In this book you will find compact, up-to-date basic knowledge about German income tax, German corporate income tax and German trade tax (legal status 1.1.2018). The textbook, which has already been published in its sixth German edition, has now been translated into English language. It clearly presents the basics of German Profit Taxes and introduces even the previously inexperienced reader to the world of income tax, corporate income tax and trade tax. As in the previous German editions, the focus is not on individual tax-related recommendations for action or detailed regulations, but on the fundamental systematics of the subject matter. The book is therefore the ideal companion for targeted preparation for examinations in the Bachelor's and Master's programmes at universities that are oriented towards business taxation or tax law. It is also ideally suited for self-study. Target groups are therefore students, lecturers in the field of business taxation and tax law. The book is also suitable for English-speaking practitioners (including those from abroad) who wish to develop basic knowledge of German Profit Taxes useful for everyday professional life. Assistants in tax consulting, tax clerks as well as landlords specialising in tax and not least also tax advisers are addressed here.
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Das E-Book (TTS) können Sie hören im Abo „Legimi Premium” in Legimi-Apps auf:
Christoph Freichel, Gernot Brähler,Christian Lösel, Andreas Krenzin
Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek
Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über <http://dnb.dnb.de> abrufbar.
Das Werk einschließlich aller seiner Teile ist urheberrechtlich geschützt. Jede Verwertung außerhalb der engen Grenzen des Urheberrechtsgesetzes ist ohne Zustimmung des Verlages unzulässig und strafbar. Das gilt insbesondere für Vervielfältigungen, Übersetzungen, Mikroverfilmungen und die Einspeicherung und Verarbeitung in elektronischen Systemen.
© UVK Verlag 2021
– ein Unternehmen der Narr Francke Attempto Verlag GmbH + Co. KG
Dischingerweg 5 · 72070 Tübingen
Einbandgestaltung: Atelier Reichert, Stuttgart
Cover-Illustration: © iStock MicroStockHub
Druck und Bindung: CPI books GmbH, Leck
eMail: [email protected]
The German income tax law is subject to permanent changes and due to the high pace of reform, the legislator often makes manual mistakes or that regulations are particularly complex. The textbook, which has already been published in its sixth German edition, has now been translated into English language.
This textbook provides beginners with a comprehensive overview of fundamental aspects of income tax law. After an introduction to income tax law, income tax (Chapter 2) is analysed as a focal point. This includes the characterisation, meaning and principles of income tax, personal and impersonal tax liability as well as the temporal allocation of income. This chapter focuses on the explanations relating to the determination of taxable income and the income tax to be determined. Subsequently, the principles of corporate income tax (Chapter 3) and trade tax (Chapter 4) are presented. However, the explanations are not limited to the respective basic principles, but also relate to questions of tax liability, the determination of taxable income or the business profit. Finally, numerous examples are also used to illustrate how these types of taxes are actually assessed. Chapter 5 is devoted to the approaches of the legislator for the implementation of a legal form neutrality of taxation in Germany. The explanations in this textbook on income tax, corporate income tax and trade tax are supplemented by a so-called comprehensive case study in which the interrelationships of the determination of taxable income or business profit, the respective provisions that may be necessary and the calculation of the relevant tax liabilities are shown, taking into account the special features mentioned in the case.
For the sixth edition, the entire book was revised and updated in order to adapt it to the current state of knowledge and legal status. In order to meet the didactic requirements, the book contains numerous practical examples as well as illustrative figures and tables. At the end of each chapter there is a summary in the form of core statements on key findings, questions and individual references to literature, which are suitable for in-depth, topic-specific literature study. The comprehensive index helps you to search for concrete content.
The book is the ideal companion for the targeted preparation for examinations in the Bachelor's and Master's programmes at universities that are oriented towards business taxation or tax law. It is also ideally suited for self-study. Target groups are therefore students, lecturers in the field of business taxation and tax law. The book is also suitable for English-speaking practitioners (including those from abroad) who wish to develop basic knowledge of German Profit taxes useful for everyday professional life. Assistants in tax consulting, tax clerks as well as landlords specializing in tax and not least also tax advisers are addressed here.
We would like to thank especially Christoph Freichel’s partners Mr. WP StB Dr Matthias Ritzi and Mr. WP StB Matthias Rohr from Moore Treuhand Kurpfalz GmbH Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, Steuerberatungsgesellschaft, Mannheim, for the financial support of this book and Mr. Dr Jürgen Schechler from UKV Verlag for the pleasant cooperation. We would like to express our gratitude to our academic staff and student assistants, who have supported us tirelessly and conscientiously in the preparation of the manuscript. In alphabetical order: Ms. Sophie Marie Lorinser, B.A., Ms. RA Dipl.-Finw. Katrin Michels, Mr. Felix Schmitt, B.A. and Ms. Lena-Marie Waller, B.A.
We are grateful for any suggestions for improvement, spelling mistakes or suggestions and would like to refer you to the following e-mail addresses:
The book is based on the legal status 01.01.2018
Christoph FreichelGernot BrählerChristian LöselAndreas Krenzin
In addition to this textbook, a web service is available for download on the title page of the book at www.uvk.digital/9783739830247
1.A clearly structured presentation of the illustrations of the book.
2.Additional examples and understanding questions, which support the didactical usability of the presentation by the lecturer in instruction and for the student in the self-study are very useful.
List of abbreviations
1Introduction to German profit tax law
1.1The importance of taxes
1.2Tax burden and tax justice
1.3The three tax disciplines
1.4The tax system
1.4.1Earnings of the state
1.4.2Classification of the tax types
184.108.40.206Taxpayer and/or taxable subject
220.127.116.11Subject of taxation and/or taxable object
18.104.22.168Tax threshold, tax allowance, deductible amount
22.214.171.124Tax rate and tax scale
2Personal income tax
2.1Basic principles of personal income tax
2.1.1Characterization, importance and principles of personal income tax
126.96.36.199Characteristics and demarcation of the personal income tax
188.8.131.52Fiscal and economic importance
184.108.40.206Principles of income taxation
220.127.116.11The two forms of income tax assement
2.1.2Personal and impersonal liability for personal income tax
2.1.3Personal liability for personal income tax
18.104.22.168Types of unlimited tax liability
22.214.171.124Types of limited tax liability
126.96.36.199Problem of double taxation
2.1.4Impersonal liability for personal income tax
188.8.131.52The types of income
184.108.40.206Determination of the personal income tax
220.127.116.11Classification of earnings and expenses
18.104.22.168Assessment period and determination period
2.2Determination of taxable income
2.2.1Determination of income
22.214.171.124Overview of the methods of determining income
126.96.36.199Determination of profit
188.8.131.52Determination of surplus income
2.2.2Seven types of income
184.108.40.206The profit income types
220.127.116.11The surplus income types
18.104.22.168Compensation and income from previous employment (Sec. 24 EStG)
2.2.3Determination of the total amount of income
22.214.171.124Elderly allowance (Altersentlastungsbetrag)
126.96.36.199Tax allowance for single parents
188.8.131.52Deduction for farmers and foresters
2.2.4Fiscal treatment of losses
184.108.40.206Concept of special expenses
220.127.116.11Unlimited deductible special expenses
18.104.22.168Limited deductible special expenses
22.214.171.124Concept of extraordinary expenses
126.96.36.199Extraordinary expenses in general cases
188.8.131.52Extraordinary expenses in standardized cases
2.2.7Family benefit compensation
2.2.8Assessment basis and scale
184.108.40.206The taxable income
220.127.116.11Scaled income tax
18.104.22.168Special rates according to Secs. 34 and 34a EStG
22.214.171.124Determination of the personal income tax to be assessed
126.96.36.199Determination of the final payment and/or the refund entitlement
2.3.2Other partners of a partnership
3Corporate income tax
3.1.2Personal tax liability
188.8.131.52Unlimited tax liability
184.108.40.206Limited tax liability
3.2Tax assessment basis
3.2.1Determination of taxable income
3.2.2Adaptations of the commercial balance sheet to the tax balance sheet
3.2.3Additions and deductions to determine the taxable income outside of the balance sheet
220.127.116.11Hidden profit distributions
18.104.22.168Hidden equity contributions
22.214.171.124Tax-exempt income from investments in accordance with Sec. 8b (1) KStG
126.96.36.199Non-deductible expenditures in accordance with Sec. 10 KStG
188.8.131.52Non-deductible expenditures in accordance with Secs. 4 (5), (5b), 4h, 4j EStG, Secs. 8a, 8b (3) and (5) KStG
3.2.4From the total amount of income to the remaining corporate income tax payment/refund
4.1.1Characterization of trade tax
4.1.2Subject of taxation
4.1.3Personal tax liability
4.2.1Additions under Sec. 8 GewStG
4.2.2Deductions under Sec. 9 GewStG
4.2.4Tax allowance, federal tax rate, municipal rate and advance payments
4.4Lump-sum crediting of trade tax
4.5Final question on trade tax
5Legal neutrality of taxation
5.1Principle of legal neutrality of taxation
5.2Approaches for the implementation of legal form neutral taxation in Germany
6Final comprehensive case
6.1Information regarding corporate income tax
6.2Information regarding personal income tax
6.4.1Determination of the taxable income/provision for trade tax/provision for corporate income tax
6.4.2Calculation of the tax liability for 2018
184.108.40.206Application of the flat-rate withholding tax within the meaning of Sec. 32d EStG
220.127.116.11Application of the partial-income method within the meaning of Sec. 3 no. 40 lit. d EStG
List of figures
List of tables
English – German
German – English
Aktiengesellschaft (stock company)
Alterseinkünftegesetz (German Retirement Income Act)
Abgabenordnung (The Fiscal Code of Germany)
Außensteuergesetz (German International Transactions Tax Act)
Bundesausbildungsförderungsgesetz (German Federal Education Assistance Act)
Bewertungsgesetz (German Valuation Act)
Bundesfinanzhof (Federal Fiscal Court)
Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (German Civil Code)
Bundesministerium der Finanzen (German Federal Ministry of Finance)
Bundessteuerblatt (German Federal Tax Law Gazette)
Deutsches Institut der Wirtschaftsprüfer (German Institute of Auditors)
European Economic Area
European Free Trade Association
Erbschaftsteuer (Inheritance Tax)
Einkommensteuer (Personal income tax)
Einkommensteuer-Durchführungsverordnung (German Implementing Ordinance for Income Tax)
Einkommensteuergesetz (German Income Tax Act)
Einkommensteuer-Hinweise (German notes on income tax law)
Einkommensteuer-Richtlinien (German guide to income tax law)
and the following
Finanzgericht (Fiscal Court)
Gewerbesteuer (trade tax)
Gewebesteuer-Durchführungsverordnung (German Implementing Ordinance for Trade Tax)
Gewerbesteuergesetz (German Trade TaxAct)
Gewerbesteuer-Richtlinien (German guide to trade tax law)
Grundgesetz (German Constitutional Law)
Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung (similar to a limited liability company)
Grunderwerbsteuer (land transfer tax)
Grundsteuer (land tax)
Handelsgesetzbuch (German Commercial Act)
in accordance with
in conjunction with
Kapitalertragsteuer (capital yields tax)
Kraftfahrzeugsteuer (motor vehicle tax)
Kommanditgesellschaft (similar to a limited partnership)
Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien (similar to a partnership limited by shares)
Körperschaftsteuer (corporate income tax)
Körperschaftsteuergesetz (German Corporate Income Tax Act)
Körperschaftsteuer-Richtlinien (German guide to corporate income tax law)
Lohnsteuer-Durchführungsverordnung (German Implementing Ordinance for Wage Tax)
Lohnsteuer-Richtlinien (German wage tax guidelines)
Mineralölsteuer (petroleum tax)
Offene Handelsgesellschaft (similar to a general partnership)
Profit and loss account
Solidaritätszuschlag (solidarity surcharge)
Universal Mobile Telecommunications System
Taxes form an important part of every citizen’s financial endeavors. The liability to pay taxes accompanies every citizen from the cradle to the grave. The tax liability is imposed by the polity to finance the services performed by the state and influences citizens’ economic dealings. The state must observe certain basic principles when levying taxes, e.g. the principles of legality and uniformity of taxation. In particular, taxation is supposed to be based on the economic capacity of the taxpayer. The state may not unduly call on individual citizens (strangulation effect) if it desires to participate in the success of the private economy in a sustainable manner. Non-uniform taxation can lead to evasive reactions by the eco- nomic actors and presents credibility and legitimacy problems that, inter alia, can lead to a decrease in tax revenue.
Thus, a state must take care to levy taxes so as to reflect the relationship between the legal protection of ownership and the social obligation arising from ownership in a legal and comprehensible manner which is seen to be just. The opposition of the objectives and interests that play a role in taxation must be taken into account in levying taxes. Economic actors want to and must reduce the tax liability, inter alia because of the pressure of globalization. On the other hand, the taxes finance tasks whose fulfillment can be for the benefit of the economic actors and provide the state with the opportunity to intervene in the economic process, inter alia, for the benefit of all.
Modern industrial states fulfill a number of political tasks of a social, regulatory and economic nature. The extent of the tasks vested in the respective political system is always reflected in its so-called Staatsquote, which indicates the ratio of government expenditures to gross national product (GNP). In Germany, this ratio was 44.3 % in 2016:
Figure 1: Ratio of government expenditures to the GNP for Germany 2016
Figure 2: Development of the expenditure-GNP ratio from 1980 to 2016
States levy contributions, predominantly in the form of taxes, to finance the public services. A high public expenditure quota generally means that the economic actors are subject to an increased liability to pay taxes and contributions. This liability to pay taxes and contributions is expressed by the so-called tax ratio which indicates the ratio of taxes and social contributions to the gross national product. In 2016, this tax ratio amounted to 42.7 %:
Figure 3: Tax and contribution ratio for Germany 2016
Taxes influence the economic activities of the people and change their consumption, investment and savings habits. Thus, taxes must be arranged in a “just” manner. “Just” means that the circumstances of each individual case must be taken into account, as only specially tailored rules prevent generalized and therefore unjust legal consequences in individual cases. However, the more the tax laws take details into account, the more complex they become and the more difficult they become to apply or carry out. As is the case when there are too few regulations, the complexity of tax provisions caused by the increasing number of rules for specific cases leads to injustices because only those who have access to correspondingly qualified advice are able to make fiscally optimal arrangements. Those taxpayers who receive no or poor advice are thus at a disadvantage compared to those who receive good advice, because the former are unable to take advantage of the possibilities to avoid paying taxes. The term “Dummensteuer” (idiot tax) has also been used in this context. The term “just” also means not over-regulating the system of taxation, but rather keeping it manageable and comprehensible for the majority of taxpayers.
In addition to excessive regulations for individual cases, another reason for the complexity of our tax system is the fact that the assessment of taxes not only serves as a source of income for the state, but rather is used economically and socio-politically to steer the actions of individuals. Taxes are meant to guide behavior. Instead of enacting imperatives and prohibitions, the legislature encumbers undesired behavior with additional taxes and promotes desired behavior and those goods worthy of such promotion (so-called merit goods) with tax relief (e.g. lower value-added tax of 7 % for foodstuffs and magazines, instead of the normal 19 %). Thus, the state not only pursues fiscal interests, but also steering objectives as well (e.g. the restriction of cigarette consumption with the tobacco tax, or the promotion of energy saving with the ecology tax).
In light of the allocative and distributive importance of taxes for the state and its economic actors, several scientific research facilities address their effects, their application, or their distribution. The tax disciplines can be broken down into the three sub-areas: tax law, financial science, and business taxation. The object of experience for all three disciplines is the phenomenon “taxes”, although the respective subject matters of their research differ. The demarcations between the individual areas are fluid.
The discipline of tax law considers taxation to be a legal process. This discipline concentrates on the legal aspects of taxation and is concerned with the relationship between the state and its citizens with regard to taxation. The subject matter includes issues in the construction of tax provisions or the examination of their conformity with the constitution and/or the law of the European Union.
The discipline of financial science forms part of political economics and is thus macro-economically orientated. The economic actions of the state form the object of knowledge, to the extent that earnings and expenses are included. The discipline of financial science addresses, for example, issues involving the just distribution of tax revenue or the minimization of negative effects of taxation on production, consumption and competition (influence on the allocation of resources, minimization of deadweight loss).
The subject matter of business taxation is the examination of effects of taxation on the business activities of companies. There are four main scientific areas of research within the discipline of business taxation:
•Problem-oriented assessment of tax law (presentation of legal norms): Knowledge of the most important national and international tax provisions is of fundamental importance for the discipline of business taxation.
•Theory of tax effects in business economics: Analysis and description of the influence of taxation on the variables of fundamental importance to decisions made by economic actors.
•Theory of tax planning in business economics: Advice for the decisionmakers of a company in exercising options under tax law and in the arrangement of planned circumstances in order to minimize the total tax burden.
•The evaluative-normative theory of business taxation: Critical opinions on the current state of tax law (de lege lata) as well as planned changes (de lege ferenda).
It is an indispensable prerequisite to first examine tax law in terms of a portrayal of legal norms because tax law constitutes, on the one hand, the framework within which fiscal arrangements are made and, on the other hand, the instrument of such arrangements. Building on this, the effects of taxation can be examined for subsequent targeted tax planning afterwards.
There are three different tax disciplines:
•Financial science and
The public sector is financed by public and extraordinary earnings. Ordinary earnings end up with the state and are thus available to the state indefinitely. A difference must be drawn between earned income of the state and (sovereign) compulsory levies. Earned income of the state is acquired by the public sector’s participation in the market, e.g. by way of private businesses with public shareholding (Deutsche Post, Deutsche Bahn, Deutsche Telekom, as well as banks, research centers, harbor companies, airport companies and construction companies, etc.). Compulsory levies are divided into taxes, fees, contributions and special duties. Extraordinary earnings are only available to the state temporarily and must be paid back when a certain deadline has been reached. These extraordinary earnings also include public borrowing.
Figure 4: Possibilities of financing for the state
Taxes make up the largest portion of state earnings in all industrial countries, including Germany. According to the legal definition contained in Sec. 3 (1) AO (The Fiscal Code of Germany), taxes are “payments of money that do not represent counter-performance for a particular performance and that are imposed by a polity on all those who fulfill the statutory requirements for the tax liability, in order to generate income”. The term “tax” possesses the following characteristics:
•Compulsory levies: Taxes are levied by public corporations by virtue of their financial sovereignty. The taxpayer is to pay these levies if certain statutory requirements are fulfilled. It is not voluntary.
•Payments of money: According to their definition, taxes are payments of money, not performances in kind. They can be payment obligations that occur once (e.g. inheritance tax, and land transfer tax GrESt) or periodically recurring payment obligations (e.g. income tax, corporate income tax, and trade tax).
•No counter-performance: Taxes neither establish an entitlement to counter-performance by the state, nor is the level of taxes calculated directly according to the public services received by the taxpayer. Thus, taxes are not calculated in accordance with the equivalence principle.
•Public polity: Tax sovereignty is a prerequisite to levying taxes. In Germany, this is vested in the federal government (Bund), the federal states (Länder), the municipalities (Gemeinden) as well as those religious communities that possess the status of a corporation under public law.
•Statutory basis: Taxes must be levied from all who fulfill the statutory requirements for the tax liability. Taxes may not be levied in the absence of a statutory basis.
•Realization of earnings also as secondary objective: Taxes not only serve in the realization of earnings, but also economic- and socio-political (steering-) purposes. For this reason, the discipline of financial science also points out the possibility of using taxes to influence the behavior of the taxpayers (“ecology tax”).
The levy of taxes is accompanied by the so-called ancillary expenses related to taxes. According to Sec. 3 (4) AO, these are late fees, interest, surcharges on arrears, administrative fines and costs. In doing so, the legislature does not intend to realize earnings, but rather to cause a certain behavior on the part of the taxpayer. Ancillary expenses related to taxes are imposed if the tax-related obligations are not or are belatedly fulfilled by the taxpayer.
Fees (under public law) are also levies by the state for the realization of earnings. In contrast to taxes, however, the performance by the citizen (in the form of a fee) is matched by a counter-performance by the state. Thus, they are levied for the actual, individual use of public facilities; the equivalence principle applies. A distinction must be made between the following:
•Administrative fees (e.g. passport fees, motor vehicle registration fee),
•Utilization fee (e.g. road tolls, entrance fee for the local public swimming pool, trash collection fee), and
•Licensing fees (e.g. for concession fees, UMTS-license fees).
Contributions are expense reimbursements imposed for the potential utilization of the concrete services performed by public facilities. They also serve as financing. Contributions only entitle the party liable to pay to the possibility of utilizing the services performed, whereby a concrete counter-performance is rendered in the case of fees. The party liable to pay contributions must fulfill the payment obligation, even if he does not take advantage of the counter-performance (e.g. tourism levy).
Special levies are levies that are not assessed to cover the general fiscal requirements of the state, but rather serve to finance special tasks and are only levied from certain groups of citizens. Inaddition to financing, steering objectives are also pursued; in doing so, an incentive is intended for a certain behavior and undesirable behavior is to be sanctioned. An example of this is the equalisation levy in accordance with the German Severely Handicapped Persons Act (Schwerbehindertengesetz) paid by the employer if a certain minimum number of severely handicapped persons is not employed.
The tax system consists of all individual taxes levied as well as the way in which they are levied. Considering the numerous federal, regional and communal taxes that are levied in Germany from different taxpayers, for different taxable objects, and on different assessment bases in different forms – partially with dependencies and interdependencies – the German tax system is a very complex system. On 19 September 2003 the law of taxes and levies for the Federal Republic of Germany consisted of 118 laws, 87 ordinances as well as several hundred statements made by the German Federal Ministry of Finance (BMF). Additionally, there are innumerable laws that are not tax laws per se, but are of relevance to tax matters.
Scholars have developed several different approaches to systemizing the (individual) taxes.
Figure 5: Approaches of systematization
•Direct and indirect taxes
The distinction originates from the discipline of financial sciences and is related to the possibility provided by the legislature to shift tax liability. In the case of direct taxes, the tax debtor, the ultimate taxpayer, i.e. the party that ultimately bears the tax burden, and the taxpayer are identical (e.g. income tax). The intended shift of the tax liability from the tax debtor to the ultimate taxpayer is characteristic of indirect taxes. Accordingly, in the case of value-added tax, although the business owner is the tax debtor and the taxpayer, it is the final private consumer, who is to be encumbered financially (ultimate taxpayer).
Direct taxes: No shift of tax liability is envisagedIndirect taxes: Shift of tax liability is envisaged
•Personal and impersonal taxes
Personal and/or impersonal taxes are taxes that allow for characteristics related to individuals (e.g. marital status, age). The most important personal taxes are personal income tax (Einkommensteuer – ESt), inheritance tax (Erbschaftsteuer – ErbSt) as well as the corporate income tax (Körperschaftsteuer – KSt). Another fundamental characteristic of the personal taxes is the distinction between the unlimited and limited tax liability. In the case of impersonal taxes, object-related taxes or real-estate taxes, the amount of taxes is generally determined solely by characteristics related to the object. The trade tax (Gewerbesteuer – GewSt) and the land tax (Grundsteuer – GrSt) are examples of impersonal taxes.
•Classification according to economic factors
In examining the economic factors and/or the assessment basis of the taxes, the following groups of taxes can be identified:
-Profit taxes (the economic success forms the assessment basis of the taxes, e.g. personal income tax, corporate income tax and trade tax),
-Substance taxes (the amount of funds form the assessment basis of the taxes, e.g. land tax and deferred transaction tax),
-Transaction taxes (are generally based on legal transactions, e.g. land transfer tax),
-Excise tax (generally based on consumption; for all intents and purposes, however, it is usually the producer who is taxed, e.g. petroleum tax and tobacco tax).
Value-added tax cannot be clearly classified according to the scheme above. Technically, it is arranged like the transaction tax and takes into account the change of disposing capacity. According to the intentions of the law, it is, however, an excise tax because the final consumer is to be encumbered.
Additional classification factors were developed especially within the discipline of financial sciences. In this respect, a distinction can be made, for example, between the parties entitled to the revenue (federal, regional, communal or community taxes) or ac- cording to the unit of measure forming the assessment basis (specific taxes or ad valor taxes). Specific taxes are related to physical magnitudes, such as quantity, weight or lot size (e.g. liters for petroleum tax, kWh for electricity tax). In contrast, the assessment basis of ad valor taxes are values (e.g. the taxable income in the case of personal income tax).
The taxable subject is the person, who is subjected to taxation. The taxable subject can be a natural person (personal income tax) as well as a legal entity (corporate income tax), such as a capital company. The term “taxable subject” is synonymous with “tax debtor” and “taxpayer.”
The subject of taxation and the taxable object are used synonymously and can be used to describe a thing, an action or a sum of money. The existence of the subject of taxation and/or the taxable object constitutes the tax liability. For example, the personal income tax and/or the corporate income tax are based on the income earned. An economic asset (e.g. real property, business establishment, motor vehicle) or an economic event (e.g. turnover) can be the connecting factor for taxation.
The tax base provides information on the extent to which a subject of taxation is subjected to taxation. It is the quantified object of taxation. The assessment basis is often expressed in money (e.g. income). It can, however, also be a technical and/or physical magnitude, such as cubic capacity (e.g. motor vehicle tax – KfzSt) or liters of fluid (e.g. MinöSt).
A tax threshold is the part of the assessment basis up to the maximum value of which taxes are not levied. If the tax threshold is exceeded, the entire assessment basis shall be subjected to taxation. The tax threshold on private sales transactions of € 600 in accordance with Sec. 23 (3) sent. 5 of the German Income Tax Act (Einkommensteuergesetz – EStG) is the classic example. The intended purpose of the tax threshold is to relieve the tax administration which should not be bothered with insignificant amounts.
A tax allowance remains tax free regardless of the amount forming the assessment basis. It is an amount that can be deducted in the calculation of the tax base, but which is generally only granted to the extent that it does not cause the assessment basis to be below zero. An example is the basis tax allowance of € 9,000 in accordance with Sec. 32a (1) sent. 2 no. 1 EStG that exempts the taxpayer’s subsistence level from taxation. On account of the progressive character of personal income tax, tax allowances benefit taxpayers with high income more than taxpayers with low income because, when earning a higher income, the resulting reduction of the assessment basis and the tax rate is larger than it is when less income is earned.
A deductible amount is not deducted from the assessment basis but rather directly from the tax debt. In doing so, it directly reduces the amount of taxes to be paid. While the tax allowance leads to more relief in a progressive tax scale with an increasing assessment basis, the deductible amounts provide relief to all taxpayers to the same degree and are thus perceived as more just. An example for a deductible amount is the deduction of donations to political parties by natural persons amounting to 50 % of the expenditures, at most € 825 (cf. Sec. 34g sent. 1 no. 1 and sent. 2 EStG).
A tax threshold is the part of the assessment basis, up to the maximum value of which taxes are not levied.
A tax allowance is the part of the assessment basis that is exempted from taxation.
A deductible amount is deducted from the taxpayer’s tax debt.
The tax rate indicates what percent of the assessment basis or what absolute amount of money per unit of the assessment basis is levied as taxes by the fiscal authorities. The term tax scale is used if the tax rate is not constant for the entire assessment basis. Thus, a tax scale consists of a sequence of tax rates.
Tax scales can be simple tax scales (dependent on only one variable, e.g. the personal income tax scale, which is only dependent on the amount of taxable income) or combined scales (dependent on more than one variable, e.g. the inheritance tax scale, which is dependent on the amount of the inheritance as well as the degree of relationship). The scales of personal taxes are usually constructed progressively, i.e. the tax rate and the resulting average tax burden increase with the assessment basis.
The basic tax rate is the tax rate that must be paid for the first Euro of the taxpayer’s assessment basis.
On the other hand, the top tax rate is the highest tax rate provided for in a tax scale (= maximum marginal tax rate).
The average tax rate results from the amount of taxes to be paid divided by the respective assessment basis. If the tax rate is expressed as a percentage, the result is to be multiplied by a factor of 100.
The marginal tax rate or the marginal rate of tax is the tax rate at which the last (highest) unit of the assessment basis achieved is taxed. The marginal tax rate results from the first derivative of the tax function.
The differential tax rate is the average tax rate levied on an additional part of the assessment basis (Bz). If the taxes on the assessment basis including Bz are depicted as Sz and as S for the taxes without this part of the assessment basis, the differential tax rate is calculated as (Sz – S)/Bz.
The scale can be designed as a calculation scale or as a threshold scale (graduated scale). In the calculation scale, the rate that applies to the last unit of taxation shall apply to the entire assessment basis. In the case of the threshold scale or graduated scale, the assessment basis is broken down into portions, to which a certain tax rate is then applied respectively. The personal income tax scale in Germany is designed as a threshold scale. In 2018 the following scale applies:
•From € 0 to € 9,000:
Basis tax allowance; not subject to taxation (cf. Sec. 32a (1) sent. 2 no. 1 EStG)
•From € 9,001 to € 13,996:
Transition to linear-progressive development. The marginal tax rate increases from a basic tax rate of 14 % to 23.87 % (cf. Sec. 32a (1) sent. 2 no. 2 EStG).
•From € 13,997 to € 54,949:
Linear-progressive development with a quick increase in the marginal tax rate up to 42 % (cf. Sec. 32a (1) sent. 2 no. 3 EStG).
•From € 54,950 to € 260,532:
Proportional development with a marginal tax rate of 42 % (cf. Sec. 32a (1) sent. 2 no. 4EStG).
•Above € 260,533:
Proportional development with a top tax rate of 45 % (cf. Sec. 32a (1) sent. 2 no. 5 EStG), so-called wealth tax (Reichensteuer).
Figure 6: Tax scale in 2018
Only the top tax rate in Germany is 45 %. The average tax rate is regularly (significantly) lower due to the tax tariff.
The distribution of the tax revenue to the federal government, the federal states and the municipalities is regulated in Art. 106 of the Basic Constitutional Law of Germany (GG). Most of the tax types are assigned exclusively to an individual federal, regional or local authority (Gebietskörperschaft) named in the Basic Constitutional Law (divided tax system). The revenue from the most profitable tax types, especially the personal income tax, corporate income tax and value-added tax (community taxes), is, however, divided between the federal government and the federal states according to a set distribution key (combined tax system). The advantage of the combined system is that the distribution of the tax revenue to the regional authorities leads to the avoidance of multiple taxation by different levels. The tax sovereignty over the tax revenue can be classified as follows:
Figure 7: Classification of the taxes according to the tax sovereignty
The personal income tax and the corporate income tax are community taxes.
The land tax and the trade tax are communal taxes.
The expenses of the state are predominantly financed by levying taxes.
The legal definition of tax is contained in Sec. 3 (1) of the Fiscal Code of Germany (AO).
Different disciplines of science have taxes as object of knowledge.
•Impersonal and personal taxes
•Direct and indirect taxes
•Classification according to economic factors
•Classification according to the regional authorities entitled to the revenue
•Taxpayer and/or taxable subject
•Subject to taxation and/or taxable object
•Tax threshold/tax allowance/deductible amount
•Tax rate/tax scale
1.Which disciplines of science deal with taxes?
2.What types of income does the state receive?
3.What kinds of levies can be distinguished?
4.What is a tax allowance, what is a tax threshold and what is a deductible amount? What is the difference between the three?
5.What is the difference between the marginal tax rate, average tax rate and differential tax rate?
6.What taxes are levied solely by the federal governments, by the federal states or by the municipalities? What taxes are levied in the combined system?
Dietrich Grashoff, Florian Kleinmanns, Aktuelles Steuerrecht 2017 (Current tax law 2017), Munich, 13th ed. 2017, pp. 7-16.
Wolfgang Jakob, Einkommensteuer (Personal income tax), Munich, 4th ed. 2008, p. 24.
Dieter Schneeloch, Stephan Meyering, Guido Patek, Betriebswirtschaftliche Steuerlehre, Bd. 1: Grundlagen der Besteuerung, Ertragsteuern (Business taxation, Vol. 1: Principles of taxation, profit taxes), Munich, 7th ed. 2016, pp. 1-42.
Klaus Tipke, Joachim Lang, Steuerrecht (Tax law), Cologne, 22nd ed. 2015, pp. 1-72, 185-194, 252.
Personal income tax is levied in accordance with the law. According to Sec. 4 of the Fiscal Code of Germany (AO), “Law is every legal norm”. Taxation without a legal basis is not permitted. The legal bases of the personal income tax include the following:
•Formally enacted laws:
1.Constitution: The German Basic Constitutional Law of 23 May 1949
2.General laws: E.g. the Fiscal Code of Germany (Abgabenordnung – AO) or the Income Tax Act (EStG),
•Statutory regulations: The German Implementing Ordinance for Income Tax (Einkommensteuer-Durchführungsverordnung – EStDV) and the German Implementing Ordinance for Wage Tax (Lohnsteuer-Durchführungsverordnung – LStDV).
Laws and subordinate legislation are generally binding. The following also have a substantial influence on legal practice:
•The jurisdiction of the German Federal Fiscal Court (BFH) and the German Fiscal Courts (FG)
•Administrative provisions: Income tax guidelines (Einkommensteuer-Richtlinien – EStR), wage tax guidelines (Lohnsteuer-Richtlinien – LStR), official statements from the German Federal Ministry of Finances (Bundesministerium der Finanzen – BMF), decrees of the federal states or orders from the regional tax offices (Oberfinanzdirektionen).
Administrative provisions are only binding for the tax administration, not taxpayers.
The jurisdiction of the courts is only binding for the respective case. The decisions do have influence beyond the individual case, however, because it must be assumed that the courts will make the same decision in similar cases. The administrative provisions are only binding for the tax administration, however, not for the taxpayers.
The personal income tax belongs to the group of profit taxes, as does the corporate income tax and the trade tax. This group includes all types of taxes in which economic success forms the tax base. The magnitudes of success that are examined thereby include the profit, the revenue, the surplus or even the income.
As a personal tax, the personal income tax is linked with the tax subject “natural person.” In doing so, the principle of the personal ability to pay is accommodated by taking into account the taxpayer’s personal circumstances in the calculation of the income (e.g. the subsistence level as basis tax allowance under Sec. 32a (1) sent. 2 no. 1 EStG and the classification of insurance premiums for person- al insurances as special expenses in accordance with Sec. 10 (1) nos. 3 and 3a in conjunction with (i.c.w.) (4) EStG. The so-called taxable income (zu versteuerndes Einkommen – z.v.E.) forms the assessment basis of the personal income tax. As a personal tax, the personal income tax may not be deducted from its own assessment basis in accordance with Sec. 12 no. 3 EStG. According to Sec. 10 no. 2 of the German Corporate Tax Code (KStG), the same applies to the corporate income tax. As an impersonal tax, the trade tax is based on the ability of the (commercial) enterprise as the taxable subject to pay. The assessment basis is the trade income. Although trade tax is levied for business purposes and therefore represents a business expense, it cannot be deducted as a business expense when calculating profits (cf. Sec. 4 (5b) EStG).
Personal and corporate income tax
taxable subject (personal tax), personal ability to pay
taxable object (property/real tax), objective ability to pay
(objectified) trade Income
Deductibility from the assessment basis
Table 1: Differentiation of the profit tax types
In 2016, the revenue from income tax amounted to approx. € 244.5 billion. Thus, together with value-added tax, it is the most important tax.
Figure 8: Revenue from selected types of German taxes in 2016
The ability-to-pay principle is fundamental to the German tax system and is substantiated by several sub-principles. Although these principles have not been codified expressis verbis, i.e. they are not written in the law, they are, however, reflected in numerous provisions:
•The principle of taking into consideration the personal ability to pay: Each taxpayer should participate in providing tax revenue according to his ability to pay. How the ability to pay should be measured is the subject of debate. Indicators, such as income, assets or consumption, are often used. There is consensus that tax- payers in the same situations must be taxed equally (horizontal tax equity), while taxpayers in different situations are – corresponding to the character of the difference – to be treated differently (vertical tax inequity).
•Objective net income principle: The assessment basis of taxation is reduced by expenditures which are made to generate income and which stand in direct economic relation to this generation. Losses are also taken into account in the determination of the income because they lower the taxpayer’s ability to pay. Hence, losses in one type of income may be offset with earnings in other types of income. The deductibility of business expenses (Sec. 4 (4) EStG) and income-related expenses (Secs. 9, 9a EStG) as well as the forms of loss offsetting (Secs. 2 (3), 10d EStG) are examples of how the objective net income principle is realized in the determination of the taxable income.
•Subjective net income principle: Expenditures made to maintain the taxpayer’s existence are to be exempted from taxation. In doing so, characteristics which lie solely in the private sphere of the taxpayer are taken into account. Examples of this can be found in the basic tax allowance laid down in the EStG currently amounting to € 9,000 and the admissibility of deducting special expenses and extraordinary burdens.
•Principle of personal universality: All natural persons fulfilling the requirements to which taxation is linked are to be subjected to taxation without regard to their social position, status or origin. There are no exceptions founded in the taxpayer’s person (e.g. Federal President, nobility, etc.).
•Principle of impersonal universality: Every subject of taxation is to be taxed evenly, regardless of its nature or composition (e.g. real estate, capital assets, securities, money). Differences in taxation that result from the nature of the subject of taxation are to be avoided. However, this principle is increasingly being broken, e.g. with regard to the taxation of capital yields accruing to the private assets of a natural person with the flat-rate withholding tax or the restriction on the offsetting of losses from capital assets pursuant to Sec. 20 (6) EStG.
•Principle of progressive income taxation: The progression of the tax scale is a manifestation of the ability-to-pay principle. Accordingly, a better ability to pay – measured by a high income – should also result in a tax payment of higher proportions. The objective of arranging the scale progressively is the call for a contribution to the polity matching the ability to pay.
•Principle of discrete period taxation: This principle is not a manifestation of the ability-to-pay principle, but rather a fiscal necessity. The ability-to-pay principle requires as a just assessment basis the lifetime income, which can only be determined after the taxpayer has passed on. The state is, however, dependent on continuous tax revenue in order to perform the tasks assigned to it. Thus, the income tax scale is based on one year in accordance with Sec. 32a EStG so as to ensure an even tax yield. Transactions that lie outside the current period of time for the determination of the taxable income are generally not taken into account in the respective assessment period. Allowances for the principle of taxing lifetime income are, however, made with the possibility of carrying losses forward and back.
A distinction should be made between the two forms of income tax assessment:
Figure 9: Forms of assessing income tax
Assessing taxes is the basic form of tax assessment, whereby withholding taxes at the source forms an exception for certain types of income.
When taxes are assessed, the taxpayer should list the income earned during the calendar year in a form and declare it to the fiscal authorities. After the submitted tax return has been reviewed, the fiscal authorities set the amount of taxes to be paid in a tax assessment. A distinction is drawn between the individual tax assessment and the joint tax assessment. Generally, the taxable income earned during the calendar year is calculated for each natural person individually (individual tax assessment, Sec. 25 (1) EStG). This applies to persons who are single, divorced, widowed or permanently separated.
Only married couples may apply for joint assessment
under Sec. 26b EStG, in which the assumption is made that each spouse has a stake in half of the other partner’s income. According to Sec. 32a (5) EStG, in the case of joint assessment the scaled in- come tax amounts to twice the resulting tax amount for half of the joint income subject to taxation. This method is known as “Ehegatten-Splitting” (spousal income splitting),
The following are the cumulative requirements for the tax assessment in the form of spousal income splitting:
•Civil law marriage and/or marriage during the calendar year
•Unlimited tax liability of both partners
•Not permanently separated
The exception to the assessing of taxes is taxation at the source of the income. Withholding taxes and/or source taxes are not viewed as forming a separate type of taxes, but rather represent an advance payment of income tax that may be credited against the income tax after it has been determined. The purpose of withholding taxes is, among other things, to ensure tax revenue for the state. Hence, wage taxes on income earned from dependent-employment are deducted from the wages by the employer, who pays it to the fiscal authorities. The capital yields tax, for example, is withheld and paid to the fiscal authorities by the paying company (e.g. the GmbH when profits are distributed) and/or by the paying institution (e.g. the bank for accrued interest). An exception is the so-called flat-rate withholding tax or withholding tax within the meaning of Sec. 32d EStG. Capital yields that flow into the private assets of a natural person are usually taxed at a reduced rate of 25 %. In these cases, the tax liability is already settled by the deduction of the capital yields tax, and the capital yields do not have to be assessed with the remaining income of the taxpayer (cf. Sec. 43 (5) EStG). However, if the special tariff of Sec. 32d (1) EStG is not applicable, the capital yields tax retains its character as an advance payment of income tax.
The withholding tax and/or the source tax do not form a separate type of tax, but rather merely a special form of tax assessment to ensure tax revenue. This gives it the character of an advance payment of income tax.
Income tax is counted among the profit taxes. Together with value- added tax, it is the most important tax (measured by the total tax yield).
The distinction is drawn between the forms of tax assessment – assessing taxes and withholding taxes at the source.
Important legal bases are the German Constitutional Law, the Fiscal Code of Germany, the German Personal Income Tax Act and the German Implementing Ordinance for Wage Tax.
The ability-to-pay principle is of fundamental importance to the law on personal income tax and is substantiated by the division into several sub-principles.
1.What are the most important legal bases of personal income tax?
2.How can personal income tax be differentiated from other profit taxes?
3.What is the importance of income tax?
4.How are the forms of tax assessment differentiated?
5.What main principles and sub-principles form the basis of German income tax law?
There are two steps necessary to determine the liability for personal income tax: First, it must be decided which persons are to be called upon to pay the income tax (personalliability for personal income tax). Secondly, it must be decided which of the positions are included in the taxation of the income (impersonal liability to personal income tax).
Figure 10: Personal and impersonal liability for personal income tax
Personal income tax is a personal tax. The German Income Tax Act (Einkommensteuergesetz – EStG) applies the liability for taxes to all natural persons (Sec. 1 (1) sent. 1 EStG), regardless of age, citizenship and legal capacity. Thus, even minors and otherwise legally incapacitated persons are liable for taxes; their tax obligations are attended to by their legal representatives. In contrast, legal entities are not subject to personal income tax, but rather corporate income tax. Partnerships, in particular the OHG (general partnership) and the KG (limited partnership) – known in the terminology of taxation as “copartnerships” – are neither subject to personal nor corporate income tax. The taxes on the profits of these companies are assessed from the individual partners relative to their participation and at their respective individual tax rates.
A natural person’s personal liability for personal income tax begins at birth and ends at death … from the cradle to the grave!
According to Sec. 1 (1) and (4) EStG, a distinction is drawn between unlimited and limited tax liability. The distinction is related to the scope of the taxable income. Unlimited tax liability is divided into the unlimited, extended unlimited and notional (unlimited) tax liability. The limited tax liability is classified either as the general limited tax liability or the extended limited tax liability.
Figure 11: Personal income tax liability
a) Unlimited tax liability as defined by Sec. 1 (1) EStG
According to Sec. 1 (1) EStG, “Natural persons who are domiciled or have their habitual residence in the country are subject to unlimited personal income tax.” Hence, the requirements for unlimited tax liability are as follows:
•Natural persons, i.e. all living persons from the moment of their birth until their death.
•Domestic, i.e. within the borders of the Federal Republic of Germany, including the portion of the continental shelf, in accordance with Sec. 1 (1) sent. 2 EStG.
•Domicile, as defined in Sec. 8 of the Fiscal Code of Germany (Abgabenordnung – AO); required is the possession of a dwelling, in addition to the taxpayer’s intent to maintain and use the dwelling.
•Habitual residence is defined in Sec. 9 AO (as opposed to temporary residence) as continuous residence lasting more than six months. Short-term interruptions are not taken into account in calculating the length of residence.
Citizenship is irrelevant in determining whether tax liability exists.
Armin is a Turkish citizen. On 2 May he enters Germany, but does not establish a domicile. On 5 August he travels home to Turkey but returns to Germany, where he remains until 23 December.
In spite of the residence being interrupted by the trip to Turkey, Armin is subject to unlimited tax liability in Germany for the entire period of time between 2 May and 23 December. The stay in Germany lasted longer than six months (Sec. 9 sent. 2 clause 1 AO). According to Sec. 9 sent. 2 clause 2 AO, the trip home is not taken into consideration. It does not matter that Armin lacks German citizenship.
Within the scope of the unlimited tax liability, all domestic and international earnings – the so-called global income – is subject to German taxation (principle of global income taxation).
b) Extended unlimited tax liability as defined by Sec. 1 (2) EStG
According to Sec. 1 (2) EStG the scope of persons subject to unlimited tax liability under subsection 1 is extended to include persons, who
•are German citizens,
•are not domiciled or not habitually residing in Germany,
•have established employment with a domestic legal entity under public law and are paid from domestic public funds, and
•are subject to limited tax liability in their country of domicile and/or residence.
The same applies to the dependents sharing the same household and who are German citizens or who have no income or exclusively domestic earnings.
German ambassadors and consulate officers are subject to extended unlimited personal income tax in Germany.
Götz lives in the USA with his wife Elisabeth and is employed as a diplomatic ambassador of Germany. Elisabeth has no income.
Götz and Elisabeth are German citizens, but entertain neither domicile nor habitual residence in Germany. As ambassador, Götz is employed by the German Ministry of Foreign Affairs and receives his wages from German public funds. Elisabeth fulfills the requirements of Sec. 1 (2) sent. 1 clause 2 EStG. Thus, the couple is subject to extended unlimited tax liability in Germany.
c) National unlimited tax liability as defined by Sec. 1 (3) and Sec. 1a EStG
Persons who have neither domicile nor habitual residence in the country, but who cross over the border from other countries (e.g. Switzerland, Austria, Netherlands, Poland or Czech Republic) into Germany in order to perform their work, are referred to as cross-border workers. These persons, as they do not fulfill the requirement under Sec. 1 (1) EStG are only subject to limited tax liability in Germany and unlimited tax liability in their country of domicile. In Germany, the taxpayer’s personal circumstances (subsistence level, special expenses, etc.) cannot be taken into consideration because this is supposed to be the case within the scope of the unlimited tax liability, i.e. in the foreign country of domicile. Cross-border workers, however, earn their income predominantly or exclusively in Germany and, accordingly, earn no or little income in their country of domicile. They are therefore unable to assert the personal aspects abroad for lack of taxable income. For this reason, cross-border workers run the risk of being discriminated against relative to “normal” employees because their personal circumstances are neither taken into account in the country of employment nor the country of domicile. In the so-called Schumacker-decision on 14 February 1995, in which this discrimination formed the subject matter of the lawsuit, the European Court of Justice decided that cross-border workers may now apply to be subject to unlimited tax liability. In doing so, the unlimited tax liability is fictitious. This is, however, only possible if (almost) all of the income is subject to German personal income tax.
Requirements of the notional unlimited tax liability include the following:
•at least 90 % of the total income earned must be subject to German personal income tax or
•the taxable income not earned in Germany may not exceed the basic tax allowance of € 9,000 in accordance with Sec. 32a (1) sent. 2 no. 1 EStG and
•a certificate must be issued by the foreign fiscal authorities indicating the foreign income.
The tax benefits for those subject to unlimited tax liability may be taken advantage of if the requirements are fulfilled. These include special expenses, extraordinary burdens, child benefit, respectively tax allowances for children and basic tax allowance.
Karl, whose sole domicile is in Switzerland, only earns income to which German income tax applies. The requirements for habitual residence in Germany are not fulfilled. The necessary certificate indicating the amount of income earned at home is submitted.
Karl is not subject to unlimited tax liability in Germany under Sec. 1 (1) EStG because he entertains neither domicile nor habitual residence domestically. Sec. 1 (2) EStG does not apply either. Without an application, Karl is therefore subject to limited tax liability in Germany according to Sec. 1 (4) EStG. The unlimited tax liability is presumed, however, in accordance with Sec. 1 (3) EStG after submission of the Swiss certificate because an application was filed and only German income was earned. This is advantageous to Karl because he can, for Example, claim special expenses, which would not have been possible in the case of limited tax liability (Sec. 50 (1) sent. 3 EStG).
However, there is the problem that the German EStG contains subject- or family-related benefits, which presuppose not only the unlimited tax liability of the income recipient himself, but also the unlimited tax liability of the spouse. Especially in the case of cross-border workers, the latter is usually not present, so that without further regulations neither a joint assessment with splitting table nor the so-called real splitting could be granted. Sec. 1a EStG therefore contains an additional advantage in the context of unlimited tax liability, which, however, according to the wording of the provision, only benefits EU and EEA nationals. In 1999, the EU concluded an agreement with Switzerland to ensure the free movement of persons between Switzerland and the EU states in accordance with the arrangements within the EU. On this basis, the European Court of Justice ruled in its ruling of 28 February 2013 that EU law is violated if joint taxation is refused because the spouse's place of residence is in Switzerland. The German tax authorities are following this ruling and granting the benefit of Sec. 1a (1) no. 2 EStG if the spouse is resident in Switzerland. This applies accordingly to the benefit under Sec. 1 (1) no. 1 EStG. Nationals of the EU or the EEA and of Switzerland can take advantage of the spouse splitting and the real splitting,
•if, with regard to real splitting, the recipient of the benefits within the meaning of Sec. 10 (1a) EStG is not subject to unlimited tax liability and is resident or ordinarily resident in the EU, the EEA or Switzerland and the taxation of the benefit or payment at the recipient's place of residence is evidenced by a certificate issued by the competent foreign tax authority, or
•if, with regard to spousal splitting, the spouse who is not permanently separated and who has no domicile or habitual residence in the country, has his or her domicile or habitual residence in the EU or EEA or Switzerland and applies for taxation for unlimited tax liability. If the regulations of the fictitious unlimited tax liability are claimed, the income of both spouses must be taken into account and the basic tax allowance (Sec. 32a (1) sent. 2 no. 1 EStG) doubled.
Richard, a citizen of Austria, lives in Vienna with his wife, Silvia. He commutes daily to Germany and performs his work there. The necessary certificate indicating the amount of income earned at home is submitted.
Richard is not subject to unlimited tax liability in Germany because he entertains neither domicile nor habitual residence in Germany. Sec. 1 (1) EStG does not apply. Without an application, Richard is therefore subject to limited tax liability in Germany according to Sec. 1 (4) EStG. The unlimited tax liability is presumed, however, after submission of the Austrian certificate because an application was filed and only German income was earned. In accordance with Sec. 1a (1) no. 2 EStG, Richard is also granted the application of the spousal income splitting within the meaning of Sec. 26 (1) sent. 1 EStG, i.e. Silvia is also treated as being subject to unlimited taxation in Germany. If Richard were not a citizen of the EU/EEA or Switzerland, he could, for Example, claim special expenses in Germany, but not spousal income splitting.
Taxation of cross-border workers from third countries(Sec. 1 (3)EStG)
Additional privileges for citizens of the EU/EEA(Sec. 1a EStG)
Child benefit/child allowance
Basic tax allowance
Joint assessment with splitting tariff(Sec. 26 (1) EStG)
Real splitting(§ 10 (1a) no. 1 EStG)
Deduction of pension benefits to recipients who are not subject to unlimited taxation
„Ich bin wirklich begeistert. Auch die Möglichkeit des zusätzlichen eReaders im Abo finde ich persönlich toll.”
„Die Auswahl von Legimi ist großartig.”
„Der Leser findet seine E-Books/Hörbücher sehr schnell und sie lassen sich, ob mit oder ohne Internetverbindung problemlos öffnen.”
Wurm sucht Buch
„Ich finde das Angebot von Legimi richtig toll.”
„Besonders schön finde ich die große Auswahl an möglichen Abo-Modellen und besonders die Abos mit eReader.”
Miss Foxy Reads
„Ich muss sagen, dass ich von dem E-Reader mehr als positiv überrascht bin.”
„Das ist wirklich eine großartige Idee und mal was ganz Anderes.”
Mikka liest das Leben...
Tausende von E-Books und Hörbücher
Ihre Zahl wächst ständig und Sie haben eine Fixpreisgarantie.
Sie haben über uns geschrieben:
Dabei gewährt der E-Book-Anbieter größtmögliche Freiheiten
Größter Vorteil die Möglichkeit, in der aktuellen App komfortabel zwischen E-Book und Hörbuchversion eines Titels
Spotify for E-Books