In
commencing an account of the life of Rembrandt Van Rhÿn and his
works, I feel both a pleasure and a certain degree of confidence,
as,
from my first using a pencil, his pictures have been my delight and
gratification, which have continued to increase through a long life
of investigation. Though I cannot expect to enhance the high
estimation in which Rembrandt is held by all persons competent to
appreciate his extraordinary powers, nevertheless, the publication
of
the results of my study may tend to spread a knowledge of his
principles and practice, which may be advantageous to similar
branches in other schools; for, notwithstanding that his style is
in
the greatest degree original and peculiar to himself, yet it is
founded upon those effects existing in nature which are to be
discovered, more or less, in the works of all the great masters of
colouring and chiaro-scuro. Of his early life little is known; for,
unless cradled in the higher circles of society, the early lives of
eminent men frequently remain shrouded in obscurity. The
development
of their genius alone draws attention to their history, which is
generally progressive; hence a retrospective view is ambiguous.
Little is known either of Rembrandt's birth or the place of his
death; what is known has already been related, from Houbraken to
Bryan, and from Bryan to Nieuwenhuys, and anecdotes have
accumulated,
for something new must be said. It is, however, fortunate that in
searching into the source from which this extraordinary artist drew
his knowledge, we have only to look into the great book of Nature,
which existed at the time of Apelles and Raffaelle; and,
notwithstanding the diversity of styles adopted by all succeeding
painters, beauties and peculiarities are still left sufficient to
establish the highest reputation for any one who has the genius to
perceive them, and the industry to make them apparent. This was the
cause of Rembrandt's captivating excellence; neither a combination
of
Coreggio and Titian, nor of Murillo and Velasquez, but as if all
the
great principles of chiaro-scuro and colour were steeped and
harmonized in the softening shades of twilight; and this we
perceive
in nature, producing the most soothing and bewitching results.
These
digressions may, however, come more properly into notice when
Rembrandt's principles of colour come under review.Rembrandt
Van Rhÿn, the subject of this memoir, was born in the year 1606,
between Leydendorp and Koukerk, in the neighbourhood of Leyden, on
the Rhÿn, but certainly not in a mill, as there is no habitable
dwelling in the one now known as his father's. My excellent young
friend, Mr. E. W. Cooke, whose works breathe the true spirit of the
best of the Dutch school, in a letter upon this subject,
says—"My
dear Sir,"I
send you another sketch of the mill; the picture, including the
doorzigte, or view out of the window, I painted on the spot, and
that
picture is now in the possession of the King of Holland, having
taken
it back with me to show him. The mill was a magazine for powder
during the Spanish invasion; it was soon after converted into a
corn
mill, and was in the possession of Hernan Geritz Van Rhÿn when his
son Rembrandt was born; it is situated at Koukerk, on the old Rhÿn,
near Leyden. I hope you will correct the vulgar error that
Rembrandt
was born in a mill. There are often dwelling houses attached to
water-mills, such as we have in England; but in Holland, not such a
structure as a water-mill, with water-power; the water-mills there
are only draining
mills, such as we
have in Lincolnshire, Norfolk, &c. Surely the noise and
movement
of a windmill would ill accord with the confinement of any lady,
especially the mother of so glorious a fellow as
Rembrandt. For the
honour of such association I hope you will not omit my name in the
work, for I painted three pictures of that precious relic."Yours,
&c. "E.
W. Cooke."
INTERIOR
OF THE MILL OF REMBRANDT'S FATHEREXTERIOR
OF THE SAME
The
mill now known as the one possessed by Rembrandt's father is built
of
stone, with an inscription, and "Rembrandt,"
in gold letters, over the door. The one etched by his eminent son
is
a wooden structure, which must have long since fallen into decay.
As
they are both interesting, from association of ideas, I have given
etchings of them.The
mother of Rembrandt was Neeltje Willems Van Zuitbroek, whose
portrait
he has etched. As he was an only child, his parents were anxious to
give him a good education, and therefore sent him to the Latin
school
at Leyden, in order to bring him up to the profession of the law;
but, like our own inimitable Shakspere, he picked up "small
Latin and less Greek." Having shown an early inclination for
painting, they placed him under the tuition of Jacob Van
Zwaanenburg,
a painter unmentioned by any biographer; he afterwards entered the
studio of Peter Lastman, and finally received instruction from
Jacob
Pinas. The two last had visited Rome, but, notwithstanding, could
have given little instruction to Rembrandt, as their works show no
proof of their having studied the Italian school to much purpose.
After receiving a knowledge of a few rules, such as they could
communicate, he returned home, and commenced painting from nature,
when he laid the foundation of a style in art unapproached either
before his time or since. In 1627 he is said, by Houbraken, to have
visited the Hague, when, by the price he received for one of his
pictures, he discovered his value as an artist. The neighbourhood
of
the Rhine was now given up for the city of Amsterdam, where he set
up
his easel in the year 1628, under the patronage of the Burgomaster
Six, and other wealthy admirers of the fine arts.Rembrandt's
first works, like all the early works of eminent artists, were
carefully finished; the work that raised him to the greatest
notice,
in the first instance, is Professor Tulpius giving an Anatomical
Lecture on a dead Body,1
and is dated 1632. Reynolds, in his Tour through Flanders, speaking
of this picture, says:—"The Professor Tulpius dissecting a
corpse which lies on the table, by Rembrandt. To avoid making it an
object disagreeable to look at, the figure is just cut at the
wrist.
There are seven other portraits, coloured like nature itself;
fresh,
and highly finished. One of the figures behind has a paper in his
hand, on which are written the names of the rest. Rembrandt has
also
added his own name, with the date 1632. The dead body is perfectly
well drawn, (a little foreshortened,) and seems to have been just
washed; nothing can be more truly the colour of dead flesh. The
legs
and feet, which are nearest the eye, are in shadow; the principal
light, which is on the body, is by that means preserved of a
compact
form; all these figures are dressed in black." He further
adds—"Above stairs is another Rembrandt, of the same kind of
subject: Professor Nieman, standing by a dead body, which is so
much
foreshortened that the hands and feet almost touch each other; the
dead man lies on his back, with his feet towards the spectator.
There
is something sublime in the character of the head, which reminds
one
of Michael Angelo; the whole is finely painted,—the colouring much
like Titian."Simeon
in the Temple, in the Museum of the Hague, painted in 1631, is in
his
first manner; as are The Salutation, in the Gallery of the Marquis
of
Westminster, painted in 1640; and The Woman taken in Adultery, in
the
National Gallery, painted in 1644, all on panel, and finished with
the care and minuteness of Gerhard Dow. His most successful career
may be taken from 1630 to 1656. About the year 1645 he married Miss
Saskia Van Uylenburg, by whom he had an only son, named Titus, the
inheritor of the little wealth left after his father's
embarrassments, but, though bred to the arts, inheriting little of
his father's genius. In what part of Amsterdam he resided at this
time we have no record, nor is the house now shown as Rembrandt's,
and which was the subject of a mortgage, sufficiently authenticated
to prove its identity; he may have lived in it, but it could not at
any time have been sufficiently capacious to contain all the
effects
given in the catalogue extracted from the register by Mr.
Nieuwenhuys.The
late Sir David Wilkie, in a letter to his sister, says:—"At
the Hague we were delayed with rain, which continued nearly the
whole
of our way through Leyden, Haarlem, and Amsterdam. Wherever we
went,
our great subject of interest was seeing the native places of the
great Dutch painters, and the models and materials which they have
immortalized. At Amsterdam we sallied forth in the evening, in
search
of the house of Rembrandt; it is in what is now the Jews' quarter,
and is, in short, a Jew's old china shop; it is well built, four
stories high, but it greatly disappointed me. The shop is high in
the
ceiling, but all the other rooms are low and little, and, compared
with the houses of Titian at Venice, of Claude at Rome, and of
Rubens
at Antwerp, is quite unworthy the house of the great master of the
school of Holland. Even if stuffed, as it is now, with every
description of the pottery of Canton, it could not have held even a
sixth part of the inventory Nieuwenhuys found, as the distrained
effects of Rembrandt, and the only solution is, that he may have
once
lived there; but as his will, still extant, is dated in another
street, and as several of the pictures he painted could not be
contained in the rooms we were in, we must conclude that, like the
shell which encloses the caterpillar, it was only a temporary abode
for the winged genius to whom art owes so much of its
brilliancy."As
the place of his residence is veiled in obscurity, so is the place
of
his demise, which is supposed to have taken place in 1664, as Mr.
Smith, in a note to his Life of Rembrandt, says—"that no
picture is recorded bearing a later date than 1664, and the balance
of his property was paid over to his son in 1665."Mr.
Woodburn, in a Catalogue of his Drawings, says:—"It is
uncertain what became of him after his bankruptcy, or where he
died;
a search has been made among the burials at Amsterdam, until the
year
1674, but his name does not occur; probably Baldinucci is correct
in
stating that he died at Stockholm, in 1670;" others have
mentioned Hull, and some give a credence to his having fled to
Yarmouth, during his troubles, and mention two pictures, a lawyer
and
his wife, said to have been painted there; they are whole lengths,
and certainly in his later manner, but I could not gather any
authentic account to build conjecture upon, as the intercourse
between Amsterdam and Yarmouth has been kept up from olden time,
and
a Dutch fair held every three years on the shore. The ancestors of
the family in whose possession they still are, may have visited
Holland; but, amongst such conflicting opinions, it is useless to
attempt elucidation of the truth of this. We may rest certain that
his works will be appreciated in proportion as a knowledge of their
excellence is extended.
REMBRANDT'S
HOUSE AT AMSTERDAM
Extract
from the Book of Sureties of Real Estates remaining at the
Secretary's Office of the City of Amsterdam, fol. 89,
&c.Legal
Receipt and Discharge, given by Titus Van Ryn, for the Balance of
the
Estate of his Father, Rembrandt Van Ryn.Good
for Gls.
6952–9.the
29.7bre—Willem
Muilm.I
the undersigned acknowledge to have received of the said
Commissaries
the undermentioned six thousand nine hundred and fifty-two Guldens
nine Stuivers, the 5th November, 1665.Received
the contents, Titus Van Ryn. }Before
the undersigned Magistrates appeared Titus Van Ryn, the only
surviving son of Rembrandt Van Ryn and of Saskia Van Uylenburg
(having obtained his veniam ætatis), as principal,—Abraham Fransz,
merchant, living in the Angelier Straat, and Bartholomeus Van
Benningen, woollen-draper, in the Liesdel, as guarantees. And
jointly, and each of them separately, promised to re-deliver into
the
hands of the Commissaries of the Insolvent Estates, when called
upon,
the said six thousand nine hundred fifty-two Guldens and nine
Stuivers, which the said Titus Van Ryn shall receive of and from
the
before-mentioned Commissaries, the money arising from the house and
ground in the Anthonis bree Straat, A.º 1658, which was sold under
execution, and from the personal estate of Saskia Van Uylenburg and
Rembrandt Van Ryn aforesaid; hereby binding all their goods,
moveables, and immoveables, present and future, in order to recover
the said sum and costs. Therefore the before-mentioned principal
promised to indemnify his said sureties under a similar obligation
as
above written.—Actum, the 9th September, 1665.A.
J. J. Hinlopen and Arnout Hooft.H.
V. Bronchorst.2207 : a3:36952:1(Stamp)8_______69529The
following Catalogue is extracted from the Register Lª R. fol. 29 to
39 inclusive, of the Inventory of the Effects of
Rembrandt Van Rhyn,
deposited in the Office of the Administration of Insolvent Estates
at
Amsterdam, Anno 1656.