35,99 €
Medicine is a career that most people consider to be enviable. Whatever one's criteria for a good job, being a doctor ticks a lot of boxes: doctors are needed, respected, well remunerated and can make a difference between life and death Increasingly, doctors are experiencing stress, depression and anxiety, fuelled by the increasing demands of the health services, and the lack of resources to support them.
Focussing on the causes, symptoms and management of psychological problems experienced by doctors at all stages in their careers, this book considers the difficulties and stressors of medicine as a career, linking to studies that look at what interventions are successful in the workplace and offering various solutions.
Including:
A valuable resource both for trainers and doctors alike.
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 262
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2013
Contents
Introduction
Part 1: The job and you
Chapter 1: It’s just a difficult job
1.1 Health organisations can be a health hazard
1.2 Life in the team
1.3 Workers of the world
1.4 And then there’s medicine itself
1.5 Things change
1.6 Conclusion
Bibliography
Chapter 2: Why me?
2.1 Life events
2.2 Looking for patterns
2.3 Early experience
2.4 Is gender an issue?
2.5 Emotional intelligence
2.6 Self-criticism and perfectionism
2.7 The MBTITM
2.8 Summary
Bibliography
Part 2: Waving, not drowning
Chapter 3: You and your partner: for life?
3.1 Work-home balance in medicine
3.2 Being different
3.3 Being self-centred
3.4 The competition for power
3.5 The problem solver
3.6 Personality
3.7 Stress and anger
3.8 Things happen
3.9 Recipe for the long term
Bibliography
Chapter 4: Choosing a specialty
4.1 Why medicine?
4.2 So why choose that?
4.3 Different specialties and the influence of stress
4.4 Disability
4.5 Gender still matters
4.6 Personality and career choice
4.7 Choosing general practice or a hospital specialty
4.8 Discover your career anchor
4.9 So how do you choose?
Bibliography
Chapter 5: Dealing with stress
5.1 Recognise it!
5.2 Taking control and letting it go
5.3 The eye of the beholder
5.4 Keeping a diary
5.5 Feeling overwhelmed
5.6 Don’t panic!
5.7 Sometimes work is traumatic
5.8 Coming from overseas
5.9 Financial issues
5.10 Coping well
5.11 Summary
Bibliography
Chapter 6: Down in the dumps
6.1 Recognising depression
6.2 Causes and cures
6.3 Keeping a diary
6.4 And when you’re better
6.5 Summary
Bibliography
Chapter 7: Difficult people?
7.1 Could it be me?
7.2 Dealing with difficult people
7.3 The bully and the bullied
7.4 Treating other doctors
7.5 Conclusion
Bibliography
Chapter 8: Feeling angry
8.1 Analysing your anger
8.2 Anger and depression
8.3 Cooling down
Bibliography
Chapter 9: A little too much
9.1 Is it a problem for you?
9.2 Tackling addiction
Bibliography
Chapter 10: Demands, demands, demands!
10.1 Strategies to make life easier
10.2 Demands change
Bibliography
Chapter 11: Can you afford emotions?
11.1 Is compassion good for you?
11.2 Using dialogue
11.3 Your health too
Bibliography
Chapter 12: To err is human
12.1 Risk and the individual
12.2 When an error happens
12.3 That was close!
12.4 Complaints and litigation
Bibliography
Chapter 13: Managing the stress and problems of others
13.1 Primary interventions
13.2 Secondary interventions
13.3 A long-standing problem
13.4 Getting help
Bibliography
Index
Professor Jenny Firth-Cozens is an occupational and clinical psychologist who has worked throughout the health service and within academia. In addition to a number of studies of MRC funded interventions for occupational stress and depression, she conducted and reported the first UK study of stress in young doctors, following them for almost 20 years and providing an understanding of the problems that face doctors throughout their careers. She has been special advisor and consultant to London Deanery, the National Clinical Assessment Service and the National Patient Safety Agency. She has published numerous scientific articles and reports along with several books, both academic and popular, including Stress in Health Professionals: Psychological and Organizational Causes and Interventions (Wiley) and Nervous Breakdown: What Is It? What Causes It? Who Will Help? (Piatkus) which was a book club choice for many years. In addition she has contributed articles and columns to most leading newspapers and magazines.
Dr. Jamie Harrison is a GP and Deputy Director of Postgraduate GP Education for the Northern Deanery. He pioneered the GP Career Start Scheme in County Durham and for five years advised the English Department of Health on GP recruitment in Europe. He has collaborated extensively to produce a range of books on contemporary health service issues, publishing Medical Vocation and Generation X, GP Tomorrow, Clinical Governance in Primary Care, The New GP, and Rebuilding Trust in Healthcare. He continues to work closely with young doctors as a GP Trainer, as well as supporting older doctors with performance concerns.
This edition first published 2010, © 2010 by Jenny Firth-Cozens
BMJ Books is an imprint of BMJ Publishing Group Limited, used under licence by Blackwell Publishing which was acquired by John Wiley & Sons in February 2007. Blackwell’s publishing programme has been merged with Wiley’s global Scientific, Technical and Medical business to form Wiley-Blackwell.
Registered office: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK
Editorial offices: 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ, UK111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030-5774, USAThe Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK
For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services and for information about how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com/wiley-blackwell
The right of the author to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher.
Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may not be available in electronic books.
Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The publisher is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book. This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is sold on the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services. If professional advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.
The contents of this work are intended to further general scientific research, understanding, and discussion only and are not intended and should not be relied upon as recommending or promoting a specific method, diagnosis, or treatment by physicians for any particular patient. The publisher and the author make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this work and specifically disclaim all warranties, including without limitation any implied warranties of fitness for a particular purpose. In view of ongoing research, equipment modifications, changes in governmental regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to the use of medicines, equipment, and devices, the reader is urged to review and evaluate the information provided in the package insert or instructions for each medicine, equipment, or device for, among other things, any changes in the instructions or indication of usage and for added warnings and precautions. Readers should consult with a specialist where appropriate. The fact that an organization or Website is referred to in this work as a citation and/or a potential source of further information does not mean that the author or the publisher endorses the information the organization or Website may provide or recommendations it may make. Further, readers should be aware that Internet Websites listed in this work may have changed or disappeared between when this work was written and when it is read. No warranty may be created or extended by any promotional statements for this work. Neither the publisher nor the author shall be liable for any damages arising herefrom.Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Firth-Cozens, Jenny.How to survive in medicine : personally and professionally / Jenny Firth-Cozens ; with contributions from Jamie Harrison.p. ; cm.Includes bibliographical references and index.ISBN 978-1-4051-9271-21. Physicians—Vocational guidance. 2. Physicians—Job stress. I. Title.[DNLM: 1. Physicians—psychology. 2. Interprofessional Relations. 3. Stress, Psychological—prevention & control. W 62 F527h 2010]R690.F566 2010610.69023—dc22
2010000504
ISBN: 978-1-4051-9271-2
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
1 2010
In the early 1980s I was working for the Medical Research Council at Sheffield University, looking at psychotherapy interventions for work-based depression. Two doctors in specialty training at the local hospital came to see me to ask if anything could be done about their profession: something, they said, was wrong. Over the past two months two young doctors they knew had killed themselves. Despite the shattering effects they felt about this, nothing had been said in their teams; they just met and talked clinically as usual. Both incidents were treated as if nothing had happened; as if doctors were uniformly strong and so couldn’t possibly be depressed or take their own lives. Nor, it seemed, should they be stressed by the loss of a colleague. They asked if I could start a study which tested this presumption, that explored the causes of stress and depression in doctors, and investigated what could be done about it.
My research interest at the time was to see which causes of stress and depression were job-related and which ones the individual brought with them – was it the person, or was it the job? – and so I began a 17 year longitudinal study, following over 300 doctors from their fourth year in medical school to senior doctor posts. Many of the findings in this book, and most of the quotes, come from this study and from the many others which followed.
Medicine is a career that most people consider to be enviable. Whatever one’s criteria for a good job, being a doctor ticks a lot of boxes: doctors are needed, respected, well remunerated and can make a difference between life and death. When asked what they enjoyed most about their roles, young doctors said that feeling useful and tackling problems were the most satisfying: ‘Finishing a job and knowing that I’ve done it well’. Many of them also said how much they enjoyed the patients: ‘Meeting a lot of people and helping them’. This changes over their careers so that patients and their relatives are often seen as the problem, rather than the benefit of the job. Still, the main enjoyment they experienced should go on: throughout your career you can get satisfaction from being useful and doing things well.
Older doctors when asked the same question often reflected on their role as privileged: ‘Where else could I get such variety – every patient’s different. It’s always interesting, always a challenge.’ Others welcomed the detective work involved in diagnosis. General practitioners appreciated the relationships that were formed: ‘Caring for three generations of one family’ and ‘Being able to journey with people through the good times and the bad’. While some felt the increasing pressure from the health care system created real issues for them, others still relished the challenge of beating the system: ‘Keeping the needs of the patients ahead of the forces of management’.
It seems then that there are many real satisfactions in medicine which, it might be thought, would outweigh most of the difficulties that you may have to face in your career. A proportion of doctors would agree with this and say that they are ‘happy’ or ‘very happy’ with their choice of career: a BMJ survey in 2001 found that 16% of doctors in the United Kingdom, 4% in Spain, 34% in Ireland and 36% in New Zealand were in this satisfied group. However, that is hardly a resounding gold star for great career satisfaction and, at the other extreme, two thirds of British doctors and more than half in many other countries reported feeling unhappy or very unhappy.
There is clearly something about the work or the people who do it, or both, that makes this potentially rewarding career less of a pleasure and satisfaction than you or the rest of the population might expect. This book explores what the pitfalls and problems of medicine are, and how you, the individual doctor, can tackle them. At the very least this should help you to survive your career as a reasonably healthy person; at best it should help you to gain even greater satisfaction and enjoyment from it.
Long-term studies show that dissatisfaction and general unhappiness are, without interventions, remarkably consistent over a lifetime. Although they are not clinical conditions, they do incorporate other more serious problems such as high levels of stress and depression. In numerous surveys around the world doctors who, with their income and educational levels, should be one of the least stressed groups, have levels of stress considerably higher than those of workers in general. Surveys have been remarkably consistent in showing that around 28% of doctors at various points in their careers are above threshold on the General Health Questionnaire (the GHQ is a brief assessment tool which is a useful measure of occupational stress and a snapshot of general psychological problems in a population) compared with 18% for the British workforce as a whole.
Stress is an overused word, but still a useful one as it represents the whole gamut of emotional distress. When it’s used in this book it doesn’t refer to feelings of pressure or challenge, both of which are inevitable and often positive responses to difficult aspects of life. When stress is mentioned, it’s always regarded as negative. Of those who score above threshold on the GHQ, some will show clinical levels of depression or anxiety.
Different surveys of depression in doctors have used very different measures and so it’s difficult to be accurate about the levels found. Nevertheless, one study of health care staff as a whole reported that, of those above threshold on the GHQ, half had clinical depression or anxiety at interview1, so the number of doctors suffering in this way at any one time is likely to be considerable. Most surveys show that the proportion of doctors who are depressed is as great as or more than that of the general population, and this is despite the fact that psychological difficulties as a whole reduce as you rise up the social and occupational ladder. When you consider that, with depression, decision-making, concentration and memory are all going to be impaired, this is going to make a doctor’s work even more difficult as well as having a knock-on effect for patient care. Moreover, some groups of doctors are particularly high users of alcohol and other drugs and for those who fall into this category, a smooth ride through their careers becomes somewhat less likely. Overall, it has been estimated that, at some point in their careers, around 15% of doctors will be impaired from depression or substance misuse.
Because of policy changes or new training systems, the most stressed or depressed grades vary according to where the pressure lies in different decades. So in the 1980s in particular, the most distressed were in their first postgraduate year when working hours were formidable, while in the last decade stress levels have evened out across grades, though somewhat higher in consultants. New systems of career progression might change this once more. What this means for you is that there is no particular level in medicine where you can sit back and relax; it means that throughout your careers you need to be aware and to care for your own psychological health, not just that of your patients.
The chapters which follow come from what is now a very large research literature that considers the difficulties and stressors of medicine as a career, but also from studies that look at what interventions are successful in the workplace. They also reflect my experience and finally from my experience as a clinician and coach working with doctors of all ages and other professionals, and Jamie Harrison’s work as a partner in general practice and within a postgraduate deanery. The first part sets out the possible causes of problems, and the second part, much larger, goes into various solutions. The bibliographies which follow each chapter contain key references, while the chapters referred to cover most of the others. We hope the book helps you not only to survive medicine, but also to enjoy it more.
Jenny Firth-CozensLondon
1Weinberg A, Creed F. Stress and psychiatric disorder in healthcare professionals and hospital staff. Lancet 2000;355:533–7.
When people become stressed or depressed while doing difficult jobs like medicine, they tend to look around the workplace at others who are doing jobs that seem equally hard but appear to be functioning well, and wonder if their difficulties are simply because of the way they are rather than the work they do. They ask: ‘Is it me or is it the job?’ This chapter outlines the parts of the job that have been found to cause problems. There’s no doubt that many aspects of the roles within medicine are very difficult and often upsetting, and it takes an unusual person not to feel stressed at times.
There is good evidence that the organisation you work in can make a difference to how much stress you experience: some medical schools, some specialties and some organisations are less stressful than others. For example, a medical school that formed its students into small consistent groups throughout their clinical years showed far fewer stressed students than one which sent students through in groups of over 40. Similarly, one hospital will cause problems to a much greater proportion of its staff than will another: one study comparing hospital staff in a number of organisations found those above threshold for stress on the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) varied from 17% to 34% depending on the hospital, whilst a study of newly qualified house officers in London’s hospitals found mean GHQ levels varied from 8.1 to 15.3 and this was not to do with hospital size or whether it is modern or old. It seems the management of a hospital has an effect.
Teaching hospitals tend to be more difficult places to work than non-teaching, probably because the competition is so much fiercer between colleagues, and the patients are more ill. But also it is clear from these data that there are going to be management issues which make one hospital a good place, with satisfied staff and low turnover, while another has disgruntled and stressed staff, where rumours and insecurity abound, and relationships are difficult. In all organisations, from banks to hospitals or general practices, these effects are passed down the hierarchy and on to customers or patients – and bounce back in the costs of absence, turnover, mistakes, litigation and complaints. Whether you are student, staff or patient, management clearly matters.
This is equally true at the team level. You will probably recognise that some teams you have worked in have been good places to be, while others have a number of people off sick, experience frequent back-biting and scapegoating, and rarely deal with conflicts openly or fairly. So what are the criteria for a good team? Studies have found that in a good team:
Its task is defined and its objectives clear.
There is participation in decision-making by all members, good communication and frequent interaction between them.
It meets regularly to review its objectives, methods and effectiveness.
There is a shared commitment to excellence of patient care.
Its members trust each other and feel safe to speak their minds.
It has reasonably clear boundaries and is not too large (ideally fewer than 10 people).
Its members know who leads it and the leadership is good.
Its meetings are well conducted.
What a pleasure it is to be in one of those teams: you can work harder, be more innovative and be carried during those times when life events might make you less productive. Group processes are powerful influences on individual actions, equally strong for those teams where the criteria are not met. For example, studies have shown:
General practitioners (GPs) in poor teams are more likely to opt for early retirement.
The quality of teamwork is the principal influence on whether junior doctors take sick leave.
The team can compensate for an individual member’s errors over time, so a well-established team is likely to make fewer errors overall, and to identify and deal with the underlying causes.
Those in high-quality health care teams are significantly less stressed than those in ineffectively functioning teams or those not in a team – and low stress is related to better patient care.
Figure 1.1 GHQ-12 scores for those in good teams compared to poor teams.
Some researchers on teams have concluded that, despite all the measures of team function, you really need only to measure the stress levels of its members. Just look at the difference between the stress levels of good teams and poor teams measured on the criteria listed above (Figure 1.1).
Although most health service staff see themselves working in teams, data from the NHS National Staff Surveys show that a large proportion of them work in ‘pseudo-teams’; that is, the staff say they are in a team, but it does not meet the criteria for a real team set out above. The surveys show that the fewer criteria that are met, the more those team members make errors and suffer harassment and violence, and the more their organisations show lower quality of care, worse use of resources and higher patient mortality. There are similar findings in primary care. The shift from uni-professional hospital teams, such as a medical firm or a nursing team, to multi-professional groups working within a clinical area to provide a service demands new, more complex teamwork skills which most organisations have not yet managed to develop. So team factors and organisational factors can affect your mental health and always need to be considered.
In addition to the sort of organisational and team factors that affect how you feel, there are a number of aspects of a career in medicine which are as stressful as they are in other walks of life. For example, in surveys from most of the western world, overload is always said to be difficult – for students, doctors and every other type of staff, whether in health care or outside it. For doctors, the demands are exacerbated by shift work and, when they are young, by frequent relocations. For them the greatest effect of overload is the conflict it can cause between work and home. You probably need more support from home life at a time like this, but you’re probably going to get much less than you need because you spend less time at home. This isn’t just a factor for women with children: both male and female doctors report equal work–home conflicts.
But even overload – having too few staff and too little time to do the job – doesn’t always cause stress; the correlation between hours of work and stress are consistently fairly low in medicine. A young doctor who feels well supported by his or her seniors, who has reasonable periods of sleep, and who gets on with the rest of the staff will usually have no problems working reasonably long hours; in fact, he or she will often really enjoy the feeling of competence growing, of being useful and feeling part of a team. For many people, overload is simply an easy and obvious way to label other less tangible causes, and it’s true that it will often play an indirect role in stress in that feeling exhausted will always make other problems loom larger, a death become more distressing. As we shall describe later (Chapter 10), there are many factors that lead an individual to feel overloaded but these rarely include simply the number of hours worked.
Other aspects of your role which cause stress in most types of jobs and most organisations include a lack of clarity about what is expected of you – so you don’t always know when you’ve done a good job – and a lack of discretion or control in how you carry out that job. The reductions in medical autonomy and increases in accountability that have taken place over the last few decades have made many doctors feel that they no longer have control over their work. A greater sense of personal control leads to increased job satisfaction and even better health. The clearer you are about your role and its expected outcome, the happier you are likely to be; and most of us would rather achieve that outcome in the way that suits us best.
Sexism, racism and homophobia exist in all walks of life and medicine is certainly not immune from them. While this might be more subtle when directed towards sexuality or ethnicity, it can still be remarkably open in terms of women. For example, two female first-year postgraduates wrote:
My consultant told me that women are unable to make decisions about male patients, especially if they are life and death decisions. He thought they should stick to paediatrics and dermatology.
My consultant would put his arm round my waist and pull me to him laughing and saying ‘how about a hot date’, even though other people were around. I found it really embarrassing and didn’t know how to handle it. I didn’t want to look like a prude but I knew he shouldn’t do it.
Beyond these stressors common to workers everywhere are others that are particular to medicine, and some of these vary to some extent depending on where you are in your career. However, the following are always difficult for almost everyone at times.
Dealing with difficult patients.
Even before people could look up their symptoms on the Internet, it was still difficult to have to deal with patients or patients’ relatives who were argumentative, unappreciative, untrusting or just plain abusive.
Sometime I feel overwhelmed with the total lack of appreciation and even resentment I get from patients. This has got so much worse over the last 20 years as psychiatrists now only get the most psychotic of patients and often have to section people. I guess sometimes the relatives are relieved. (Psychiatrist)
Then there’s the ‘heartsink’ patient with chronic back pain. You just dread them coming back. You know that whatever medication you suggest won’t work, and the demand for yet another specialist referral will lead to the same negative outcome. And you get the blame (again) for not sorting it all out. (GP)
As people increasingly consult the Internet before they talk to you, or come in to see you holding a newspaper cutting about the latest treatment or cure, expectations of what you can provide seem to go up and up. Television programmes such as Casualty or ER don’t help as they offer false hopes of miraculous medical interventions. The health care scandals of the last decade have made some people less accepting of your opinion, although the general loss of deference in the population towards authority figures may be more at play here. Generally doctors are still one of the most trusted professions by societies across the world.
Death and suffering.
If you ask young doctors to complete a questionnaire and rate a number of known stressors, including dealing with death and suffering, they rate this item very low – ‘not a problem to me’. But if you ask them to write about a recent stressful event, young doctors in particular write most often about this area, especially if the patient was young or in other ways similar to them. For example:
A patient with carcinoma of pancreas, otherwise fit, aged 43, developed a massive coagulopathy after total pancreatectomy. He died. I had feelings of total helplessness while giving blood, etc, although management decisions were not left to me. Could not accept defeat and couldn’t cope with total failure of our therapies, despite realising medically the gravity of the situation.
A 29 year old woman, recently married, was presumed to have sarcoidosis, but biopsy showed adenocarcinoma with lung metastases. The consultant reckoned she had six weeks to live. The fact that she was young and female made the incident particularly distressing to come to terms with. Also she was just married and had a devoted husband.
Of course it’s upsetting to see someone die at a time when they shouldn’t, or to be in pain or distress from something you have done to them, however necessary it was. It is also difficult on those thankfully rare occasions when someone close to you is ill and the boundary between your personal and professional life becomes blurred. For example, a fourth year medical student wrote:
Mother was admitted to psychiatric hospital having gone manic again. This time on lithium. Father never takes time off when mum’s ill and I had to go. She was managed very badly as a patient as she was a doctor’s wife and never really treated by outside doctors. I feel very responsible about helping solve the problem. I had a psychiatry exam too.
The quotation above highlights another type of patient that doctors find difficult to treat: another doctor or the relatives of a doctor. Traditionally, they are either over-treated or under-treated. We will discuss this further in Chapter 7.
Medicine is an emotionally demanding job and this is sometimes somewhat swept under the carpet. Some stressors will be chronic and so need to be dealt with by long-term solutions to ease or prevent them happening; others will be one-offs that will not usually be possible to plan for and so will need to be tackled after the event. For example:
Making mistakes.
Medicine is clearly made much more difficult with the growth of litigation that is sweeping the western world. All doctors find that if they have to face claims or complaints or discipline, this is one of the most difficult times of all in their careers. However, even if there is no complaint, even if a mistake goes largely or wholly unnoticed, doctors still remember them for most of their lives and most doctors have at least one of these tucked away in their memories, one that resurfaces from time to time when things get tough. A specialist trainee wrote:
I missed the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism and treated the patient as a case of severe pneumonia until the day after. Her condition deteriorated and only then was the diagnosis put right. I felt guilty and lost confidence.
It’s very human to make mistakes, and they are bound to happen in a difficult job like medicine, so often filled with uncertainty and where advances are happening at a rate of knots. But throughout their careers, whether junior or senior, doctors feel great and lasting shame and distress from where things went wrong. How you tackle those mistakes – the way you use them to learn and the way you think about their cause – are important in terms of how you will feel in the future and even how you will develop as a doctor (see Chapters 5 and 6). We will talk about mistakes much more in Chapter 12.
Where emotions run high, as they are bound to do when you deal with such fundamental issues of life and death, blame can sometimes ricochet around when things go wrong. In reality, it’s rarely down to one person or another, and almost always involves systems issues. Nevertheless, one of the most stressful aspects of mistakes is where you get the blame for something you feel was not at all your fault. For example:
I was blamed for a mistake about a patient’s medication as I’d taken the message from the consultant in the path lab and he’d got it wrong.
At a time like that, getting support from a senior is particularly important:
