
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
Jack Bush, Daryl M. Harris, and Richard J. Parker
This edition first published 2016© 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Registered OfficeJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK
Editorial Offices350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148-5020, USA9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ, UKThe Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK
For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services, and for information about how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com/wiley-blackwell.
The right of Jack Bush, Daryl M. Harris and Richard J. Parker to be identified as the authors of this work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher.
Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may not be available in electronic books.
Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The publisher is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book.
Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and authors have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. It is sold on the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services and neither the publisher nor the author shall be liable for damages arising herefrom. If professional advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication data applied for
Hardback ISBN: 9780470974827Paperback ISBN: 9780470974810
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
Cover image: GettyImages © skhoward Shutterstock © James LaurieiStockphoto © Narelle Robson-Petch
To our children Deborah and Kalita; Julia, Angie, Joanna, and Johnny; Owain and Aneurin And in memory of Don Andrews
The authors came together to write this book from diverse and distant places. Jack Bush (PhD in philosophy) from Tacoma, Washington, USA, entered the field of correctional treatment in 1973 – before widespread acceptance of evidence-based practice, and before the term “what works” was part of professional parlance. Bush’s education in correctional treatment consisted largely of listening to offenders and ex-offenders tell their stories of how they perceived the world. Daryl Harris (doctorates in both clinical psychology and neuropsychology) has pursued a practical career in forensic psychology in Great Britain from his home in Wales. Richard Parker (PhD in criminology) has developed and delivered treatment programs for offenders in Canberra and Sydney, Australia. In a sense and to varying degrees, we all grew up professionally in the blossoming era of evidence-based practice. And each of us experienced frustration in our encounters with the culture of actual forensic practice.
With a background of counseling voluntary and semi-voluntary clients, Parker felt some contradictions in the “what works” literature. How do you individualize treatment while maintaining program integrity? How do you keep relatively unmotivated high-risk offenders involved in community treatment programs geared more to motivated medium-risk offenders? Parker saw even the most motivated offenders trying hard, but ending up confused and overwhelmed by the large number of skills they were asked to learn.
Harris recalls a warning from the head of security at his first clinical psychology post at a high security hospital in the UK. Do not turn your back on “them” for a second, the security official counseled, or they will assault you – and that will be the end of “your war.” The comparison of offender treatment with combat, with treatment providers expected to be on their guard and offenders feeling under siege, is abhorrent to the authors and, we believe, clinically futile.
We were frustrated with the adversarial stance of “us versus them” and the conception of corrections, including correctional treatment, as a kind of war. We found the delivery of treatment within that culture to be a battle within the criminal justice system – a battle of the system fighting against itself. We were equally uncomfortable with the clinical notion of criminality as a kind of disease. And we were frustrated (as we believe all practitioners of correctional treatment sometimes are) with the barrier to communication posed by offenders themselves by their attitudes of hostility and non-compliance to authority. And yet, if it is indeed a war between prison authority and offenders, who can blame offenders for vowing not to lose?
Our common backgrounds, diverse as they are, united us behind the major themes of this book. Our understanding of offenders as human beings derives less from statistical outcome studies and more from our personal communication with individual offenders and ex-offenders. Yet we acknowledge and respect the quantitative evidence of what works in this field.
We have each been strongly influenced by the “what works” literature originated by Canadian researchers, and particularly by Don Andrews. Bush first met Don Andrews on a cocktail cruise on board a boat on Lake Huron in 1988. The cruise was sponsored by a Canadian correctional treatment conference. Andrews was spreading the word about the analyses of correctional treatment outcomes being performed by him and other Canadian researchers. Bush was implementing the Cognitive Self Change program for violent offenders in the American state of Vermont. Cocktails in hand, Bush explained to Andrews why, based on his experience with offenders, it was important to pay attention to the most criminal of offenders (not the “easy cases”), to pay particular attention to how they think, and to communicate with them in ways that do not lead them to reject our message – and us. Andrews explained to Bush the statistical foundations of risk, need, and responsivity. It was a moment of mutual recognition. We were describing the same phenomena from two different points of view, and coming to the same conclusions.
That moment of recognition captures the intent and structure of this book. The authors do not offer an alternative to quantitative science as a way to understand criminal behavior and what to do about it. Rather, we present an additional dimension to that understanding. This is the dimension of human experience, of offenders’ experience and our own. We believe this aspect of our shared humanity provides a potential key to diminishing the war between us and them, and in some cases to resolving it.
We want to thank all those that helped this book come about.
Jack says: I want to thank those who have supported my ideas and my programs over the past many years. In particular, I thank my long time friend and boss at the Correctional Treatment Program in Oregon, Roger Smith; my friends and colleagues in Vermont who nurtured and delivered and improved the Cognitive Self Change program, and especially Brian Bilodeau, Thomas Powell, Charles Gurney, Steve Woodsum, Renee Weeks, and Richard Powell. Above all, I thank my best friend and lover, wife, life companion, and writing coach: Susan F. Brink. Thank you, Susie.
Richard says: I would like to thank the former Executive Director of ACT Corrective Services, James Ryan, for showing faith and having the courage to bring the Cognitive Self Change program to Australia; and the numerous CSC facilitators who have vindicated my faith in the ability of this program to reach out to a wide array of often difficult offenders; and my wife, Marlene, who has been with me through this incredible journey.
Daryl says: I would like to say thanks to anyone who has shown faith in me or taken the time wittingly or unwittingly to help me learn – principally my parents (Pat and Alan), brother (Richard), friends, colleagues, offenders, patients, teachers (especially Chris Penford, Richard Harvey, and Dave Golder), lecturers (especially Janice Kay, Denver Daniels, and Sean Hammond), and my co-authors, but most of all Sarah my wife and my children Owain and Aneurin.
In this introduction the authors offer a brief description of their premises and presuppositions, particularly as these differ from traditional or “mainstream” ways of thinking in the field of correctional treatment. We sketch and briefly summarize how our experience with offenders points us to the main conclusions of this book. This Introduction is presented in six sections.
On the face of it, criminal behavior appears easy to understand. Selfish disregard for other people seems to be a normal human trait. It is easy to imagine that most of us would be this way most of the time if we were not so well brought up, or if there were no laws, or if laws were not enforced. However, on a closer look, criminal behavior is not so simple. The most persistent offenders seem to be immune to caring about the harm they do to others. Law enforcement and punishment seem not to deter them. They seem perversely determined to be as they are, and to stay that way. Something more than “normal human selfishness” is going on here. But what is it?
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
