Other views 2nd quarter 2022 - Wagner Eduard - E-Book

Other views 2nd quarter 2022 E-Book

Wagner Eduard

0,0
13,99 €

oder
-100%
Sammeln Sie Punkte in unserem Gutscheinprogramm und kaufen Sie E-Books und Hörbücher mit bis zu 100% Rabatt.
Mehr erfahren.
Beschreibung

 Since we are in a time of upheaval, events keep occurring that give us something to think about. I try to see some of these tendencies from a different perspective. I will of course leave it up to you whether this also applies to your views, without wanting to influence them. 

Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:

EPUB
Bewertungen
0,0
0
0
0
0
0
Mehr Informationen
Mehr Informationen
Legimi prüft nicht, ob Rezensionen von Nutzern stammen, die den betreffenden Titel tatsächlich gekauft oder gelesen/gehört haben. Wir entfernen aber gefälschte Rezensionen.



Eduard Wagner

Other views 2nd quarter 2022

Since we are in a time of upheaval, events keep occurring that give us something to think about. I try to see some of these tendencies from a different perspective. I will of course leave it up to you whether this also applies to your views, without wanting to influence them. BookRix GmbH & Co. KG81371 Munich

Foreword

Far be it from me to attack anyone here or to judge anyone. Rather, it is my view of things, as I interpret it below. It may well be that one or the other thinks that this would be a radical view of things. But sometimes it seems to me that you bury your head in the sand. Not reacting, will solve itself. I believe this thread runs through the entire body of writing. As I said, this is not paternalism of anyone, but my opinion on various things at home and abroad.

April 2022

April 2022

 

Ukraine war

Is it possible that too much power has been given to a person or is it perhaps the case that a single man can do as he pleases? You have already seen in the course of the last 2 decades how it developed and you have let it do as it pleased. In addition, he was courted by importing raw materials in large quantities. Apparently, nothing has been learned from history. It has often happened that individuals have used power and others have had to suffer for it. I am thinking, among other things, of the 2nd World War or perhaps of the times of the Roman Empire, where people knew how to help themselves by liquidating the despot named Caesar. But that doesn't mean that you eliminate such a person. But in this context, I have to ask myself why we have well-endowed intelligence services that react accordingly. For example, you know how to deal with opponents, and we saw that not so long ago, for example, when a person was killed in an embassy or a dissident disappears in prison for life. It may well be that such actions backfire, but what is the alternative. We are now seeing this in Ukraine, where tens of thousands of people are being massacred and the world is more or less watching as a man wants to crown himself "tsar". In this context, I also cannot imagine that if the whole thing is carried out effectively, anyone else will be tempted to follow in the footsteps of this despot. As I said, this is by no means meant to be a call to eliminate a human being, because it is not up to anyone to carry it out. The basic evil, in my opinion, is that you give too much power to a person, which has proven to be a mistake time and time again in history. Of course, this president should not lack money, so he has to look for further influence and what is easier than to secure power and expand it. Only the whole thing has an expiration date and such people, as the past shows us, usually do not have a high life expectancy, let alone a natural death. It is only during the lifetime of such people that the people have to suffer from it, and I do not see that.

May 2022

May 2022

 

Advertising

It always amazes me when you say in an advertisement that stands for a retail chain that there is more Tyrol in it. In my opinion, it is all well and good to refer to one of the nine provinces of Austria, but as I said, our country is made up of more provinces. After all, the FRG does not only consist of Bavaria. If you look into this, you can see that you had sold a retail chain abroad and now it comes to such statements.

Deaths with Covid

It doesn't make sense to me how it can happen that it is not possible to create exact data on Covid diseases or the resulting deaths. Isn't it the case that the first thing you do when you enter an ordination is asked for an e-card? Of course, this also applies to all other health services. Of course, the social security number is noted on this card and thus, at least in the whole of Austria, there is an indexed number that only exists once. So you have a single number that, in my opinion, can be easily linked. It's clear that the criteria that entail death should be clearly defined, but then I have meaningful data. This material is certainly one that can be used for appropriate evaluations, as well as it should be the basis for political decisions.

Climate change

It always amazes me how long it takes for there to be a movement in society and I don't just mean my homeland, but I do believe that this is an international problem. For years, people have sat back and imported energy from abroad. Yes, the price was probably right, but the whole thing also had the disadvantage of immense dependence on these exporting countries. We are now feeling this accordingly and do not know how to get out of this cycle. Okay, there are alternative energies in the meantime, but it's all going too slowly. When I then learn from the media that 2 thirds of our entire Austrian gas needs are consumed in Vienna and Lower Austria, I have to ask myself why there are so many houses with roofs. In my opinion, these roofs can be used very well for solar panels and, in addition, this does not necessarily disturb the appearance of the environment. In addition, it can be noted that the energy generated can be used in the same building, which in turn would minimize some line construction to and from the building. Yes, the idea of wind turbines is certainly a good one, but it does not necessarily contribute to the appearance of the environment. If you talk about reducing CO2 in this context, then the objectives with periods of more than 10 years are very long. The approaches in this area are good, but in my opinion, this is taking far too long. What natural disasters still have to happen before you finally realize that we are running out of time, it's not five to twelve, it's already twelve o'clock.

Compulsory vaccination

It should be said in advance that I have been vaccinated 3 times. Why? For me, it's not necessarily about my own person, but rather about the fact that I'm always among people. I can get infected as well as infect others. In addition, I see it as my civic duty to protect my environment if I am really ill. I live in this country and therefore have rights and obligations. I see it as one of these duties that I got vaccinated. Apparently, I am one of the few who share my view, otherwise there would have been no need for a political discussion as to whether or not to introduce compulsory vaccination. Certainly has two sides to the point of view. On the one hand, I am certainly against the encroachment on my privacy by legal barriers, but, as I said, the discussion about this could have been avoided if one had fulfilled one's duties as a citizen. It's clear that even after two years of pandemic, we don't know how to deal with it, it has been far too little researched for that. It is only with this dilemma that we will certainly have to live longer. It is also clear that there are side effects with these vaccinations, but I would rather have the risk of suffering from a side effect than hanging on a ventilator for weeks and then perhaps dying. Especially since the percentages of illness from a side effect are lower than falling ill with Covid.

300 hp and more

It may well be that I am of advanced age and therefore may have antiquated views in this regard, but some things in the production of motor vehicles and other technical devices always amaze me. In principle, I think the idea of e-cars is good, although it comes to my mind that the plans for them have been in the "drawer" of the car industry for a long time. The reason for this could be that they wanted to use the resources of oil until they are exhausted. However, the only disadvantage of the whole thing is that this is not necessarily beneficial to our climate, which is reflected again and again in various disasters. Another point I have to mention is that the car industry produces vehicles with excessive engine power. 100 hp is not enough, at least 150 and even more are needed. I remember my first car had 34 hp and that was enough. Yes, more horsepower is an advantage when overtaking, but where am I supposed to drive such a vehicle with more engine power, when there are already speed limits in almost every country. Yes, and then no one can persuade me that the consumption is low, with an engine power of less than 100 hp this would certainly be less, which also benefits the environment. Okay, I have a car with 200 hp, maybe a maximum of 130 km/h and pollute the environment. It's clear and I don't want to blame the industry or society, but apparently a car with a lot of power and a lot of technical bells and whistles is a status symbol that the two groups mentioned take into account. What kind of status symbol was it then, as there were no cars yet?

Quality of technical equipment

If you buy any technical device today, whether it's a computer or a household appliance, you have to consider how long it will last. In the past, a batch had been produced in larger quantities and some devices had been taken out of this production and put through their paces. After that, a verification label was stuck on the whole batch. Apparently, this no longer exists today. There is production in tens of thousands of pieces, perhaps still in Asia, and the entire production goes to the dealer without testing. It may be that putting a production through its paces is costly, but the end customer remembers the manufacturer, where he knows whether he has tested or not. Because if he sees that this device had worked perfectly for years, he will be happy to access this producer again and will be more willing to pay a reasonable price for it.

Throwaway society

Is it the case today that you always have to have the latest device, otherwise you won't be up to date? I can remember something where a laptop was bought new in the appropriate store and after opening it, you had to find that the keyboard was defective. So we stood at this dealer, who received this device without hesitation and handed us a new laptop for it. When I asked what would happen to the broken device, I was told that it would be disposed of at the retailer's headquarters. Yes, what does that mean? Since this is hazardous waste, it should also be disposed of accordingly. Well, yes, so again a bit more hazardous waste somewhere in Africa. What is completely incomprehensible to me, however, is that food is treated even worse. It's not just about the disposal of food in the household, but in my opinion much more about the trade, which thinks at the end of business that the food in question will not be for sale the next day. In my opinion, if this is the fault, it is divided between both sides, i.e. retailers and customers. Some think it won't be for sale the next day, others just want nice goods. Yes, but in the end, the customer pays the price for tens of millions of tons of food ending up in the mill. Can we afford that, because the producer rarely takes back goods?

International food

I am always amazed when I hear or read how food is transported across Europe. It starts with meat, living or dead, and continues with potatoes and the like. We are certainly a stable agricultural country where this does not have to be done. We have enough agriculture that is happy if they could see their products in the trade in their environment. Such food does not necessarily have to be carted through half of Europe. Above all, in my opinion, there is a second aspect, namely that of the cost-benefit calculation for the producer, especially at such low prices, because transport is not exactly cheap and in addition it harms our environment when more and more trucks are on the road with food, which is also available domestically.