The Twelve Caesars E-Book

Matthew Dennison

• Herausgeber: Atlantic Books
• Kategorie: Geisteswissenschaft
• Sprache: Englisch

Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2012

Beschreibung

One of them was a military genius### one murdered his mother and fiddled while Rome burned. Six of their number were assassinated, two committed suicide, and five of them were elevated to the status of gods. They have come to be known as the 'twelve Caesars' - Julius Caesar, Augustus, Tiberius, Caligula, Claudius, Nero, Galba, Otho, Vitellius, Vespasian, Titus and Domitian. Under their rule, Rome was transformed from a republic to an empire, whose model of regal autocracy would survive in the West for more than a thousand years. In The Twelve Caesars, Matthew Dennison offers a beautifully crafted sequence of imperial portraits, triumphantly evoking the luxury, licence, brutality and sophistication of imperial Rome at its zenith.

Leseprobe

BY THE SAME AUTHOR

The Last Princess: The Devoted Life of Queen Victoria’s Youngest Daughter

Empress of Rome: The Life of Livia

First published in hardback and export and airside trade paperback in Great Britain in 2012 by Atlantic Books, an imprint of Atlantic Books Ltd.

Copyright © Matthew Dennison, 2012

The moral right of Matthew Dennison to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act of 1988.

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of both the copyright owner and the above publisher of this book.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.

Hardback ISBN: 978-1-84887-683-5 Trade Paperback ISBN: 978-1-84887-684-2 E-book ISBN: 978-0-85789-780-0

Designed by carrdesignstudio.com Printed in Great Britain

Atlantic Books An imprint of Atlantic Books Ltd Ormond House 26–27 Boswell Street London WC1N 3JZ

www.atlantic-books.co.uk

‘There is no worse heresy than that the office sanctifies the holder of it.’

Lord Acton to Mandell Creighton, 5 April 1887

‘It is a man’s pleasures, yes his pleasures, which tell us most about his true worth, his gravitas and his self-control. No one is so dissolute that his work lacks all semblance of seriousness; it is our leisure which betrays us... One of the chief features of good fortune is that it permits us no privacy, no concealment, and in the case of emperors, it flings open the door not only to their homes but to their private bedrooms and deepest retreats; every secret is exposed and revealed to rumour’s listening ear.’

Pliny the Younger, Panegyricus 82

‘That old passion for power, which has ever been innate in man, increased and broke out as the Empire grew in greatness.’

Tacitus, Histories II.38

CONTENTS

List of Illustrations

Note on the text

Family Trees

Introduction

IJulius Caesar: ‘Too great for mortal man’

IIAugustus: ‘All clap your hands’

IIITiberius: ‘Ever dark and mysterious’

IVGaius Caligula: ‘Equally furious against men and against the gods’

VClaudius: ‘Remarkable freak of fortune’

VINero: ‘An angler in the lake of darkness’

VIIGalba: ‘Equal to empire had he never been emperor’

VIIIOtho: ‘If I was worthy to be Roman emperor...’

IXVitellius: ‘A series of carousals and revels’

XVespasian: ‘The fox changes his fur, but not his nature’

XITitus: ‘The delight and darling of the human race’

XIIDomitian: ‘But the third’?

Bibliography

Notes

Glossary

Index

List of Illustrations

Introduction: Death of Julius Caesar by Alexander Zick © Bettmann / Corbis

Julius Caesar: Statue of Caesar © Osa

Augustus: Bronze statue of emperor Caesar Augustus © Only Fabrizio

Tiberius: Statue of Tiberius © Toni Sanchez Poy

Gaius Caligula: Gaius Caligula, Emperor of Rome by Antonius © Stapleton Collection / Corbis

Claudius: 18th Century Engraving of Claudius © Chris Hellier / Corbis

Nero: Marble head of Nero Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus © Lagui

Galba: Servius Sulpicius Galba Roman emperor, murdered by Otho, Mary Evans Picture Library

Otho: Marcus Salvius Otho Roman emperor, Mary Evans Picture Library

Vitellius: Male bust representing the emperor Vitellius © Marie-Lan Nguyen / Wikipedia Commons

Vespasian: Titus Sabinus Vespasianus, Roman emperor, Mary Evans Picture Library

Titus: 19th century engraving of the Roman Emperor Titus, iStockphoto

Domitian: Ancient bronze Roman coin Domitian © Paul Picone

Note on the text

In the interests of readability and accessibility, I have tried wherever possible to restrict footnotes to a minimum. To this end, I have not provided specific notes on quotations from Suetonius’ Lives of the Caesars: the present account simply contains too many. All unattributed quotations therefore are from Suetonius. In each instance, I have made use of the translation by J.C. Rolfe first published in London by William Heinemann in 1914 – still, almost a century later, distinguished by its combination of accuracy, elegance and charm.

INTRODUCTION

Introduction: Death of Julius Caesar by Alexander Zick © Bettmann / Corbis

‘Exactitude is not truth,’ wrote the painter Henri Matisse in 1947. Readers of the Roman historian Gaius Suetonius Tranquillus must surely agree. In his De vita Caesarum – usually called in English The Lives of the Caesars or The Twelve Caesars – which was probably published in the decade after the accession of the emperor Hadrian in AD 117, Suetonius sought instances of both: not all overlap. Exactitude is apparently one result of much of his careful fact-finding and evidence-sifting; many of his truths are verifiable by reference to other surviving primary sources. Equally obviously, there are omissions from the twelve Lives; there are also areas where the reader must exercise caution.

In intent Suetonius’ approach to biography is comprehensive, embracing both the public and private lives of his subjects, and he essays impartiality, quoting conflicting opinions, demonstrating consistently that arguments have at least two sides, abiding by Virginia Woolf’s injunction that the biographer ‘be prepared to admit contradictory versions of the same face’.1 The principal property of his writing is not precision save in the sharpness and bold outline of the many anecdotes he preserves: he adopts (when it suits him) a loose chronology or schematic approach to his material, and his method intermittently suggests a squirrel hoarding nuts, piling and compiling details. He is not writing history as the ancients understood it – an account of the public and political life of the state in war and in peace: chronological, annalistic, thematic, interpretative. His work is life-writing, then as now accorded lowlier status, susceptible to intrusions of the subjective and admitting the possibility of alternative truths: a bravura unmasking of the office-holder behind the office. Given the open-handedness of his approach, his refusal either to endorse or to condemn, the cumulative effect of Suetonius’ research retains an exhilarating, mobile quality reminiscent of Impressionist and Pointillist paintings: an emphasis on looking and seeing; a manipulation of light and shadow; passages of bold colour; a vigorous quest for truth; a certain deliberate liveliness unconstrained by academic convention.

In a survey of female biography written at the turn of the nineteenth century, Mary Hays wrote: ‘The characteristic of the Roman nation was grandeur: its virtues, its vices, its prosperity, its misfortunes, its glory, its infamy, its rise and fall were alike great.’2 It was a statement of its time, a reiteration of that grandiloquence which history painters of the later eighteenth century had sought to extract from Roman subjects. But successive generations of readers have agreed with Hays’ vision of Rome, and it is possible to enjoy Suetonius’ biographies as the expression of this ‘grandeur’ coloured by a dozen different prisms, a compendium of glory and infamy, virtue and (notably) vice.

No account of Rome’s twelve rulers from Julius Caesar to Domitian can escape the long shadow of Suetonius. To attempt to do so would be contrary: that has not been my intention. The present work revisits Suetonius’ 1,900-year-old survey in acknowledgement of the immense riches both of its subject matter and of the author’s treatment. I have not attempted to imitate my starting point, which would not be possible, nor to offer a commentary on it, an academic appreciation or a riposte. Rather the present work, like Suetonius’, looks at the breadth of its subjects’ lives in an effort to uncover the human face of eminence and snapshots of vanished moments which are utterly remote from our own experience but intermittently familiar. Only implicitly does it address Lord Acton’s famous assessment of the connections between access to power and personal corruption which are all too evident in several Caesars’ spectacular failings.

Instead, the present Twelve Caesars, informed by additional primary sources and associated secondary material including paintings, revisits aspects of that earlier magnum opus in an effort to create for the generalist reader portraits which recall telling facets of twelve remarkable men: the political seen through the personal, the private impulse exposed to public scrutiny, even the history of their histories, which expresses another kind of truth. None of these portraits is exhaustive; none is encyclopedic. None aims primarily to titillate, none to instruct or offer moral exempla. Material is arranged by turns thematically and chronologically, a loosely knit garment, the intention to cast light on the origins, nature and impact of lives and careers which cannot otherwise be satisfactorily confined within a book of this length. Each of these vignettes, I hope, explores ‘the creative fact; the fertile fact; the fact that suggests and engenders’.3 The present work is an entertainment, and will have succeeded in its aim if a single reader is inspired to return to that earlier, justly celebrated Twelve Caesars.

JULIUS CAESAR

(100–44 BC)

‘Too great for mortal man’

Julius Caesar: Statue of Caesar © Osa

Isolated by eminence, the bald whoremonger Gaius Julius Caesar conceals from us the innermost workings of heart and mind. Twas ever thus. Repeatedly he came, saw, conquered; he wrote too, and with impassioned gestures and in a high-pitched voice he importuned his contemporaries if not for love, then for acquiescence, assistance, acknowledgement, awe, acclaim, an approximation of ardour and, above all, admiration and action. He did not stoop to explanations, but asserted unblushingly that dearer to him than life itself was that public renown the Romans called dignitas (a quality he rated higher than moral decency, according to Cicero).1

The scale of his achievements dazzled and repelled his contemporaries. (So too a habit of playing fast and loose with the strict legalities of those offices of state he won by bribery, force of will and sheer charisma.) Ancient sources, including Ciceros letters, betray this ambivalence: they omit to unravel any motive bar vaunting self-belief. Openly Caesar regarded himself as the leading man of the state. He could tolerate no superior and once announced that he preferred the prospect of pre-eminence in a mountain backwater to second place in Rome. Suetonius claims that he allowed honours to be bestowed on him which were too great for mortal man... There were no honours which he did not receive with pleasure. We know too well the outcome.

Intermittently his character was cold, the white heat of ambition his defence against the loneliness of epic hubris. We learn as much of the man himself from the handful of portraits which survive from his own lifetime: long-nosed and broad-browed, with strong cheekbones, a resolute, direct gaze and the receding hairline which caused him such anguish. Their style has yet to evolve that bland idealization which will transform the public face of his successor Augustus from autocratic wunderkind to ageless marble dreamboat. As the written sources confirm, Caesars was not the appearance of a hero (nor was blandness among his characteristics). He dressed with eccentric flamboyance, customizing the purple-striped tunic that was the senators alternative to the toga with full-length fringed sleeves and a belt slung loosely about his waist; later he affected scarlet leather boots. Fastidiousness bordering on vanity reputedly extended to depilation of his pubic hair. It is the sort of detail by which the Romans habitually found out their heroes feet of clay and we may choose to disregard it if we will.

Of the twenty-three dagger wounds inflicted on Caesar on the Ides of March 44 BC by that conspiracy of friends, Romans and countrymen not to mention cuckolded husbands and former colleagues only one was fatal, poetically a wound to the heart (or near enough). It was not a poets death, although Caesar had written poetry one composition, appropriately called The Journey, undertaken on the twenty-four-day march from Rome to Further Spain. Rather it was the death of a man who had sown and reaped mightily. As he announced at Marcus Lepidus dinner party while dissent fomented, his choice had always been for a speedy death. Conspiracy did not thwart that final ambition. Given his apparent disregard for the good opinion of Romes governing class, his destiny, as Plutarch concluded, was not so much unexpected as... unavoidable.