Erhalten Sie Zugang zu diesem und mehr als 300000 Büchern ab EUR 5,99 monatlich.
- Herausgeber: Musaicum Books
- Kategorie: Fachliteratur
- Sprache: Englisch
Theodore Dreiser's novel 'The Stoic' is a thought-provoking exploration of human nature and the struggles one faces when navigating the morally complex waters of society. The book delves into themes of determination, fate, and the consequences of one's actions, all wrapped in Dreiser's signature naturalistic writing style that captures the raw emotions and intricate relationships of the characters. Set against the backdrop of early 20th-century America, 'The Stoic' offers a nuanced portrayal of the individual's fight against societal norms and personal desires. Dreiser's vivid descriptions and sharp insights make this novel a profound and gripping read for those interested in psychological realism and social commentary. As a prominent figure in American literature, Theodore Dreiser drew inspiration from his own experiences and observations of the world around him to craft compelling narratives that cut to the core of human existence. His unflinching portrayal of human flaws and aspirations shines through in 'The Stoic,' showcasing his deep understanding of the human condition. Dreiser's keen eye for detail and nuanced character development make 'The Stoic' a literary masterpiece that continues to resonate with readers today. I highly recommend 'The Stoic' to readers who appreciate insightful social critiques and profound character studies. Dreiser's masterful storytelling and insightful commentary make this novel a must-read for anyone interested in exploring the complexities of human nature and society. In this enriched edition, we have carefully created added value for your reading experience: - A succinct Introduction situates the work's timeless appeal and themes. - The Synopsis outlines the central plot, highlighting key developments without spoiling critical twists. - A detailed Historical Context immerses you in the era's events and influences that shaped the writing. - An Author Biography reveals milestones in the author's life, illuminating the personal insights behind the text. - A thorough Analysis dissects symbols, motifs, and character arcs to unearth underlying meanings. - Reflection questions prompt you to engage personally with the work's messages, connecting them to modern life. - Hand‐picked Memorable Quotes shine a spotlight on moments of literary brilliance. - Interactive footnotes clarify unusual references, historical allusions, and archaic phrases for an effortless, more informed read.
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 695
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2018
Das E-Book (TTS) können Sie hören im Abo „Legimi Premium” in Legimi-Apps auf:
Ähnliche
THE STOIC
Published by
Books
Table of Contents
Introduction
A man who has mastered the alchemy of markets must learn whether wealth can purchase meaning when time, desire, and the stubborn architectures of society begin to resist him, and in that contest—between accumulation and comprehension, appetite and restraint—Theodore Dreiser’s The Stoic finds its grave, unsparing center.
The Stoic, by Theodore Dreiser, is the third novel of the Trilogy of Desire, following The Financier and The Titan, and it completes the long arc of the financier Frank Cowperwood. Published posthumously in 1947, it moves the saga into the late phase of Cowperwood’s career, as he seeks new fields for investment and influence while navigating personal bonds that both enable and complicate his designs. Without disclosing its outcomes, one can say that the book examines the costs of relentless ambition, asking what remains when the calculus of profit and loss presses against life’s irreducible limits.
Dreiser, a central figure of American literary naturalism, composed this novel late in his life. He died in 1945, and The Stoic appeared two years later, bearing the weight of a career spent observing the machinery of cities, the pressures of money, and the habits of men who move markets. The period of composition straddles profound historical shifts, and the book’s worldliness—rooted in finance, transit, and transatlantic society—reflects a writer attentive to the expanding scale of modern commerce and the intimate repercussions it triggers within households, friendships, and consciences.
Its claim to classic status rests not only on Dreiser’s name but on the trilogy’s audacity: an epic anatomy of capitalism told through one man’s ascent and endurance. The Stoic consolidates that vision, revealing how the energies that built empires of credit and steel also eroded certainties of character and community. Dreiser’s matter-of-fact narration, patient accumulation of detail, and refusal to romanticize motives grant the work a forensic authority. The result is a novel that feels both documentary and dramatic, a study of systems and a portrait of a soul tested by success.
Frank Cowperwood stands among literature’s defining capitalists—a figure at once magnetic and disquieting. The Stoic advances his story into fresh terrain, showing how later-life ventures intensify the friction between calculation and conscience. Dreiser juxtaposes Cowperwood’s iron discipline with the evolving perspectives of those near him, including Berenice, whose intelligence and sensibility complicate the hero’s convictions. Through their encounters, the novel charts the human costs of mastery: the loneliness of command, the contingency of reputation, and the perpetual negotiation between private longing and public performance that high ambition demands.
Dreiser’s technique is exacting and cumulative. He builds character and world through accretion—financial terms, social rituals, urban geography—until the reader feels the texture of institutions pressing upon individual choice. Scenes unfold with a reporter’s plainness and a moralist’s patience, linking offices, drawing rooms, boardrooms, and boulevards into a single ecology of action. The narrative travels beyond the American centers of the earlier volumes into new locales, widening the horizon while preserving the trilogy’s signature clarity of motive: the steady push for advantage, the stubborn will to organize chance.
The title points toward an ethos as much as a character trait. In The Stoic, ideals of composure, endurance, and self-command are repeatedly weighed against urgent appetites—for gain, recognition, beauty, and love. Dreiser probes the paradox of control: the more one seizes, the more one is seized by consequences. He explores how people justify desires under the banner of necessity, how restraint can be strategic rather than ethical, and how, even in triumph, a life may lack the coherence that philosophy promises and commerce assumes.
As in Dreiser’s earlier work, the social canvas is expansive. Money crosses into politics; investment touches transportation and real estate; taste and philanthropy mingle with publicity and social ascent. The book traces how credit networks and personal networks interlock, amplifying risk and reward. It attends closely to class sensibilities, gendered expectations, and the protocols of old and new elites. The interplay between American and European settings underscores questions that run through the trilogy: What does modernization take from people, what does it give, and who controls the terms of that exchange?
The Stoic also speaks to Dreiser’s lasting influence. His naturalist method—linking private fates to impersonal forces—helped shape twentieth-century American realism, informing writers who examined urban life, class pressure, and moral ambiguity. The Cowperwood novels, taken together, provided a template for portraying business as a dramatic arena without reducing it to mere allegory. In this sense, Dreiser’s legacy extends beyond any single title: he legitimized the financial world as worthy of sustained, serious fiction, a move that later novelists variously adopted, contested, and deepened.
Because it appeared after the author’s death, The Stoic has been read both as a summation and as a testament. Readers and scholars continue to debate its severity, its compassion, and its analytic power. The book endures for its unsentimental scrutiny of ambition and for its readiness to show how character bends under pressure yet refuses simple redemption or condemnation. As the culminating volume of a decades-spanning project, it gathers prior themes—risk, appetite, calculation, self-fashioning—into a sober meditation on what any lifetime of striving can guiltily buy and what it must finally confront.
One need not read the earlier volumes to follow this novel, though doing so enriches its resonances. New readers will find a clear narrative line and a steady illumination of motives, rendered in prose that trusts accumulation over ornament. The Stoic invites patience: to watch enterprises take shape, alliances shift, and consequences ripen. Its pleasures are those of recognition and analysis, as patterns emerge across scenes of business and domesticity, and as the differences between strategic poise and true wisdom grow more apparent with every negotiation, venture, and encounter.
For contemporary audiences, The Stoic remains urgent because the structures it studies—finance, media, social aspiration—are still with us, enlarged and accelerated. Its questions about how to live amidst abundance, scarcity, volatility, and spectacle have not dimmed. Dreiser’s novel offers no easy consolations; instead, it grants the steadier satisfaction of seeing our systems and selves in cold daylight. In that clarity lies the book’s lasting appeal: a rigorous, humane attention to power and its price, and to the fragile, necessary search for meaning beyond the balance sheet.
Synopsis
The Stoic, posthumously published in 1947, concludes Theodore Dreiser’s Trilogy of Desire, following The Financier and The Titan. It resumes the career of Frank Cowperwood, an indefatigable American speculator, as he pursues new domains for expansion after earlier battles in the United States. Dreiser’s naturalistic method places personal appetite within the pressures of capital, regulation, and reputation, depicting the impersonal systems that both empower and limit individual will. The narrative takes up Cowperwood’s late-stage ambitions with a cool, documentary patience, examining how enterprise scales, what compromises it demands, and how the pursuit of mastery leaves its mark on private life and public perception alike.
The novel opens with Cowperwood surveying opportunities beyond Chicago, turning to London as a stage worthy of his resources and nerve. He travels with an established circle, including Aileen, and reconnoiters the city’s transit prospects, where subterranean rail offers a modern spectacle and a complex tangle of rights, charters, and politics. Dreiser frames his protagonist as a seasoned tactician reading a new board: meeting bankers, engineers, and political intermediaries; mapping the customs of the City; measuring English reserve against American speed. The move is pragmatic rather than romantic, presented as a calculated enlargement of reach in a market ripe for consolidation.
Once situated, Cowperwood sets about forming syndicates, courting investors, and gathering expert advice on routes and equipment, while legal advisors prepare the petitions and bills required for Parliamentary approval. Dreiser details the rhythms of capital raising, prospectuses, and committee-room persuasion, where every mile of track implies years of paperwork, negotiation, and publicity. The financial apparatus—brokers, underwriters, and newspaper allies—becomes a character of its own, alternately supportive and wary. Disputes over valuations, guarantees, and public obligations thicken. The tone remains analytical: progress proceeds by increments, shaped by hearings, subscriptions, and the periodic shocks that unsettle markets and reputations.
Parallel to these maneuvers, Dreiser relocates the social drama to London’s drawing rooms, clubs, and galleries. The American newcomer must learn a different choreography of status, where deference, lineage, and understatement can be as consequential as liquidity. Cowperwood’s acquisitive taste extends to art, furnishing both distinction and leverage. Against this milieu, two women define contrasting registers of feeling and aspiration. Aileen, long central to his private life, fights for visibility and regard within a world that coolly tests her. Berenice Fleming, younger and self-possessed, enters as a figure of cultivated curiosity, her sensibility complicating the novel’s measure of success.
Opposition gathers from several quarters: rival consortia defending concessions; municipal reformers skeptical of private control; labor interests fearful of wage pressure; and a press eager for scandal or civic crusade. Dreiser shows how policy arguments mix with personality, how publicity can inflate or deflate an undertaking overnight, and how a financier’s confidence is both asset and liability. Cowperwood answers with alliances, incremental concessions, and tactical displays of candor, always separating principle from price. The field is crowded, the clock relentless. The more the network coheres on paper, the more its vulnerabilities—technical, legal, and moral—become legible to friends and foes alike.
The personal plotlines deepen the business chronicle. Aileen contends with social snubs and shifting definitions of loyalty, her pride and affection meeting public chill. She seeks to anchor herself in roles that will dignify her position while the ground keeps moving. Berenice’s arc leans toward reflection: travel, art, and reading widen her horizons, and she evaluates power not only as possession but as responsibility. Cowperwood, aging yet undeterred, balances drive with an emerging calculus of legacy. Dreiser’s emphasis is not melodrama but accumulation—of experiences, reputations, and obligations—through which each character tests the meaning of attachment and independence.
Construction and finance produce their own crises: engineering snags, adverse testimony, capital shortfalls, and the delicate art of refinancing. Dreiser tracks prospectuses through volatile markets, the staging of public offerings, and the choreography of confidence that keeps projects alive. Committees query guarantees; contractors adjust bids; foreign investors watch exchange rates and headlines. The narrative remains close to processes—audits, valuations, schedules—showing how large systems absorb private will. Ethical questions surface around speculation, public benefit, and the line between energetic promotion and manipulation. Ideas of philanthropy and cultural patronage circulate, suggesting ways ambition might translate into permanence beyond the trading floor.
Thematically, The Stoic extends Dreiser’s exploration of determinism and desire. The title points less to classical doctrine than to endurance—the capacity to absorb setbacks without relinquishing the will to act. London, with its old hierarchies and new technologies, becomes a laboratory in which appetite tests itself against custom and infrastructure. Class codes, gendered expectations, and national styles mediate every negotiation. Art and beauty appear as both trophies and shelters, hinting at meanings not reducible to price. Through Berenice’s discriminations and Aileen’s resilience, the novel interrogates what refinement and respectability can and cannot redeem in the calculus of power.
As the trilogy’s capstone, the book reframes the American success story within a wider, transatlantic modernity, asking how far money can carry a person toward fulfillment, and what remains unpurchased. Dreiser does not hurry answers; he accumulates contexts until the questions feel inescapable. The Stoic’s broader significance lies in its sober anatomy of ambition—its mechanics, its glamor, and its toll—set against institutions that outlast any single career. Without disclosing late turns, the novel closes by inviting reflection on the uses of endurance and the limits of acquisition, completing a study that measures wealth not only by gain but by the life it shapes.
Historical Context
The Stoic unfolds against the late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century urban world, moving from Philadelphia and Chicago to London. These were fast-growing cities dominated by banks and trust companies, stock exchanges, municipal councils, and the emerging public-utility corporations that built and operated street railways and subways. Newspapers shaped public opinion, courts arbitrated corporate disputes, and political machines controlled access to lucrative franchises. In that setting, fortunes could be made by securing long-term rights to urban transport, assembling syndicates to finance them, and timing speculation. Dreiser situates his story in this institutional matrix, where private ambition and public authority collide over the future of modern cities.
After the American Civil War, the United States entered the Gilded Age, roughly the 1870s through the 1890s, characterized by rapid industrialization, urbanization, and striking wealth inequality. Railroads, steel, coal, and finance formed the backbone of national growth, while cities like Chicago became hubs of commerce and speculation. Philadelphia remained a major financial and manufacturing center. A new class of financiers and corporate organizers emerged, operating across state lines and increasingly across the Atlantic. Dreiser’s narrative reflects this world of concentrated capital, where personal daring and institutional leverage mattered as much as technical know-how, and where reputations rose and fell with the business cycle.
The era’s financial markets were loosely regulated, centered in New York but reaching into regional exchanges in cities such as Philadelphia and Chicago. Speculation in municipal bonds, railway shares, and utility stocks was common, fueled by call money and syndicate underwriting. Recurrent crises punctuated growth—the Panic of 1873 and the Panic of 1893 devastated credit and toppled ambitious schemes; liquidity shocks could reverberate globally. Dreiser echoes these rhythms of boom and bust, showing how opportunistic operators exploited gaps between public need and private finance. His portrait of capital’s volatility places individual decisions within a system prone to cycles, insider alliances, and sudden reversals.
Urban street transportation was pivotal. Nineteenth-century horsecar lines gave way to cable systems and then to electric traction as cities expanded. Franchises—exclusive rights to lay tracks and operate routes for fixed terms—were granted by city councils and state legislatures. In Chicago especially, intense battles over the length and terms of these franchises occurred in the 1890s and early 1900s, with accusations of bribery and backroom deals common. Dreiser mirrors these “traction wars,” dramatizing how legal charters, engineering promises, and political influence combined to determine who controlled the arteries of the modern metropolis.
Philadelphia, a key early setting for Dreiser’s financier figure, was shaped by entrenched party organizations and closely linked worlds of banking and municipal administration in the postwar decades. Public utilities such as gas and transit were flashpoints for patronage and profit. Conflicts over city investment, bond issues, and the safekeeping of public funds provided opportunities for brokers willing to take risks with municipal money. Dreiser integrates this climate into his character’s origins, tracing a path from local brokerage offices and council chambers to the larger arena of national urban development, where the techniques learned in one city were exported to another.
As the century turned, the Progressive Era gathered strength, calling for curbs on corruption, professionalized city management, and sometimes municipal ownership of utilities. Journalists helped catalyze reform: Lincoln Steffens’s reports on urban graft (collected in The Shame of the Cities, 1904) captured the intersection of money and politics. Civic groups pressed for transparency in franchise awards and rate regulation. Dreiser’s story registers these pressures, contrasting reform rhetoric with the enduring power of capital. The narrative depicts reform as both a political force and a strategic obstacle that savvy financiers learned to navigate—or to co-opt—while pursuing control over essential services.
London provided a different but related setting. By the late 1890s the city faced severe congestion and inadequate transport links. American investors and engineers became central to a new phase of subway building and electrification. In 1902 the Underground Electric Railways Company of London was formed to finance and integrate several deep-level tube lines and modernize surface transport. Large power stations and standardized rolling stock supported this expansion in the years around 1906–1907. Dreiser draws on this moment of high-cost, high-stakes modernization, where British municipal oversight, private concessionaires, and foreign capital negotiated the terms of the capital’s mobility.
The late Victorian and Edwardian City of London was a global financial hub, wary after the 1890 Barings crisis but eager to fund infrastructure with credible sponsors. Transatlantic syndicates brought American methods of promotion and consolidation to British ventures, relying on prospectuses, underwriting pools, and staged issues of debentures and shares. Negotiations involved banks, law firms, and politicians attuned to the public mood about fares and service. Dreiser’s novel captures these cross-border flows of people and money, showing how reputations made in American cities could open doors in London, while also exposing the cultural frictions and ethical compromises inherent in such ventures.
Technological change underpinned the opportunities and risks the novel explores. Electric traction, demonstrated effectively in the late 1880s, displaced horses and cable systems across U.S. cities in the 1890s. In London, shield-driven tunneling and powerful centralized generating stations enabled deep-level tubes to run safely and frequently. These innovations transformed daily life: commutes shortened, urban land values shifted, and expectations for reliable service rose. Yet high fixed costs and complex engineering created financial vulnerability if ridership or fares disappointed. Dreiser uses this nexus of technology and indebtedness to show how modern systems demanded both boldness and meticulous capital management.
Public opinion in this period was volatile and heavily mediated by newspapers. The expansion of the penny press, rising literacy, and circulation battles gave publishers incentives to sensationalize scandals involving franchises and financiers. Financial pages offered tips and rumors that could move markets. Campaigns for and against traction settlements appeared alongside muckraking exposés of city hall. Dreiser reflects this environment by depicting the contest to control narratives—through advertising, influence with editors, and courtroom drama—suggesting that image management became as necessary as engineering competence in winning public and political consent.
The cultural milieu of high finance included voracious art collecting. Wealthy Americans, enriched by industry and utilities, purchased European paintings, tapestries, and sculpture through London and Paris dealers and auctions. Institutions such as the Metropolitan Museum of Art (founded 1870) and the Art Institute of Chicago (founded 1879) signaled a drive to convert private fortune into public cultural capital. Collecting served social prestige, personal pleasure, and a kind of immortality. Dreiser threads this context into his fiction, showing how taste, patronage, and display could legitimate fortunes won in contentious arenas like transit franchises, while also revealing the power dynamics behind cultural acquisition.
Shifting gender norms also mark the period. The late nineteenth century saw the emergence of the “New Woman,” with growing access to higher education, professions, and public life, even as legal and social constraints persisted. Actresses, artists’ models, and socially ambitious women navigated complex moral codes and limited avenues for autonomy. Divorce became more visible, though stigmatized. In the United States and Britain, women’s clubs and reform networks fostered philanthropic and civic initiatives. Dreiser uses these developments to frame relationships and aspirations in The Stoic, contrasting the era’s demands for respectability with evolving ideals of independence, taste, and social responsibility.
Immigration and labor conflict formed part of the urban background, especially in Chicago. Between the 1880s and 1914, the United States received large numbers of immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe, transforming neighborhoods and labor markets. Major confrontations—such as the 1886 Haymarket affair and the 1894 Pullman Strike—shaped attitudes toward unions, policing, and urban order. Employers and investors pursued economies of scale, while workers sought security and dignity. Dreiser’s narrative registers this climate obliquely, highlighting how the creation of urban infrastructure was intertwined with questions of wages, fares, and access, and how philanthropic gestures often coexisted with hard-edged business practices.
The legal environment tightened as public concern grew. In the United States, the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 targeted combinations restraining trade, and states experimented with public utilities commissions to oversee rates and service. Court rulings weighed the sanctity of contracts against claims of public interest. In Britain, Parliament and the Board of Trade scrutinized proposed railways and tramways, shaping franchise terms and safety standards. Dreiser situates his story within these frameworks, emphasizing that success depended not only on capital and engineering but also on navigating statutes, charter clauses, and regulatory scrutiny in two different legal traditions.
The character at the center of Dreiser’s trilogy is modelled on the real-life financier Charles T. Yerkes, whose career spanned Philadelphia, Chicago, and London in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Dreiser had a background in journalism in the 1890s, covering urban life and observing closely the dynamics of business and politics. Influenced by literary naturalism associated with writers like Émile Zola, he emphasized economic and social forces over individual will. The Stoic, the trilogy’s final installment, distills years of research into how a single, relentless personality interacts with the era’s institutions, showing the mechanisms of acquisition more than the romance of entrepreneurial myth.
The book’s publication history also illuminates its tone. Dreiser died in 1945, and The Stoic appeared posthumously in 1947, derived from drafts and notes he left at his death. By then, readers had lived through the Great Depression and the New Deal, which reshaped American attitudes toward markets, regulation, and inequality. Dreiser’s long-standing critique of unfettered capitalism had only sharpened in his later years. The novel thus reached a public primed to see the Gilded Age as a cautionary prelude to reform, and to weigh questions of personal fortune against social cost, without requiring explicit contemporary commentary inside the narrative.
Although principally a novel of acquisition and ambition, The Stoic is steeped in the period’s philanthropy and social reform currents. The settlement house movement—exemplified by Toynbee Hall in London (founded 1884) and Hull-House in Chicago (founded 1889)—sought practical remedies for urban poverty through education, housing, and cultural programs. Industrialists and financiers funded libraries, museums, and universities, often invoking ideas like Andrew Carnegie’s 1889 “Gospel of Wealth.” Dreiser places such endeavors alongside the mechanisms of profit, inviting readers to assess whether charity offsets structural inequities or simply burnishes reputations built within contested systems of urban power and privilege.
Author Biography
Theodore Dreiser (1871–1945) was a major figure of American literary naturalism, known for expansive, unvarnished portraits of urban life, economic ambition, and moral ambiguity in the modern United States. Emerging at the turn of the twentieth century, he brought a documentary intensity to fiction that tested prevailing standards of decorum and idealism. His work challenged readers to confront how social forces—money, status, work, and desire—shape character and fate. Notable novels such as Sister Carrie and An American Tragedy placed him at the center of debates about realism, censorship, and the role of literature in depicting the nation’s industrial and urban transformation.
Raised in the Midwest, Dreiser briefly attended Indiana University before financial pressures steered him into journalism. Reporting in cities such as Chicago and St. Louis immersed him in the social landscape that would later animate his fiction: factories, boardinghouses, offices, and the restless movement of people seeking opportunity. As a reader, he gravitated to European realists and naturalists, including Honoré de Balzac and Émile Zola, as well as scientific and sociological ideas that stressed determinism. These influences, combined with newsroom habits of observation, encouraged a style that favored psychological candor, extensive detail, and the tracing of cause and effect across social environments.
Dreiser’s first novel, Sister Carrie (1900), was championed within the publishing house by novelist-editor Frank Norris but met resistance for its frank treatment of desire and success. Although the book suffered from limited promotion and early moral controversy, it later gained recognition as a foundational naturalist text. The novel’s emphasis on material conditions, chance, and the impersonal energies of the city announced Dreiser’s method. His early professional years in newspapers and magazines—culminating in editorial work in New York—sharpened his sense of how commerce, publicity, and aspiration intersect, a perspective he brought to subsequent fiction about business, art, and social mobility.
Across the 1910s, Dreiser broadened his scope. Jennie Gerhardt (1911) continued his exploration of class and vulnerability. The Financier (1912) and The Titan (1914), the first two installments of his “Trilogy of Desire,” traced the career of a hard-driving capitalist, scrutinizing the energies and costs of American enterprise; a concluding volume, The Stoic, appeared posthumously in 1947. The Genius (1915) provoked controversy for its sexual frankness and its unflinching portrait of an artist in conflict with social norms. Throughout these works, Dreiser’s prose—often labeled unwieldy by critics—pursued breadth, psychological density, and a sociological sweep unusual in American fiction of the period.
An American Tragedy (1925) marked Dreiser’s greatest commercial and critical success. Drawing on a widely reported criminal case, the novel interrogated ambition, status anxiety, and the pressures of modern life without relying on melodramatic moral judgment. Reviewers praised its scale and seriousness, while others criticized its style; the book nevertheless cemented Dreiser’s reputation as an uncompromising realist. The story became a touchstone for discussions of American opportunity and constraint, and its cultural reach extended through stage and film adaptations, which helped sustain public interest and debate over the novel’s depiction of social determinants and individual responsibility.
In addition to fiction, Dreiser produced essays and travel writing that framed his social concerns. A Traveler at Forty (1913) and A Hoosier Holiday (1916) blended observation with autobiography, while Dreiser Looks at Russia (1928) offered a controversial appraisal of the Soviet experiment during a period when he was increasingly sympathetic to left-wing causes. He consistently criticized economic inequality and defended artistic freedom against censorship. By the 1930s and 1940s, Dreiser’s public positions aligned more openly with radical politics; in 1945, shortly before his death, he joined the Communist Party USA, a step that intensified debate about his social vision.
In his later years, Dreiser lived and worked in California, revising long-conceived projects and drafting new fiction. The Bulwark (published 1946) and The Stoic (1947) appeared after his death in 1945, rounding out his career with reflections on conscience, belief, and the legacies of ambition. Dreiser’s influence endures in American narratives that foreground structural forces—class, capital, media, and urbanization—while granting characters moral complexity. Though his prose remains contentious, his commitment to depicting modern life in its full, often harsh, reality continues to shape critical discourse and inspires writers engaged with social truth and the American experience.
THE STOIC
Chapter 1
There were two most disturbing problems confronting Frank Cowperwood at the time of his Chicago defeat, when, so reducingly and after so long a struggle, he lost his fight for a fifty-year franchise renewal[1].
First, there was his age[1q]. He was nearing sixty, and while seemingly as vigorous as ever, it would be no easy matter, he felt, with younger and equally resourceful financiers on the scene, to pile up the great fortune which assuredly would have been his if his franchise had been extended. That fortune would have been all of $50,000,000.
Secondly, and of even greater importance, in his realistic judgment, was the fact that by this time he had still not achieved social connections of any value; in other words, social prestige. Of course, his youthful incarceration in the penitentiary in Philadelphia had not helped matters, and then, too, his natural varietism, plus his unfortunate marriage to Aileen, who had been no real social help, and his own determined and almost savage individualism, had alienated many who otherwise might have been friendly to him.
For Cowperwood was not one to make friends of those less forceful, subtle, or efficient than himself. It smacked too much of meaningless self-depreciation and was, at best, in his opinion, a waste of time. On the other hand, he found, the strong and cunning or genuinely significant were not always easy to acquire as friends. Particularly here in Chicago, where he had fought so many of them for position and power, they had chosen to combine against him, not because he represented morals or methods different from any they were willing to practice or accept in others, but rather because he, a total stranger, had ventured on financial preserves presumably their own and had risen to greater wealth and power, and in less time, than they had. Moreover, he had attracted the wives and daughters of some of the very men who were most jealous of him financially, and so they had set out to ostracize him socially and had well-nigh succeeded in doing so.
So far as sex was concerned, he had always desired individual freedom and proceeded ruthlessly to achieve it. At the same time, he had always held the thought that somewhere he might well meet a woman so superior that in spite of himself he might be held, not to absolute faithfulness—he was never willing to count upon that in regard to himself—but rather to a genuine union of understanding and affection. For eight years now he had felt that he had really found that ideal individual in the girl, Berenice Fleming. Obviously, she was not overawed by his personality or his fame, nor at all impressed by his usual arts. And because of that, as well as the deep aesthetic and sensual spell she cast over him, there had arisen in him a conviction that she, with her youth, beauty, mental awareness, and certainty as to her own personal value, could contrive and maintain the natural social background for his force and wealth, assuming, of course, that he were ever free to marry her.
Unfortunately, for all his determination in connection with Aileen, he had not been able to divest himself of her. For one thing, she was determined not to give him up. And to have added a contest for freedom to his difficult railway fight in Chicago would have been too much of a burden. Moreover, in Berenice’s attitude, he saw no trace of the necessary acceptance. Her eyes appeared to be set toward men not only younger than himself but with conventional social advantages which his personal record made it impossible for him to offer her. This had given him his first real taste of romantic defeat, and he had sat alone in his rooms for hours at a time convinced that he was hopelessly beaten in his battle for greater fortune and for the love of Berenice.
And then suddenly she had come to him and announced a most amazing and unexpected surrender, so that he experienced a sense of rejuvenation which almost at once definitely restored his old constructive mood. At last, he felt, he had the love of a woman who could truly support him in his quest for power, fame, prestige.
On the other hand, as frank and direct as had been her explanation of why she had come—“I thought you really might need me now . . . I have made up my mind”—still, there was on her part a certain hurt attitude in regard to life and society which moved her to seek reparation in some form for the cruelties she felt had been imposed on her in her early youth. What she was really thinking, and what Cowperwood, because of his delight at her sudden surrender did not comprehend, was: You are a social outcast, and so am I. The world has sought to frustrate you. In my own case, it has attempted to exclude me from the sphere to which, temperamentally and in every other way, I feel I belong. You are resentful, and so am I. Therefore, a partnership: one of beauty and strength and intelligence and courage on both sides, but without domination by either of us. For without fair play between us, there is no possibility of this unsanctioned union enduring. This was the essence of her motive in coming to him at this time.
And yet Cowperwood, aware as he was of her force and subtlety, was not so fully aware of her chain of thought in this direction. He would not have said, for instance, looking upon her on that wintry night of her arrival (perfect and flowery out of an icy wind), that she was as carefully and determinedly aligned mentally. It was a little too much to expect of one so youthful, smiling, gay and altogether exquisite in every feminine sense. And yet she was. She stood daringly, and yet secretly somewhat nervously, before him. There was no trace of malice in regard to him; rather love, if a desire to be with him and of him for the remainder of his days on these conditions might be called love. Through him and with him she would walk to such victory as might be possible, the two of them whole-heartedly and sympathetically co-operating.
And so, on that first night, Cowperwood turned to her and said: “But Bevy, I’m really curious as to this sudden decision of yours. To think you should come to me now just when I have met my second really important setback.”
Her still blue eyes enveloped him as might a warming cloak or a dissolving ether.
“Well, I’ve been thinking and reading about you for years, you know. Only last Sunday, in New York, I read two whole pages about you in the Sun. They made me understand you a little better, I think.”
“The newspapers! Did they, really?”
“Yes, and no. Not what they said about you critically, but the facts, if they are facts, that they pieced together. You never cared for your first wife, did you?”
“Well, I thought I did, at first. But, of course, I was very young when I married her.”
“And the present Mrs. Cowperwood?”
“Oh, Aileen, yes. I cared for her very much at one time,” he confessed. “She did a great deal for me once, and I am not ungrateful, Bevy. Besides, she was very attractive, very, to me at that time. But I was still young, and not as exacting mentally as I am now. The fault is not Aileen’s. It was a mistake due to inexperience.”
“You make me feel better when you talk that way,” she said. “You’re not as ruthless as you’re said to be. Just the same, I am many years younger than Aileen, and I have the feeling that without my looks my mind might not be very important to you.”
Cowperwood smiled. “Quite true. I have no excuses to offer for the way I am,” he said. “Intelligently or unintelligently, I try to follow the line of self-interest, because, as I see it, there is no other guide. Maybe I am wrong, but I think most of us do that. It may be that there are other interests that come before those of the individual, but in favoring himself, he appears, as a rule, to favor others.”
“I agree, somehow, with your point of view,” commented Berenice.
“The one thing I am trying to make clear to you,” went on Cowperwood, smiling affectionately at her, “is that I am not seeking to belittle or underestimate any hurt I may have inflicted. Pain seems to go with life and change. I just want to state my case as I see it, so that you may understand me.”
“Thanks,” and Berenice laughed lightly, “but you needn’t feel you are on the witness stand.”
“Well, almost. But please let me explain a little about Aileen. Her nature is one of love and emotion, but her intellect is not, and never was, sufficient for my needs. I understand her thoroughly, and I am grateful for all she did for me in Philadelphia. She stood by me, to her own social detriment. Because of that I have stood by her, even though I cannot possibly love her as I once did. She has my name, my residence. She feels she should have both.” He paused, a little dubious as to what Berenice would say. “You understand, of course?” he asked.
“Yes, yes,” exclaimed Berenice, “of course, I understand. And, please, I do not want to disturb her in any way. I did not come to you with that in view.”
“You’re very generous, Bevy, but unfair to yourself,” said Cowperwood. “But I want you to know how much you mean to my entire future. You may not understand, but I acknowledge it here and now. I have not followed you for eight years for nothing. It means that I care, and care deeply.”
“I know,” she said, softly, not a little impressed by this declaration.
“For all of eight years,” he continued, “I have had an ideal. That ideal is you.”
He paused, wishing to embrace her, but feeling for the moment that he should not. Then, reaching into a waistcoat pocket, he took from it a thin gold locket, the size of a silver dollar, which he opened and handed to her. One interior face of it was lined with a photograph of Berenice as a girl of twelve, thin, delicate, supercilious, self-contained, distant, as she was to this hour.
She looked at it and recognized it as a photograph that had been taken when she and her mother were still in Louisville, her mother a woman of social position and means. How different the situation now, and how much she had suffered because of that change! She gazed at it, recalling pleasant memories.
“Where did you get this?” she asked at last.
“I took it from your mother’s bureau in Louisville, the first time I saw it. It was not in this case, though; I have added that.”
He closed it affectionately and returned it to his pocket. “It has been close to me ever since,” he said.
Berenice smiled. “I hope, unseen. But I am such a child there.”
“Just the same, an ideal to me. And more so now than ever. I have known many women, of course. I have dealt with them according to my light and urge at the time. But apart from all that, I have always had a certain conception of what I really desired. I have always dreamed of a strong, sensitive, poetic girl like yourself. Think what you will about me, but judge me now by what I do, not by what I say. You said you came because you thought I needed you. I do.”
She laid her hand on his arm. “I have decided,” she said, calmly. “The best I can do with my life is to help you. But we . . . I . . . neither of us can do just as we please. You know that.”
“Perfectly. I want you to be happy with me, and I want to be happy with you. And, of course, I can’t be if you are going to worry over anything. Here in Chicago, particularly at this time, I have to be most careful, and so do you. And that’s why you’re going back to your hotel very shortly. But tomorrow is another day, and at about eleven, I hope you will telephone me. Then perhaps we can talk this over. But wait a moment.” He took her arm and directed her into his bedroom. Closing the door, he walked briskly to a handsome wrought-iron chest of considerable size which stood in a corner of the room. Unlocking it, he lifted from it three trays containing a collection of ancient Greek and Phoenician rings. After setting them in order before her, he said:
“With which of these would you like me to pledge you?”
Indulgently, and a little indifferently, as was her way—always the one to be pleaded with, not the one to plead—Berenice studied and toyed with the rings, occasionally exclaiming over one that interested her. At last, she said:
“Circe might have chosen this twisted silver snake. And Helen, this green bronze circlet of flowers, perhaps. I think Aphrodite might have liked this curled arm and hand encircling the stone. But I will not choose for beauty alone. For myself, I will take this tarnished silver band. It has strength as well as beauty.”
“Always the unexpected, the original!” exclaimed Cowperwood. “Bevy, you are incomparable!” He kissed her tenderly as he placed the ring on her finger.
Chapter 2
The essential thing which Berenice achieved for Cowperwood in coming to him at the time of his defeat was to renew his faith in the unexpected and, better yet, in his own luck. For hers was an individuality, as he saw it, self-seeking, poised, ironic, but less brutal and more poetic than his own. Where he desired money in order to release its essential content, power, to be used by him as he pleased, Berenice appeared to demand the privilege of expressing her decidedly varied temperament in ways which would make for beauty and so satisfy her essentially aesthetic ideals. She desired not so much to express herself in a given form of art as to live so that her life as well as her personality should be in itself an art form. She had more than once thought, if only she had great wealth, very great power, how creatively she would use it. She would never waste it on great houses and lands and show, but rather surround herself with an atmosphere which should be exquisite and, of course, inspirational.
Yet of that she had never spoken. Rather, it was implicit in her nature, which Cowperwood by no means always clearly interpreted. He realized that she was delicate, sensitive, evasive, elusive, mysterious. And, for these reasons, he was never tired of contemplating her, any more than he was of contemplating nature itself: the new day, the strange wind, the changing scene. What would the morrow be like? What would Berenice be like when next he saw her? He could not tell. And Berenice, conscious of this strangeness in herself, could not enlighten him or any other. She was as she was. Let Cowperwood, or any, take her so.
In addition to all this, she was, he saw, an aristocrat. In her quiet and self-confident way, she commanded respect and attention from all who came in contact with her. They could not evade it. And Cowperwood, recognizing this superior phase of her as the one thing he had always, if almost subconsciously, admired and desired in a woman, was deeply gratified as well as impressed. She was young, beautiful, wise, poised—a lady. He had sensed it even in the photograph of the twelve-year-old girl in Louisville eight years before.
But now that Berenice had come to him at last, there was one thing that was troubling him. That was his enthusiastic and, at the moment, quite sincere suggestion of absolute and single devotion to her. Did he really mean that? After his first marriage, particularly after the experience of children and the quite sober and humdrum nature of his domestic life, he had fully realized that the ordinary tenets of love and marriage were not for him. This was proved by his intrigue with the young and beautiful Aileen, whose sacrifice and devotion he subsequently rewarded by marrying her. Yet that was as much an act of equity as of affection. And subsequent to that, he considered himself wholly liberated, sensually as well as emotionally.
He had no desire to attempt, much less achieve, a sense of permanency. Nonetheless, he had for eight years been pursuing Berenice. And now he was wondering how he should present himself honestly to her. She was, as he knew, so extremely intelligent and intuitive. Lies sufficient to placate, if not really deceive, the average woman, would not advantage him much with her.
And worse, at this time, in Dresden, Germany, there was a certain Arlette Wayne. Only a year ago he had entered on the affair with her. Arlette, previously immured in a small town in Iowa and anxious to extricate herself from a fate which threatened to smother her talent, had written Cowperwood, enclosing a picture of her siren self[2]. But not receiving a reply, she had proceeded to borrow money and appear before him in person in his Chicago office. Where the picture had failed, the personality of Arlette had succeeded, for she was not only daring and self-confident, but possessed of a temperament with which Cowperwood was really in sympathy. Besides, her object was not purely mercenary. She was genuinely interested in music, and she had a voice. Of that he became convinced, and he desired to help her. She had also brought with her convincing evidence of her background: a picture of the little house in which she and her widowed mother, a local saleswoman, were living, and a quite moving story of her mother’s struggles to maintain them and further her ambition.
Naturally, the few hundred dollars which her aspirations required were as nothing to Cowperwood. Ambition in any form appealed to him, and now, moved by the girl herself, he proceeded to plan her future. For the time being, she was to have the best training Chicago could offer. Later, should she really prove worth while, he would send her abroad. However, so as not to commit or entangle himself in any way, he had specifically arranged a budget on which she was to live, and that budget was still in force. He had also advised her to bring her mother to Chicago to live with her. She therefore rented a small house, sent for her mother, and established herself, and in due course Cowperwood became a frequent visitor.
Yet because of her intellect and the sincerity of her ambition, their relationship had been based on mutual appreciation as well as affection. She had not been moved by any desire to compromise him in any way, and it had been only shortly before Berenice’s arrival in Chicago that he had persuaded Arlette to go to Dresden, for he had realized that he might not be a personal part of Chicago much longer. And had it not been for Berenice, he would have presently visited Arlette in Germany.
But now, as he compared her to Berenice, he felt no sensual pull in her direction, for in that way, as in all others, Berenice promised to absorb him completely. However, still interested in Arlette as an artistic temperament, and concerned to see her succeed, he intended continuing to aid her. Only, as he now felt, it might be best to drop her from his life completely. It would mean little to him. She had had her day. Best start on a new footing entirely. If Berenice was going to demand absolute romantic faithfulness on pain of separation, then he would do the best he could to conform to her desires. She was surely worthy of really important sacrifices on his part. And in that frame of mind, he was more inclined to dream and promise than at any time since his youth.
Chapter 3
The following morning, a little after ten o’clock, Berenice telephoned Cowperwood and they agreed to meet at his club for a talk.
As she entered by a private stairway to his apartment, she found him waiting to greet her. There were flowers in the living room and bedroom. But still so dubious was he as to the reality of this conquest that, as she came leisurely up the steps, looking at him and smiling, he scanned her face anxiously for any suggestion of change. But as she crossed the threshold and allowed him to seize her and hold her close, he felt reassured.
“So you came!” he said, gaily and warmly, at the same time pausing to survey her.
“Did you think I wouldn’t?” she asked, laughing at the expression on his face.
“Well, how was I to be sure?” he queried. “You never did anything I wanted you to do before.”
“True, but you know why. This is different.” She yielded her lips to his.
“If you only knew the effect your coming has had on me,” he went on, excitedly. “I haven’t slept a wink all night. And I feel as though I’d never need to sleep again . . . Pearly teeth . . . Slate blue eyes . . . rosy mouth . . .” he went on admiringly. And he kissed her eyes. “And this sunray hair.” He fingered it admiringly.
“The baby has a new toy!”
He was thrilled by her comprehending, yet sympathetic, smile, and bent and picked her up.
“Frank! Please! My hair . . . you’ll get me all mussed up!”
She protested laughingly as he carried her to the adjoining bedroom, which seemed to flicker with flame from the fireplace, and, and, because he insisted, she allowed him to undress her, amused at his impatience.
It was late in the afternoon before he was satisfied to “be sane and talk,” as she put it. They sat by a tea table before the fire. She insisted that she was anxious to remain in Chicago, so as to be with him as much and as long as possible, but they must arrange things so as not to attract attention. As to this, he agreed. His notoriety was then at its terrific peak, and, in consequence, particularly because Aileen was known to be living in New York, his appearance with anyone as attractive as herself would be the signal for a flood of comment. They would have to avoid being seen together.
For now, he added, this matter of franchise extension[3], or, rather, as it stood now, no franchise, did not mean a cessation of work any more than it meant that he was to lose his street railway properties. These had been built up over a period of years, and shares in them sold to thousands of investors, and they could not be taken from him or his investors without due process of law.
“What really has to be done, Bevy,” he said to her intimately, “is to find a financier, or a group of them, or a corporation, to take over these properties at a value that is fair to all. And that, of course, can’t be brought about in a minute. It may take years. As a matter of fact, I know that unless I step forward and personally request it as a favor to me, nobody is likely to come in here and offer to do anything. They know how difficult it is to manage street railways profitably. And then there are the courts, which will have to pass on all this, even if these enemies of mine, or any outside concerns, are willing to try and run these roads.”
He was sitting beside her, talking to her as though she were one of his fellow-investors or financial equals. And while she was not greatly interested in the practical details of his world of finance, she could sense how intense was his intellectual and practical interest in these things.
“Well, I know one thing,” she interpolated at this point, “and that is, you will never really be beaten. You are too wise and too clever.”
“Maybe,” he said, pleased by her tribute. “Anyhow, all that takes time. It may be years before these roads are taken off my hands. At the same time, a long delay of that kind might cripple me, in a way. Supposing I should want to do anything else; I should feel handicapped because of the responsibility here.” And for a moment, his large gray eyes stared into space.
“What I would prefer to do,” he mused, “now that I have you, would be to loaf and travel with you, for a time, anyhow. I’ve worked hard enough. You mean more than money to me, infinitely more. It’s odd, but I feel all at once as though I’ve worked too hard all my life.” He smiled and fondled her.
And Berenice, hearing him say these things, was suffused with pride and power, as well as real tenderness.
“That’s perfectly true, dear. You’ve been like some big engine or machine that’s tearing full speed somewhere, but doesn’t know exactly where.” She toyed with his hair and smoothed his cheek as she talked. “I’ve been thinking of your life, and all you’ve accomplished up to now. I think you should go abroad for a while, and look at things in Europe. I don’t see what else you could do here, unless you want to make more money, and Chicago certainly isn’t a very interesting place. I think it’s terrible.”
“Well, I wouldn’t say that, exactly,” returned Cowperwood, defensive for Chicago. “It has its points. I came here originally to make money, and certainly I have no complaint to make on that score.”
“Oh, I know that,” said Berenice, amused at his loyalty despite the bitterness and worry that his career here had involved. “But, Frank . . .” and here she paused, weighing her words most carefully, “you know, I think you’re so much bigger than that. I have always thought so. Don’t you think you ought to take a rest, look about and see the world, apart from business? You might find something you could do, some big public project that would bring you praise and fame, rather than money. There might be something you could undertake in England or France. I’d love to live in France with you. Why not go over there and give them something new? What about the traffic situation in London? Something like that! Anyway, leave America.”
He smiled at her approvingly.
“Well, Bevy,” he said, “it does seem a little unnatural to be indulging in a practical conversation like this with a pair of beautiful blue eyes and a sunburst of hair opposite me. But all that you say has the ring of wisdom. By the middle of next month, perhaps sooner, we are going abroad, you and I. And then I think I can find something to please you, for it hasn’t been more than a year since I was approached concerning a proposed tube system for London. At that time I was so busy here I didn’t have time for anything else. But now . . .” and he patted her hand.
Berenice smiled a satisfied smile.
It was dusk before she departed, discreet and reserved and smiling as she entered the carriage that Cowperwood had called.
A few moments later, it was a gay and much more vital Cowperwood who stepped forth, thinking how, the next day, he would arrange first with his lawyer for a conference with the mayor and certain city officials to determine on ways and means of divesting himself of his various and immense holdings. And after that . . . after that . . . well, there was Berenice, the one great dream of his life really come true. What of defeat? There was no defeat! It was love that made life, certainly not wealth alone.
Chapter 4
The proposition to which Cowperwood referred as having come from an English source some twelve months before had been brought to him by two adventuring Englishmen, Messrs. Philip Henshaw and Montague Greaves, who carried letters from several well-known bankers and brokers of London and New York, establishing them as contractors who had already built railroads, street railways, and manufacturing plants in England and elsewhere.
Some time before, in connection with the Traffic Electrical Company (an English company organized for the purpose of promoting railway enterprises), they personally had invested ten thousand pounds in a scheme to promote and construct an underground railway, to run from Charing Cross Station, the center of London, to Hampstead, four or five miles away and a growing residential district. It was a sine qua non of the scheme that the line in prospect was to afford direct means of communication between Charing Cross Station (the terminal of the Southeastern Railway which fed the south and southeast coasts of England and was one of the main arteries of travel to and from the Continent) and Euston Station, the terminal of the London and Northwestern Railway, serving the northwest and connecting with Scotland.
As they explained it to Cowperwood, the Traffic Electrical Company had a paid-up capital of lb30,000. It had succeeded in getting through both houses of Parliament an “act” permitting them to build, operate, and own this particular tube or line; but in bringing this about, contrary to the general idea held by the English public in regard to its Parliament, a considerable sum of money had to be expended—not directly to any one group, but, as Messrs. Greaves and Henshaw hinted, and as Cowperwood, of all people, was fully capable of understanding, one must resort to many ways and means of currying favor with those who were in a better position to influence the minds of a committee than outsiders coming directly with a request for a valuable public privilege, especially when, as in England, it was granted in perpetuity. To that end, recourse had been had to a firm of solicitors: Rider, Bullock, Jonson & Chance, as clever, socially reputable, and technic ally well-informed a combination of legal talent as the great Empire’s capital could boast. This distinguished firm had innumerable connections with individual shareholders and chairmen of various enterprises. In fact, this firm had found persons whose influence had not only persuaded the committee of Parliament to grant the act for the Charing Cross and Hampstead, but also, once the act was in hand and the original thirty thousand pounds nearly gone, suggested Greaves and Henshaw, who, for a two-year option for the construction of the tubes, had, about a year before, paid down lb10,000.
The provisions of the act were nominally stiff enough. It had required the Traffic Electrical Company to deposit exactly sixty thousand pounds in consols[4] as security that the proposed work would be performed in accordance with provisions requiring partial or final completion of construction on or before certain dates. But, as these two promoters had explained to Cowperwood, a bank or financing group, for the usual brokerage rates, would be willing to maintain the required amount of consols in any designated depository, and the Parliamentary committee, again rightly approached, would doubtless extend the time limit for completion.
