The Life and Times of General John Graves Simcoe, Commander of the "Queen's Rangers" During the Revolutionary War E-Book

David Breakenridge Read

• Herausgeber: Reading Essentials
• Kategorie: Sachliteratur, Reportagen, Biografien
• Sprache: Englisch
• Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2019

Beschreibung

John Graves Simcoe (1752 –1806) was a British army officer who saw action in the American Revolutionary War, in the Siege of Boston. During the siege, he purchased a captaincy in the grenadier company of the 40th Regiment of Foot. In 1777, Simcoe was given the command of the Queen's Rangers. He was the first Lieutenant Governor of Upper Canada from 1791 until 1796.

This is a well-written life of the first governor of the province of Upper Canada (Ontario), when it was established in 1792. 

The author of this biography writes: "There never yet has been published a history of the life of General Simcoe, the first Governor of Upper Canada. The pioneers of the country and their descendants are entitled to be made acquainted with the officer who was first entrusted with the administration of their affairs, and was the real founder of the Province. In writing "The Life and Times of General Simcoe" I have endeavoured to recall the public acts of the first Governor of Upper Canada in his different capacities of citizen, soldier and administrator. His career as a soldier and officer of the " Queen's Rangers " during the Revolutionary War naturally demands attention. For much that I have written on that subject I am indebted to the Journal which he himself kept during the different campaigns of the War of Independence."

Leseprobe

The Life and Times of General John Graves Simcoe, Commander of the Queen's Rangers During the Revolutionary War 

by David Breakenridge Read

First published in 1890, 1926 (revised)

This edition published by Reading Essentials

Victoria, BC Canada with branch offices in the Czech Republic and Germany

[email protected]

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage or retrieval system, except in the case of excerpts by a reviewer, who may quote brief passages in a review.

The Lifeof John Graves Simcoe 

First Lieutenant-Governor of the Province of Upper Canada

1792-96

by 

John Graves Simcoe as a Young Man

(From an Oil Painting)

To the Memory of

JOHN ROSS ROBERTSON

OF TORONTO

A Canadian who loved his country, a Journalist who loved his

profession, a Mason who loved his order, a Man

who loved his fellowmen,

This Life of John Graves Simcoe

Is Dedicated

by his friend for many years

The Author.

Contents

PAGE

Preface

13

Chapter I

Birth and Descent

17

Chapter II

Education and Early Military Life

38

Chapter III

The Queen’s Rangers

55

Chapter IV

Life in England

74

Chapter V

Upper Canada of Simcoe’s Time

94

Chapter VI

The Constitutional Act

103

Chapter VII

Needs of the Province

115

Chapter VIII

Simcoe in Canada

130

Chapter IX

The Executive Council

145

Chapter X

Sojourn in Kingston

155

Chapter XI

Early Days in Niagara

165

Chapter XII

First Session of Legislature

173

Chapter XIII

Provincial Matters of Import

189

Chapter XIV

The Second Session

206

Chapter XV

Defences and Fortifications

216

Chapter XVI

The Third Session

234

Chapter XVII

War Clouds Dispersed

248

Chapter XVIII

The Fourth Session

267

Chapter XIX

La Rochefoucault at Newark

272

Chapter XX

The Fifth Session

286

Chapter XXI

Good-bye to Canada—In England Again

293

Chapter XXII

Simcoe’s Latter Days. . .

307

Chapter XXIII

Finances of the Province

324

Chapter XXIV

Religion and Education

337

Chapter XXV

Ills, Antidotes and Menus

364

Chapter XXVI

Simcoe’s Executive Council

375

Chapter XXVII

Members Legislative Council

406

Chapter XXVIII

Members Legislative Assembly

421

Chapter XXIX

Simcoe as a Freemason

452

Illustrations

PAGE

John Graves Simcoe as a Young Man

—(From an Oil Painting)

Frontispiece

H.M.S. Pembroke

—(From Monument in St. Andrew’s Church, Cotterstock, Eng.)

19

Leeside House

—Birthplace of Capt. Simcoe, R.N., Hilton, Durham, England

32

Where Governor Simcoe Was Born

—Cotterstock, England

32

Exeter Grammar School

48

Merton College

—The Quad, Oxford, England

48

Map of the Seat of War in the Environs of Philadelphia

57

Map of the Seat of War in North America

61

Uniforms of Queen’s Rangers, Revolutionary War

—Light Infantryman and Hussar; Grenadier; Rifleman. (From Water Colors by Capt. Murray of the Queen’s Rangers)

64

Mrs. John Graves Simcoe in Welsh Dress

—(From a Miniature)

80

Wolford Lodge

—Honiton, Devon

88

Wolford Lodge Interiors

—The Salon, The Hall, The Morning Room

96

Navy Hall, Niagara, From the River, 1792.

(From a Drawing by Mrs. Simcoe)

132

Protestant Church (St. George’s), Kingston, 1791

156

Plan of Kingston, U.C., 1790

159

H.M. Schooner Onondaga

—(From a Drawing by Mrs. Simcoe)

160

Castle Frank in Summer of 1796.

—(From a Drawing by Mrs. Simcoe)

167

Members of Simcoe’s Administration

—Chief Justice Osgoode, Hon. Peter Russell, Hon. James Baby, Hon. Alex. Grant, Sec’y. Wm. Jarvis, Hon. Robert Hamilton, Hon. (Sir) D. W. Smith, Hon. Alex. Macdonell

176

Some of Those Who Had a Part in the Affairs of Upper Canada

—Sir Alured Clarke, Lord Dorchester, Chief Justice Smith, Rev. John Stuart, Bishop Mountain, Rev. John Bethune, Sir John Johnson, Colonel Talbot

192

Butler’s Barracks at Queenston, 1793

—(From a Drawing by Mrs. Simcoe)

207

York (Toronto) Harbour, 1793, Near the Old Fort

—(From a Drawing by Mrs. Simcoe)

224

Some Notables During Simcoe’s Regime

—H.R.H. Prince Edward, Dr. James Macaulay, Hon. John Munro, Maj.-Gen. Æneas Shaw, Capt. (Sir) E. B. Littlehales, Mr. Justice Powell, Joseph Brant (Thayendanegea), Robert Isaac Dey Gray

240

Site of Charlotteville, at Long Point, 1795

—(From a Drawing by Lieut. Pilkington, copied by Mrs. Simcoe)

280

Statue of John Graves Simcoe, Queen’s Park, Toronto

320

Wolford Chapel, West View, Near Honiton, Devon

336

Wolford Chapel, Interior

336

Gavel Used in Union Lodge, Exeter, 1766

462

Preface

This work would not have appeared—at least in its present form—but for the diligent and successful researches of the late John Ross Robertson. My own investigations, pursued for some years, into the early history of Upper Canada, brought us together on many occasions. We found a common object of interest in John Graves Simcoe, our first Lieutenant-Governor. Mr. Robertson frequently urged me to write a life of Simcoe and I as often replied by urging him to do so. On almost the last interview we had, it was agreed that we should undertake the task together, he to write concerning Simcoe out of Canada and I concerning him in Canada. His lamented death prevented that project being carried into execution; but his son, Mr. Irving E. Robertson, has generously placed his collection of correspondence, &c., at my disposal that I might alone write what we had intended to write in association.

For the following pages I am alone responsible. Although the documents collected by Mr. Robertson have been utilized to the full, no use has been made of the chapters he wrote.

Much of the material is found in the Simcoe and Simcoe-Wolford Papers procured by the late Mr. Robertson; much collected by myself from the Canadian Archives and elsewhere, appears now in convenient form in three publications by the Ontario Historical Society—The Correspondence of Lieut.-Governor John Graves Simcoe, edited by Brigadier-General E. A. Cruickshank, LL.D., F.R.S.C. The Canadian Archives and those of Ontario with their many treasures, have been drawn on freely, as have the Parliamentary Library at Ottawa, the Reference Library at Toronto, the Riddell Canadian Library at Osgoode Hall, Toronto, and the Congressional Library at Washington. To those in charge of these institutions my sincere thanks are due and are here given for their unfailing courtesy and attention to what must have seemed at times almost unreasonable demands. Miss M. I. Sivers, who for years was closely in touch with Mr. Robertson and his work, has been of inestimable service in suggestion, criticism and correction.

While it is not to be expected that the following chapters are wholly without error, I have in practically every case given my authority, so that the error, if important enough, may be corrected.

Full credit has been given in the instances in which other accounts of Simcoe’s life have been quoted. I have in all cases gone to the original sources and owe nothing to any previous biographer.

No attempt has been made at fine writing: the facts of Simcoe’s life have been plainly stated and conjecture has been avoided.

The chapter on Simcoe as a Freemason has been added out of respect for Mr. Robertson’s well-known love of the Craft.

I venture to hope that the present work will do something to make Simcoe better known in his public and private career.

Osgoode Hall, Toronto,

September 1926.

CHAPTER IBirth and Descent

John Graves Simcoe who was to become the first Lieutenant-Governor of the Province of Upper Canada, was born, February 25, 1752, at Cotterstock, a hamlet in Northamptonshire[1], about ten miles from Peterborough and a mile and a half from the old town of Oundle.

His father was Captain John Simcoe[2], whose ancestry has given trouble to some biographers; it may now be stated with certainty that he was the only son of the Reverend William Simcoe, Vicar of Woodhorn, Northumberland, who had been Curate of South Shields, Durham.

Born in 1710, John Simcoe was a man of the highest character, well read in the classics and general literature and specially skilled in mathematics. He obtained an appointment as Midshipman in the Royal Navy through the influence of his father in 1730: the name of the ship is unknown.

In 1737, he was appointed Lieutenant and in 1743, Captain. We find him in 1746 in command of H.M.S. Falmouth, employed about Jamaica in the unnecessary war with France which Pelham had declared in 1743; he was ordered by Vice-Admiral Thomas Davers of the Red Squadron, June 20, 1746, to take to England in his ship certain Spanish Privateers who had been captured by British ships in the Caribbean Sea[3]. He was placed in command of the second of the two divisions into which the home-bound fleet was divided, and arrived in due time at the Downs[4]. In the following year, 1747, we find him in command of H.M.S. Prince Edward in King Road, a roadstead in the estuary of the Severn[5]; and in the same year he was granted a coat of arms by the Garter and Clarencieux Kings of Arms—he was then described as of Chelsea, Middlesex.

In 1747, August 8, while still Commander of H.M.S. Prince Edward, he married Catherine Stamford; and after the Peace of Aix-la-Chapelle in 1748, settled in Cotterstock, where four sons were born to them, Pawlett William, John, John Graves and Percy William: the first and second died in infancy and the youngest was drowned in 1764. In 1749, he was involved in litigation arising out of his conduct as officer in the Navy; but he received the commendation of Chief Justice Willes at a trial at Guildhall[6]. He was an intimate friend of Samuel Graves, afterwards (1770) Vice-Admiral, and later (1778) Admiral; and the infant son received his second name in honour of this friend who became his godfather[7]. Simcoe hoped to be sent as Engineer in charge of the Forts and Settlements on the Coast of Africa, but the Committee of Merchants to whom was entrusted the choice selected another; he remained for a time in command of the Prince Edward, stationed at King Road, but in 1755 was looking for a command with little prospect of success; he applied to be permitted in case of war to serve as a volunteer with Sir Edward Hawke, and his request was granted by the Admiralty. But he almost immediately received the command of the St. George at Portsmouth—the Seven Years’ War, which broke out in 1756, demanded the services of all men so well qualified as John Simcoe. It was on board the St. George that the Court Martial for the trial of Admiral Byng was held, Simcoe being a member of the Court[8].

An expedition to North America being in prospect, Simcoe applied for and received the command of the Pembroke, a new 60-gun ship launched in April, 1757; he said that he had the seizure of Quebec so much at heart that he could “almost resolve to go as a volunteer”[9]. He was ordered by the Admiralty, November, 1757, to put himself in command of a number of ships and proceed with them and the Pembroke to join Sir Edward Hawke; he had sealed orders, but the Fleet was to join the Rochefort expedition, which proved unsuccessful.

H.M.S. Pembroke

From a Monument in St. Andrew’s Church, Cotterstock

The following year finds him at Halifax under the command of Admiral Edward Boscawen and later at Louisbourg, in the siege and capture of which he took part[10].

There has been some confusion as to the movements of Simcoe during the winter of 1758-9: it seems now clear that being on the Pembroke he was attached to Rear-Admiral Durell’s Squadron which wintered at Halifax.

This Squadron was intended to cruise off the mouth of the St. Lawrence, to block the entrance and cut off all aid from and intercourse with France. Durell, however, remained at Halifax and gave as an excuse when Wolfe and Saunders arrived, April 30, that he was waiting to hear if the ice would permit him to sail up the St. Lawrence. Saunders ordered him to sea, and Simcoe went with the Squadron with his ship, but he did not reach Quebec, as he died, apparently of pneumonia, on board the Pembroke, off Anticosti, May 15, 1759[11].

He had strong views of the importance of the conquest of Canada, and its incorporation in the British Empire. In a letter, June 1, 1755, to Lord Barrington, Secretary at War, he points out the insolence and aggressiveness of the French and adds:—“Such is the position of Quebec that it is absolutely the key of French America, and our possession of it would forever lock out every Frenchman, be the signal of revolt to the Indians—Our seizure of Canada would undeniably . . . . . . . give us the monopoly of the fur and fishery trades, open to us so many new and vast channels of commerce as would take off our every possible manufacture especially of woollen and linen, whilst it poured in every growth and every material at so cheap a rate as would make us necessarily the mart of foreign exportation and most amply compensate for even the extinction of all our other foreign trade of importation—a circumstance . . . . . . . to be wished as it would reunite and fortify all our colonists and the exclusive possession of that continent will fill each ocean with British shipping without depopulating this Country . . . . . . .” He recommends a plan of campaign and future conduct in considerable detail, and urges again and again the ease and importance of the conquest[12].

Lord Barrington recognized the importance of the project, for we find him writing to Simcoe, “desiring to know what force of ships and troops would be sufficient”[13]. Simcoe’s answer does not seem to have been preserved; but it is known that his son, the Lieutenant-Governor, always considered that it was his father’s plans which were followed in the conquest of Canada, 1759-1760, and that the conquest was undertaken by reason of his representations. Later in the year 1755 or in 1756, Simcoe sends to a Lord of the Admiralty, an elaborate scheme “for forming a body of seamen into a regular disciplined corps to answer all occasions of service in peace or war”—“a marine brigade”[14]. The Admiralty in 1755 revived the Marine force which had disappeared after the Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle in 1748: it has been continuously sustained since the revival and for many years without change from Simcoe’s scheme.

In 1756, he urges the formation of a “well regulated national militia”: he urges the repeal of the Game Laws, and permission to the people to shoot game—saying to the “Freeholder” whom he supposed to object, that “it is better to participate with a good grace your monopoly of wild birds to those whose labour feeds and clothes you and whose bravery . . . . . . . will defend you, your wife, your children, your estate and your real property, civil and religious, than have with a very bad grace your all exposed to be ravished from you by every merciless, rapacious invader . . . . . . . Let the destruction of game be but by fire arms . . . . . . . of the militia and its sale be absolutely prohibited and the contraveners impartially punished and the game will rapidly increase”. He points out that the “Buccaneers, the Negroes and the Indians who carry their guns for subsistence are the best marksmen and most dangerous partisans in the world and only want to be broken to the art of war to be the best regulars. So will the English prove when allowed the exercise of firearms, the prohibition of which by the Game Laws has broken that British spirit, and extinguished that bravery heretofore the terror of the French nation”[15]. A National Militia was indeed organized in 1757 to continue with little change until 1908; but the Game Laws remained practically the same.

In 1757, he urges the possession by British of a fortified harbour on each side of the Isthmus of Panama—the advantage “would be immense and surprising; nothing less . . . . . . . than the entire trade and dominion of the South Sea would be the natural consequence—here would be a vent for all the woollen, linen and silk manufactures of Great Britain . . . . . . . with an advanced price, we could sell every commodity infinitely cheaper than the Spanish Merchant could afford . . . . . . .”[16].

His last extant letters are insistent upon the necessity of conquering France by way of Quebec; he had, when Braddock was appointed in 1755 to carry on the war in America, pointed out to Hugh Percy, Earl (later Duke) of Northumberland “that France could not be advantageously attacked in America but by a direct seizure of Quebec”. This he repeated in 1759 to Northumberland; and also that “a peace on any other terms but the absolute dominion of North America will destroy us . . . . . . a peace which leaves an inch of ground in North America to France will undo Great Britain . . . . . . . We have now in our power by a vigorous attack on Quebec to become masters of all North America at one blow.”

To Admiral Boscawen about the same time he wrote: “The reduction of Quebec will at a blow give us the dominion over North America”; and to Lord Ravensworth: “Another war will ruin Great Britain . . . . . . in a few years if any temporary delusive peace now leaves an inch of Canada in the possession of France. We have it in our power now to ruin her there forever if we take Quebec this next year”[17].

In 1754 he wrote for the guidance of young officers in army and navy an admirable paper, “Maxims of Conduct”, or “Rules for Your Conduct”[18].

Captain John Simcoe was evidently well educated. He had read and could aptly quote Cicero in the original and was familiar with Plutarch (perhaps in Bryan’s Latin version of 1729): his style was clear, his logic convincing, his terminology accurate, his conclusions generally sound and always plausible—his writings were admirable in their vigor and force; if we cannot always agree with him we must at least recognize his candor, persuasiveness, utter loyalty to King and country, and devotion to their interests as he saw them.

It has been thought worth while to give the foregoing particulars of Captain Simcoe to indicate that many of the best traits of the Lieutenant-Governor were inherited. Of his wife, Catherine Stamford, little is known except that she was a model wife and mother.

On the death of her husband, Mrs. Simcoe removed from Cotterstock to Exeter, devoting her life to her two boys until the younger was drowned in the River Exe in 1764, and then to her sole surviving child, John Graves Simcoe. In 1766, her death took place at Newcastle.

Leeside House

The Birthplace of Captain John Simcoe, R.N., Hilton, Durham, England.

Where Governor Simcoe Was Born, Cotterstock, Northampton County, England

NOTES

[1] Duncan Campbell Scott, in The Makers of Canada; John Graves Simcoe, Toronto, 1905, pp. 15, 17, erroneously places Cotterstock in Northumberland.

[2] David B. Read, Q.C., in The Life and Times of General John Graves Simcoe, Toronto, 1890, erroneously calls his father John Graves Simcoe: this error is repeated in a paper: Lieutenant-General John Graves Simcoe, First Governor of Upper Canada by F. R. Parnell, Niagara Historical Society, No. 36, 1924.

The father of Captain John Simcoe is said by John Hodgson in his History of Northumberland to have been the Reverend William Simcoe, Vicar of Long Horsley in that County; but the investigations made by Mr. J. Ross Robertson or at his instance, make it plain that this is a mistake, and that he was Vicar of Woodhorn, as stated in the text.

The genealogy has been traced back some generations:—(I) William Simcoe, of Spurstow, Bunbury Parish, Chester, was Churchwarden of that Parish in 1664; his eldest son was (II) John Simcoe, born 1624 or 1625. He is described as “a Chandler at the Sugar Loaf in Fetter Lane”, and afterwards of Red Lion Square, Gentleman. At the age of 40 he married, en secondes noces, Anne Dutton, a widow aged 36; Harleian Society, Vol. 34, p. 158. They had issue, inter alia, (III) William, born 1676, who became Curate at South Shields, Durham, and later Vicar of Woodhorn in Northumberland and Chaplain to the Prisoners in Newgate, Newcastle-upon-Tyne. By his first wife, Mary, daughter of John Hutchinson of Leeside House, Township of Hilton and Parish of Staindrop in the County of Durham whom he married January 3, 1609/10, he had issue, inter alia, (IV) John Simcoe who was born at Leeside House, November, 1710.

[3] “Vicenza Lopez and Manuel Bosques, lately Commanders of the Spanish Galley taken by His Majesty’s Ship Wager and José Borrell, late Commander of the schooner Santa Maria taken by His Majesty’s sloop Drake.” Wolf. I, 1, 4, (i. e., Papers obtained by Mr. J. Ross Robertson at Wolford.)

[4] Wolf. I, 1, 5-7.

[5] do. do. do. 14.

[6] do. do. do. 17. A letter to Captain John Simcoe at “Cotterstock near Oundle in Northamptonshire,” dated, Stratford in Essex, December 21, 1749, from Bamber Gascoigne, Lord of the Admiralty, suggested that Simcoe’s costs in the law suit should be paid by the Crown.

[7] Graves was Commander of the North American Fleet which attempted to enforce the Boston Port Act of 1774. In a letter to John Simcoe from Maddox Street, May 9, 1752, Graves presents compliments “to you and Mrs. Simcoe and infant Graves”. Wolf. I, 1, 20.

[8] For the preceding statement, see do. do. do. pp. 21, 28, 30, 44, 46, 53. Although from the Wolf. Papers, it is not made to appear that Simcoe was a member of this Court, do. do. do. 53, 54, it is certain that he was such. On March 1, 1757, it was ordered by the House of Lords that the President (Vice-Admiral Thomas Smith) and other members of the Court Martial including Captain John Simcoe should attend the House to be examined on the second reading of a Bill to permit Members of the Court to disclose some facts relative to the sentence of death pronounced on Byng: 15 Parliamentary History, Col. 809. See also Wolf. I, 1, 60, 61; and Simcoe gave evidence, March 2, 15 Parliamentary History, Col. 816, saying that he had no desire to disclose anything. It will be remembered that Byng was found guilty of wilful negligence at Minorca and was executed—in Voltaire’s bitter jest, pour encourager les autres. Simcoe seems to have had no doubt of the justice of the verdict and sentence.

The proceedings in the House of Commons in the matter will be found in the Report for February, 15 Parliamentary History, Coll. 803-807: the Bill passed and was sent up to the House of Lords, February 28, and failed to pass, do. do. do. Coll. 807-827.

[9] See his correspondence, February, 1757, with Admiral Sir Charles Knowles (who made a mess of things in the expedition against Rochefort and was superseded the same year) and with Temple, Wolf. I, 1, 58, 59.

[10] His master was James Cook, who in later years declared that he had received a great part of his training in navigation and seamanship from Simcoe—Cook had been a common seaman in the Navy only a few years before. We shall meet Cook again. There are still extant documents by Simcoe concerning the siege of Louisbourg. The official Record in the Admiralty gives as the date of Captain Simcoe’s death May 14; but the contemporary entry in the log of the Pembroke is May 15, the latter is probably correct.

[11] In a letter to Lord Ravensworth from the Pembroke, October, 1758, Captain Simcoe says that he had “been in the Gulf of St. Lawrence on a cruise with Charles Hardy attended only with the advantage of proving the ease of attacking Quebec.”

Admiral Durell’s Journal from October, 1758, is now available in the Archives at Ottawa. October 2, 1758, we find “Capt. Simcoe of the Pembroke ordered to discharge into the Garrison of Louisbourg the Party of Men and officers belonging to Bragg’s Regiment.”

On Oct. 17, Simcoe presided at a Naval examination (in Louisbourg harbour still).

On Oct. 25, Durell orders certain things to be accomplished “that we may sail the sooner for Halifax Harbour.”

On Oct. 26, Pembroke and Vanguard are supplied “with 4 months supply of surgeons necessarys.”

Nov. 7, prepared to sail for Halifax: Simcoe is mentioned as being supplied with signals.

On the 12th, they had not yet sailed and “ordered Capt. Simcoe of the Pembroke to receive from the Hospital at this place (Louisbourg), all the recover’d seamen belonging to His Majesty’s Ships that are at Halifax.” Sailed from Louisbourg, Nov. 15; arrived the 20th; 21st, Simcoe arranged a court-martial; 23rd, he presided at an enquiry.

Dec. 4, he is “ordered to issue slop”; Jan. 12, he examined qualifications of a lieutenant; during February, they get their ships ready for sea as soon as possible.

March 8, Simcoe examines conditions of damaged slops on the Elizabeth. March 22, the same on the Crown.

In Admiral Durell’s Journal . . . Princess Amelia, Halifax Harbour under date April 3, 1759, is the entry: “This day ordered the Captains of the Pembroke, Centurion and Squirrel to get their provisions compleated, the two first for four months . . . .” In his Remarks on Board the Princess Amelia from Halifax to the River St. Lawrence, under date May 15, 1759, is the entry “This day died Capt. Simcoe of His Majesty’s Ship Pembroke. I have appointed Capt. John Wheelock of His Majesty’s Ship Squirrel to act as Captain of the said ship until further orders.”

In the Log of the Pembroke, kept by James Cook, Master, of which a copy is in the Canadian Archives, the heading after the appointment of Captain Wheelock contains the names of “Captain Simcoe and Captain Wheelock.” The Pembroke, as is shown by its Log, took an active part in the siege of Quebec.

Wolfe had an unfavorable opinion of Durell. If Wolfe was right, while Durell seems to have had sufficient technical and professional skill, he was dilatory and unenterprising—and that in an undertaking which above all else demanded speed and daring. It may be that Wolfe was not wholly just: Saunders was of a different type. Durell’s Journal furnishes ample proof that they spent the winter in Halifax Harbour as all the entries are marked, “In Halifax Harbour”, and Durell mentions sending ships to cruise about and search for French boats, for English ships off their course and the like. Canadian Archives, “Admirals’ Journals, No. 7”.

Beckles Wilson, The Life and Letters of James Wolfe, London, pp. 421, 423, 424, is in error in supposing that Durell sailed a few days before Saunders left Spithead, February, 1759—Durell did not leave this side of the Atlantic that winter.

Since the above was written an admirable study of Durell’s movements has been contributed to The Royal Society of Canada by Miss E. Arma Smillie, M.A.; it is entitled: The Achievement of Durell in 1759, and is published in the Proceedings and Transactions, R. S. C., 3rd Series, Vol. XIX, Section II, p. 131.

In the memoir attached to the 8vo edition of John Graves Simcoe’s Military Journal, New York, 1844, is found the following statement: “The most striking occurrence of his (i.e., Captain Simcoe’s) life arose . . . . . . it is said from an accident improved in a manner peculiar to genius and extensive professional knowledge. The story is that he was taken prisoner by the French in America and carried up the River St. Lawrence. As his character was little known, he was watched only to prevent his escape, but from his observations in the voyage to Quebec, and the little incidental information he was able to obtain, he constructed a chart of that river and carried up Wolfe to his famous attack upon the Canadian Capital”. This is copied in Henry J. Morgan’s Sketches of Famous Canadians, Quebec, 1862, p. 116, and almost verbatim in David B. Read’s The Life and Times of Gen. John Graves Simcoe, Toronto, 1890, at pp. 9, 10, and less fully in David B. Read’s The Lieutenant-Governors of Upper Canada and Ontario, 1792-1899, Toronto, 1900, at p. 21, also in the paper mentioned in note 2 suprâ. Duncan Campbell Scott in his The Makers of Canada: John Graves Simcoe, p. 16, says: “It is stated that he was enabled to supply Wolfe with a chart of the river and with valuable information collected during an imprisonment at Quebec. No details of this capture and imprisonment are anywhere given and the story begins in shadow and does not close in light.”

It is certain that there is no truth in the story of alleged capture and imprisonment. Dr. Scott says: “The prototype of this tale is that of Major Stobo whose capture, detention in Quebec and subsequent presence with Wolfe before the beleaguered city are authenticated.” Morgan, op. cit., p. 116, says that Simcoe “was killed at Quebec in the execution of his duty in the year 1759 whilst assisting the ever glorious Wolfe in the siege of that City.”—an error repeated in more than one work, amongst them, Kingsford’s History of Canada, Vol. VII, p. 337, and my own La Rochefoucault. This seems to have originally been an incorrect inference from his monument in the Church of St. Andrew’s, Cotterstock.

To the memory of John Simcoe, Esq., late Commander of His Majesty’s Ship Pembroke, who died in the Royal Service upon the important expedition against Quebec in North America in the year 1759, aged 45 years. He spent the greatest part of his life in the service of his King and country, preferring the good of both to all private views. He was an officer esteemed for his great abilities in naval and military matters, of unquestioned bravery and unwearied diligence. He was an indulgent husband, a tender parent and a sincere friend; generous, humane and benevolent to all; so that his loss to the public as well as to his friends cannot be too much regretted. This monument was in honour to his memory, erected by his disconsolate wife, Katharine Simcoe, 1760.

Underneath lie Pawlett William and John, sons of the above John and Katharine Simcoe.

It may here be added that Surveyor-General Major Samuel Holland in a letter to Lieutenant-Governor Simcoe, at York (Toronto) from Quebec, January 11, 1792, says that he met Captain Simcoe a few days after the surrender of Louisbourg on his ship the Pembroke; and “during our stay at Halifax . . . . . under Captain Simcoe’s eye, Mr. Cook and myself compiled materials for a chart of the Gulf and River St. Lawrence, which plan at his decease was dedicated to Sir Charles Saunders, with no alterations than what Mr. Cook and I made coming up the River. Another chart of the River, including Chaleur and Gaspé Bays, mostly taken from plans in Admiral Durell’s possession was compiled and drawn under your father’s inspection and sent by him for immediate publication to Thomas Jeffery, (Jefferys) predecessor to Mr. Faden. These charts were of much use as some copies came out prior to our sailing from Halifax to Quebec in 1759.” The chart was reprinted in 1775 and 1794 with the Title—An Exact Chart of the River St. Laurence, from Fort Frontenac to the Island of Anticosti, showing Soundings, Rocks, Shoals, with views of the Lands. There is a copy in the Riddell Canadian Library at Osgoode Hall, Toronto.

Holland adds:—“Being General Wolfe’s Engineer during the attack of that place, I was present at a conversation on the subject of sailing for Quebec that fall. The General and Captain gave it as their joint opinion it might be reduced the same campaign, but this sage advice was overruled by the contrary opinions of the Admirals who conceived the season too far advanced so that only a few ships went with General Wolfe to Gaspé, &c., to make a diversion at the mouth of the River St. Lawrence. Again, early in the spring following, had Captain Simcoe’s proposition to Admiral Durell been put into execution, proceeding with his own ship, the Pembroke, the Sutherland and some frigates via Cut of Canso for the River St. Lawrence in order to intercept the French supplies, there is not the least doubt that Monsieur Cannon with his whole convoy must have been taken as he only made the river six days before Admiral Durell, as we learn from a French brig taken off Gaspé. . . . . . Had he lived to have got to Quebec, great matter of triumph would have been afforded him on account of his spirited opposition to many captains of the navy who had given it as their opinion that ships of the line could not proceed up the river whereas our whole fleet got up perfectly safe”. Revd. Dr. Henry Scadding’s Surveyor-General Holland, Toronto, 1876, pp. 3, 4.

[12] See this letter in extenso in my edition of La Rochefoucault’s Travels, published by the Ontario Archives for 1916, pp. 137-144; Wolf. I, 1 33-38, has verbal and unimportant differences; but there are in this manuscript some suggestions not in the printed text, e.g., Simcoe says:—“The cession of the neutral lands or whatever France may take in the West Indies or Mediterranean all would be an empty purchase for Canada.

Perhaps the erection of Canada into a kingdom for Prince Edward would for ages answer the purpose as well as be a greater, more rational, and permanent accession of strength to this Kingdom and Royal Family than the wearing of so many crowns by the House of Bourbon in different parts of Europe can possibly be to that family or France.”

It will be remembered that there was considerable discussion during the Seven Years’ War as to whether Canada should be retained and Guadaloupe returned to France on the Peace and that Franklin’s “Canada Pamphlet” turned the scale. See my Papers, Franklin in Canada, Empire Club Papers, 1923, and Benjamin Franklin’s Mission to Canada and the Causes of its Failure, Historical Society of Pennsylvania, Dec. 1, 1923, 47 Pennsylvania Historical Magazine, 1923. It is also known that it was intended that the country to be formed by the Provinces at Confederation in 1867 should be known as the “Kingdom of Canada”, and that the name was changed at the instance of Lord Stanley who feared that such name would offend the susceptibilities of the United States. It was not intended in 1867, however, that the Kingdom of Canada should have a separate King as in Simcoe’s suggestion.

Prince Edward was, of course, not the Duke of Kent, father of Queen Victoria, but Edward Augustus, Duke of York and Albany (1739-1767), second son of Frederick, Prince of Wales, and younger brother of King George III.

A memorandum initialled by John Graves Simcoe and in his handwriting, presented by his daughter to the late Rev. Dr. Henry Scadding, reads as follows:—

“Major Holland told me that my father was applied to, to know whether his body should be preserved to be buried on shore. He replied, ‘Apply your pitch to its proper purposes,—keep your lead to mend the shot holes and commit me to the deep’ ”. Rev. Dr. Henry Scadding’s Surveyor-General Holland, Toronto, 1896, pp. 4-5.

Major Samuel Holland was Surveyor-General of Canada: Holland Landing and Holland River were named after him.

[13] Wolf. I, 1, 25. William Wildman, Viscount Barrington, was Secretary at War, Nov. 14, 1755, to Mar. 18, 1761: he was not Secretary of War or a principal Secretary of State at all but an official of inferior rank. At this time, and from 1539 to 1768, there were two Secretaries of State only; but in 1794, a Secretary of State for War was appointed. There are now five principal Secretaries of State, one being Secretary for War.

Barrington was not a member of the Cabinet; he made it a condition when he accepted the post of Secretary at War in Rockingham’s Administration that he should be permitted to vote against the Ministry, both on the Stamp Act and on the question of General Warrants. John Heneage Jesse: Memoirs of the Life and Reign of King George the Third, London, 1901, Vol. II, p. 21.

The paper as sent to Barrington is without the very appropriate motto from Cicero, De Oratoribus, 2, 40, 169, prefixed to the copy in John Graves Simcoe’s possession and printed in my edition of La Rochefoucault (ut suprâ) “Si barbarorum est, in diem vivere, nostra consilia sempiternum tempus spectare debent,” which was added in a copy sent a little later to one of the Lords of the Admiralty. Wolf. I, 1. 39-41. Captain Simcoe says that the letter to Barrington was “the substance of what I had spoken when Mr. Braddock was first destined to Virginia, whose fate was foretold. I say nothing more about it but leave to time and events to discover the error or solidity of the reasoning”, do. do. do. 44.

[14] do. do. do., 39-41. A copy of the letter to Barrington accompanied the scheme.

[15] do. do. do. 50-55.

[16] do. do. do. 70-72.

[17] Letter to Northumberland, do. do. do. 94, 95. Letter to Boscawen, do. do. do. 96: other letter, do. do. do. 97. In the last named letter he says that he “will write to Mr. Pitt very soon”. In all the letters he presses his claim to a flag.

[18] A memorandum in Wolford MSS., in the handwriting of Eliza Simcoe, a daughter of General Simcoe, reads:—“London, Portland Place, No. 3, Maxims of Conduct by Captain John Simcoe, R.N. The following maxims for the guidance of young officers in the British Naval and Military Service, were written in the year 1754, for the edification of his sons, by Capt. J. Simcoe, R.N., a highly accomplished officer, who, at the age of forty-five, died on service whilst commanding the Pembroke, 64, during Wolfe’s memorable expedition against Quebec.”

This summary draft, however hastily and inaccurately penned, will point out your course and serve as a general beacon in learning and executing your duty if you are well disposed; if you are not, a thousand volumes would be ineffectual. But know it is your indispensable duty to labour to become the great and accomplished officer, which duty your country has a right to expect from all in her service in half pay as full employment; though your views and promotion may be traversed by faction, malice or ignorance, though caprice or bad lessons may defeat your expectations arising from your consciousness of the best intentions and real service, though the wanton favour of the superficial and narrow-minded even the consciousness of demerit and guilt may give to the less worthy, or less able, the posts, which your poor country’s all may depend on, though birth will generally (and ought) where all other things are equal, have the preference,—bear the disappointment or injury with temperance in the day of National distress, which Heaven avert from this Kingdom. The voice of the public will do you justice amidst the obscurity to which you are condemned, call you forth for its own sake and the great accomplished officer shine with double splendour, when the “Will of the Wisps”, if they should exist, will vanish.

Cotterstock, Octr. 20th, 1754. J. Simcoe.

RULES FOR YOUR CONDUCT

1. Let the groundwork of your whole conduct be a just respect for and love of God; know that with such respect, every man must necessarily be brave, and without such due impression every man must as necessarily be a coward.

2. The love of your Country and King, which necessarily flows from the first maxim, must be your ruling principle; let no ill usage taint this principle, to the observance of which you must always and cheerfully be ready, when occasion calls to sacrifice life, fortune and the strongest ties.

3. Cherish carefully that delicate and essential principle Honour, which, if pure will readily dictate what is fittest to be done, and what is to be avoided more than death.

4. Remember always that you are the servant of the Public, that its honour and safety may in a greater or lesser degree, be entrusted to your conduct; you can then never without a violation of your trust, sacrifice either to what busy blind selfishness may repute private good, or suffer the least competition between private and public emolument; the labourer is undoubtedly worthy of his hire if he use the delegated authority and wealth of his master; to labour only for himself he deserves a halter instead of a ribbon; instances have been where Officers have uniformly done their duty in sacrificing private to public regards, and for reward have met with neglect, contempt or injury; others have as uniformly sacrificed public duty to selfish pursuits and in the chase rose to opulence, favour and credit. Let no ill maxims, however general or successful, alure you from, nor ill usage slacken your devout discharge of your duty; you are sure of the noblest and most lasting reward, the testimony of a good conscience.

5. Let your obedience to the commands of Superior Officers be exact, implicit and cheerful; if those commands should at any time be indiscreet, or lead you instantly to sudden death you are in all cases most punctually to execute them, and know the first virtue in an inferior is cheerful obedience and,—hesitation, impiety—your superior alone being answerable for his orders.

6. He who knows not how to obey, can never know how to command; you are therefore not only to obey, promptly and with all your spirit the commands of a Superior, but you are in the course of your service to learn practically the distinct duties of every officer.

7. Be strenuous in learning your duty, be not afraid of labour, nor of the Tar-bucket; but constantly attend, when duty requires you not elsewhere, the boatswain’s people in knotting, splicing and rigging, handing and reefing; perfect yourself in the detail of all business from the stem to the stern, from the keelson to the masthead; and learn all duties from the common seasman’s to that of the highest commission officer. When you come to be an officer you’ll make but an awkward figure, if in ordering the execution of any service you know not how to go about it dexterously yourself; besides such general knowledge in the detail will give you lights and a presence of mind which on occasion may save the Crown’s ship or squadron, with the lives of invaluable subjects.

8. Charles the 12th of Sweden used to say that “he was but half a man who was without numbers”; it is as true a maxim that he is but half a Sea Officer who is not equally a good soldier as Seaman, and you must not therefore, as is too common, think yourself a fine officer, if you can rig and work a ship in the ordinary methods, and in which without the theory of ship working, you’ll probably find yourself outdone by the collier or your own forecastle man; you must strenuously apply to learn the duty of a soldier.

9. It will not in this pursuit be sufficient to learn the battalion exercise; you must learn all the necessary military motions, the breaking and forming any body of men into Platoons, Divisions, Battalions, Brigades, all the various dispositions and combinations, camp duty, field duty, garrison duty, trench duty; in short, you must successfully learn whatever pertains in the Infantry to the office of Sentinel, Corporal, Adjutant, Lieutenant, Captain, &c., upwards to that of the General; thus your knowledge must rise from the small detail to a comprehension of the great parts of the military science till you are able to plan or execute the great operations of War founded on rational and systematical principles.

10. This progress towards the finished officer will be slow and ineffectual if in your course you enter not into the rationale of things; you must by enquiry, reading or reflection learn the reason of every process from the strapping of a block to the orders of battle, in the seaman’s part, and from the posting of a sentinel to the orders of battle, according to the genius of the ground, the disposition, nature and number of the enemy in the soldier’s duty; when reasoning goes not hand in hand with the practice in both services it is but routine, the act of a parrot. You can pretend to, and you’ll be lost in most things which have not occurred to your grovelling experience, unable to remedy as invent in common exigencies; what then would be your figure, or where the lustre of the officer on extraordinary occasions?

11. It will greatly aid you to gain some knowledge in designing and in fortification; the latter will be useful when you attack or defend any fortified place, or are to defend any Port where intrenchment may prolong your defence, and save your honour as man till you are relieved; the first will be serviceable in infinite occasions in the Sea and Land services; the French make it a rule to give the government of their Colonies to their Sea Officers but their officers are well qualified as Soldiers, Seamen and Engineers; we begin to follow their example in those promotions; can we doubt that the maxim would not be as general as rational if our Sea Officers would take pains to inform themselves in those respective duties?

12. Exactitude is a necessary quality, but affect not the Martinet. It is dwelling on the surface without penetrating the essence of things. It is labouring about minutes and things of no consequence, betraying want of understanding and an incapacity of entering into the spirit of the service, or of combining and varying of things according to circumstances; such a one may be dignified with the Staff of a Velt-Marshal or Admiral, but he is at bottom a Corporal or boatswain’s mate.

13. Remember that as a Surprise is most ruinous in its consequences, it is the greatest disgrace an Officer can incur, as it must arise from negligence; be therefore ever alert, vigilant, and careful on your post, nor let inevitable destruction tempt you to desert it without order in any circumstances whatever. By sea or land the same rule holds good in civil and ordinary life; whatever your station be, act in it well and with dignity, considering it as a post entrusted to you by Providence; this just behaviour will in a cottage make you a greater man than a Prince who acts remissly.

14. In your reading avoid everything trivial or which leads not directly to the knowledge of your duty, such as romances, novels, plays or poems; amongst these are to be excepted Homer, Virgil or any Tyrtaeus if you meet with them; a little practical Geometry will be necessary. Above all, read a thousand times over Caesar, Polybius, Arrian, Thucydides and Xenophon. In the latter you’ll find the politest scholar, the best man, the finest gentleman, and excepting the much injured Alexander, the greatest Captain in all ages. If you know not the original languages get the best translations. These will open your understanding, enlarge your ideas, ripen and inform your judgment better than a thousand campaigns under incompetent masters. Do not think that the benefit of reading these great military Masters is confined to the Land service; their lessons by analogy necessarily reach the Sea service, and the Military art; as good sense in the application belongs to both elements and speaks all languages; you will find in these and some other authors a Naval Art of War more profound, intelligent, scientific and therefore more bold than has appeared since their days. No wonder the greatest Sea Captains of antiquity as of modern times were those who were the most accomplished leaders of Armies on shore.

15. The choice of good military authors is very small, but for the honour of the military profession they are sufficient for all purposes and abound with the best precepts as examples, for civil and military life, and I hazard my reputation on this assertion that they are not only the best models for military conduct, but for conduct in every station of the patriot, courtier, statesman, magistrate, and finished gentleman.

16. I must not omit to observe that military duty of two kinds—duty of danger and duty of fatigue; both go or ought to go, unless in critical conjunctures, by rotation. Duty of danger begins with the oldest Officer, suiting the command, who has a right to the post. Honour on extraordinary occasions requests voluntarily the post of danger; if granted, labour to discharge adequately the honour and trust reposed in you; if denied you have done your duty with a good grace, but if you should be appointed to a duty of fatigue which goes by rotation, beginning with the youngest Officer, and if it should be a tour of a junior Officer you must without the least hesitation or discontent execute it cheerfully, nay, it will be for your advantage, for every such duty will be probably a new lesson towards perfecting your knowledge.

17. Inure your body to bear extremes of heat and cold, hunger and thirst, and exercise to agility and strength by suitable toil.

18. Use your Officers and men with humane treatment, set them the examples of temperance, modesty and obedience to the laws of your Country; regard the orderly and deserving; punish inexorably the disobedient and flagitious.

19. Avoid quarrelling. Give offence to none, nor suffer it from any, but you are to intermit it when you are on actual service, with which no consideration is to interfere.

ADDITIONAL NOTE

A statement of the Admiralty Records concerning Captain Simcoe, and an account of his services extracted from Charnock’s “Biographia Navalis” are subjoined. These I owe to the courtesy of the Secretary of the Admiralty.

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Public Record Office, 11 Jan., 1924.

Result of a Search in the Admiralty Records:

Name

John Simcoe

Birthplace

v

Baptismal Certificate

v

First Entry

v

Passing Certificate

v

Seniority

Lieutenant 7 Aug. 1739; Captain 28 Dec. 1743.

Death

14 May, 1759.

Ship

Rank

Date of Entry

Date of Discharge

New-castle

Lieut.

(3)

7 Aug.

1739

11 May

1740

”

”

(2)

12 May

1740

15 Oct.

1740

Princess Caroline

”

(3)

16 Oct.

1740

14 Jan.

1741

Burford

”

(3)

15 Jan.

1741

26 Apl.

1741

Russell

”

(4)

27 Apl.

1741

7 June

1741

Cumberland

”

(2)

8 June

1741

1 May

1743

”

”

(1)

2 May

1743

18 July

1743

Thunder Bomb

Master & Commdr

19 July

1743

27 Dec.

1743

Kent

Captain

28 Dec.

1743

18 Feb.

1744

Seahorse

”

19 Feb.

1744

28 Jan.

1745

Falmouth

”

29 Jan.

1745

24 Oct.

1746

H.P. x

”

25 Oct.

1746

13 Mar.

1747

x—

Half Pay

Prince Edward

Captain

14 Mar.

1747

12 Sept.

1748

H.P.

”

13 Sept.

1748

2 July

1756

St. George

”

3 July

1756

4 Apl.

1757

Pembroke

”

5 Apl.

1757

14 May

1759

Note.—Passing Certificate cannot be found; for his Services before being appointed Lieutenant the name of a ship on which he served previous to 1739 would assist in a further search being made.

From Charnock’s “Biographia Navalis”, Vol. 5, London, 1797.

SIMCOE, JOHN,—The name of this gentleman is omitted in many of the navy lists we have seen. In some of them he is stated to have been promoted to the rank of Captain in the navy, and appointed to the Kent on the 28th December, 1743; but Mr. Hardy states his first commission to have been to the Falmouth, agreeing, however, with the date just given. We find no other mention made, not even of the commands held by this gentleman, till the latter end of the year 1756, when he was captain of one of the ships then lying at Portsmouth and was one of the members of the court-martial convened, in the month of December for the trial of Admiral Byng. Nothing farther occurs relative to him, except that, in 1758, he commanded the Pembroke, one of the fleet ordered in the ensuing year on the expedition against Quebec. He died on board that ship, in the River St. Laurence, on the 14th of May, before any operations had taken place.

(“A Chronological List of the Captains of His Majesty’s Royal Navy”, by Rear Admiral John Hardy, London, 1784.)

CHAPTER IIEducation and Early Military Life

John Graves Simcoe was a little over seven when his father died and the family removed to Exeter; he had already received the rudiments of an education and shortly after removal to Exeter he entered the Free Grammar School in that Cathedral City. He was attentive and studious, an apt but not a brilliant scholar; what he learned, he learned thoroughly and retained permanently; at an early age, he read Homer in Pope’s translation, and as a boy, he took part with his companions in a play portraying the scenes of the Iliad. He attained proficiency in the branches of knowledge taught in the school and was among the first, if not the first in his standing; he was also well versed in modern history, not as yet taught in schools, and he eagerly read every tale of war. Active, filled with a spirit of emulation, he was foremost in all games of boyhood—his standing on the playground equalled that in the schoolroom.

No myths have grown up about him, he seems to have been a hardy, active, well-bred English boy of the best type, and he was likeable and ever on good terms with his fellows.

Merton College—The Quad, Oxford, England

In 1766, he was sent to Eton, and three years afterwards he entered at Merton College, Oxford. He took a high place in both Colleges in his studies—there is reason to think, also in sport—but there was nothing phenomenal in either. Extant examples of his English and Latin verses in manuscript indicate diligence, accuracy and ability; and volumes of ancient and modern history with annotations in his own hand sufficiently evidence his devotion to that study.

He does not seem to have taken a degree[1]. The reason is not known, but it has been said that it was due to ill-health[2]. Whatever the reason, he remained at Merton for only one year and returned to Exeter, where he studied military science under a tutor[3], having been promised an Ensign’s commission by friends of his mother.

All was not going well with the Empire; George Grenville’s theory of Colonies that they existed for the advantage of the Mother Country had resulted in 1765 in the Stamp Tax; the American Colonies resisted; and although Grenville lost power almost immediately, Townshend continued Grenville’s policy. America still resisted and the King, George III, urged the use of compulsion. Whatever might otherwise have been the result, when the King succeeded in 1770 in making Lord North Prime Minister, an open war of force was inevitable.

This is not the place to treat at large of the merits of the controversy resulting in the Declaration of Independence and the destruction of the old British Empire[4]. It is, however, certain that men like Washington, Jefferson, Franklin, Adams, never contemplated separation from Great Britain until 1775, nor could any wish so to do until that time be discovered among the people of the Thirteen Colonies—that Chatham in 1773 said that the “New Englandmen feel as Old England should feel”[5]—that it was only when a bungling Ministry aided by a conscientious but ill-unbalanced King who had been as badly educated as he was badly advised, insisted on crushing by military and mercenary force all aspirations of a free people to free self government that Independence was declared.

A very large proportion of the Colonists did not recognize the necessity for severing connection with the Mother Country; but they were overborne, and the result we know.

There is nothing to indicate that Simcoe ever saw any merit in the contentions of the Colonies—he says “the late war in America . . . . . . he always considered as forced upon Great Britain, and in which he served from principle . . . . . . Had he supposed it to have been unjust he would have resigned his commission, for no true soldier and servant of his country will ever admit that a British officer can divest himself of the duties of a citizen or in a civil contest is bound to support the cause his conscience rejects”[6].

All his education and the example of his father tended to impress him with certitude that the King and his Ministers were right, and he never wavered in that conviction. In 1770, he entered the Army as an Ensign in the 35th Regiment of Foot[7], in which his intimate friend Edward Drewe served.

He was not sent to America with the first detachment of his regiment but remained in England until May, 1775; he arrived on the last ship of the fleet at Boston on June 19, 1775, two days after the famous battle of Bunker Hill[8]. His god-father, Vice Admiral Samuel Graves[9], was in command of the North American fleet charged with enforcing the Act closing Boston Harbour to commerce; and Simcoe was entrusted by him with certain services, the performance of which brought him into acquaintance with many of the American Loyalists—“from them he soon learned the practicability of raising troops in the country whenever it should be opened to the King’s forces; and the propriety of such a measure appeared to be self-evident. He, therefore, importuned Admiral Graves to ask General Gage that he might enlist such negroes as were in Boston and with them put himself under the direction of Sir James Wallace who was then actively engaged at Rhode Island and to whom that Colony had opposed negroes: adding to the Admiral, who seemed surprised at his request, ‘that he entertained no doubt he should soon exchange them for whites’[10]