The Mind in the Making: The Relation of Intelligence to Social Reform E-Book
James Harvey Robinson
1,99 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: Booksell-Verlag
- Kategorie: Geisteswissenschaft
- Sprache: Englisch
In "The Mind in the Making: The Relation of Intelligence to Social Reform," James Harvey Robinson explores the intricate interplay between human intelligence and societal progress. Employing a provocative literary style that blends philosophical inquiry with empirical analysis, Robinson challenges prevailing norms and advocates for an evolution in educational practices. The book dissects various aspects of human cognition and their implications for social reform, drawing upon contemporary debates in psychology and education to underline his arguments. It serves as a compelling manifesto that connects intellectual development to the broader imperative of societal change, positioning education as a cornerstone for reform efforts. James Harvey Robinson, a prominent American historian and educator, was deeply invested in the transformative potential of education throughout his career. His progressive views were shaped by the socio-political climate of the early 20th century, which was characterized by rapid change and a growing awareness of social issues. Robinson's exposure to diverse intellectual traditions and his dedication to reformative equity underpin his assertion that cultivated minds can lead to a more just and enlightened society. This book is an essential read for those interested in the intersections of psychology, education, and social reform. Robinson's insights provide a valuable framework for contemporary discussions surrounding the role of intelligence in shaping society. His work invites readers to rethink the purpose of education and tradition, making it a highly relevant text for educators, policymakers, and reform advocates alike. In this enriched edition, we have carefully created added value for your reading experience: - A succinct Introduction situates the work's timeless appeal and themes. - The Synopsis outlines the central plot, highlighting key developments without spoiling critical twists. - A detailed Historical Context immerses you in the era's events and influences that shaped the writing. - A thorough Analysis dissects symbols, motifs, and character arcs to unearth underlying meanings. - Reflection questions prompt you to engage personally with the work's messages, connecting them to modern life. - Hand‐picked Memorable Quotes shine a spotlight on moments of literary brilliance. - Interactive footnotes clarify unusual references, historical allusions, and archaic phrases for an effortless, more informed read.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2019
Ähnliche
The Mind in the Making: The Relation of Intelligence to Social Reform
Table of Contents
Introduction
Societies change when people learn to think more clearly about themselves and the world they are trying to remake. James Harvey Robinson’s The Mind in the Making: The Relation of Intelligence to Social Reform takes this premise as its orienting signal, arguing that the quality of our collective life is inseparable from the habits of mind we cultivate. Rather than offering a program of instant uplift, Robinson examines how beliefs are formed, why errors endure, and what kind of disciplined intelligence might guide improvement. The result is a reflective, rigorous invitation to reconsider how ideas shape institutions—and how institutions, in turn, shape ideas.
First published in 1921 by the American historian James Harvey Robinson, this book belongs to the tradition of non-fiction that blends intellectual history, social theory, and educational critique. Its immediate context is the early twentieth century, when the aftermath of World War I prompted searching questions about progress and public reason. Robinson writes not as a detached specialist but as a scholar addressing a general readership, bringing historical perspective to the urgent civic issues of his time. The setting is the modern world itself—its classrooms, newspapers, churches, parliaments, and laboratories—where competing authorities vie to define what counts as knowledge and how it should be used.
The premise is straightforward yet demanding: if reform is to be more than wishful rhetoric, it must be grounded in a sober understanding of how minds actually work. Robinson explores the formation of opinions, the persistence of prejudice, and the tension between inherited traditions and critical inquiry. His voice is lucid, patient, and argumentative without being doctrinaire, welcoming readers into a process of examination rather than issuing edicts. The prose favors pointed examples and clear distinctions over technical jargon, creating an experience at once accessible and unsettling—a sustained tutorial in intellectual self-scrutiny with consequences for civic life.
Central themes include the power of habit in channeling thought, the entanglement of emotion with judgment, and the subtle authority of custom that can sanctify outdated ideas. Robinson probes how institutions transmit assumptions, how language frames possibilities, and how educational practices can either liberate or constrict inquiry. He is especially attentive to the ways collective opinion exerts pressure on individual reasoning, shaping what seems self-evident long before evidence is considered. Throughout, the book raises a practical question that still stings: by what methods can a community cultivate intelligence that is not merely clever, but responsibly tethered to reality and open to correction?
Readers today will recognize the stakes. In an age of rapid information flows and polarized discourse, Robinson’s emphasis on disciplined skepticism, evidence-seeking, and intellectual humility bears renewed relevance. The book invites reflection on how we weigh expertise, how we revise our views, and how educational systems might train citizens to resist easy certainties. It speaks to debates about policy design, media literacy, and institutional trust, suggesting that sustainable reform requires more than moral passion or technical fixes; it demands habits of mind that can sift claims, acknowledge bias, and learn from error without paralysis or cynicism.
The experience of reading Robinson is that of a guided inquiry rather than a sequence of pronouncements. He assembles observations from history and everyday life to reveal patterns that might otherwise remain obscure, then asks readers to test those insights against their own assumptions. The mood is earnest and reformist, but the method is careful, favoring patient accumulation of reasons over dramatic revelations. Without relying on specialized psychology, he shows how intellectual vigilance can be taught and practiced, and how the very act of questioning can be socially constructive when tethered to shared standards of evidence and fair-minded debate.
Approached as an introduction to better thinking about thinking, The Mind in the Making offers both a diagnosis and a discipline. It reminds us that ideals of justice and progress cannot be realized by aspiration alone; they require minds trained to discern, to doubt, and to revise. Robinson’s contribution endures because it frames intelligence as a public resource, not merely a private talent, and challenges readers to treat inquiry as a civic duty. Those who enter these pages can expect a bracing, humane conversation about the relationship between knowledge and change—and an invitation to practice the habits that make reform possible.
Synopsis
The Mind in the Making: The Relation of Intelligence to Social Reform (1921) sets out Robinson’s central aim: to explain how human thinking actually operates and to show why social improvement depends on better use of intelligence. Writing in the aftermath of the First World War, he surveys the sources of error in belief, the historical growth of knowledge, and the ways institutions persist regardless of fitness. The book addresses general readers and reformers, proposing that conscious, informed inquiry can replace accidental, tradition-bound evolution. It opens by stating that understanding the mind is prerequisite to deliberate, humane changes in education, politics, and economic life.
He begins with an analysis of human nature, emphasizing impulses, instincts, habits, imitation, and suggestion. Robinson argues that most beliefs arise pre-rationally and are later stabilized by custom and authority. The mind is conservative; it prefers familiar routines and social approval, and it accepts ideas from respected sources without examination. He uses examples from religious and social history to show how taboos and sanctions foster conformity. Children display curiosity that schooling and convention often redirect. The initial chapters stress that the raw materials of thought are emotional and social, so any plan for reform must account for these persistent, shaping forces.
Robinson then introduces the concept of rationalization: people commonly devise reasons to justify desires, loyalties, and fears. He examines how words carry inherited meanings that distort discussion. Terms like state, property, liberty, rights, and duty summon associations and partisan interpretations. This verbal baggage encourages dispute and obscures facts. He outlines the importance of defining terms, distinguishing observation from inference, and recognizing the role of wish and fear in opinion. By showing how language, prestige, and group feeling guide judgment, he prepares the case for using disciplined inquiry to check bias and for revising ideas when evidence reveals their shortcomings.
Turning to education, Robinson critiques traditional curricula for emphasizing classical languages, formal grammar, and doctrinal history at the expense of contemporary knowledge. He argues that schooling has often trained obedience and memory rather than curiosity and verification. He proposes an educational program oriented to mental hygiene, including clear thinking, scientific method, and acquaintance with modern social realities. Universities should reorganize around the problems of the present, not only the preservation of inherited culture. He recommends instruction that reveals how beliefs are formed, how institutions change, and how knowledge grows, so that citizens can participate intelligently in democratic adjustments.
He reframes the study of history as a tool for orientation in the modern world. Rather than recounting rulers, battles, or ecclesiastical disputes, the new history traces the evolution of ideas, economic arrangements, and everyday life, showing how institutions arose contingently and can be altered. History, in this view, delivers perspective, undermining the illusion that current arrangements are natural or final. Robinson emphasizes continuity and change, encouraging readers to see the present as a phase in a longer process. This approach, he maintains, equips individuals and legislators to evaluate proposals in light of origins, purposes, and unintended consequences.
Applying this historical and psychological perspective, Robinson reviews major institutions: religion, law, property, the family, business, and the state. He argues that many features of these systems reflect past emergencies or interests rather than present needs. Property rights and inheritance, for instance, evolved under specific conditions and may hinder welfare or innovation when treated as sacrosanct. Legal doctrines, ecclesiastical authority, and corporate practices show similar inertia. He proposes reexamining functions, testing outcomes, and adjusting arrangements to align with human well-being. Reform, in this account, means continuous, evidence-based revision rather than the defense of absolutes or wholesale repudiation.
Robinson presents the methods of modern science as the most reliable guide for such revision. He calls for cooperative inquiry, public testing of claims, and willingness to discard inadequate hypotheses. In social affairs, this means gathering comparable evidence, conducting controlled experiments where possible, and treating policies as provisional. He discusses the role of experts in informing democratic deliberation and the danger of propaganda, sensational journalism, and prestige opinion. Better communication between investigators and the public, he argues, can moderate enthusiasms and fears. The press, schools, and civic organizations should transmit verified knowledge and cultivate habits of reflective judgment.
Addressing nationalism and war, Robinson uses the recent conflict to illustrate collective irrationality. Group loyalty, honor, and fear amplify suggestion and suppress criticism, while myths and slogans simplify complex disputes. He reviews economic rivalries, militarist traditions, and diplomatic secrecy that precipitate hostilities. The remedy he sketches includes international cooperation, open discussion, and education that reduces chauvinism by widening loyalties beyond the nation. He supports institutions that manage disputes and circulate reliable information. These chapters integrate his themes: impulses and words can drive societies to catastrophe unless intelligence—organized, patient, and self-correcting—guides policy and recalibrates motives to longer-term aims.
The book concludes with a general program for social reconstruction grounded in understanding the mind. Robinson urges cultivation of curiosity, tolerance, and skepticism, along with training in analysis and evidence. He rejects final solutions, recommending steady improvement through trial, feedback, and revision. The central message is that beliefs, institutions, and policies should be treated as instruments subject to test, not as sacred inheritances. By aligning education, public discourse, and governance with scientific habits, societies can better harmonize individual aims with common welfare. The closing pages restate the promise: intelligence, rightly used, can make social change deliberate, humane, and cumulative.
Historical Context
James Harvey Robinson composed his treatise in the United States in the immediate aftermath of the First World War, publishing it in 1921 in New York. The milieu was the late Progressive Era, when rapid urbanization, mass immigration, and industrial consolidation had reshaped American life since the 1890s. Universities such as Columbia, where Robinson had long taught, were expanding the social sciences even as wartime pressures narrowed intellectual freedom. The founding of the New School for Social Research in 1919 in New York City, to which Robinson contributed, symbolized a quest for independent inquiry. The book thus emerged from a setting marked by reformist energy, administrative expertise, and anxiety about mass opinion and authority.
Progressive reform, stretching from the 1890s to the early 1920s, supplied the book’s practical horizon. Reformers pursued regulation and social investigation: the Pure Food and Drug Act and Meat Inspection Act (1906), the creation of the Federal Reserve (1913), and the Clayton Antitrust Act (1914). Catastrophes like the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire in New York (25 March 1911), which killed 146 garment workers, accelerated labor and safety legislation. Settlement houses founded by Jane Addams in Chicago (1889) modeled data-driven social work. Robinson’s call for social intelligence aligns with this reform tradition, arguing that only organized, evidence-based inquiry into habits and institutions can rationally guide public policy in a complex industrial democracy.
The First World War (1914–1918) and the United States’ entry on 6 April 1917 transformed political culture. Mobilization under the Selective Service Act (1917) sent over two million American soldiers to Europe; the Meuse–Argonne offensive (September–November 1918) symbolized the war’s industrial scale. The United States suffered more than 116,000 military deaths before the Armistice of 11 November 1918. Robinson read the carnage and the diplomatic failures surrounding the Treaty of Versailles (signed 28 June 1919) as an indictment of unexamined loyalties, national myths, and rigid institutions. His book thus insists that critical scrutiny of beliefs and interests is essential if intelligence is to prevent crises produced by collective passions.
Wartime propaganda and legal restrictions on speech furnished a laboratory for understanding mass persuasion. The Committee on Public Information, chaired by George Creel (1917–1919), coordinated films, posters, and Four Minute Men speeches, while Postmaster General Albert S. Burleson censored the mails. The Espionage Act (1917) and Sedition Act (1918) enabled prosecutions upheld in Schenck v. United States (1919) and Abrams v. United States (1919). Socialist leader Eugene V. Debs was imprisoned in 1918 for an antiwar speech in Canton, Ohio. Robinson’s analysis of suggestion, taboo, and herd instinct mirrors these events, arguing that democratic societies must cultivate disciplined inquiry to resist manipulation and ideological contagion.
The First Red Scare (1919–1920) revealed the fragility of civil liberties after war. Following anarchist bombings in June 1919, Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer directed raids in November 1919 and January 1920, executed by J. Edgar Hoover’s General Intelligence Division, detaining thousands and deporting radicals on the USS Buford in December 1919. Academic freedom suffered amid loyalty demands and dismissals. Robinson resigned from Columbia in 1919 and helped found the New School for Social Research in New York that year with colleagues including Charles A. Beard and Alvin Johnson. The book’s plea for independent, experimental thinking directly reflects this conflict, warning that entrenched institutions often protect prestige rather than truth.
The triumph of woman suffrage in the United States culminated with the Nineteenth Amendment, ratified when Tennessee became the decisive thirty sixth state on 18 August 1920 and certified on 26 August. Organizations such as NAWSA, led by Carrie Chapman Catt, and the National Woman’s Party under Alice Paul, employed state campaigns, parades, and White House pickets (1917) to shift opinion and policy. President Woodrow Wilson endorsed the amendment in 1918. Robinson’s emphasis on the social formation of beliefs speaks to this expansion of the electorate: he argues that democratic citizenship requires education that exposes inherited prejudice and equips new voters and officials to deliberate with evidence rather than deference.
Debates over heredity and social planning shaped public policy between 1910 and 1921. The Eugenics Record Office opened at Cold Spring Harbor in 1910; Indiana enacted the first compulsory sterilization law in 1907, followed by California in 1909 and other states. During 1917–1918, psychologist Robert M. Yerkes led Army Alpha and Beta intelligence tests, results later misused to advance claims of innate hierarchy and immigration restriction. Henry H. Goddard’s 1912 study of the Kallikak family popularized dubious hereditarian narratives. Robinson’s book challenges such reifications of intelligence, arguing that habits, institutions, and environments mold minds, and warning that pseudo scientific authority, when wedded to policy, can license grave social injustices.
Postwar turbulence underscored the stakes of rational reform. The Seattle General Strike (February 6–11, 1919), the Boston Police Strike (September 1919), and the steel strike (September 1919–January 1920) dramatized labor conflict. The Red Summer of 1919, including the Chicago race riot (July 27–August 3), exposed racial violence and migration tensions. The Senate refused to ratify the Treaty of Versailles in votes on 19 November 1919 and 19 March 1920, rejecting the League of Nations amid nationalist anxieties. The Emergency Quota Act of 19 May 1921 imposed immigration limits. Robinson links such crises to unexamined traditions and group fears, urging a cultivated social intelligence to manage pluralism and interdependence without coercion.
