13,99 €
Rippermania has driven a 120-year-old investigation to identify the depraved perpetrator of the savage murder of five prostitutes in the East End of London. This book features personalities whose reputations have been tarnished by modern authors clamouring to name celebrities as suspects, accomplices or conspirators.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2008
I’M A CELEBRITY, GET ME OUT OF WHITECHAPEL!
Policeman: ‘I’m taking you in for questioning about the ’orrible murders’.
Suspect: ‘Don’t you know who I am?’
The Whitechapel Murders sparked an upsurge in the popular pastime of ‘slumming’ amongst society ‘swells’, where affluent gentlemen dressed down and wandered around the district looking for cheap thrills. In November 1888, Sir Arthur George, attracted the attention of the police and was arrested for suspiciously approaching a prostitute. Dressed in an old shooting jacket and slouch hat, the young baronet was held in custody until his identity was proven. An intimate friend of the Prince of Wales, Sir Arthur would not be the last member of the capital’s social elite to be accused of being the infamous Jack the Ripper.
The author would like to express his appreciation for access to archive material, books, newspapers and online resources available at the John Pike Local Studies Room, Torquay Central Library.
Title
Acknowledgements
Illustrations
Introduction: Jack the Ripoff
1 Queen Victoria: A Reign of Terror
2 The Prince of Wales: The Playboy Prince
3 Joseph Merrick: The Elephant Man
4 Richard Mansfield: The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde
5 Charles Parnell: The Uncrowned King of Ireland
6 Lord Salisbury: An Honest Politician
7 Lord Randolph Churchill: The Fourth Party
8 Sir Charles Warren: Hounded Out of Office
9 The Duke of Clarence: The Prince of Darkness
10 Sir William Gull: Physician Extraordinary
11 Sir Robert Anderson: The Third Man
12 Walter Sickert: Jack the Ripper’s Bedroom
13 King Leopold II: The Barbaric Beast of the Belgian Congo
14 Robert James Lees: The Human Bloodhound
15 William T. Stead: Shock Journalism
16 Aleister Crowley: The Wickedest Man in the World
17 Madame Helena Blavatsky: Jill the Ripper
18 Sir Arthur Conan Doyle: The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes
19 Rasputin: Great Criminals of Russia
20 James Maybrick: The Diary of Jack the Ripper
21 James Kenneth Stephen: Flight of the Arrow
22 Oscar Wilde: The Picture of Dorian Gray
23 Frank Miles: For Pity and Love
24 Algernon Swinburne: The Demoniac Poet
25 Dr Thomas Barnado: The Scientific Humanitarian
26 Francis Thompson: In Darkest London
27 General William Booth: Onward Christian Soldiers
28 George Gissing: The Nether World
29 Lewis Carrol: The Mad Hatter 1
30 William Gladstone: The Grand Old Man
31 W.G. Grace: The Comic Bandit
Bibliography and Sources
Copyright
Throughout the text individuals are cross-referenced in bold fonts to indicate that there is more information in a separate chapter dedicated to that person.
The illustrations in this book have been obtained from antiquarian books and the following magazines and newspapers: The Graphic, Illustrated London News, Illustrated Police News, Le Journal Illustré,The Penny Illustrated Paper, People, New York Herald, Punch.
There are liars, damn liars and people who write books about Jack the Ripper.
ANTIQUARIAN CRIME-BOOK DEALER, JACK HAMMOND
Rippermania has driven a 120-year-old investigation to identify the depraved killer of five prostitutes in the East End of London. A fanatical group of researchers dubbed ‘Ripperologists’ devote their lives to the quest and continually serve up a never-ending list of compelling and totally fascinating suspects. With well over 200 names already in the frame, there is little chance of Jack the Ripper becoming an endangered species. Publishers playfully invite Scotland Yard to close the file on the case with hopeful subtitles such as ‘The Final Solution’ or ‘The Mystery Solved’ – although each new revelation ensures that the most credible solution will never be universally accepted. With an insatiable readership to feed, every conceivable angle has been covered to produce ‘evidence’ against individuals, including desperate attempts to conduct psychic investigations and analyse astrological charts. The current growth in the ‘Ripper’ market reflects modern society’s obsession with ‘celebrity’ and this book focuses on the many famous personalities whose, admittedly, often rather dubious reputations have been further tarnished by sources eager to accuse public figures of being informants, suspects, accomplices or conspirators implicated in the case of the world’s most notorious serial killer. Safe in the knowledge that dead celebrities can’t sue – and never allowing the facts to get in the way of a good story – authors have imaginatively named and shamed royal figures, prominent politicians, eminent artists and successful writers. The evidence against each of them is flimsy at best – and, let’s face it, they can’t all be guilty – although conspiracy theorists would have us believe that the Crown, with cooperation from the government and top police officials, turned a blind eye as a band of secret-society cutthroats committed the atrocities in an effort to either appease Irish nationalists or cover up the sordid love lives of a choice of two princes of the realm.
The Ripper strikes again!
Jack the Gorilla!
Gathered within these pages are the Victorian ‘A’ list contenders for the prestigious title of Jack the Ripper – including one plucked at random from my own imagination. Setting aside my admiration for the glorious proposition that the murders were committed by an escaped gorilla – a marvellous anecdote and refreshing antidote to the human celebrity jungle – I temporarily inhabit the fantasy world of the more unscrupulous Ripper buffs and, with deference to the home of my own publisher, Gloucestershire, conjure up a (tongue-in-cheek) suspect in the gargantuan shape of the county’s most famous son, no less a personage than cricket legend W.G. Grace!
Mike Holgate
March 2008
And are Queen Victoria’s lieges to be scared almost to fits,
And helpless women murdered and cut up in little bits,
Because the eyes of Justice, which proverbial are blind,
Won’t open just a little way and help us for to find
The livin’, breathin’, vampire which on blood enjoys its feast,
As now pervades and poisons the regions of the East?
JUDY, 10 OCTOBER 1888
Queen Victoria celebrated her Golden Jubilee in 1887, marking fifty glorious years when the nation’s naval supremacy and military might established the British Empire as the world’s leading power. In the wake of the Industrial Revolution the country had also enjoyed unparalleled economic prosperity, which brought about vast social changes to towns and cities. Nowhere was this more evident than in London, which, during the sovereign’s long reign, experienced a population explosion, quadrupling in size and creating a squalid, poverty-stricken lower class, living in areas of poor housing where unemployment, crime, drunkenness and prostitution were rife. Charles Booth would publish the findings of his sociological survey Life and Labours of London in 1889, by which time, the Establishment had already received a violent indicator about the worst extremes of social evil from someone whose name would become as memorable as the monarch’s – the world’s first serial sex killer – Jack the Ripper.
Murder in the heart of the city’s East End was commonplace, yet, the ferocity of the ‘Whitechapel Murders’ and the savagery inflicted on the victims immediately attracted lurid headlines in the press and raised awareness of the appalling social conditions. Estimates of how many women were targeted by the killer vary from three to thirty between 1887 and 1891, although the consensus of opinion is that the same hand slaughtered five prostitutes over an eight-week period in Autumn 1888. The first of these ‘canonical’ victims was struck down on 31 August, when the mutilated body of Mary ‘Polly’ Nichols was found. Unable to afford a bed in a lodging house, she had been wandering the streets trying to raise money by prostitution when her throat was viciously cut right through to the spinal column before her skirts were raised and her abdomen ripped open exposing her intestines. A week later Annie Chapman met a similar fate, when her intestines were removed and laid neatly on the ground, while her womb was removed and taken away by her killer. On the last day of September, an infamous ‘double event’ occurred when two women were slain in a single night. Elizabeth Stride was last seen talking to a man ‘respectable’ in appearance – less than thirty minutes before her body was discovered. This time there was no mutilation and blood was still seeping from the dead woman’s throat, indicating that the Ripper had narrowly escaped detection. Forty minutes later, the psychopath struck again when he slashed the throat and stomach of Katherine Eddowes. With maniacal zeal, her throat, face and abdomen were slashed and a kidney and womb removed. The worst atrocity was saved for the final victim Mary Jane Kelly who was attacked in her lodging house on 9 November 1888. When a rent collector called on the streetwalker, he peeped through the window and spotted her naked, bloodied corpse lying on the bed. Her face had been brutalised almost beyond recognition; flesh removed from her abdomen and thighs was found on a bedside table, while the breasts had been sliced off and her heart extracted and removed from the scene of the crime.
Charles Booth.
Queen Victoria took a special interest in the murder investigation by forwarding her own opinions and suggestions to her ministers. The day after the final murder she advised:
This new most ghastly murder shows the absolute necessity for some very decided action. All these courts must be lit, and our detectives improved. They are not what they should be. You promised, when the first murder took place, to consult with your colleagues about it.
The fact that this innocuous memorandum proposing improved street lighting also refers to the Queen having taken action ‘when the first murder took place’ has been interpreted as proof that she had some inside knowledge of it being the first of a sequence. In this respect, it has been argued that she had some sinister motive to apprehend the villain whom she knew to be a close member of her own family. Suspicion has fallen on her notorious womanising son the Prince of Wales, or allegedly syphilitic grandson the Duke of Clarence who have both been accused of being Jack the Ripper. Alternatively, it has been suggested that there was a ‘cover up’ of the amorous activities of either prince. In the case of the Prince of Wales, he is said to have had a relationship with the aforementioned Mary Kelly, who became pregnant with his child and a scandal was averted when she and her friends were silenced by two young lawyers, Montague Druitt and James Kenneth Stephens. The royal conspiracy theory surrounding the Duke of Clarence was supposedly organised by the Prime Minister Lord Salisbury with the cooperation of the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Charles Warren. In this scenario, Queen Victoria’s physician-in-ordinary Sir William Gull was recruited by the Freemasons to eliminate women attempting to blackmail the government with embarrassing knowledge that the Duke had entered into a secret marriage and fathered the child of a commoner. Aiding and abetting Gull in his grim task was either artist Walter Sickert, or head of Scotland Yard CID Sir Robert Anderson. Orchestrated by former Chancellor of the Exchequer Lord Randolph Churchill, their mission was to eliminate all witnesses and save the monarchy, which was increasingly coming under attack. In 1890, the American Daily Northwestern referred to the unsavoury lifestyles of the Prince of Wales and his son the Duke of Clarence and cited them as the worst examples of the ‘debauchery which too conspicuously punctures European royalty’. The newspaper blamed their sordid behaviour and the growing threat of revolution on Queen Victoria’s family relationship to virtually every head of state on the Continent and her marriage to her Bavarian cousin Prince Albert, a union which had produced nine children: ‘The inbred crowd of royal stock of all Europe is becoming sadly deteriorated both bodily and mentally, and cannot long, in any event, survive the strength of a higher order of governmental civilization which the common people are attaining’.
Queen Victoria.
God will never allow such a wicked man to come to the throne.
A ROYAL FOOTMAN ON THE PRINCE OF WALES
Queen Victoria’s eldest son and daughter-in-law, the Prince and Princess of Wales, celebrated their Silver Wedding Anniversary in 1888. Throughout the relationship, the promiscuous prince – christened Albert Edward, though known as ‘Bertie’ to his friends and ‘Dirty Bertie’ to his detractors – had enjoyed numerous salacious affairs. The first scandal broke in December 1861 as preparations were being made for his forthcoming engagement to the daughter of the heir to the Danish throne, Princess Alexandra. Rumours of the prince’s lustful pursuits at Cambridge University persuaded his parents to send him on a military exercise in a remote part of Ireland. However, the plan backfired disastrously when actress Nellie Clifden boasted of how the prince’s friends had smuggled her into the royal army tent and the amorous liaison was soon the talk of London. Upon his return to Cambridge, his furious father Prince Albert, who fell ill during the journey back to Buckingham Palace and succumbed to typhoid fever, berated Bertie about his irresponsible behaviour. As Queen Victoria withdrew from the public eye and went into decades of prolonged mourning, she blamed her son for the loss of her husband and told one of her daughters, ‘Much as I pity I never can or shall look at him without a shudder’.
The incidental death of his father seemingly did not trouble the incorrigible prince whose sexual conquests, including famed actresses Lillie Langtry and Sarah Bernhardt and a string of society beauties Daisy Brook, Alice Keppell and Jennie Churchill, continued unabated following his marriage in March 1863. The largely pro-monarchy press, who delighted in pillorying politician Charles Parnell and author Oscar Wilde for their extra-marital activities, patriotically avoided criticising the heir to the throne who feared no embarrassing revelations even when openly accompanied by his mistresses in public. Whiffs of scandal only circulated when members of his own elite royal social circle broke ranks. In 1869, Bertie was compelled to appear as a witness in the divorce court after being named as one of the many lovers of Lady Mordant. He was able to deny the affair without contradiction when her ladyship was declared unfit to give evidence – suspiciously certified insane and institutionalised at the behest of her husband’s family. The philandering prince was at the centre of another marriage scandal in 1876, when Lord Aylesford threatened to divorce his wife for her affair with Lord Blandford, the elder brother of politician Lord Randolph Churchill. The latter intervened to protect the family honour by threatening to reveal the details of compromising letters written to Lady Aylseford by Bertie unless the prince persuaded his compliant friend Lord Aylesford to drop the legal action. This ugly blackmail attempt so incensed the prince that he sought to resolve the matter by means of a pistol duel with Churchill who laughed off the challenge.
The Prince and Princess of Wales at the time of their marriage in 1863.
The Prince of Wales could not avoid another court appearance when he forced Sir William Gordon-Cumming to sign an undertaking that he would never gamble again after being caught cheating at baccarat in 1891. The culprit agreed to the ultimatum on condition that the matter was kept quiet, but when the secret was leaked and openly discussed in social circles, he sued five people for slander and called the heir to the throne as a witness. Gordon-Cumming lost the case, was dismissed from the army and expelled from his clubs, while the prince’s public image was severely damaged for encouraging illegal gambling.
The researches of Andy and Sue Parlour as told to author Kevin O’Donnell in The Jack the Ripper Whitechapel Murders (1997) develop an earlier contention by John Wilding in Jack the Ripper Revealed (1993) that Bertie and some of his friends kept a room above a butcher’s shop in Watling Street, City of London, where they regularly changed clothes to go fire-watching. It is proposed that the property was also used for wild orgies with prostitutes and, following a dinner celebrating his Silver Wedding Anniversary in March 1888, while Princess Alex and Queen Victoria went for a coach ride around the city, the prince was given a surprise treat by his rakish chums who took him to the secret address for a romp with Mary Kelly, who subsequently claimed to be carrying his child. To suppress the impending royal scandal and save the monarchy, a high-ranking cabal involving Prime Minister Lord Salisbury, chief of police Sir Charles Warren, and the prince’s recently reconciled friend Lord Randolph Churchill, resulted in the killing of Kelly’s known associates carried out by trusted aides, Montague Druitt and James Kenneth Stephen. The Parlours believe that the body whose face was badly disfigured at Mary Kelly’s lodging house was some other unfortunate soul and that the woman carrying the royal baby was possibly saved by her lover who heard of the plot and spirited her out of the country to Canada.
