Reverse Osmosis E-Book

Jane Kucera

• Herausgeber: John Wiley & Sons
• Kategorie: Fachliteratur
• Sprache: Englisch

Seitenzahl: 857

Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2023

Beschreibung

REVERSE OSMOSIS Reverse osmosis (RO) is the world's leading demineralization technology. It is used to provide clean water for potable and ultrapure uses as well as to treat wastewater for recycle or reuse. Regardless of the application or industry, the basics of RO are the same. This book provides the reader with in-depth knowledge about RO basics for any application. This third edition is completely updated, still covering the basics of RO but with new insights as to how to optimize performance. Sections of the book cover the history of RO, membrane and transport model development, pretreatment to minimize membrane deposition and damage, effective cleaning and troubleshooting methods, and data collection and analysis. A new section was added that provides detail about RO and water sustainability. Alternative membrane materials and high-recovery RO are some of the topics included in this new section. Topics are presented in clear and concise language with enough depth to enhance comprehension. The reader will walk away with a new understanding of the topics covered in the book, thereby enabling them to optimize their own RO systems. Engineers and consultants will be able to design or troubleshoot RO systems more effectively. This book is the complete and definitive guide to RO for all persons concerned with RO systems.

Leseprobe

Scrivener Publishing100 Cummings Center, Suite 541JBeverly, MA 01915-6106

Publishers at ScrivenerMartin Scrivener ([email protected])Phillip Carmical ([email protected])

Reverse Osmosis 3rd Edition

Jane Kucera

This edition first published 2023 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA and Scrivener Publishing LLC, 100 Cummings Center, Suite 541J, Beverly, MA 01915, USA© 2023 Scrivener Publishing LLCFor more information about Scrivener publications please visit www.scrivenerpublishing.com.

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or other-wise, except as permitted by law. Advice on how to obtain permission to reuse material from this title is available at http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions.

Wiley Global Headquarters111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA

For details of our global editorial offices, customer services, and more information about Wiley prod-ucts visit us at www.wiley.com.

Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of WarrantyWhile the publisher and authors have used their best efforts in preparing this work, they make no rep-resentations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this work and specifically disclaim all warranties, including without limitation any implied warranties of merchant-ability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representa-tives, written sales materials, or promotional statements for this work. The fact that an organization, website, or product is referred to in this work as a citation and/or potential source of further informa-tion does not mean that the publisher and authors endorse the information or services the organiza-tion, website, or product may provide or recommendations it may make. This work is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a specialist where appropriate. Neither the publisher nor authors shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages. Further, readers should be aware that websites listed in this work may have changed or disappeared between when this work was written and when it is read.

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

ISBN 9781119724742

Cover images: Left to rightUsed Water Filters, Iryna Piskova | Dreamstime.comDesalination Plant, Tifonimages | Dreamstime.comReverse Osmosiss Plant, Tifonimages | Dreamstime.comEarth in Rain Drop, Romolo Tavani | Dreamstime.comCover design by Kris Hackerott

Dedication

For, and in memory of, my dad; he’ll always be O.K.

Preface to the 3rd Edition

The use of reverse osmosis (RO) has grown significantly since the first commercial systems were installed in the mid-1960’s. Today, RO is used for a variety of applications from seawater desalination for drinking water, to industrial demineralization for boiler make-up and steam generation, and preparing ultrapure water for semiconductors or pharmaceutical water for injection. The use of RO is currently outpacing both thermal desalination and ion exchange demineralization techniques for such applications. RO offers smaller infrastructure relative to thermal desalination processes and has recently equaled or exceeded energy savings afforded by thermal tech-niques for seawater desalination. The ability of RO to replace or augment conventional ion exchange saves end users the need to store, handle, and dispose of large amounts of acid, caustic, and regeneration waste, making RO a “greener” technique than ion exchange for demineralization. Overall costs of RO have declined with the introduction of interfacial compos-ite membranes in the early 1980’s and improvements in membrane per-formance (permeability and selectivity) have driven down the costs of operations. Additionally, improvements in energy recovery devices have reduced energy requirements for the technique, further easing operating costs. These advances have enabled RO to become the leading demineral-ization technique in the world.

As RO has experienced significant growth, knowledge about RO has not kept pace. Personnel are often faced with operating an RO system without understanding the technique or meaningful training. Further, RO system designers often lag in knowledge of best design practices. This has resulted in the perpetuation of misconceptions and “lore” about RO design and operations, often leading to poor RO system performance.

Much of the current literature about RO includes lengthy discussions or focuses on niche applications, both of which have their place, but which make it difficult to quickly resolve practical issues associated with more commonplace applications. Hence, the objective of this book is to bring clear, concise, and practical information to engineers, designers, end users (including operators), and consultants regarding the breadth of the “what, how, and why” of RO. The 3rd edition includes expanded details and guide-lines along with corresponding rationale. Also included in this edition is a full section regarding sustainability, new innovations, and future prospects for this demineralization technique.

Acknowledgements

Global Acknowledgements:

Douglas E. Smith

Dr. Drannan Hamby

Prof. Julius “Bud” Glater

Paul Szustowski

3rd Edition Acknowledgements:

Dr. Eric M.V. Hoek, UCLA

Dr. Menachem Elimelech, Yale University

Dr. Jeffrey McCutcheon, UCONN

Wayne Bates, Hydranautics

Elke Peirtsegaele, DuPont Water Solutions

Lyndsey Wiles, Zwitterco

Matthew Flannigan, Nalco Water, an Ecolab Company

Donna Murphy, DuPont Water Solutions

Peter Metcalf, Toray Membrane

Jessica Uy, Toray Membrane

Garth Parker Jr., DuPont Water Solutions

Eugene Rozenbaoum, LG Chem

Tony Fuhrman, NX Filtration

Andy Taverna, Mack Pump

Christie MacKenzie, Grundfos

Alden Whitney, Pentair-XFlow, XFlow

Bassem Khoury, Hydrodex

Seong Hoon Yoon, Nalco Water, an Ecolab Company

Scot Farmer, Nalco Water, an Ecolab Company

Brendan Kranzmann, Nalco Water, an Ecolab Company

Alex Barr, NW Nalco Water, an Ecolab Company

Greg Coy, GL Coy & Associates, Inc.

Georgine Coy, GL Coy & Associates, Inc.

Jeanne Modelski, Nalco Water, an Ecolab Company

Dennis Bitter, Atlantium

Greg Johnson, New Logic Research

Angela Romanoff, Trojan Technologies

Emma Anderson, Trojan Technologies

Michael Boyd, Gradiant

Uzi Kafri, Rotec, Ltd.

Malcolm Man, Saltworks Technologies, Inc.

Section IFUNDAMENTALS

1Introduction to Reverse Osmosis: History, Challenges, and Future Directions

1.1 Introduction

Reverse osmosis (RO) is a demineralization technique (also known as a “desalination” technique) used to separate solutes in solution from solvents. As a demineralization technique, the solutes are defined as dissolved ions and organics, while the solvent is usually water. RO relies on a semipermeable membrane that is responsible for the separation. The membrane allows water to pass through it while retaining most of the dissolved solids. The driving force for RO is an applied pressure that forces water through the membrane in the direction opposite of that via the natural process of osmosis (detailed in Chapter 2).

Figure 1.1 shows how the separation performance of RO compares to other membrane- and conventionally-based separation/filtration technologies. RO is the finest “filtration” technique currently available, capable of removing monovalent ions from solution to yield demineralized water (as discussed in Chapter 3, RO does not rely on size-exclusion filtration to separate solutes from solution but uses the most-cited Solution-Diffusion Model of separation to describe how solutes pass through a membrane.

Reverse osmosis is the leading worldwide technology for demineralization for both industrial and municipal applications today. Figure 1.2 shows that membrane techniques (including RO, electrodialysis, electrodialysis reversal, continuous electrodeionization, membrane distillation, etc.) have been on the rise since 2000 while thermal processes have been on the decline during the same time period (note that world-wide capacity for both types of techniques were about equal just prior to the year 2000) [1]. RO offers several advantages over other demineralization processes. Total energy requirements for RO are lower than that for thermal processes [2]. Further, RO systems have a smaller footprint and are modularized for each of installation, use, and expansion [2].

Figure 1.1 Filtration spectrum comparing various membrane-based technologies (italics) and conventional multimedia filtration (bold) for separation capabilities based on approximate size of removal and nature of the dissolved solute or suspended solid to be removed.

Figure 1.2 New contracted capacity of membrane- and thermal-based desalination techniques from 2002 through June 2022. Courtesy of IDA Desalination and Reuse Handbook, 2022-2023, Page 7 [1].

RO has also replaced ion exchange in many plants for brackish water demineralization to avoid handling acid, caustic and regeneration waste. Today, RO is commonly used to compliment ion exchange by removing the bulk of solutes from water prior to treatment with ion exchange, thereby greatly reducing the chemicals and neutralization needed for the ion exchange polishing.

Since commercialization in the mid-1960s, RO has seen developmental strides in selectivity and water permeability, thereby producing better quality water at lower applied pressure. For example, the 1965 pilot test at Coalinga, CA, USA (conducted prior to start-up of the first commercial RO facility at this location) demonstrated solute passage (measured as total dissolved solids (TDS)) through the cellulose acetate membranes of about 9% [3]. Today, TDS passage through commercial, brackish water, polyamide composite membranes is as low as 0.2% [4], and, for commercial, thin film nanocomposite seawater membranes, 0.11% [5]. RO operating pressures have decreased from about 41 bar in the 1970s to less than 16 bar today. Specific energy consumption (SEC) has also decreased from the range of 7.0–9.0 kWh/m3 to about 2.5–3.5 kWh/m3 in 2016 [6], owing to more water-permeable membranes and efficiencies in pumping equipment.

1.2 A Brief History of Reverse Osmosis

1.2.1 Early Development

The first recorded description of osmotic properties of semipermeable membranes occurred in 1748, when Jean-Antoine Nollet observed the phenomenon of osmosis [7]. Wilhelm Pfeffer, in his book, Osmotic Investigations: Studies on Cell Mechanics, published in 1877, describes the osmotic properties observed in plant cell membranes [8]. At about the same time, Moritz Traube developed artificial membranes made of cupric ferrocyanide (carbon, copper, nitrogen, and iron), and demonstrated that these membranes interacted differently with water than with dissolved solutes [8]. In 1948, Dr Gerald Hassler, at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), proposed an “air film” barrier between two cellophane membranes where he surmised that osmosis involves evaporation of water at one membrane, followed by transport through the air film as a vapor, and then the vapor condensed at the other membrane [7].

The timeline to today’s membranes begins in 1955 as shown in Figure 1.3. Professor Charles Reid at the University of Florida together with Ernest Breton, demonstrated a pressure-driven process of reversing osmotic flow through cellulose acetate membranes [10]. They had investigated several materials in a trial-and-error process, including cellophane, rubber hydrochloride, and polystyrene, in addition to cellulose acetate. They focused on available polymers at the time, with hydrophilic groups to facilitate water transport. Some polymers investigated exhibited no product flow or passed 75% of the feed water chloride concentration at up to 55 bar applied pressure, which clearly were not effective [10]. The cellulose acetate membrane prepared by Reid and Breton from DuPont (88 CA-43 (E.I. du Pont de Nemours, Wilmington, DE USA)) exhibited chloride passage of less than 4% at applied pressures of only 27.5 bar [10]. Water throughput ranged from 0.08 m3/m2-d (m/d) for a 22-μm thick membrane up to 0.56 m/d for a 3.7-μm thick membrane tested at 41 bar on a 0.1 M sodium chloride solution [10]. Reid and Breton concluded that their cellulose acetate membranes exhibited requisite semipermeable properties for practical applications, but improvements in durability and throughput were required [10].

Figure 1.3 Milestones in the history of RO development.

Figure 1.4 Sidney Loeb’s “big dripper”, cellulose acetate flat sheet membrane equipment. Courtesy of Julius “Bud” Glater. (a) disassembled module and (b) completely assembled module.

The breakthrough resulting in commercially-viable membranes for “reverse osmosis” (a term first used in a 1956 UCLA Engineering Report by Hassler [9, 11]) was achieved by Sidney Loeb and Srinivasa Sourirajan over the years of 1958–1960 while working in Professor Samuel Yuster’s UCLA lab [9]. After months of work, Loeb and Sourirajan developed a suitable cellulose acetate membrane with higher throughput and lower solute passage than the Reid and Breton membranes [12]. The membranes were initially hand-cast and characterized as a homogeneous material with a physically-asymmetric structure [13]. Figure 1.4 shows Loeb and the flat-sheet membrane equipment dubbed the “big dripper”. Later, tubular configurations of the membrane were achieved. Figure 1.5 shows a schematic of the tubular casting system [14], while Figure 1.6 shows permeating water from the tubular membrane. Figure 1.7 shows the capped, in-floor immersion preserved in Boelter Hall at UCLA.

Figure 1.5 Schematic of the tubular cellulose acetate membrane casting device used at UCLA. Courtesy of Julius “Bud” Glater.

Figure 1.6 Productivity of tubular cellulose acetate RO membrane. Courtesy of Julius “Bud” Glater.

Figure 1.7 Capped immersion tube used in the tubular membrane casting shown in Figure 1.4 at UCLA, 2008.

In 1961, the first company to apply RO was Havens Industrials in Southern California, USA [9]; details of this first application were not found in other historical references. However, on June 4, 1965, the City of Coalinga, CA USA, began a pilot test of the tubular, Loeb-Sourirajan cellulose acetate membranes, under the direction of Loeb and Professor Joseph McCutchan of UCLA (see Figure 1.8) [15]. The 3-year pilot dubbed “Raintree” generated 5,000 gallons per day of drinking water for the city [14].

Figure 1.8 Sidney Loeb (left), UCLA professor Joseph McCutchan (right) and other team members at the Raintree RO pilot test facility at Coalinga, CA USA, cir. 1965. Courtesy of Julius “Bud” Glater.

1.2.2 Advances 1970s–1980s

Cellulose acetate membranes exhibited good throughput with low solute passage, but they had some serious operational design limitations. Limitations included high operating pressure requirements (24–31 bar), narrow operating pH range (4–6), and a low maximum temperature limit of 35°C. And, although solute passage was less than 5%, even lower solute passage was desired. Hence, for RO to truly grow in application, membranes that could achieve performance beyond the limitations of cellulose acetate membranes were needed.

In 1967 E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company (DuPont) developed and later, in 1971, patented a linear polyamide (aramid) membrane in hollow fine fiber form (Richter, Square, Hoehn, US patent Number 3,567,623, assigned to DuPont, 1971 [16]). The membranes were commercialized as the brackish water Peramsep™ B-9 (1969) and seawater B-10 (1974) Permeators (Permasep is a registered trademark of DuPont Company, Inc. Wilmington, DE, USA). While the patent claimed various preparations of organic, nitrogen-linked aromatic polymers of the formula —LR—, where L is the nitrogen linkage such as an amide, and R is an aromatic linkage such as phenylene, a 100% —CONH— membrane exhibited chloride passage of 0.5% when operating on a 35,000 ppm sodium chloride solution at 103 bar at 30°C [16]. In practice, however, the rated solute passage for the permeators was about 10%, with most operational plants observing closer to 5% passage, on a par with cellulose acetate membranes [17]. Further, the productivity of these membranes was lower than that of cellulose acetate membranes, ranging from about 0.04–0.08 m/d [18]. However, the equivalent salt passage and much higher packing density of the hollow fiber membranes, were advantages over flat sheet and tubular cellulose acetate membrane configurations. Other aramid advantages included greater stability over a broader pH range and tolerance to higher temperature (up to 49°C) [19, 20].

Research work continued to try to increase productivity without sacrificing low solute passage [18]